- Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby: Reason in the Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking
- Objective Evaluation of Demonstrative Arguments
- Frans H. van Eemeren: Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
- Factors for Evaluating Presumptions and Presumptive Inferences
- Reconstructing Complex Pro/Con Argumentation
- A Normative Pragmatic Theory of Exhorting
- The Thesis of the Effectiveness of Quasi-logical Arguments
- Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in TV Commercials: A Case Study
- Narration as Argument . Paula Olmos, Editor
- Mencius’s Strategies of Political Argumentation
- Douglas Walton: Argument Evaluation and Evidence
- Populism and Informal Fallacies: An Analysis of Right-Wing Populist Rhetoric in Election Campaigns
- Plausible Argumentation in Eikotic Arguments: The Ancient Weak Versus Strong Man Example
- Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng (eds): Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
- The Role of Argument in Negotiation
- On Defining ‘Argument’
- David Hitchcock (2017): On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and Critical Thinking
- Virtuous Arguers: Responsible and Reliable
- Reasoning and Arguing, Dialectically and Dialogically, Among Individual and Multiple Participants
- Precedential Ad Hominem in Polemical Exchange: Examples from the Israeli Political Debate
- Argumentation in Mencius: A Philosophical Commentary on Haiwen Yang’s The World of Mencius
- Andrea Rocci: Modality in Argumentation—A Semantic Investigation of the Role of Modalities in the Structure of Arguments with an Application to Italian Modal Expressions
- Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach
- How Computational Tools Can Help Rhetoric and Informal Logic with Argument Invention
- Case-to-Case Arguments
- Henrique Jales Ribeiro: Retórica, Argumentação e Filosofia. Estudos Sistemáticos e Histórico – Filosóficos , MinervaCoimbra, Coimbra, 2016, pp. 171
- Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining
- Splitting a Difference of Opinion: The Shift to Negotiation
- Legal Audiences
- Jacobus C. (Jacky) Visser, A Dialogue Game for Critical Discussion: Groundwork in the Formalisation and Computerisation of the Pragma-Dialectical Model of Argumentation. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam
- The Conjunction of a French Rhetoric of Unity with a Competing Nationalism in New Caledonia: A Critical Discourse Analysis
- Radiolab’s Sound Strategic Maneuvers
- Christian Plantin: Dictionnaire de l’Argumentation. Une Introduction aux Études d’Argumentation
- Fernando Leal Carretero (coord.): Argumentación y Pragma-Dialéctica: Estudios en Honor a Frans van Eemeren
- Peirce Knew Why Abduction Isn’t IBE—A Scheme and Critical Questions for Abductive Argument
- The Elusive Notion of “Argument Quality”
- Cochrane Review as a “Warranting Device” for Reasoning About Health
- Legal Facts in Argumentation-Based Litigation Games
- “You Think That Says a Lot, but Really it Says Nothing”: An Argumentative and Linguistic Account of an Idiomatic Expression Functioning as a Presentational Device
- Questioning the Virtual Friendship Debate: Fuzzy Analogical Arguments from Classification and Definition
- Argumentation Theory Without Presumptions
- Presumptions, Assumptions, and Presuppositions of Ordinary Arguments
- The Nature and the Place of Presumptions in Law and Legal Argumentation
- Arguments from Ostension
- Speech Acts in a Dialogue Game Formalisation of Critical Discussion
- Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions
- The Structure of Arguments by Analogy in Law
- Re-contextualising Argumentative Meanings: An Adaptive Perspective
- Using Argumentative Tools to Understand Inner Dialogue
- Toulmin’s Logical Types
- Group Emotions in Collective Reasoning: A Model
- On the Norms of Visual Argument: A Case for Normative Non-revisionism
- Christopher W. Tindale: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
- Leonard Nelson: A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies
- The Burden of Proof in Philosophical Persuasion Dialogue
- Arguments from Expert Opinion and Persistent Bias
- Frans H. van Eemeren and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation
- Dialogical Features of Presumptions: Difficulties for Walton’s New Dialogical Theory
- Introduction for a Special Volume of Argumentation on Presumptions, Presumptive Inferences and Burdens of Proof
- Evaluating Arguments from a Play about Ethics in Science: A Study with Medical Learners
- Argumentative Patterns in Chinese Medical Consultations
- Virtuous Norms for Visual Arguers
- M. A. Gilbert: Arguing with People
- Factors Predicting the Intent to Engage in Arguments in Close Relationships: A Revised Model
- Presumptions in Speech Acts
- Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy
- Towards a Theory of Close Analysis for Dispute Mediation Discourse
- The Formalization of Critical Discussion
- Unacceptable Generalizations in Arguments on Legal Evidence
- Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
- Must a Successful Argument Convert an Ideal Audience?
- F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen (eds): Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory
- Self-Reporting and the Argumentativeness Scale: An Empirical Examination
- Institutional Argumentation and Institutional Rules: Effects of Interactive Asymmetry on Argumentation in Institutional Contexts
- Breaking Out of the Circle
- Argumentative Writing Behavior of Graduate EFL Learners
- Brothers in Arms: Virtue and Pragma-Dialectics
- Laypeople’s Evaluation of Arguments: Are Criteria for Argument Quality Scheme-Specific?
- Presumption as a Modal Qualifier: Presumption, Inference, and Managing Epistemic Risk