- Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias
- Locke and “ad”
- Free Speech Fallacies as Meta-Argumentative Errors
- What Do We Mean by ‘That’s a Fallacious Narrative’?
- The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context
- Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate
- Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference
- Analysis of Argumentation in the Discussion Sections of Published Articles in ESP Journal: A Diachronic Corpus-Based Approach
- Representing the Structure of a Debate
- Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics
- Primatologists and Philosophers Debate on the Question of the Origin of Morality: A Dialectical Analysis of Philosophical Argumentation Strategies and the Pitfalls of Cross-Disciplinary Disagreement
- Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions
- Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate
- Two Types of Refutation in Philosophical Argumentation
- Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies
- An Unconscious Universal in the Mind is Like an Immaterial Dinner in the Stomach. A Debate on Logical Generalism (1914–1919)
- The Persistent Interlocutor
- Twitter Activists’ Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion
- Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy
- Michel Meyer (1950–2022)
- Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context
- Ruth Amossy: In defense of polemics, Springer, Argumentation Library, Volume 42, 2021
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: argumentation between doctors and patients: understanding clinical argumentative discourse
- Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning
- “Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing
- Argumentation in Suboptimal Settings
- Questions, Presuppositions and Fallacies
- Demanding a halt to metadiscussions
- Secundum Quid and the Pragmatics of Arguments. The Challenges of the Dialectical Tradition
- Internal Deliberation Defending Climate-Harmful Behavior
- Charles Arthur Willard (1945–2021): In Memoriam
- Why We Need Skepticism in Argument: Skeptical Engagement as a Requirement for Epistemic Justice
- Bothsiderism
- Arguments and Reason-Giving
- From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements
- When Evaluative Adjectives Prevent Contradiction in a Debate
- The Cultural Embeddedness of Arguments Raised as a Part of the Bulgarian Debate About the Ratification of the Istanbul Convention
- Raymond S. Nickerson, Argumentation, The Art of Persuasion
- Socratic Irony and Argumentation
- Reasonable Reconstruction of Socratic Irony in Public Discourse
- Evaluating Reasoning in Natural Arguments: A Procedural Approach
- Getting Out in Front of the Owl of Minerva Problem
- Adversariality in Argumentation: Shortcomings of Minimal Adversariality and A Possible Reconstruction
- Associating Ethos with Objects: Reasoning from Character of Public Figures to Actions in the World
- Modal Qualification and the Speech-Act of Arguing in LNMA: Practical Aspects and a Theoretical Issue
- Christopher W. Tindale: The Anthropology of Argument: Cultural Foundations of Rhetoric and Reason
- Designing Critical Questions for Argumentation Schemes
- Compliance with EU Law and Argumentative Discourse: Representing the EU as a Problem-Solving Multilevel Governance System through Discursive Structures of Argumentation
- Presumptions and Burdens of Proof . An Anthology of Argumentation and the Law. ed. by H. V. Hansen, F. J. Kauffeld, J. B. Freeman, and L. Bermejo-Luque. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2019
- Managing the Complexity of Dialogues in Context: A Data-Driven Discovery Method for Dialectical Reply Structures
- Affecting Argumentative Action: The Temporality of Decisive Emotion
- Slippery Slope Arguments in Legal Contexts: Towards Argumentative Patterns
- Defeasibility, Law, and Argumentation: A Critical View from an Interpretative Standpoint
- From Yeshiva to Academia: The Argumentative Writing Characteristics of Ultra-Orthodox Male Students
- How Can Modifications of Meaning Influence Argumentation? The Concept and Typology of Semantic Arguments
- The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters: The Case of Causal Connectives
- Review of Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context , eds. Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
- Attack, Defense and Counter-Attack in the Inuit Duel Songs of Ammassalik
- Argumentation Through Languages and Cultures
- On the Differences Between Practical and Cognitive Presumptions
- Argumentum Ad Baculum , Aristotelian Civic Fear, or Praeteritio : Threats in Anti-Choice Letters
- “That’s Unhelpful, Harmful and Offensive!” Epistemic and Ethical Concerns with Meta-argument Allegations
- Douglas Neil Walton (1942–2020)
- Arsyad Al-Banjari’s Dialectical Model for Integrating Indonesian Traditional Uses into Islamic Law
- Jain Philosophers in the Debating Hall of Classical India
- Argument, Inference, and Persuasion
- Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation
- Strategic Manoeuvring by Dissociation in Corporate Crisis Communication: The Case of the 2017 United Airlines’ Passenger Dragging-Off Incident
- Political Argumentation by Reciting Poems in the Spring and Autumn Period of Ancient China
- The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory
- The Legitimacy Crisis of Arguments from Expert Opinion: Can’t We Trust Experts?
- Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory
- Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type
- “Those are Your Words, Not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment
- Annotating Argument Schemes
- Correction to: Eddo Rigotti and Sara Greco: Inference in Argumentation. A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes
- No Place for Compromise: Resisting the Shift to Negotiation
- Eddo Rigotti and Sara Greco: Inference in Argumentation. A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes
- On the Importance of Questioning Within the Ideal Model of Critical Discussion
- Whataboutisms and Inconsistency
- Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory
- Argumentative Use and Strategic Function of the Expression ‘Not for Nothing’
- Correction to: Revisiting Accounts of Narrative Explanation in the Sciences: Some Clarifications from Contemporary Argumentation Theory
- Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation
- Revisiting Accounts of Narrative Explanation in the Sciences: Some Clarifications from Contemporary Argumentation Theory
- Argumentation Evolved: But How? Coevolution of Coordinated Group Behavior and Reasoning
- Definite Descriptions in Argument: Gettier’s Ten-Coins Example
- Underlying Assumptions of Examining Argumentation Rhetorically
- Teaching Argument Through Relationships
- On Defining ‘Argument’: Comments on Goodman
- “I Have No Comment”: Confrontational Maneuvering by Declaring a Standpoint Unallowed or Indisputable in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Regular Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- Introduction: Rhetoricians on Argumentation
- Rhetorical Citizenship and the Science of Science Communication
- Place, Image and Argument: The Physical and Nonphysical Dimensions of a Collective Ethos
- Progress, but Slow Going: Public Argument in the Forging of Collective Norms
- Correction to: Comment on ‘Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise’
- Argument from Similitude in Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Deliberative Dissent from War
- Dialectical Models of Deliberation, Problem Solving and Decision Making
- Rhetorical Structures, Deliberative Ecologies, and the Conditions for Democratic Argumentation
- Presumptions, and How They Relate to Arguments from Ignorance
- Refutational Strategies in Mencius’s Argumentative Discourse on Human Nature
- Place as Argument
- Argumentation and the Challenge of Time: Perelman, Temporality, and the Future of Argument
- An Early Renaissance Altarpiece by Domenico Veneziano: A Case of Visual Argumentation?
- On the Puzzling Death of the Sanctity-of-Life Argument
- Arguing Terror
- Introduction: Of Place and Time
- Argumentative Competence in Friend and Stranger Dyadic Exchanges
- Review: Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres
- Why Images Cannot be Arguments, But Moving Ones Might
- A Cross-Cultural Study of Argument Orientations of Turkish and American College Students: Is Silence Really Golden and Speech Silver for Turkish Students?
- Dale Hample: Interpersonal Arguing
- How do Culture, Individual Traits, and Context Influence Koreans’ Interpersonal Arguing? Toward a More Comprehensive Analysis of Interpersonal Arguing
- The Pernicious Effects of Compression Plagiarism on Scholarly Argumentation
- Steve Oswald, Thierry Herman and Jérôme Jacquin (eds.): Argumentation and Language-Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations
- Argumentative Style: A Complex Notion
- Old and New Fallacies in Port-Royal Logic
- Kati Hannken-Illjes: Argumentation. Einführung in die Theorie und Analyse der Argumentation. Narr/Francke/Attempto: Tübingen, 2018, 193 pp
- Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation
- Argumentation Theory for Mathematical Argument
- Argument by Analogy in Ancient China
- Confrontational Maneuvering by Dissociation in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- Standing Standpoints and Argumentative Associates: What is at Stake in a Public Political Argument?
- Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby: Reason in the Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking
- Objective Evaluation of Demonstrative Arguments
- Frans H. van Eemeren: Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
- Factors for Evaluating Presumptions and Presumptive Inferences
- Reconstructing Complex Pro/Con Argumentation
- A Normative Pragmatic Theory of Exhorting
- The Thesis of the Effectiveness of Quasi-logical Arguments
- Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in TV Commercials: A Case Study
- Narration as Argument . Paula Olmos, Editor
- Mencius’s Strategies of Political Argumentation
- Douglas Walton: Argument Evaluation and Evidence
- Populism and Informal Fallacies: An Analysis of Right-Wing Populist Rhetoric in Election Campaigns
- Plausible Argumentation in Eikotic Arguments: The Ancient Weak Versus Strong Man Example
- Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng (eds): Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
- The Role of Argument in Negotiation
- On Defining ‘Argument’
- David Hitchcock (2017): On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and Critical Thinking
- Virtuous Arguers: Responsible and Reliable
- Reasoning and Arguing, Dialectically and Dialogically, Among Individual and Multiple Participants
- Precedential Ad Hominem in Polemical Exchange: Examples from the Israeli Political Debate
- Argumentation in Mencius: A Philosophical Commentary on Haiwen Yang’s The World of Mencius
- Andrea Rocci: Modality in Argumentation—A Semantic Investigation of the Role of Modalities in the Structure of Arguments with an Application to Italian Modal Expressions
- Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach
- How Computational Tools Can Help Rhetoric and Informal Logic with Argument Invention
- Case-to-Case Arguments
- Henrique Jales Ribeiro: Retórica, Argumentação e Filosofia. Estudos Sistemáticos e Histórico – Filosóficos , MinervaCoimbra, Coimbra, 2016, pp. 171
- Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining
- Splitting a Difference of Opinion: The Shift to Negotiation
- Legal Audiences
- Jacobus C. (Jacky) Visser, A Dialogue Game for Critical Discussion: Groundwork in the Formalisation and Computerisation of the Pragma-Dialectical Model of Argumentation. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam
- The Conjunction of a French Rhetoric of Unity with a Competing Nationalism in New Caledonia: A Critical Discourse Analysis
- Radiolab’s Sound Strategic Maneuvers
- Christian Plantin: Dictionnaire de l’Argumentation. Une Introduction aux Études d’Argumentation
- Fernando Leal Carretero (coord.): Argumentación y Pragma-Dialéctica: Estudios en Honor a Frans van Eemeren
- Peirce Knew Why Abduction Isn’t IBE—A Scheme and Critical Questions for Abductive Argument
- The Elusive Notion of “Argument Quality”
- Cochrane Review as a “Warranting Device” for Reasoning About Health
- Legal Facts in Argumentation-Based Litigation Games
- “You Think That Says a Lot, but Really it Says Nothing”: An Argumentative and Linguistic Account of an Idiomatic Expression Functioning as a Presentational Device
- Questioning the Virtual Friendship Debate: Fuzzy Analogical Arguments from Classification and Definition
- Argumentation Theory Without Presumptions
- Presumptions, Assumptions, and Presuppositions of Ordinary Arguments
- The Nature and the Place of Presumptions in Law and Legal Argumentation
- Arguments from Ostension
- Speech Acts in a Dialogue Game Formalisation of Critical Discussion
- Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions
- The Structure of Arguments by Analogy in Law
- Re-contextualising Argumentative Meanings: An Adaptive Perspective
- Using Argumentative Tools to Understand Inner Dialogue
- Toulmin’s Logical Types
- Group Emotions in Collective Reasoning: A Model
- On the Norms of Visual Argument: A Case for Normative Non-revisionism
- Christopher W. Tindale: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
- Leonard Nelson: A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies
- The Burden of Proof in Philosophical Persuasion Dialogue
- Arguments from Expert Opinion and Persistent Bias
- Frans H. van Eemeren and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation
- Dialogical Features of Presumptions: Difficulties for Walton’s New Dialogical Theory
- Introduction for a Special Volume of Argumentation on Presumptions, Presumptive Inferences and Burdens of Proof
- Evaluating Arguments from a Play about Ethics in Science: A Study with Medical Learners
- Argumentative Patterns in Chinese Medical Consultations
- Virtuous Norms for Visual Arguers
- M. A. Gilbert: Arguing with People
- Factors Predicting the Intent to Engage in Arguments in Close Relationships: A Revised Model
- Presumptions in Speech Acts
- Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy
- Towards a Theory of Close Analysis for Dispute Mediation Discourse
- The Formalization of Critical Discussion
- Unacceptable Generalizations in Arguments on Legal Evidence
- Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
- Must a Successful Argument Convert an Ideal Audience?
- F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen (eds): Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory
- Self-Reporting and the Argumentativeness Scale: An Empirical Examination
- Institutional Argumentation and Institutional Rules: Effects of Interactive Asymmetry on Argumentation in Institutional Contexts
- Breaking Out of the Circle
- Argumentative Writing Behavior of Graduate EFL Learners
- Brothers in Arms: Virtue and Pragma-Dialectics
- Laypeople’s Evaluation of Arguments: Are Criteria for Argument Quality Scheme-Specific?
- Presumption as a Modal Qualifier: Presumption, Inference, and Managing Epistemic Risk