- From inference processes to situations of misunderstanding : A case study
- Crafting multimodal argumentative meshworks : Li Ziqi’s “Mushroom at the End of the World”
- Amplifying argument : The Flanders Field American Cemetery visitors center
- Cultivating contexts for deliberative argumentation
- Review of Cronier & Deruelle (2019): Argumenter en guerre. Discours de guerre, sur la guerre et dans la guerre de l’Antiquité à nos jours
- Paroemiological argumentation in Italian and French journalistic discourse
- Argument Continuities in theory and practice : Evidence from Canada
- Three forms of internal negotiation through the activity of private diary-writing
- Review of Schär (2021): An Argumentative Analysis of the Emergence of Issues in Adult–Children Discussions
- (De-)constructing New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern’s initiative to wear the hijab after the Christchurch terrorist attack : Critical perspectives on newspapers’ discourse and argumentation
- Characterising an MEP’s argumentative style : Mr. Schlyter’s contribution to the debate on labelling fruit juices
- Antifascist argumentation in Giacomo Matteotti’s 1924 speech to the Italian Parliament
- The argumentative style of the opening speech of a debate in the European Parliament
- Arguing through quotations : The case of European Commission press releases
- Negative campaigning : The argumentative potential of attacks in political election campaigns
- Viva la libertà! : On persuasive definitions of “Liberty” within contemporary Italian political discourse
- Prescribed argumentation, actual argumentation, reported argumentation : The management of argumentation in a public debate in France
- Journalists’ moves in political press conferences and their implications for accountability
- Demosthenes’ strategic maneuvering in the First Olynthiac : Balancing effectiveness and reasonableness of argumentation in the context of the Athenian Assembly of the People
- Bricks as arguments : Representing polysemy in Amsterdam School architectural design
- “Completely impartial opinion, okay?” : An argumentation-theoretical approach to sponsorships on YouTube
- The co-construction of campaign argumentation on U.S.A. late-night talk shows
- Review of Brambilla (2020): The quest for argumentative equivalence. Argumentative patterns in political interpreting contexts
- Review of Mohammed (2018):
- Review of van Eemeren, Garssen & Labrie (2021): Argumentation between doctors and patients: Understanding critical argumentative discourse
- Strategic maneuvering in extended polylogues
- How do scientists criticize the computer metaphor of the brain? : Using an argumentative pattern for reconstructing resistance to metaphor
- How do Chilean seniors think about arguing? : Their motivations, understandings, and emotional registration of interpersonal arguing
- Be reasonable! : How to be an optimist in the ‘Age of Unreason’
- A system of circumstantial evidence for fact-finding in criminal trial
- Review of van Eemeren (2018): Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
- Review of Omar (2019): Strategic Maneuvering for Political Change. A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of Egyptian Anti-Regime Columns
- Call for papers 10th ISSA conference on argumentation in 2022
- Six related essays on argumentative style
- Examining argumentative style : A new theoretical perspective
- The uncompromising confrontational argumentative style of the spokespersons’ replies at the regular press conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- Characteristics of a detached argumentative style in public policy analysis : Text types as presentational choices
- Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style
- On the relation between argumentative style and linguistic style : Integrating linguistic-stylistic analysis systematically into the analysis of argumentative style
- The presentational dimension of Geert Wilders’s populist argumentative style
- “Well, in the case of my mom…” : Personal stories as negotiable arguments in public forums
- “The people want it” : Analysis and evaluation of the populist argument in the context of deliberation
- Economic consequences for lawyers : Beyond the jurisprudential preface
- Deliberating over legislative ends : An inventory of goal-(de)legitimizing argument schemes
- Marcelo Danesi and Sara Greco (Eds.). (2016). Case studies in discourse analysis
- C. Ilie & G. Garzone, Eds. (2017) Argumentation across communities of practice. Multi-disciplinary perspectives
- Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication : Dialogical intentions and customization of recommendations for the assessment of medical deliberation
- Argumentation in Nigerian investigative public hearings : A pragma-dialectical study of defendants’ discourses
- A Dutch dose of dissent : Exploring the role of gender, education, and culture on Dutch students’ argumentative predispositions
- Legal argumentation in Mesopotamia since Ur III
- Ideology in positivist research articles on issues of teaching English as a foreign language
- Marta Zampa (2017). Argumentation in the newsroom
- Contextualizing pragma-dialectics. Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng
- Argumentation and meaning
- Automatic argumentation mining and the role of stance and sentiment
- At the juncture between evidentiality and argumentation : Evidential verb complementation
- The significance of the adversative connectives aber, mais, ma (‘but’) as indicators in young children’s argumentation
- Implicit argumentation and persuasion : A measuring model
- The Argument and the Honey Pot : A pragmatic account of fallacies of seduction
- Non-propositional meanings and commitment attribution : More arguments in favor of a cognitive approach
- The TV addresses of the Swiss government before popular votes : A case study of argumentation in direct democracy
- An argumentative reconstruction of the computer metaphor of the brain
- “Doctor, I disagree” : Development and preliminary validation of a patient argumentativeness scale
- Rhetorical imaginings and multimodal arguments at the European Green Belt : Juxtaposing nonhuman nature and technology in our collective memory of the Cold War
- Niilo Lahti (2017) The maneuvering Paul: A pragma-dialectical analysis of Paul’s argumentation in First Corinthians 4:18–7:40
- Francesco Arcidiacono & Antonio Bova (2017). Interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional contexts
- On philosophical argumentation
- Scientific arguments in policy-making
- The strategic use of argumentation from example in re-evaluating a people
- Challenging judicial impartiality
- A rhetorical perspective on conspiracies
- Environmental argumentation
- Environmental manifestoes
- Sophistical refutations in the climate change debates
- The 2015 Paris Climate Conference
- Criticism and justification of negotiated compromises
- Framing fracking
- Deontic power and institutional contexts
- The argument from example in health communication
- Commentary
- “Easy ways to lose weight with pleasure”
- Divide to unite
- Engaging publics through climate math
- Frans H. van Eemeren (Ed., 2017). Prototypical argumentative patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context
- Eveline T. Feteris (2017). Fundamentals of legal argumentation. A survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions
- Feteris, E.T., H. Kloosterhuis, J. Plug, & C. Smith (Eds. 2016). Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law
- Runjić-Stoilova, A. & Varošanec-Škarić, G. (Eds. 2017). New Insights into Rhetoric and Argumentation
- Commentary on “Implicit persuasion in medical decision-making: an overview of implicitly steering behaviors and a reflection on explanations for the use of implicitly steering behaviors”
- Disputing with patients in person-centered care
- Commentary on “Disputing with patients in person centered care: ethical aspects in standard care, pediatrics, psychiatry and public health”
- Argumentation and patient centered care
- The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news encounters
- Commentary on “The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news encounters”
- The role of argumentative strategies in the construction of emergent common ground in a patient-centered approach to the medical encounter
- Commentary on “The role of argumentative strategies in the construction of emergent common ground in a patient-centered approach to the medical encounter”
- A pragma-dialectical perspective on obstacles to shared decision-making
- Commentary on “A pragma-dialectical perspective on obstacles to shared decision-making”
- The stereotypicality of symptomatic and pragmatic argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer
- Commentary on “The stereotypicality of symptomatic and pragmatic argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer”
- Implicit persuasion in medical decision-making
- Establishing validity among pre-school children
- Prime Minister Abe’s challenge to the Japanese Postwar Constitution
- Validating extremism
- Defending either a personal or an assigned standpoint
- Baruch B. Schwarz and Michael J. Baker. (2017) Dialogue, argumentation and education: History, theory and practice
- Maralee Harrell (2016): What is the argument? An introduction to philosophical argument analysis
- Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at diplomatic press conferences
- Argumentative discourse in contemporary China
- Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at diplomatic press conferences
- A pragma-dialectical approach to governmental crisis communication
- Strategic maneuvering by persuasive definition in corporate crisis communication
- Argument by multimodal metaphor as strategic maneuvering in video advertising
- Wu Peng. (2017). Discourse and trade dispute: A discourse-analytic research on Sino-US trade disputes over tire imports
- Zhiwen Yang. 2013. Normative research on specific method of legal argumentation
- Zhou Qiang. (2015) The paradigm of contemporary Chinese argumentation studies. Reflection and reconstruction.
- Zhang Xiaomang. (2011). Thoughts and methods of argumentation from the Great Thinkers in the Pre-Qin Period
- The space for strategic manoeuvring in adjudicating a freedom of speech case in the Netherlands
- Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports
- Practical reasoning in corporate communication with multiple audiences
- Do adult-children dialogical interactions leave space for a full development of argumentation?
- Competition and conflict between communicative norms
- Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.) (2015). Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
- Ahmed Omar (2016). Strategic Maneuvering in Supporting the Feasibility of Political Change. A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of Egyptian Anti-regime Columns
- Fernando Leal Carretero (Ed. & Trans.). (2015). Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: Estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren
- Merel Boers (2016). A Controversy on Moral Judgment
- Roosmaryn Pilgram (2015). A Doctor’s Argument by Authority
- Context-dependency of argumentative patterns in discourse
- The role of the argument by example in legislative debates of the European Parliament
- The identification of prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions
- Argumentative patterns using symptomatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements
- Argumentative patterns in the European Union’s directives
- Review of van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen, Eds. (2015) Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory
- Review of Wierda, Renske (2015) Experience-based authority argumentation in direct-to-consumer medical advertisements