Intellectual History Review

• Anticlerical legacies: the deistic reception of Thomas Hobbes, c. 1670–1740
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2024By Katherine A. East Newcastle University
• Hans Jonas’s image theory
  Intellectual History Review06 August 2024By Fabio Fossa Roberto Franzini Tibaldeo a Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italyb Escola de Educação e Humanidades, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, BrazilFabio Fossa is a Postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Mechanical Engineering of the Politecnico di Milano (Milan, Italy). His main research areas include applied ethics, philosophy of technology, robot and AI ethics, and the philosophy of Hans Jonas. His current research deals with the philosophy of artificial agency and the ethics of driving automation. He is a member of the research group META – Social Sciences and Humanities for Science and Technologies and Editor-in-Chief of the Italian journal InCircolo – Rivista di filosofia e culture.Roberto Franzini Tibaldeo (Ph.D. in Science of Culture, Modena 2005, and Ph.D. in Philosophy, Torino 2011) is Professor of philosophy at the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (Curitiba, Brazil). From 2015 to 2018 he served as F.R.S.-F.N.R.S. Postdoctoral researcher at the Université catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium), and from 2010 to 2015 he was Research fellow in Political Philosophy at the Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant’Anna (Pisa, Italy). Research interests: continental philosophy (esp. Hans Jonas), ethics and politics of responsibility, philosophy for children/communities (p4c), landscape studies.
• Contract before Enlightenment: the ideas of James Dalrymple, Viscount Stair, 1619–1695
  Intellectual History Review30 July 2024By Julia Rudolph North Carolina State University
• Translating the East: an introduction
  Intellectual History Review30 July 2024By Francesco Borghesi Yixu Lü
• The early days of Tibetan Studies in Europe: some textual and historical considerations regarding I.J. Schmidt (1779–1843) and his German translation of The Wise and the Foolish
  Intellectual History Review15 July 2024By Jim Rheingans University of Vienna, Department of South Asian, Tibetan and Buddhist Studies, AustriaJim Rheingans is Professor of Tibetan Studies at the University of Vienna.
• Democracy: constrained or militant? Carl Schmitt and Karl Loewenstein on what it means to defend the constitution
  Intellectual History Review09 July 2024By Mariano Croce Department of Philosophy, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, ItalyMariano Croce is Associate Professor of Political Philosophy at Sapienza University of Rome. He held the post of Marie Curie Fellow at the Faculty of Law of the University of Antwerp, where he is co-leader of the research line in kinship studies. His books include Carl Schmitt’s Institutional Theory. The Political Power of Normality (Cambridge University Press, 2022, with Andrea Salvatore), The Legacy of Pluralism: The Continental Jurisprudence of Santi Romano, Carl Schmitt, and Costantino Mortati (Stanford University Press, 2020, with Marco Goldoni), and The Politics of Juridification (Routledge, 2018).
• Organic intellectuals from modern India: B. R. Ambedkar and R. M. Lohia on inequality, intersectionality, and justice
  Intellectual History Review04 July 2024By Priyanka Jha Christian Olaf Christiansen a Department of Political Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Indiab Department of Philosophy and History of Ideas, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkPriyanka Jha teaches in the Department of Political Science, Banaras Hindu University. She is interested in History of Political Thought in Modern India and Global Gendered Intellectual History.Christian Olaf Christiansen is an Intellectual Historian of Twentieth Century Political and Economic Ideas. From 2019-2024, he was the Principal Investigator of a project on the Global Intellectual History of Inequality.
• From sodomy to homosexuality: the role of criminal law in Filippo Maria Renazzi’s Rome between the Enlightenment and the Napoleonic Era
  Intellectual History Review04 July 2024By Tommaso Scaramella Department of Legal Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyTommaso Scaramella received his Ph.D. in History, Cultures, and Civilizations from the University of Bologna in 2018. He currently holds a research grant in early modern history at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, following research and teaching experiences at the Universities of Verona and Bologna. His interests focus on sexualities, genders, bodies, and emotions during the early modern period. His publications include the book Un doge infame. Sodomia e nonconformismo sessuale a Venezia nel Settecento (Marsilio, 2021).
• The Five Human Relationships (wulun 五倫) as presented to European readers in François Noël’s translation of the Elementary learning (Xiaoxue 小學)
  Intellectual History Review26 June 2024By Giulia Falato Faculty of AMES, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKDr Giulia Falato works as a Lecturer in Chinese Studies at the University of Oxford. Her main research interest lies in the history of Sino-Western cultural relations, with a particular focus on exchanges in the fields of pedagogy, moral philosophy and lexical innovations. Her publications include a monograph on Alfonso Vagnone S.J.’s Tongyou jiaoyu 童幼教育 (On the Education of Children, c. 1632) with annotated translation, a book chapter about the Jesuit translations strategies in late Ming and early Qing catechisms, and a co-edited volume about education and representation of children in the Chinese literary traditions.
• Instruments of knowledge: finding meaning in objects, habits, and museums
  Intellectual History Review19 June 2024By Richard J. Oosterhoff University of Edinburgh
• Dictionaries as authorities? The problematic use of Chinese dictionaries by missionaries in the Rites Controversy
  Intellectual History Review17 June 2024By Thierry Meynard Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of ChinaThierry Meynard is professor and Ph.D. director at the philosophy department of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, where he teaches Western Philosophy and Classics. He is the vice-director of the Archive for the Introduction of Western Knowledge at Sun Yat-Sen University. He has authored in the English language: The Jesuit Reading of Confucius (2015), and co-edited with Daniel Canaris, A Brief Response on the Controversies over Shangdi, Tianshen and Linghun, by Niccolò Longobardo (2021).
• Translation, dialogue and conversation: Malebranche’s Entretien d’un philosophe chrétien, et d’un philosophe chinois
  Intellectual History Review17 June 2024By Andrew Benjamin School of Culture and Communication, Faculty of Arts, University of Melbourne, AustraliaAndrew Benjamin is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at Monash University, Australia.
• Translation, dialogue and conversation: Malebranche’s Entretien d’un philosophe chrétien, et d’un philosophe chinois
  Intellectual History Review17 June 2024By Andrew Benjamin School of Culture and Communication, Faculty of Arts, University of Melbourne, AustraliaAndrew Benjamin is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at Monash University, Australia.
• The translation of Saints and the Confucian discourse of sages in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century China: the examples of Alfonso Vagnone, Zhang Xingyao and Yan Mo
  Intellectual History Review13 June 2024By Xueying Wang Department of Theology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USAXueying Wang is Assistant Professor at The University of Notre Dame. Her research focuses on Catholicism in China, especially the Chinese Rites Controversy (ca. 1630–1742).
• Transwriting in Aleni’s Xingxue cushu: communicating the philosophy of human nature between the West and late Ming China
  Intellectual History Review13 June 2024By Hailin Zhu School of Foreign Language, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, People’s Republic of ChinaHailin Zhu is Professor at Guangdong Medical University, China.
• From sanctus to shengren: mediating Christian and Chinese concepts of human excellence in early modern China
  Intellectual History Review07 June 2024By Daniel Canaris School of Languages and Cultures, University of Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaDaniel Canaris is an intellectual historian specializing in Sino-Western cultural exchange, as well as the Italian Enlightenment and Renaissance. He completed his Ph.D. in Italian Studies at the University of Sydney in 2017 and has been awarded fellowships by the University Erlangen-Nuremberg, the Warburg Institute (University of London), the Sun Yat-sen University, the Ricci Institute for Chinese-Western Cultural History (University of San Francisco), and Villa I Tatti (Harvard; declined), and is currently an A.R.C. Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (D.E.C.R.A.) fellow. His first monograph, Vico and China, was published in 2020 as part of the Voltaire Foundation’s Oxford University Studies in the Enlightenment series, and co-edited with Thierry Meynard a critical edition and translation of Longobardo’s Resposta breve (Palgrave Studies in Comparative Global History). His critical edition and translation of Michele Ruggieri’s Tianzhu shilu 天主实录 was published by Brill in 2023.
• Mandeville’s fable: pride, hypocrisy, and sociability
  Intellectual History Review09 May 2024By Ross CarrollDublin City University
• De Peccato Originali (On Original Sin 1679)
  Intellectual History Review08 May 2024By Matthew BainesMoore Theological College
• Ambiguity and experience: ethics of action in early twentieth-century France
  Intellectual History Review12 April 2024By Pietro TerziInstitut de Recherches Philosophiques, Université Paris Nanterre, Nanterre, FrancePietro Terzi is associate researcher at the Institute de Recherches Philosophiques at the Université Paris Nanterre. He holds a Ph.D. from the Fondazione Collegio San Carlo in Modena (Italy) and the Université Paris Nanterre.
• Liberalism reinvents itself
  Intellectual History Review14 March 2024By Arthur GhinsDepartment of Political Economy, King's College London, Strand, LondonArthur Ghins is a British Academy postdoctoral fellow at King's College London. His work on the history of modern democracy and liberalism has appeared, among others, in The Journal of Politics, Modern Intellectual History, and Political Studies. He is currently completing his first book manuscript, titled The People's Two Powers: Public Opinion and Popular Sovereignty from Rousseau to Liberal Democracy.
• Music, nature and divine knowledge in England 1650–1750: between the rational and the mystical
  Intellectual History Review14 March 2024By Emily KentUniversity of Edinburgh
• After the Flood: Imagining the Global Environment in Early Modern Europe
  Intellectual History Review07 March 2024By Gregory F.W. ToddUniversity of Edinburgh
• Apropos of Something: A History of Irrelevance and Relevance
  Intellectual History Review26 February 2024By Anthony Ossa-RichardsonUniversity College London
• Out of the margins: readers and the early modern (re-)emergence of mathematics
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2024By Kevin Gerard TraceyDepartment of English, Maynooth University, Maynooth, IrelandKevin Gerard Tracey is an Irish Research Council postdoctoral fellow at Maynooth University. His research focuses upon the mathematical and intellectual cultures of early modern Europe. Recent publications include chapters and articles on Ramist mathematical pedagogy in sixteenth-century Germany (2021); on mathematical and astronomical teaching in seventeenth century English universities (2022); and on Irish émigrés' reading of French astronomical treatises in seventeenth-century Spain (2023).
• Politics, religion and ideas in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Britain: essays in honour of Mark Goldie
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2024By R. J. W. MillsInstitute of Intellectual History, University of St Andrews
• The interlopers: early Stuart projects and the undisciplining of knowledge
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2024By Philippe Bernhard SchmidUniversity of Basel
• Anecdotes of Enlightenment: human nature from Locke to Wordsworth
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2024By R. J. W. MillsInstitute of Intellectual History, University of St Andrews
• Biblical scholarship in an age of controversy: the polemical world of Hugh Broughton (1549–1612)
  Intellectual History Review07 February 2024By Andrew BernsUniversity of South Carolina
• Patrizi, panpsychism, and the Presocratics
  Intellectual History Review04 January 2024By Vojtěch HladkýFaculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech RepublicVojtěch Hladký is a philosopher, Hellenist, and intellectual historian. He earned his Ph.D. degree from the Charles Univerity in Prague. He is an assistant professor at the Department of Philosophy and History of Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague. His research concentrates mainly on Ancient and Renaissance thought.
• The soul and force in Patricius’s Nova de universis philosophia
  Intellectual History Review20 December 2023By Luka BoršićInstitute of philosophy, Zagreb, CroatiaLuka Boršić obtained his first Ph.D. degree in Ancient philosophy with emphasis of classical languages and his second in history of philosophy with the emphasis on the emergence of modern science. His main areas of research are ancient philosophy, Renaissance philosophy and modern science, and gender philosophy. He works as a scientific adviser at the Institute of Philosophy in Zagreb, Croatia, presently serving as the Director of the Institute. In 2019, he was a Fulbright Scholar at Columbia University in New York, studying Paul Oskar Kristeller’s papers.
• Democracy and inequality in Latin America: revisiting the intellectual legacy of Guillermo O’Donnell
  Intellectual History Review20 December 2023By Sofía MercaderDepartment of Philosophy and History of Ideas, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkSofía Mercader is a postdoctoral researcher at Aarhus University. She holds a PhD in Hispanic Studies from the University of Warwick. She is the author of Punto de Vista and the Argentine Intellectual Left (Palgrave Macmillan, 2021).
• Making sense of the exotic: the differing impact of travel reports in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century thought
  Intellectual History Review14 December 2023By Stephen GaukrogerStephen Gaukroger (1950 – 2023), one of the founding editors of Intellectual History Review, was Emeritus Professor of History of Philosophy and History of Science at the University of Sydney. After graduating from Birkbeck College London with a congratulatory First, he completed his doctoral dissertation in the Department of the History and Philosophy of Science at Cambridge University. He then took up research fellowships, first at the University of Cambridge, then at the University of Melbourne, before being appointed in 1981 to a lectureship at the University of Sydney, where he remained, advancing to full Professor in 1998. Over the years up to his retirement in 2015, he held two Australian Research Council Professorial Fellowships, as well as visiting Fellowships and Professorships at Oxford; The School of Advanced Study, University of London; the University of Aberdeen; and the Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon. He was an elected member of the Australian Academy of the Humanities, the Royal Society of New South Wales, and the Royal Historical Society, as well as being a full member of the Académie Internationale d'Histoire des Sciences. In 2003 he was awarded the Australian Centenary Medal for contributions to history of philosophy and history of science. In 2022 he was awarded the History of Philosophy and Science medal by the Royal Society of New South Wales in recognition of outstanding achievement in the field. Among his many executive positions in learned societies, he was President of the International Society for Intellectual History from 2002 to 2008. Stephen Gaukroger was the author of many scholarly books and articles, including Descartes: an intellectual biography (1995), Francis Bacon and the Transformation of Early-Modern Philosophy (2001), Objectivity: a very short introduction (2012), and a four-volume history of scientific thought, covering more than seven centuries, from 1210 to 1935 (2006 – 2020), as well as a book-length essay on The Failures of Philosophy (2020).
• Julia Wedgwood and the origin of language
  Intellectual History Review14 December 2023By Alison StoneDepartment of Politics, Philosophy and Religion, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UKAlison Stone is a Professor of Philosophy at Lancaster University. She has published widely on the history of philosophy and feminist philosophy. Her most recent books are the edited collection Frances Power Cobbe: Essential Writings of a Nineteenth-Century Feminist Philosopher (Oxford University Press, 2022), Frances Power Cobbe (Cambridge University Press, 2022), and Women Philosophers in Nineteenth-Century Britain (Oxford University Press, 2023). With Lydia Moland, she is co-editing the Oxford Handbook of American and British Women Philosophers in the Nineteenth Century.
• Translating Renaissance Neoplatonic panpsychism into seventeenth-century corpuscularism: the case of Sir Kenelm Digby (1603–1665)
  Intellectual History Review14 December 2023By Sergius KoderaDepartment of Philosophy, University of Vienna, AustriaSergius Kodera received his Doctorate in 1994. Since then, Kodera has been teaching Early Modern and Renaissance Philosophy at the Department of Philosophy at the University of Vienna. He received his Habilitation in 2004. Currently he is working on a book-length study on Della Porta in English. His main fields of interest are the history of the body and sexuality, magic and media in trans-disciplinary perspectives. For a list of publications, see https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3119-2749.
• God, space and the Spirit of Nature: Morean trialism revisited
  Intellectual History Review12 December 2023By Jacques JosephDepartment of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech RepublicJacques Joseph is an assistant professor at the Department of Philosophy and History of Science at Charles University in Prague. He published a monograph in Czech on Henry More. He specializes in interactions between Renaissance and Early Modern philosophy and science, as well as in modern French epistemology.
• Pantheism and panpsychism in the renaissance and the emergence of secularism
  Intellectual History Review11 December 2023By Elisabeth BlumPaul Richard BlumTomáš NejeschlebaMartin ŽemlaPalacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic
• Cosmopsychology around 1900: Paul Scheerbart in the context of Plato, Cusanus, Kant, Fechner, and Lovelock
  Intellectual History Review11 December 2023By Detlef ThielWiesbaden, GermanyDetlef Thiel, free philosopher at Wiesbaden, Germany, has held lectureships in philosophy at Trier University, Hochschule Rhein Main Wiesbaden. He is the editor of the Collected Works of Salomo Friedlaender/Mynona (38 vols so far). Thiel has written books on Jacques Derrida (1990), Plato (1993), Maßnahmen des Erscheinens. Friedlaender/Mynona im Gespräch mit Schelling, Husserl, Benjamin und Derrida (2012). He edited Scheerbart: Du hast mich also totgeschossen? Unbekannte Texte und Materialien (2021).
• Panpsychism represented. The animate world of Bernard Palissy, 1510–1590
  Intellectual History Review11 December 2023By François QuivigerAssociate Fellow, the Warburg Institute, School of Advanced Study, University of London, UKFrancois Quiviger is a fellow of the Warburg Institute, University of London, where he previously worked as a librarian, curator of digital resources, researcher and teacher. The main theme of his research is the history of cognition and sensation insofar as it pertains to the making and reception of images and to the relationship of humans to nature. With these questions in mind, he has written on early modern art and art theories, academies, music, wine and banqueting. Recent books include Leonardo da Vinci: self, art and nature (2019) and The Sensory World of Italian Renaissance Art (2010).
• An introduction to God’s omnipresence through the “four ways” of Francis of Meyronnes OFM (fl. 1320)
  Intellectual History Review11 December 2023By Jeffrey C. WittLoyola University MarylandJeffrey C. Witt is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University Maryland. His research focuses on late medieval scholasticism and the Sentences commentary tradition. As the director of the Scholastic Commentaries and Texts Archive (S.C.T.A.; https://scta.info), his most recent work is focused on developing a digital corpus of the scholastic tradition. As part of that work, his critical edition of the Sentences commentary (Lectures 1–20) of Peter Gracilis appeared in 2023 (reviewed by the Medieval Academy of America).
• Schelling, Bruno, and the sacred abyss
  Intellectual History Review11 December 2023By Dale E. SnowLoyola University of MarylandDale E. Snow is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University Maryland, U.S.A. Her research is focused on German Idealism and the history and philosophy of science. Her most recent book is a translation of F.W.J. Schelling’s Statement on the True Relationship of the Philosophy of Nature to the Revised Fichtean Doctrine (SUNY, 2018).
• Panpsychism and the mind-body problem in contemporary analytic philosophy
  Intellectual History Review07 December 2023By Emmett L. HolmanDepartment of Philosophy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USAEmmett L. Holman is an associate professor emeritus at George Mason Univeristy, Virginia, U.S.A. He has written numerous articles on epistemology, the mind–body problem and the ontology of the secondary qualities.
• Anton Günther’s critique of pantheism as introduction to his philosophy of revelation
  Intellectual History Review30 November 2023By Balázs M. MezeiDepartment of Political Science, Corvinus University, BudapestBalázs M. Mezei is a philosopher and historian of ideas who received his Ph.D. under the guidance of Professor Josef Seifert and Dr Barry Smith. Before starting work at Corvinus University as a Research Professor, he led the Institute of Philosophy at Pázmány Péter Catholic University for more than fifteen years. He was a returning fellow at the University of Notre Dame and published with Francesca A. Murphy and Kenneth Oakes The Oxford Handbook of Divine Revelation in 2021. Currently, he is the main editor of The Encyclopedia of Hungarian Philosophy.
• Giordano Bruno, universal animation and living atoms
  Intellectual History Review28 November 2023By Hiro HiraiCenter for Science and Society, Columbia University, New York, USAHiro Hirai, Ph.D. in philosophy and history of science, University of Lille 3 (France), is a research associate at the Center for Science and Society, Columbia University. He has published widely on Renaissance and early modern natural philosophy, medicine and alchemy, including Le concept de semence (2005) and Medical Humanism and Natural Philosophy (2011). He also edited Jacques Gaffarel between Magic and Science (2014) and coedited Justus Lipsius and Natural Philosophy (2011) and Pseudo-Paracelsus (2022). He is preparing his third monograph on Renaissance natural philosophy, medicine and magic.
• A balsamic mummy. The medical-alchemical panpsychism of Paracelsus
  Intellectual History Review23 November 2023By Martin ŽemlaCentre for Renaissance Texts, Faculty of Arts, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech RepublicMartin Žemla is an intellectual historian. He received his Ph.D. from the Charles University in Prague. He is a research fellow at the Centre for Renaissance Texts at Palacký University in Olomouc and at the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at the Charles University in Prague. His research focuses on philosophy and religion in the 13th to 17th centuries, especially German mysticism, Renaissance Neoplatonism, and Paracelsianism.
• Dilthey’s and Misch’s “Nachverstehen” of the neo-stoic “natural system of the human sciences” in their unfinished projects on pantheism
  Intellectual History Review21 November 2023By Gábor BorosDepartment of Liberal Arts, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary, Budapest, HungaryGábor Boros is a professor of philosophy, head of the Department of Liberal Arts at the Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary. He specialized in early modern philosophy. His other research topics include ethics, philosophy of emotion, and problems of narrative identity. He translated into Hungarian several chef-d’œuvre of 17th-century philosophy. His recent publications include: Georg Misch és az önéletírás (Georg Misch and Autobiography), Budapest: Károli Könyvek – L’Harmattan, 2021; The Culture of Love in China and Europe (together with P. Santangelo), Leiden: Brill, 2020; Módszer, metafizika, emóciók (Method, Metaphysics, Emotions), Budapest: Akadémiai, 2020.
• Giovanni Pico’s warning against pantheistic implications in Ficino’s Neoplatonism
  Intellectual History Review20 November 2023By Paul Richard BlumDepartment of Philosophy, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, USA; Department of Philosophy, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech RepublicPaul Richard Blum is emeritus Professor at Loyola University Maryland, U.S.A., and researcher at Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic. His research covers history of philosophy, especially in the Renaissance, early modern scholasticism, philosophy of mind, and anthropology. His most recent book is Oracles of the Cosmos: Between Pantheism and Secularism (Basel 2022).
• Renaissance magic as a step towards secularism: Agrippa, Bruno, Campanella
  Intellectual History Review16 November 2023By Elisabeth BlumDepartment of Philosophy, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech RepublicElisabeth Blum is a member of the research project “Pantheism and Panpsychism in the Renaissance and the Emergence of Secularism” at Palacký University Olomouc, where she previously was visiting professor. Among her publications are a German translation with commentary of Giordano Bruno, Spaccio de la bestia trionfante, and the book Perspectives on Giordano Bruno (2018).
• Knowledge lost: a new view of early modern intellectual history
  Intellectual History Review16 November 2023By John MarshallThe Johns Hopkins University
• “Le bon homme Comenius”: the personal and intellectual links between Comenius and Leibniz
  Intellectual History Review14 November 2023By Petr PavlasDepartment of Comenius Studies and Early Modern Intellectual History, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, Praha, Czech RepublicPetr Pavlas is a researcher at the Institute of Philosophy, Czech Academy of Sciences, and a lecturer at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of West Bohemia. He has published two monographs and several studies on Comenius, the metaphorics of the book, and the idea of a perfect language. He is presently researching early modern encyclopaedism and pansophism.
• The failures of political prophecy: Ernst Kantorowicz’s wartime lectures
  Intellectual History Review19 October 2023By Bennett NagtegaalDepartment of History, Princeton University, Princeton, USABennett is a second-year Ph.D. student at Princeton University working in the field of European intellectual history. Bennett completed his B.A. at the University of York, and his M.Phil. in Political Thought and Intellectual History at the University of Cambridge.
• Anti-liberalism, Civil War and dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and his intellectual influence on the Francoist ideologists (1939–1942)
  Intellectual History Review19 October 2023By Carlos Pérez-CrespoFaculty of Social Sciences, Universitat Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanyCarlos Pérez-Crespo did his Ph.D. in Political Science at the University of Hamburg, supported by a D.A.A.D. scholarship. He was a visiting doctoral candidate at the Faculty of History of the University of Cambridge (November 2022–March 2023). He works on topics related to political and constitutional theories from the period of the eighteenth to the twentieth century in continental Europe (focusing on Germany, France, and Spain) and their reception in South America.
• Dugald Stewart’s empire of the mind: moral education in the late Scottish Enlightenment
  Intellectual History Review17 October 2023By Giovanni B. GrandiUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
• Human empire: mobility and demographic thought in the British Atlantic world, 1500-1800
  Intellectual History Review12 October 2023By Thomas LengUniversity of Sheffield
• A Commerce of knowledge and The Republic of Arabic Letters
  Intellectual History Review28 September 2023By Ann ThomsonEuropean University Institute
• Louise Dupin’s work on women: selections
  Intellectual History Review21 September 2023By Julie Candler HayesUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst
• Between Weber and Mussolini. The issue of political leadership in the thought of the late Michels
  Intellectual History Review19 September 2023By Francesca AntoniniCa' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, ItalyFrancesca Antonini is Assistant Professor in History of Political Thought at Ca' Foscari University of Venice (Italy). Previously, she held research positions at the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Germany), École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (France), Fondazione Luigi Einaudi (Turin, Italy). Her research interests are in Intellectual History, the History of Political Thought, and Italian and European Modern History.
• Useful enemies: Islam and the Ottoman Empire in Western political thought 1450–1750
  Intellectual History Review14 September 2023By Paul Babinski
• Foxes into hedgehogs: Celenza and Hankins on Renaissance humanism
  Intellectual History Review11 September 2023By Charles F. Briggs
• The rise of modern Chinese thought
  Intellectual History Review11 September 2023By B.V.E. Hyde
• The religious innatism debate in early modern Britain: intellectual change beyond Locke
  Intellectual History Review11 September 2023By James A. Harris
• Uncivil Mirth: Ridicule in Enlightenment Britain
  Intellectual History Review11 September 2023By Rebecca Anne BarrUniversity of Cambridge
• L’Antiquité politique de Jean-Jacques Rousseau: entre exemples et modèles
  Intellectual History Review31 August 2023By Rebecca Wilkin
• Against the backdrop of sovereignty and absolutism. The theology of God’s power and its bearing on the western legal tradition, 1100–1600
  Intellectual History Review31 August 2023By Jean-Paul De Lucca
• The Dark Bible: cultures of interpretation in early modern England
  Intellectual History Review31 August 2023By Colin Donnelly
• A philosophy of beauty: Shaftesbury on nature, virtue, and art
  Intellectual History Review01 August 2023By Endre Szécsényi
• ad Jacob Taubes, Historischer und politischer Theologe, moderner Gnostiker
  Intellectual History Review26 July 2023By Samuel Garrett Zeitlin
• The self-purchase of “freedom”, a reparative history of the abolition of Caribbean slavery, 1832–1833
  Intellectual History Review26 July 2023By Leroy Levy
• Posterity: inventing tradition from Petrarch to Gramsci
  Intellectual History Review07 June 2023By Timothy Kircher
• Universal Histories
  Intellectual History Review31 May 2023By Nicholas Halmi
• Conceived in chains: slavery and American philosophy
  Intellectual History Review30 May 2023By Ryan McIlhenny
• Adam Smith reconsidered: history, liberty, and the foundations of modern politics
  Intellectual History Review18 May 2023By Eveline Campos Hauck
• Modern Virtue: Mary Wollstonecraft and a tradition of dissent
  Intellectual History Review10 May 2023By Sarah Hutton
• What is Enlightenment?
  Intellectual History Review24 April 2023By David Harris Sacks
• Enslaved by African angels: Swedenborg on African superiority, evangelization, and slavery
  Intellectual History Review17 April 2023By Vincent Roy-Di Piazza
• Adam Smith reconsidered. History, liberty, and the foundations of modern politics
  Intellectual History Review06 April 2023By Thiago Vargas
• The Histoire universelle of Agrippa d’Aubigné (1616–1626), or when the historian becomes a cosmograph
  Intellectual History Review16 March 2023By Olivier Pot
• Seeing and telling the invisible: problems of a new epistemic category in the second half of the eighteenth century
  Intellectual History Review13 March 2023By Nathalie Vuillemin
• The universal history to bring all universal histories to an end: the curious case of Volney
  Intellectual History Review09 March 2023By Audrey Borowski
• The English Universal History’s treatment of the Arab world
  Intellectual History Review09 March 2023By Ann Thomson
• Problematic metaphors for the temporality of languages
  Intellectual History Review06 March 2023By Maurice Olender
• Between art and history: on the formation of Winckelmann’s concept of historiography
  Intellectual History Review06 March 2023By Elisabeth Décultot
• In praise of grand historical narratives
  Intellectual History Review02 March 2023By Sylvana Tomaselli
• Secular and religious views of the future: Johann Gottfried Herder and the universal histories of the Enlightenment
  Intellectual History Review02 March 2023By Daniel Fulda
• Advocating ancient equalities. Pluralising “antiquity” in enlightened universal history
  Intellectual History Review27 February 2023By Maike Oergel
• Hobbesian resistance and the law of nature
  Intellectual History Review09 February 2023By Samuel Mansell
• Self-observational life in eighteenth-century Germany
  Intellectual History Review23 January 2023By Andreas Rydberg
• “Lockeian liberalism” and “classical republicanism”: the formation, function and failure of the categories
  Intellectual History Review19 January 2023By J. C. D. Clark
• Patriots and the Country party tradition in the eighteenth century: the critics of Britain’s fiscal-military state from Robert Harley to Catharine Macaulay
  Intellectual History Review19 January 2023By Max Skjönsberg
• Of the origin of government: the afterlives of Locke and Filmer in an eighteenth-century British debate
  Intellectual History Review19 January 2023By James A. Harris
• Editorial: Atlantic revolutions
  Intellectual History Review19 January 2023By J. C. D. Clark
• Liberalism and republicanism, or wealth and virtue revisited
  Intellectual History Review19 January 2023By Lasse S. Andersen
• Republicanism versus liberalism: towards a pre-history
  Intellectual History Review19 January 2023By David Craig
• “Republicanism”: a grounding concept for the American Revolution?
  Intellectual History Review19 January 2023By Peter de Bolla
• The Descriptio Silentii of Celio Calcagnini: deconstructing the ineffable?
  Intellectual History Review11 January 2023By Robin Raybould
• The private is political: Anna Becker on the Renaissance household
  Intellectual History Review21 December 2022By Sara Miglietti
• The structure of Hume’s historical thought before the History of England
  Intellectual History Review20 December 2022By Pedro Faria
• Humanists and scholastics in early sixteenth-century Paris: new sources from the Faculty of Theology
  Intellectual History Review20 December 2022By Christa Lundberg
• Elisabeth of Bohemia (1618–1680): A Philosopher in her Historical Context
  Intellectual History Review12 December 2022By Rebecca Wilkin
• Violent Fraternity: Indian Political Thought in the Global Age
  Intellectual History Review12 December 2022By Milinda Banerjee
• La Vie de Monsieur Descartes
  Intellectual History Review12 December 2022By Stephen Gaukroger
• Republican nostalgia, the division of labour, and the origins of inequality in the thought of the Abbé Sieyès
  Intellectual History Review05 December 2022By Angus Brown
• Wolffianism and Pietism in eighteenth-century German philosophy
  Intellectual History Review12 November 2022By Simon Grote
• Reforming the Law of Nature: The Secularisation of Political Thought, 1532–1682
  Intellectual History Review11 October 2022By W. Bradford Littlejohn
• Athéisme et dissimulation au XVIIe siècle. Guy Patin et le Theophrastus redivivus
  Intellectual History Review06 October 2022By Gregorio Baldin
• Modern Historiography in the Making: The German Sense of the Past, 1700-1900
  Intellectual History Review06 October 2022By Reinbert Krol
• Pan-asianism and renaissance in interwar Japan from a global perspective
  Intellectual History Review04 October 2022By Francesco Campagnola
• Immortal animals, subtle bodies, or separated souls: the afterlife in Leibniz, Wolff, and their followers
  Intellectual History Review22 September 2022By Matteo Favaretti Camposampiero
• Flavius Josephus and early modern biblical chronology
  Intellectual History Review16 September 2022By Felix Schlichter
• The two Tarquins from Livy to Lorenzo Valla: history, rhetoric and embodiment
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Daniele Miano
• From questionnaire to interview in survey research: Paul F. Lazarsfeld and the Wirtschaftspsychologische Forschungsstelle in interwar Vienna
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Eric Hounshell
• Color terminology, sensory stimuli, and the semantics of the questionnaire
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Judith R. H. Kaplan
• Magnus Hirschfeld’s 1899 psychobiological questionnaire: the paradoxes of de-narrativizing sexual and gender nonconformity
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Geertje Mak
• Ancient and modern knowledges
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Heather Ellis
• Between ancient wisdom and modern knowledge: new science and modern architecture in the case of Claude Perrault
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Katerina Lolou
• Queries in early-modern English science
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Richard Yeo
• Distilling water, distilling data: questionnaires in Dutch East India Company record-keeping
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Margaret Schotte
• Towards a history of the questionnaire
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Daniel Midena
• Herodotus, Hegel, and knowledge
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Will Desmond
• Jean-Baptiste Du Bos and the Réflexions critiques sur la poésie et sur la peinture within the context of contemporary philology and antiquarianism
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Floris Verhaart
• Bossuet and Hegel as readers of Polybius: reflections on the historiography of modernity and the end of Fortuna
  Intellectual History Review24 August 2022By Daniele Miano
• Religion, Enlightenment and Empire: British Interpretations of Hinduism in the Eighteenth Century
  Intellectual History Review04 July 2022By R. J. W. Mills
• The history of political thought: a very short introduction
  Intellectual History Review04 July 2022By R. J. W. Mills
• New lefts: the making of a radical tradition
  Intellectual History Review30 June 2022By Emile Chabal
• Spinoza’s Religion
  Intellectual History Review30 June 2022By Andrea Sangiacomo
• Hegel’s century: alienation and recognition in a time of revolution
  Intellectual History Review30 June 2022By John H. Zammito
• Inspiring imagination – embarrassing analogies: coping with the causes of cytoplasmic streaming
  Intellectual History Review23 May 2022By Ariane Dröscher
• Neglected sources on Cartesianism: the academic dictata of Johannes de Raey
  Intellectual History Review12 May 2022By Andrea Strazzoni
• Walter Charleton, wellbeing, and the Cartesian passions
  Intellectual History Review03 May 2022By Maks Sipowicz
• Two hostile bishops? A reexamination of the relationship between Peter Browne and George Berkeley beyond their alleged controversy
  Intellectual History Review26 April 2022By Manuel Fasko
• Orthodox Judaism in the twentieth century: an alternative modernity
  Intellectual History Review14 April 2022By Itamar Ben Ami
• Classical authors and “scientific” research in the early years of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, 1781–1800
  Intellectual History Review01 April 2022By Heather Ellis
• Sir Kenelm Digby (1603–1665): un penseur à l’âge du baroque
  Intellectual History Review24 March 2022By Niall Dilucia
• Edmund Burke and the invention of modern conservatism, 1830–1914: An intellectual history
  Intellectual History Review24 March 2022By D. N. Byrne
• The moral person of the state: Pufendorf, sovereignty and composite polities
  Intellectual History Review24 March 2022By Tayla Powell
• The persistence of party: ideas of harmonious discord in eighteenth-century Britain
  Intellectual History Review24 March 2022By Andrew C. Thompson
• Remaking the republic: black politics and the creation of American citizenship
  Intellectual History Review24 March 2022By Amy Cools
• History and Morality and Why History? A History
  Intellectual History Review10 February 2022By Samuel Moyn
• Christoph Besold on confederation rights and duties of esteem in diplomatic relations
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2022By Andreas Blank
• Personality, authority, and self-esteem in Hobbes’s Leviathan
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2022By Lars Vinx
• Representation, reflection, and self-esteem in the amour pur debate
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2022By Dániel Schmal
• Between admiration, deception, and reckoning: Niccolò Machiavelli’s economies of esteem
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2022By Sergius Kodera
• Esteem and self-esteem in early modern ethics and politics. An overview
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2022By Andreas Blank
• Moral theology and the historian’s conscience: is there a license to besmirch?
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2022By Daniel Schwartz
• Free will ruled by reason: Pufendorf on moral value and moral estimation
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2022By Katerina Mihaylova
• Mandeville on self-liking, morality, and hypocrisy
  Intellectual History Review08 February 2022By Sandy Berkovski
• ‘Aux Ouvrières!’: socialist feminism in the Paris Commune
  Intellectual History Review31 January 2022By James Muldoon
• Eternal dilemmas and divergent beliefs: Charles Renouvier’s agonistic history of philosophy
  Intellectual History Review24 January 2022By Pietro Terzi
• A “critical inquisition into the constitution of the intellectual faculties”: Kantian transcendental analysis and transcendental reflection in S.T. Coleridge’s Logic
  Intellectual History Review20 January 2022By Dillon Struwig
• Superbia, existimatio, and despectus: an aspect of Spinoza’s theory of esteem
  Intellectual History Review22 November 2021By Francesco Toto
• Methodological ideas in past experimental inquiry: rigor checks around 1800
  Intellectual History Review21 October 2021By Jutta Schickore
• “This is the way I pray”: precatory language in the writings of Niccolò Machiavelli
  Intellectual History Review21 October 2021By Cary J. Nederman
• William Perkins, the imagination in Calvinist theology and “inner iconoclasm” after Frances Yates
  Intellectual History Review21 October 2021By Barret Reiter
• Duelling catechisms: Berkeley trolls Walton on fluxions and faith
  Intellectual History Review09 September 2021By Clare Marie Moriarty
• “One injustice can never become a legitimate reason to commit another”: Condorcet, women’s political rights, and social reform during the French Revolution (1789–1795)
  Intellectual History Review25 August 2021By Guillaume Ansart
• Purposiveness in nature: Hegel and Spinoza on anthropomorphism and backward causation
  Intellectual History Review19 August 2021By Karen Koch
• The role of Bildung in Hegel’s philosophy of history
  Intellectual History Review19 August 2021By Simon Lumsden
• Remembering nature through art: Hölderlin and the poetic representation of life
  Intellectual History Review19 August 2021By Camilla Flodin
• Kant and Schelling on Blumenbach’s formative drive
  Intellectual History Review19 August 2021By Naomi Fisher
• Hegel’s anti-reductionist account of organic nature
  Intellectual History Review19 August 2021By Anton Kabeshkin
• Life and the two-fold structure of domination: subjugation and recognition in Hegel’s master-servant dialectics
  Intellectual History Review19 August 2021By Italo Testa
• The concept of life in German Idealism and its Aristotelian roots
  Intellectual History Review19 August 2021By Gerad Gentry
• Hobbes on treason and fundamental law
  Intellectual History Review21 July 2021By Laurens van Apeldoorn
• Adam Smith and the idea of free government
  Intellectual History Review20 July 2021By Yiftah Elazar
• The Christian Platonism of Thomas Jackson
  Intellectual History Review20 July 2021By Simon J. G. Burton
• A female perspective on Christianity and modernity: Maude Petre (1863–1942) and the history of Catholic Modernism
  Intellectual History Review19 July 2021By Giulia Marotta
• Giovanni Maria Lampredi and the neutrality of small states in eighteenth-century Europe
  Intellectual History Review19 July 2021By Giulio Talini
• Intelligent love: the story of Clara Park, her autistic daughter, and the myth of the refrigerator mother
  Intellectual History Review19 July 2021By Felix E. Rietmann
• A syntax of phenomena: William Stanley Jevons’s logic and philosophy of science as an ars combinatoria
  Intellectual History Review14 June 2021By Eleonora Buono
• Robert Desgabets’ eucharistic thought and the theological revision of Cartesianism
  Intellectual History Review18 May 2021By Niall Dilucia
• The “hereticide”. Freedom of conscience and popular indignation in a debate around Pierre Jurieu
  Intellectual History Review13 May 2021By Fiormichele Benigni
• Wollstonecraft: philosophy, passion, and politics
  Intellectual History Review13 May 2021By Max Skjönsberg
• (Black) neo-colonialism and rootless African elites: tracing conceptions of global inequality in the writings of George Ayittey and Kwesi Kwaa Prah, 1980s–1990s
  Intellectual History Review13 May 2021By Mélanie Lindbjerg Guichon
• Receptions of Hellenism in early modern Europe, 15th–17th centuries
  Intellectual History Review29 March 2021By Felicity Loughlin
• Commerce and Manners in Edmund Burke’s political economy
  Intellectual History Review23 March 2021By Sora Sato
• Wind eggs and false conceptions: thinking with formless births in seventeenth-century European natural philosophy
  Intellectual History Review22 March 2021By Paige Donaghy
• Hobbes and prosopopoeia
  Intellectual History Review01 March 2021By Jerónimo Rilla
• “We shall be the Mother of Jesus.” Visions of power among radical religious women in northern Europe, 1690–1760
  Intellectual History Review04 February 2021By Juliane Engelhardt
• Radicalism, religion and Mary Wollstonecraft
  Intellectual History Review04 February 2021By Sarah Hutton
• Were there any radical women in the German Enlightenment? On feminist history of philosophy and Dorothea Erxleben’s Rigorous Investigation (1742)
  Intellectual History Review04 February 2021By Anne-Sophie Sørup Nielsen
• Émile Du Châtelet and her Examens de la Bible: a radical clandestine woman philosopher
  Intellectual History Review04 February 2021By Maria Susana Seguin
• “There remains nothing to lose for the one who has lost liberty”: liberty and free will in Arcangela Tarabotti’s (1604–1652) radical criticism of the patriarchy
  Intellectual History Review04 February 2021By Sabrina Ebbersmeyer
• Mary Astell’s radical criticism of gender inequality
  Intellectual History Review04 February 2021By Martin Fog Lantz Arndal
• Where are the female radicals?
  Intellectual History Review04 February 2021By Sabrina Ebbersmeyer
• Catharine Macaulay and the concept of “radical enlightenment”
  Intellectual History Review04 February 2021By Karen Green
• Catharine Trotter Cockburn on the virtue of atheists
  Intellectual History Review04 February 2021By Jacqueline Broad
• Pathways to agency: women writers and radical thought in the Low Countries, 1500–1800
  Intellectual History Review04 February 2021By Marrigje Paijmans
• Sexual desire, gender equality and radical free-thinking: Theophrastus redivivus (1659) as a proto-feminist text
  Intellectual History Review04 February 2021By Gianni Paganini
• Liberty and religion: Catharine Macaulay and the history of republicanism and the Enlightenment
  Intellectual History Review29 January 2021By Max Skjönsberg
• From Aristotelianism to Galilean science: Paolo Sarpi’s natural philosophy
  Intellectual History Review14 January 2021By Gregorio Baldin
• Free trade for protectionists: a customs officer’s struggle to establish Adam Smith’s economic thought in Sweden.
  Intellectual History Review15 December 2020By Anna Knutsson
• Between Cartesianism and orthodoxy: God and the problem of indifference in Christoph Wittich’s Anti-Spinoza
  Intellectual History Review10 December 2020By Yoshi Kato
• A glorious liberty: Frederick Douglass and the fight for an antislavery constitution
  Intellectual History Review19 November 2020By R. J. W. Mills
• Clandestine philosophy: new studies on subversive manuscripts in early modern Europe, 1620−1823
  Intellectual History Review12 November 2020By Michelle Pfeffer
• Terrorists, anarchists, and republicans: The Genevans and the Irish in time of revolution
  Intellectual History Review01 October 2020By Max Skjönsberg
• Between panacea and poison: “democracy” in British socialist thought, 1881–1891
  Intellectual History Review07 September 2020By Hugo Bonin
• Hobbesian causation and personal identity in the history of criminology
  Intellectual History Review18 August 2020By Luke William Hunt
• From natural law to political economy: J. H. G. von Justi on state, commerce and international order
  Intellectual History Review10 August 2020By Simon Grote
• Revisiting Enlightenment racial classification: time and the question of human diversity
  Intellectual History Review06 August 2020By Devin Vartija
• The art of trascegliere e notare in early modern Italian culture
  Intellectual History Review06 August 2020By Alberto Cevolini
• Jean-Jacques Rousseau: the division of labour, the politics of the imagination and the concept of federal government
  Intellectual History Review04 August 2020By Max Skjönsberg
• The Enlightenment that failed: ideas, revolution, and democratic defeat, 1748–1830
  Intellectual History Review30 July 2020By Stewart J. Brown
• The role of conscience in Smith’s revised sentimentalism
  Intellectual History Review14 July 2020By Massimo Reichlin
• Calvin’s political theology in context
  Intellectual History Review13 July 2020By Marta García-Alonso
• “Physiological Kantianism” and the “organization of the mind”: a reconsideration
  Intellectual History Review10 July 2020By Paolo Pecere
• From moral theology to moral philosophy: Cicero and visions of humanity from Locke to Hume
  Intellectual History Review02 July 2020By Max Skjönsberg
• Machiavelli, Aristotle and the Scholastics. The origins of human society and the status of prudence
  Intellectual History Review22 June 2020By Alessandro Mulieri
• Perspective as practice: renaissance cultures of optics
  Intellectual History Review15 June 2020By Eileen Reeves
• The decline of magic: Britain in the Enlightenment
  Intellectual History Review04 June 2020By R. J. W. Mills
• Edward Gibbon Wakefield and the political economy of emancipation
  Intellectual History Review01 June 2020By Matilde Cazzola
• British Enlightenment theatre: dramatizing difference
  Intellectual History Review01 June 2020By R. J. W. Mills
• Edinburgh’s Enlightenment abroad: navigating humanity as a physician, merchant, natural historian and settler-colonist
  Intellectual History Review27 May 2020By Bruce Buchan
• Milton’s scriptural theology: confronting De Doctrina Christiana
  Intellectual History Review18 May 2020By Simon J. G. Burton
• A science of concord: the politics of commercial knowledge in mid-eighteenth-century Britain
  Intellectual History Review13 May 2020By Jon Cooper
• Paganism, natural reason, and immortality: Charles Blount and John Toland’s histories of the soul
  Intellectual History Review29 April 2020By Michelle Pfeffer
• Faces of Moderation: The art of Balance in an age of Extremes
  Intellectual History Review23 April 2020By Nicholas Mithen
• Against a fatal confusion: Spinoza, climate crisis and the weave of the world
  Intellectual History Review21 April 2020By Susan Ruddick
• The greatest deception: fiction, falsity and manifestation in Spinoza’s Metaphysical Thoughts
  Intellectual History Review21 April 2020By Joe Hughes
• Editors’ preface to special issue of Intellectual History Review on Spinoza and Art
  Intellectual History Review21 April 2020By Moira Gatens
• Spinoza’s counter-aesthetics
  Intellectual History Review21 April 2020By Warren Montag
• Intersections between philosophy and art: expressions of immanence in the seventeenth century — Spinoza and Vermeer
  Intellectual History Review21 April 2020By Sara Hornäk
• Spinoza on art and the cultivation of a disposition toward joyful living
  Intellectual History Review21 April 2020By Anthony Uhlmann
• We don’t know that we don’t know what a body can do … , or Spinoza and some social lives of sonic material
  Intellectual History Review21 April 2020By Amy Cimini
• Spinoza and architectural thinking
  Intellectual History Review21 April 2020By Beth Lord
• Spinoza, radical enlightenment, and the general reform of the arts in the later Dutch Golden Age: the aims of Nil Volentibus Arduum
  Intellectual History Review21 April 2020By Jonathan Israel
• Moral conscience’s fall from grace: an investigation into conceptual history
  Intellectual History Review14 April 2020By Hasse J. Hämäläinen
• Savages, Romans, and despots: thinking about others from Montaigne to Herder
  Intellectual History Review14 April 2020By Linda Andersson Burnett
• Idola fori and language: Francis Bacon as a source for Giambattista Vico
  Intellectual History Review14 April 2020By Marta Fattori
• The term “political oeconomy” in Adam Smith
  Intellectual History Review02 April 2020By Luigi Alonzi
• Divine law divided: Francisco de Vitoria on civil and ecclesiastical powers
  Intellectual History Review31 March 2020By Nathaniel Mull
• “The moral arithmetic”: morality in the age of mathematics
  Intellectual History Review31 March 2020By Mordechai Levy-Eichel
• Thomas Harriot: a life in science
  Intellectual History Review31 March 2020By David Harris Sacks
• After council communism: the post-war rediscovery of the council tradition
  Intellectual History Review31 March 2020By James Muldoon
• Self-love, egoism and the selfish hypothesis: key debates from eighteenth-century British moral philosophy
  Intellectual History Review09 March 2020By James A. Harris
• Willem Jacob ‘s Gravesande’s philosophical trajectory: “between” Leibniz and Newton
  Intellectual History Review26 February 2020By Jip van Besouw
• Ancient constitutions and modern monarchy: historical writing and enlightened reform in Denmark-Norway 1730–1814
  Intellectual History Review08 January 2020By John Christian Laursen
• Joseph Priestley: materialism and the science of the mind. Foundations, controversies, reception
  Intellectual History Review02 January 2020By Charles T. Wolfe
• Unitarian materialism. Christoph Stegmann, Joseph Priestley, and their concepts of matter and soul
  Intellectual History Review02 January 2020By Sascha Salatowsky
• Priestley in Germany
  Intellectual History Review02 January 2020By Paola Rumore
• Priestley and Kant on materialism
  Intellectual History Review02 January 2020By Udo Thiel
• Scottish Common Sense, association of ideas and free will
  Intellectual History Review02 January 2020By Sebastiano Gino
• Joseph Priestley as an heir of Newton
  Intellectual History Review02 January 2020By Pascal Taranto
• Joseph Priestley and the Argument from Design
  Intellectual History Review02 January 2020By Alan Tapper
• Priestley on materialism and the essence of God
  Intellectual History Review02 January 2020By Falk Wunderlich
• From the logic of ideas to active-matter materialism: Priestley’s Lockean problem and early neurophilosophy
  Intellectual History Review02 January 2020By Charles T. Wolfe
• Slavery and the making of early American libraries: British literature, political thought, and the transatlantic book trade, 1731–1814
  Intellectual History Review17 December 2019By Max Skjönsberg
• A theologian teaching Descartes at the Academy of Nijmegen (1655–1679): class notes on Christoph Wittich’s course on the Meditations on First Philosophy
  Intellectual History Review17 December 2019By Davide Cellamare
• La Philosophie de la biologie avant la biologie. Une histoire du vitalisme (Histoire et philosophie des sciences, 20)
  Intellectual History Review06 December 2019By Daniel Neumann
• Francesco Patrizi’s concept of “nature”: presence and refutation of Stoicism
  Intellectual History Review05 November 2019By Thomas Leinkauf
• Do we have any genuine works by Aristotle? Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’s discussion of the corpus Aristotelicum
  Intellectual History Review05 November 2019By Luc Deitz
• Francesco Patrizi da Cherso (1529–1597): new perspectives on a Renaissance philosopher
  Intellectual History Review05 November 2019By Ovanes Akopyan
• The philosophical systems of Francesco Patrizi and Henry More
  Intellectual History Review05 November 2019By Jacques Joseph
• Is Francesco Patrizi’s L’Amorosa Filosofia a heterodox reading of the Symposium?
  Intellectual History Review05 November 2019By Sandra Plastina
• History and theory: the paradox in Francesco Patrizi
  Intellectual History Review05 November 2019By Paul Richard Blum
• Francesco Patrizi da Cherso and the anti-Aristotelian tradition: interpreting the Discussiones Peripateticae (1581)
  Intellectual History Review05 November 2019By Stefano Gulizia
• In search of a spiritus: Francesco Patrizi on tides
  Intellectual History Review05 November 2019By Ovanes Akopyan
• Phaedrus’ Cicadas: Patrizi’s Dialoghi and vernacular rhetoric
  Intellectual History Review05 November 2019By Anna Laura Puliafito
• Phaedrus’ Cicadas: Patrizi’s Dialoghi and vernacular rhetoric
  Intellectual History Review05 November 2019By Anna Laura Puliafito
• Diderot and the art of thinking freely
  Intellectual History Review16 October 2019By R. J. W. Mills
• In pursuit of civility: manners and civilization in early modern England
  Intellectual History Review16 October 2019By Martha McGill
• The ecocentrists: a history of radical environmentalism
  Intellectual History Review26 September 2019By Emily Brownell
• The place of historiography in the network of logical empiricism
  Intellectual History Review23 September 2019By Fons Dewulf
• The post-progressive liberalism of Carl Becker
  Intellectual History Review19 September 2019By Alexander Jacobs
• Magnets and garlic: an enduring antipathy in early-modern science
  Intellectual History Review18 September 2019By Christoph Sander
• A philosophy to fit “the character of this historical period”? Responses to Jean-Paul Sartre in some British and U.S. philosophy departments, c. 1945–1970
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2019By Rosie Germain
• A note on a curious lie by Leibniz
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2019By Giuliano Gasparri
• Teresa, Descartes, and de Sales: the art of Augustinian meditation
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2019By Wilson Underkuffler
• A critique of everyday reason: Johann Michael Sailer and the Catholic Enlightenment in Germany
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2019By Richard Schaefer
• Italian Fascism and the Portuguese Estado Novo: international claims and national resistance
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2019By Annarita Gori
• Natural theology and ancient theology in the Jesuit China mission
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2019By Giuliano Mori
• The “tribal spirit” in modern Britain: evolution, nationality, and race in the anthropology of Sir Arthur Keith
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2019By James J. Harris
• Libertas philosophandi and natural law in early eighteenth-century Denmark-Norway
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2019By Mads Langballe Jensen
• Edward Kelley’s Danish treasure hoax and Elizabethan antiquarianism
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2019By Francis Young
• Protestantism and liberty: Catharine Macaulay’s politics of religion as a response to David Hume
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2019By Lucy Littlefield
• Defining and redefining atheism: dictionary and encyclopedia entries for “atheism” and their critics in the anglophone world from the early modern period to the present
  Intellectual History Review04 September 2019By Nathan G. Alexander
• By analogy to the element of the stars: the divine in Jean Fernel’s and William Harvey’s theories of generation
  Intellectual History Review30 July 2019By Xiaona Wang
• The Autobiography of Solomon Maimon: The Complete Translation
  Intellectual History Review18 June 2019By David Sorkin
• The X Club: Power and Authority in Victorian Science, by Ruth Barton
  Intellectual History Review09 May 2019By Bill Jenkins
• The X Club: Power and Authority in Victorian Science
  Intellectual History Review09 May 2019By Bill Jenkins
• Moses Mendelssohn’s Hebrew writings, translated by Edward Breuer
  Intellectual History Review02 May 2019By Shmuel Feiner
• Moses Mendelssohn’s Hebrew writings
  Intellectual History Review02 May 2019By Shmuel Feiner
• Utilitarianism in the Age of Enlightenment: The Moral and Political Thought of William Paley, by Niall O’Flaherty
  Intellectual History Review29 March 2019By R. J. W. Mills
• Engaging with Rousseau: reaction and interpretation from the eighteenth century to the present, edited by Avi Lifschitz
  Intellectual History Review30 January 2019By Ryan Hanley
• Adam Ferguson and the Idea of Civil Society: Moral Science in the Scottish Enlightenment, by Craig Smith
  Intellectual History Review28 January 2019By Max Skjönsberg
• China in Giambattista Vico and Jesuit accommodationism
  Intellectual History Review22 January 2019By Daniel Canaris
• Marsilio Ficino’s portrait of Hermes Trismegistus and its afterlife
  Intellectual History Review22 January 2019By Maurizio Campanelli
• Hobbes’s great divorce: civil religion in comparative and historical perspective
  Intellectual History Review22 January 2019By Jeremy Kleidosty
• Seeds of divinity: from metaphysics to enlightenment in Ficino and Kant
  Intellectual History Review22 January 2019By Jennifer Mensch
• From Sinai to Athens: Giovanni Pico della Mirandola’s philological quest for the transmission of theological truth
  Intellectual History Review22 January 2019By Giacomo Corazzol
• Of asses and nymphs: Machiavelli, Platonic theology and Epicureanism in Florence
  Intellectual History Review22 January 2019By Miguel Vatter
• Sex and toleration: new perspectives of research on religious radical dissent in early modern Italy
  Intellectual History Review22 January 2019By Umberto Grassi
• From the “Renaissance” to the “Enlightenment”
  Intellectual History Review22 January 2019By Francesco Borghesi
• Moses as Legislator in fifteenth-century Italian Jewish and Christian authors
  Intellectual History Review22 January 2019By Fabrizio Lelli
• Evil lords, benign historians: strongman politics in medieval India and Renaissance Florence
  Intellectual History Review22 January 2019By Vasileios Syros
• Commerce and Peace in the Enlightenment, edited by Béla Kapossy, Isaac Nakhimovsky, and Richard Whatmore
  Intellectual History Review11 January 2019By Max Skjönsberg
• What was meant by vulgarizing in the Italian Renaissance?
  Intellectual History Review06 December 2018By Marco Sgarbi
• The Bullion Controversy and the history of political thought: experience, innovation and theory
  Intellectual History Review05 December 2018By Ryan Walter
• From industrial change to historical inevitability: Annie Besant’s socialism and the philosophies of history
  Intellectual History Review05 December 2018By Stéphane Guy
• The interweaving of sacred and secular: metaphysics, reform and enlightenment in the rivalry between Dom Deschamps and Claude Yvon, 1769–1774
  Intellectual History Review05 December 2018By Jeffrey D. Burson
• Samuel Taylor Coleridge on ideas actualized in history
  Intellectual History Review05 December 2018By Peter Cheyne
• At the origins of a tenacious narrative: Jacob Thomasius and the history of double truth
  Intellectual History Review05 December 2018By Zornitsa Radeva
• “I will speake of that subject no more”: the Whig legacy of Thomas Hobbes
  Intellectual History Review22 November 2018By Elad Carmel
• The Moral Economists: R. H. Tawney, Karl Polanyi, E. P. Thompson and the Critique of Capitalism, by Tim Rogan
  Intellectual History Review08 November 2018By Emile Chabal
• Giordano Bruno and Bonaventura Cavalieri’s theories of indivisibles: a case of shared knowledge
  Intellectual History Review23 October 2018By Paolo Rossini
• The body politic and “political medicine” in the Jacobean period: Edward Forset’s A Comparative Discourse of the Bodies Natural and Politique
  Intellectual History Review16 July 2018By Andrei-Constantin Sălăvăstru
• Locke, the Quakers and enthusiasm
  Intellectual History Review16 July 2018By Peter R. Anstey
• Remembering the reformation: an inquiry into the meanings of Protestantism, by Thomas Albert Howard
  Intellectual History Review28 June 2018By Zachary Purvis
• The emergence of globalism: visions of world order in Britain and the United States, 1939–1950, by Or Rosenboim
  Intellectual History Review26 June 2018By Francesca Morphakis
• Naturalism and unbelief in France, 1650–1729, by Alan Charles Kors
  Intellectual History Review21 June 2018By Tim Stuart-Buttle
• Nietzsche’s Jewish problem: between anti-Semitism and anti-Judaism, by Robert Holub
  Intellectual History Review04 April 2018By Alex Soros
• Knowledge and the Public Interest, 1575–1725, by Vera Keller
  Intellectual History Review04 April 2018By Audrey Borowski
• American enlightenments: pursuing happiness in the age of reason, by Caroline Winterer
  Intellectual History Review03 April 2018By Robin Mills
• Ludvig Holberg (1684–1754): learning and literature in the Nordic enlightenment, edited by Knud Haakonssen and Sebastian Olden-Jørgensen
  Intellectual History Review29 March 2018By John Christian Laursen
• Bayle, Jurieu, and the Dictionnaire historique et critique, by Mara van der Lugt
  Intellectual History Review29 March 2018By Karen Collis
• Translations, histories, enlightenments: William Robertson in Germany, 1760–1795, by László Kontler
  Intellectual History Review29 March 2018By Tim Hochstrasser
• Only natural: John Toland and the Jewish question
  Intellectual History Review24 January 2018By Ian Leask
• Rehabilitating political parties: an examination of the writings of Hans Kelsen
  Intellectual History Review24 January 2018By Sandrine Baume
• From the Devil to the impostor: theological contributions to the idea of imposture
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By Sascha Salatowsky
• Caught in the crossfire of early modern controversy: Strabo on Moses and his corrupt successors
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By Sundar Henny
• Ante-Nicene authority and the Trinity in seventeenth-century England
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By Diego Lucci
• Machiavelli, Neville and the seventeenth-century English Republican attack on priestcraft
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By Gaby Mahlberg
• John Locke, the early Lockeans, and priestcraft
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By Mark Goldie
• Priestcraft. Anatomizing the anti-clericalism of early modern Europe
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By James A. T. Lancaster
• Voltaire, priestcraft and imposture: Christianity, Judaism, and Islam
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By John Marshall
• From matters of faith to matters of fact: the problem of priestcraft in early modern England
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By James A. T. Lancaster
• The charge of religious imposture in late antique anti-Christian authors and their early modern readers
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By Winfried Schröder
• Hermann Samuel Reimarus, the Jewish priests of the Old Testament and the trope of imposture
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By Ulrich Groetsch
• Priestcraft. Early modern variations on the theme of sacerdotal imposture
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By James A. T. Lancaster
• Putting a positive spin on priestcraft. Accommodation and deception in late-Enlightenment German theology
  Intellectual History Review12 January 2018By Andrew McKenzie-McHarg
• Paul Cohen-Portheim: questions of nationalism, messianism and nostalgia in a prison camp in England, 1914–1918
  Intellectual History Review27 November 2017By Sebastian Musch
• A “Calvinist” theory of matter? Burgersdijk and Descartes on res extensa
  Intellectual History Review24 November 2017By Giovanni Gellera
• William Falconer’s Remarks on the Influence of Climate (1781) and the study of religion in Enlightenment England
  Intellectual History Review24 November 2017By R. J. W. Mills
• Labour, utopia and modern design theory: the positivist sociology of Frederic Harrison
  Intellectual History Review23 November 2017By Matthew Wilson
• The disillusionment of Robert Dell: the intellectual journey of a Catholic socialist
  Intellectual History Review22 November 2017By Daniel Renshaw
• The French Enlightenment attempts to create a philosophy without reason: the case of Diderot and the effect of Helvétius
  Intellectual History Review22 November 2017By Henry Martyn Lloyd
• L’Amour morbide: how a transient mental illness became defunct
  Intellectual History Review22 November 2017By Alison M. Moore
• The “historical question” at the end of the Scottish Enlightenment: Dugald Stewart on the natural origin of religion, universal consent, and religious diversity
  Intellectual History Review09 November 2017By R. J. W. Mills
• Duncan F. Gregory and Robert Leslie Ellis: second-generation reformers of British mathematics
  Intellectual History Review09 November 2017By Lukas M. Verburgt
• George Berkeley and Jonathan Edwards on idealism: considering an old question in light of new evidence
  Intellectual History Review08 November 2017By Scott Fennema
• Enchanting automata: Wilkins and the wonder of workmanship
  Intellectual History Review23 October 2017By Mark Thomas Young
• Paracelsus and Roman censorship – Johannes Faber’s 1616 report in context
  Intellectual History Review14 September 2017By Lyke de Vries
• Naked wax and necessary existence: modal voluntarism and Descartes’s motives
  Intellectual History Review05 September 2017By Jason Jordan
• When one heart can speak to another: the role of tenderness in Rousseau’s theory of passions
  Intellectual History Review31 August 2017By Marco Menin
• Constantin Frantz and the intellectual history of Bonapartism and Caesarism: a reassessment
  Intellectual History Review29 August 2017By Iain McDaniel
• George Woodcock and the Doukhobors: peasant radicalism, anarchism, and the Canadian state
  Intellectual History Review23 August 2017By Matthew S. Adams
• Before Boas: the genesis of ethnography and ethnology in the German Enlightenment, by Han F. Vermeulen
  Intellectual History Review11 August 2017By Stephen Gaukroger
• What is populism? by Jan-Werner Müller
  Intellectual History Review09 August 2017By Emile Chabal
• What is populism?, by Jan-Werner Müller
  Intellectual History Review09 August 2017By Emile Chabal
• British philosophy in the seventeenth century, by Sarah Hutton
  Intellectual History Review09 August 2017By James A. Harris
• Rethinking historiography and ethnography: Surrealism’s intellectual legacy
  Intellectual History Review26 June 2017By Natalya Lusty
• Cosmopolitan translation and patriotic sensibilities in German garden art
  Intellectual History Review26 June 2017By Jennifer Milam
• Painting for the blind: Nathaniel Hone’s portraits of Sir John Fielding
  Intellectual History Review26 June 2017By Georgina Cole
• Ben Quilty: the fog of war
  Intellectual History Review26 June 2017By Rex Butler
• Greenberg’s self-negation
  Intellectual History Review26 June 2017By Malcolm Bull
• J.S. Bach’s St. Matthew Passion and intellectual history
  Intellectual History Review26 June 2017By Alan Maddox
• Climbing Mont Ventoux: the contest/context of scholasticism and humanism in early fifteenth-century Paduan music theory and practice
  Intellectual History Review26 June 2017By Jason Stoessel
• Ancients and moderns in medieval music theory: from Guido of Arezzo to Jacobus
  Intellectual History Review26 June 2017By Constant J. Mews
• Visual and aural intellectual histories: an introduction
  Intellectual History Review26 June 2017By Jennifer Milam
• Spinoza’s genealogical critique of his contemporaries’ axiology
  Intellectual History Review04 May 2017By Benedict Rumbold
• The philosopher, the ordinary believer, and their piety: Spinoza’s philosophical religion
  Intellectual History Review04 May 2017By Rudmer Bijlsma
• The body speaks Italian: Giuseppe Liceti and the conflict of philosophy and medicine in the Renaissance
  Intellectual History Review03 May 2017By Cecilia Muratori
• “The minde is matter moved”: Nehemiah Grew on Margaret Cavendish
  Intellectual History Review02 May 2017By Justin Begley
• Edmund Burke and the conservative logic of empire
  Intellectual History Review27 March 2017By Sora Sato
• Machiavelli’s passions
  Intellectual History Review27 March 2017By Matteo Faini
• Extracts from a paper laboratory: the nature of Francis Bacon’s Sylva sylvarum
  Intellectual History Review27 March 2017By Doina-Cristina Rusu
• Between science and metaphysics: Fritz Lenz and racial anthropology in interwar Germany
  Intellectual History Review27 March 2017By Amit Varshizky
• Martin Delrio: demonology and scholarship in the Counter-Reformation
  Intellectual History Review08 March 2017By Asaph Ben-Tov
• Carl Schmitt: a biography
  Intellectual History Review03 March 2017By Robert Crowcroft
• John Adams and the fear of oligarchy; John Adams’s Republic: the one, the few, and the many
  Intellectual History Review01 March 2017By Frank Cogliano
• The Catholic Enlightenment: the forgotten history of a global movement
  Intellectual History Review01 March 2017By Diego Lucci
• The Burgundy Circle’s plans to undermine Louis XIV’s “absolute” state through polysynody and the high nobility
  Intellectual History Review05 August 2016By Andrew Mansfield
• The Burgundy Circle’s plans to undermine Louis XIV’s “absolute” state through polysynody and the high nobility
  Intellectual History Review05 August 2016By Andrew Mansfield

Do you want to see other content?