- Using, risking, and consent: Why risking harm to bystanders is morally different from risking harm to research subjects
- Neonatal incubator or artificial womb? Distinguishing ectogestation and ectogenesis using the metaphysics of pregnancy
- COVID19: Why justice and transparency in hospital triage policies are paramount
- Altered Inheritance: CRISPR and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing Françoise Baylis Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press: 2019. 287 pp. ISBN 9780674976719. US$24.95 (Hardcover)
- Environmental migrants, structural injustice, and moral responsibility
- Medicine’s collision with false hope: The False Hope Harms (FHH) argument
- Empirical research in clinical ethics: The ‘committed researcher’ approach
- From dawn till dusk. bioethical insights into the beginning and the end of life
- Suicide tourism
- Setting Health‐Care Priorities: What Ethical Theories Tell Us
- Frozen embryos and the obligation to adopt
- Burying our mistakes: Dealing with prognostic uncertainty after severe brain injury
- Slipping on slippery slope arguments
- What risks should be permissible in controlled human infection model studies?
- Family refusal of emergency medical treatment in China: An investigation from legal, empirical and ethical perspectives
- View on donated life: Construction of philosophical ethics on human organ donation
- Direct to consumer testing, drugs and gifts
- Minimal or reasonable? Considering the ethical threshold for research risks to nonconsenting bystanders and implications for nonconsenting participants
- The ethics of risk displacement in research and public policy
- What is the best age to circumcise? A medical and ethical analysis
- Metaphysics to the rescue?: Four‐dimensionalism and the twinning argument against conceptionism
- Not the doctor’s business: Privacy, personal responsibility and data rights in medical settings
- Equitable access to ectogenesis for sexual and gender minorities
- The ethics of ectogenesis‐aided foetal treatment
- Cryonics for all?
- Engendering moral post‐persons: A novel self‐help strategy
- Is ugliness a pathology? An ethical critique of the therapeuticalization of cosmetic surgery
- A lost cause? Fundamental problems for causal theories of parenthood
- Against the impairment argument: A reply to Hendricks
- Defining life from death: Problems with the somatic integration definition of life
- The right to withdraw from controlled human infection studies: Justifications and avoidance
- Paternalism and certitude
- On the ethics of AI ethics
- Procreation machines: Ectogenesis as reproductive enhancement, proper medicine or a step towards posthumanism?
- How do people use ‘killing’, ‘letting die’ and related bioethical concepts? Contrasting descriptive and normative hypotheses
- The ‘tyranny of reproduction’: Could ectogenesis further women’s liberation?
- The Nuffield Council’s green light for genome editing human embryos defies fundamental human rights law
- Fading red lines? Bioethics of germline genome editing
- Regulating germline editing in assisted reproductive technology: An EU cross‐disciplinary perspective
- What do patients want? Surgical informed‐consent and patient‐centered care – An augmented model of information disclosure
- Abortion is incommensurable with fetal alcohol syndrome
- The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion revisited
- Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?
- Violinists, demandingness, and the impairment argument against abortion
- What does mental health have to do with well‐being?
- A moral argument for frozen human embryo adoption
- Does the Identity Objection to the future‐like‐ours argument succeed?
- Misusing uteruses? Childrearing capacity and access to transplantable wombs
- Drugs, genes and screens: The ethics of preventing and treating spinal muscular atrophy
- Responsibility and the limits of patient choice
- Time to start intervening in the human germline? A utilitarian perspective
- Emergency care, triage, and fairness
- Improving the justice‐based argument for conducting human gene editing research to cure sickle cell disease
- Conceptual challenges to the harm threshold
- Ectogestation ethics: The implications of artificially extending gestation for viability, newborn resuscitation and abortion
- Formula feeding can help illuminate long‐term consequences of full ectogenesis
- Bystanders, risks, and consent
- It is better to be ignorant of our moral enhancement: A reply to Zambrano
- Impassable scientific, ethical and legal barriers to body‐to‐head transplantation
- Expanded FDA regulation of health and wellness apps
- Informing about mammographic screening: Ethical challenges and suggested solutions
- Being a burden to others and wishes to die: The importance of the sociopolitical context
- The Vatican on gender theory and the responsibilities of medicine
- Promoting organ donation registration with the priority incentive: Israeli transplantation surgeons’ and other medical practitioners’ views and ethical concerns
- Progress bias versus status quo bias in the ethics of emerging science and technology
- Using the therapy and enhancement distinction in law and policy
- Two ethical concerns about the use of persuasive technology for vulnerable people
- Drawing the line on in vitro gametogenesis
- Against autonomy: How proposed solutions to the problems of living wills forgot its underlying principle
- On justifying arguments of species membership
- ‘Alive by default’: An exploration of Velleman’s unfair burdens argument against state sanctioned euthanasia
- Alive inside
- Multibiologism: An anthropological and bioethical framework for moving beyond medicalization
- Finishing Our Story: Preparing for the End of Life Gregory L. Eastwood Oxford University Press: New York, 2019. 140 pp. ISBN 9780190888084. US$14.95 (Paperback).
- Healthcare organizations and high profile disagreements
- When the political becomes personal: Reflecting on disability bioethics
- On beginning with justice: Bioethics, advocacy and the rights of asylum seekers
- Bioethics and activism
- The responsibilities of the engaged bioethicist: Scholar, advocate, activist
- Taking on the Taliban: Ethical issues at the frontline of academia
- What is the sufficientarian precautionary principle?
- Reproductive CRISPR does not cure disease
- IN DEFENSE OF GUN CONTROL Hugh Lafollette Oxford University Press. New York City, 2018. 256 pp. ISBN: 9780190873370. $30.
- Being human: Why and in what sense it is morally relevant
- Consent’s dominion: Dementia and prior consent to sexual relations
- An ambiguity in Habermas’s argument against liberal eugenics
- Do junior academic bioethicists have an obligation to be activists?
- The somatic integration definition of the beginning of life
- Germline genome editing versus preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Is there a case in favour of germline interventions?
- Conflicts of interest in e‐cigarette research: A public good and public interest perspective
- Genetic parenthood and causation: An objection to Douglas and Devolder’s modified direct proportionate genetic descent account
- The Ethics of Antibiotic Resistance: Towards an Agenda for Feasible and Justified Global Health Policy
- Evaluating the risks of public health programs: Rational antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance
- Inequality and antibiotic resistance: A contractualist perspective
- Surveillance and control of asymptomatic carriers of drug‐resistant bacteria
- A human rights approach to low data reporting in clinical trials of psychiatric deep brain stimulation
- Deciding with dignity: The account of human dignity as an attitude and its implications for assisted suicide
- (Regrettably) Abortion remains immoral: The impairment argument defended
- The ethical landscape of gene drive research
- PSYCHIATRIC NEUROETHICS—STUDIES IN RESEARCH AND PRACTICE Walter Glannon Oxford University Press, 2019. 408 pp. ISBN 978‐0‐19‐875885‐3, $44.95.
- Institutional refusal to offer assisted dying: A response to Shadd and Shadd
- Biogenetic ties and parent‐child relationships: The misplaced critique
- Vaccine mandates, value pluralism, and policy diversity
- IN OUR BEST INTEREST: A DEFENSE OF PATERNALISM Jason Hanna Oxford University Press, New York, 2018. 271 pp. ISBN 978‐0‐19‐087713‐2. $51.80.
- Why a right to life rules out infanticide: A final reply to Räsänen
- Bioethicists to the Barricades!
- Developing a ‘moral compass tool’ based on moral case deliberations: A pragmatic hermeneutic approach to clinical ethics
- Substance, rights, value, and abortion
- Upsetting the balance on sex selection
- CHOOSING DOWN SYNDROME: ETHICS AND NEW PRENATAL TESTING TECHNOLOGIES Chris Kaposy MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2018, 240 pp, Hardcover, US$$27.95 pp. ISBN: 9780262037716
- How law can help solve the collective action problem of antimicrobial resistance
- End‐of‐life decision‐making and advance care directives in Italy. A report and moral appraisal of recent legal provisions
- The international dimensions of antimicrobial resistance: Contextual factors shape distinct ethical challenges in South Africa, Sri Lanka and the United Kingdom
- Prenatal testing: Does reproductive autonomy succeed in dispelling eugenic concerns?
- Blurring the germline: Genome editing and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance
- Moral enhancement, at the peak of pharmacology and at the limit of ethics
- Germline gene editing and the precautionary principle
- Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity?
- Do we have a right to an unmanipulated genome? The human genome as the common heritage of mankind
- ‘Poking the skunk’: Ethical and medico‐legal concerns in research about patients’ experiences of medical injury
- The role of values in scientific theory selection and why it matters to medical education
- Should I want to live to 100?
- Might there be a medical conscience?
- Cutting red tape to manage public health threats: An ethical dilemma of expediting antibiotic drug innovation
- Fighting Death and Preventing Birth: Perspectives on New Methuselahs John K. Davis MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2018, 368 pp, Hardcover, US$40.00, pages ISBN: 9780262038133,
- Health ethics and Indigenous ethnocide
- Perspectives on embryo donation
- 2PN cell donation in Germany. Or: How the German Embryo Protection (Act) undermines itself
- Compensation for cures: Why we should pay a premium for participation in ‘challenge studies’
- Conflicting demands on a modern healthcare service: Can Rawlsian justice provide a guiding philosophy for the NHS and other socialized health services?
- Egg freezing: A new medical technology and the challenges of modernity
- Research versus practice: The dilemmas of research ethics in the era of learning health‐care systems
- Antibiotic resistance as a tragedy of the commons: An ethical argument for a tax on antibiotic use in humans
- The evolution of moral progress and biomedical moral enhancement
- A justice‐based argument for including sickle cell disease in CRISPR/Cas9 clinical research
- Why the embryo rescue case is a bad argument against embryonic personhood
- Engagement as co‐constructing knowledge: A moral necessity in public health research
- Anorexia nervosa, advance directives, and the law: A British perspective
- The oral biome in the aetiology and management of dental disease: Current concepts and ethical considerations
- Activism, Bioethics and Academic Research
- Will more organs save more lives? Cost‐effectiveness and the ethics of expanding organ procurement
- How to reject Benatar’s asymmetry argument
- Supporting families involved in court cases about life‐sustaining treatment: Working as academics, advocates and activists
- Covert moral bioenhancement, public health, and autonomy
- Patient and public involvement: Two sides of the same coin or different coins altogether?
- What do we owe the newly dead? An ethical analysis of findings from Japan’s corpse hotels workers
- The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion: A reply
- Great minds think different: Preserving cognitive diversity in an age of gene editing
- The point of no return: Up to what point should we be allowed to withdraw consent to the storage and use of embryos and gametes?
- Balancing competing interests and obligations in mental health‐care practice and policy
- Public reason in justifications of conscientious objection in health care
- The injustice of fat stigma
- Ethical classification of ME/CFS in the United Kingdom
- Can conscientious objection lead to eugenic practices against LGBT individuals?
- Bioethics and activism: A natural fit?
- The aims of expanded universal carrier screening: Autonomy, prevention, and responsible parenthood
- The positive value of moral distress
- Hastening death and respect for dignity: Kantianism at the end of life
- An ethical pathway for gene editing
- Certainty is not a morally defensible threshold to determine eligibility for assisted dying
- A failure in solidarity: Ethical challenges in the development and implementation of new tuberculosis technologies
- Unlocking data: Where is the key?
- Stages of life: A new metaphysics of conceptionism
- Respect for autonomy in systems of postmortem organ procurement: A comment
- Adjusting the focus: a public health ethics approach to data research
- The ethics of biobanking: Assessing the right to control problem for broad consent
- The role of data custodians in establishing and maintaining social licence for health research
- No conscientious objection without normative justification: a reply
- Qualitative and quantitative interpretations of the least restrictive means
- Circumcising human subjects: An evaluation of experimental foreskin amputation using the Declaration of Helsinki
- Gene editing: An ethical disruptor?
- Withholding and withdrawing treatment for cost‐effectiveness reasons: Are they ethically on par?
- Addressing the challenge for expedient ethical review of research in disasters and disease outbreaks
- Non‐therapeutic male genital cutting and harm: Law, policy and evidence from U.K. hospitals
- The Identity Objection to the future‐like‐ours argument
- Causal parenthood and the ethics of gamete donation
- The role of trust in global health research collaborations
- Patients with multiple needs for healthcare and priority to the worse off
- Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument
- The common rule’s ‘reasonable person’ standard for informed consent
- Refining the ethics of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: A plea for contextualized proportionality
- Erosion of informed consent in U.S. research
- Insight and the no‐self in deep brain stimulation
- A burden from birth? Non‐invasive prenatal testing and the stigmatization of people with disabilities
- Displacement and solidarity: An ethic of place‐making
- Erratum to: Companions or patients? The impact of family presence in genetic consultations for inherited breast cancer: Relational autonomy in practice
- Solidarity can make a difference: Addressing transformations in healthcare, demographics and technological replacement
- Can women in labor give informed consent to epidural analgesia?
- Ectogenesis and the case against the right to the death of the foetus
- Accepting the avoidable death: The philosophy of limiting intensive care
- Medical crowdfunding and the virtuous donor
- The German debate on male circumcision and Habermas’ model of post‐secularity
- How the CIOMS guidelines contribute to fair inclusion of pregnant women in research
- The epistemic and ethical onus of ‘One Health’
- Institutional non‐participation in assisted dying: Changing the conversation
- The importance of being pregnant: On the healthcare need for uterus transplantation
- The ethics of uterus transplantation
- Uterus transplants and the insufficient value of gestation
- Pushing the boundaries: Uterine transplantation and the limits of reproductive autonomy
- Designing humans: A human rights approach
- Embryo donation or embryo adoption? Conceptual and normative issues
- On the reconceptualization of Alzheimer’s disease
- Solidarity and care as relational practices
- No conscientious objection without normative justification: Against conscientious objection in medicine
- Ectogenesis and a right to the death of the prenatal human being: A reply to Räsänen
- Not a matter of parental choice but of social justice obligation: Children are owed measles vaccination
- Ethical issues in research on substance‐dependent parents: The risk of implicit normative judgements by researchers
- Suffering at the end of life
- The value of work: Addressing the future of work through the lens of solidarity
- From protectionism to inclusion: A New Zealand perspective on health‐related research involving adults incapable of giving informed consent
- Ethics and HIV prevention research: An analysis of the early tenofovir PrEP trial in Nigeria
- Cosmetic dentistry: A socioethical evaluation
- In vitro gametogenesis and reproductive cloning: Can we allow one while banning the other?
- Illegitmate authorship and flawed procedures: Fundamental, formal criticisms of the Declaration of Helsinki
- Why pro‐life arguments still are not convincing: A reply to my critics
- Financing uterus transplants: The United States context
- Compulsory moral bioenhancement should be covert
- Transcranial electrical stimulation for human enhancement and the risk of inequality: Prohibition or compensation?
- Enriching the concept of vulnerability in research ethics: An integrative and functional account
- The Unabomber’s ethics
- Robot Sex: Social and Ethical Implications. John Danaher Neil MacArthur (Eds.) The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, and London, 2017. 314 pp., includes index. ISBN 9780262036689. $40 (Hardcover).
- Political legitimacy and research ethics
- In vitro gametogenesis: The end of egg donation?
- Empathy is a poor foundation on which to base legislative medical policy
- Precaution, threshold risk and public deliberation
- Is infertility a disease and does it matter?
- Self‐admission in psychiatry: The ethics
- Mechanistic reasoning and informed consent
- An ecological approach to modeling disability
- Return to childhood? Against the infantilization of people with dementia
- Parents’ posthumous use of daughter’s ovarian tissue: Ethical dimensions
- Should human germ line editing be allowed? Some suggestions on the basis of the existing regulatory framework
- Genetic research and consent: On the crossroads of human and data research
- Discussing rights and wrongs: Three suggestions for moving forward with the migrant health rights debate
- Companions or patients? The impact of family presence in genetic consultations for inherited breast cancer: Relational autonomy in practice
- Clinical Research Involving Pregnant Women. F. Baylis A. Ballantyne (Eds.) Springer, Research Ethics Forum 3, 2016. 301 pp. US$ 149.00 e-book, US$ 199.00 hb. ISBN 978‐3‐319‐26510‐0, $189.
- From self‐interest to solidarity: One path towards delivering refugee health
- Migration, health, and ethics
- Social value, clinical equipoise, and research in a public health emergency
- Positioning uterus transplantation as a ‘more ethical’ alternative to surrogacy: Exploring symmetries between uterus transplantation and surrogacy through analysis of a Swedish government white paper
- Solidarity and the problem of structural injustice in healthcare
- A conception of genetic parenthood
- Community engagement in global health research that advances health equity
- The ethics of ordinary and exact justification in blood donation deferral categories for men who have sex with men
- Deceased‐directed donation: Considering the ethical permissibility in a multicultural setting
- Uterus transplantation as radical reproduction: Taking the adoption alternative more seriously
- Our flawed approach to undue inducement in medical research
- Trust and responsibility in molecular tumour boards
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: How much discretionary space best supports good medicine?
- Mandatory sex selection and mitochondrial transfer
- Humanitarian medical aid to the Syrian people: Ethical implications and dilemmas
- Tu Youyou winning the Nobel Prize: Ethical research on the value and safety of traditional Chinese medicine
- Conscientious objection and compromising the patient: Response to Hughes
- Self‐ownership, relational dignity, and organ sales
- Informed consent and nudging
- Should consent be required for organ procurement?
- There is no right to the death of the fetus
- When is coercive methadone therapy justified?
- Hit but not down. The substance view in light of the criticism of Lovering and Simkulet
- A rights‐based proposal for managing faith‐based values and expectations of migrants at end‐of‐life illustrated by an empirical study involving South Asians in the UK
- Bioethics culture wars – 2018 edition: Alfie Evans
- Framing the ethical and legal issues of human artificial gametes in research, therapy, and assisted reproduction: A German perspective
- Union’s inspiration: Universal health care and the essential partiality of solidarity
- Language barriers and epistemic injustice in healthcare settings
- Will cognitive enhancement create post‐persons? The use(lessness) of induction in determining the likelihood of moral status enhancement
- Solidarity as a national health care strategy
- Health worker migration and migrant healthcare: Seeking cosmopolitanism in the NHS
- Physician‐Assisted Death: What Everyone Needs to Know. L. W. Sumner, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2017. xv + 243 pp. US$ 16.95 pbk, ISBN 978‐0‐19‐049017‐1. US$ 74.00 hbk. ISBN 978‐0‐19‐049018‐8.
- Educational pelvic exams on anesthetized women: Why consent matters
- Regret, shame, and denials of women’s voluntary sterilization
- Conscience claims, metaphysics, and avoiding an LGBT eugenic
- The ethics of ageing
- The canary in the coal mine: Continence care for people with dementia in acute hospital wards as a crisis of dehumanization
- Toward a global geroethics – gerontology and the theory of the good human life
- Responsibility and age‐related dementia
- Are older people a vulnerable group? Philosophical and bioethical perspectives on ageing and vulnerability
- Indignity and Old Age
- Empathy, social media, and directed altruistic living organ donation
- Reproductive cloning revisited
- Fostering caring relationships: Suggestions to rethink liberal perspectives on the ethics of newborn screening
- Fragile lives with fragile rights: Justice for babies born at the limit of viability
- Effective altruists ought to be allowed to sell their kidneys
- Melanoma in the shopping mall: A utilitarian argument for offering unsolicited medical opinions in informal settings
- Relational autonomy, care, and Jehovah’s Witnesses in Germany
- Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing: A reply to Räsänen
- Influencing relatives to respect donor autonomy: Should we nudge families to consent to organ donation?
- The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism
- The trouble with public health: HIV/AIDS in Canada as a case in point
- Manipulation, salience, and nudges
- From applied ethics to empirical ethics to contextual ethics
- The epistemic costs of compromise in bioethics
- Reproductive autonomy and responsibility: current trends
- Queer reproduction revisited and why race, class and citizenship still matters: A response to Cristina Richie
- Different games of moral bioenhancement
- Who gets the gametes? An argument for a points system for fertility patients
- Enthusiastic portrayal of 3D bioprinting in the media: Ethical side effects
- Judgments of moral responsibility in tissue donation cases
- The parenthood argument
- Conscientious objection, professional duty and compromise: A response to Savulescu and Schuklenk
- A dubious defense of ‘after-birth abortion’: A reply to Räsänen
- Ectogenesis, abortion and a right to the death of the fetus
- Many thanks to Bioethics reviewers
- A Bioethics Editor’s Summer 2017 Conference Season: Conscientious Objection and Research Ethics
- Books Received September 2016 – August 2017
- The ethics of public policy RCTs: The principle of policy equipoise
- A Prospectus for ethical analysis of ageing individuals’ responsibility to prevent cognitive decline
- Scanning the body, sequencing the genome: Dealing with unsolicited findings
- Moral bioenhancement and agential risks: Good and bad outcomes
- Autism, theory of mind, and the reactive attitudes
- Public health agencies’ obligations and the case of Zika
- IAB Presidential address: “Searching for Justice”
- The limits of the treatment-enhancement distinction as a guide to public policy
- Balancing bioethics by sensing the aesthetic
- Ethical issues raised by thyroid cancer overdiagnosis: A matter for public health?
- Family interests and medical decisions for children
- Merging arts and bioethics: An interdisciplinary experiment in cultural and scientific mediation
- Fertility, immigration, and the fight against climate change
- Does benefit justify research with children?
- Bioethics, children, and the environment
- Medical Innovation in a Children’s Hospital: ‘Diseases desperate grown by desperate appliance are relieved, or not at all’
- A Kantian ethics approach to moral bioenhancement
- Presuming patient autonomy in the face of therapeutic misconception
- Reconsidering paternalism in clinical research
- The indispensability of labelled groups to vulnerability in bioethics
- When doctors deny drugs: Sexism and contraception access in the medical field
- Shame and HIV: Strategies for addressing the negative impact shame has on public health and diagnosis and treatment of HIV
- Two kinds of physician-assisted death
- First, do no harm: Generalized procreative non-maleficence
- A pragmatic analysis of vulnerability in clinical research
- Human organisms begin to exist at fertilization
- Euthanasia and cryothanasia
- Ways of showing respect for life
- Defending the social value of knowledge as a safeguard for public trust
- Response to Vogelstein: How the 2012 AAP Task Force on circumcision went wrong
- Tying oneself to the mast: One necessary cost to morally enhancing oneself biomedically
- ‘You are inferior!’ Revisiting the expressivist argument
- New Frontiers in End-of-Life Ethics (and Policy): Scope, Advance Directives and Conscientious Objection
- The experiences of pregnant women in an interventional clinical trial: Research In Pregnancy Ethics (RIPE) study
- The Ethics of Clinical Trials Research in Severe Mood Disorders
- The Voluntary Nature of Decision-Making in Addiction: Static Metaphysical Views Versus Epistemologically Dynamic Views
- Respect for Autonomy in Light of Neuropsychiatry
- Can Neuroscience Contribute to Practical Ethics? A Critical Review and Discussion of the Methodological and Translational Challenges of the Neuroscience of Ethics
- Moral Enhancement Meets Normative and Empirical Reality: Assessing the Practical Feasibility of Moral Enhancement Neurotechnologies
- Neuroethics: Neuroscience’s Contributions to Bioethics
- Assisted Dying & Disability
- What Outcomes do Dutch Healthcare Professionals Perceive as Important Before Participation in Moral Case Deliberation?
- Evaluating Clinical Ethics Support: A Participatory Approach
- Methodological Reflections on the Contribution of Qualitative Research to the Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Support Services
- Discovering What Matters: Interrogating Clinician Responses to Ethics Consultation
- Integrating Theory and Data in Evaluating Clinical Ethics Support. Still a Long Way to Go
- Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations: A Coding Scheme
- Fair Resource Allocation to Health Research: Priority Topics for Bioethics Scholarship
- Wrongness, Responsibility, and Conscientious Refusals in Health Care
- Ethical Considerations of Triage Following Natural Disasters: The IDF Experience in Haiti as a Case Study
- Moral Hard-Wiring and Moral Enhancement
- Is Consent Based on Trust Morally Inferior to Consent Based on Information?
- Alcohol Use Disorder, Liver Transplantation and Ethics
- Bioethics in a Post-Truth Era
- Human Dignity and Human Enhancement: A Multidimensional Approach
- The Place of Crowdfunding in the Discovery of Scientific and Social Value of Medical Research
- Is There a Right to the Death of the Foetus?
- Ways Out of the Patenting Prohibition? Human Parthenogenetic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
- Epistemic Authority and Genuine Ethical Controversies
- In Defense of Artificial Replacement
- The Mitochondrial Replacement ‘Therapy’ Myth
- The Consequences of Vagueness in Consent to Organ Donation
- The human genome as public: Justifications and implications
- Permanence can be Defended
- When is a Choice not a Choice? ‘Sham Offers’ and the Asymmetry of Adolescent Consent and Refusal
- The Substance View: A Critique (Part 3)
- Objection to Conscience: An Argument Against Conscience Exemptions in Healthcare
- Conscientious Objection to Vaccination
- The Invisible Discrimination Before Our Eyes: A Bioethical Analysis
- The Edge of Human? The Problem with the Posthuman as the ‘Beyond’
- Bioethics, General Ethics and CAM
- Misplaced Paternalism and other Mistakes in the Debate over Kidney Sales
- Assisted Suicide in Switzerland: Clarifying Liberties and Claims
- Doctors Have no Right to Refuse Medical Assistance in Dying, Abortion or Contraception