- Financial Conflicts of Interest are of Higher Ethical Priority than “Intellectual” Conflicts of Interest
- Conflict of Interest in Scientific Research in China: A Socio-ethical Analysis of He Jiankui’s Human Genome-editing Experiment
- Mitochondrial Donation: The Australian Story
- John Wiltshire, Frances Burney and the doctors: Patient narratives, then and now (United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2019)
- Symposium Lead Essay—Conflict of Interest: Opening Up New Territories
- If the Price is Right: The Ethics and Efficiency of Market Solutions to the Organ Shortage
- Re-examining the Ethics of Genetic Counselling in the Genomic Era
- Cui Bono?
- Balancing Interests in Healthcare
- Beyond Money: Conscientious Objection in Medicine as a Conflict of Interests
- The Ethical Dilemma of Truth-Telling in Healthcare in China
- The Case for an Autonomy-Centred View of Physician-Assisted Death
- Ethical Reasoning and Moral Distress in Social Care Among Long-Term Care Staff
- The Principle of Autonomy and Behavioural Variant Frontotemporal Dementia
- Commentary: The Voice of the People, Funded Now by Your Friendly Pharmaceutical Company
- Telling, Hearing, and Believing: A Critical Analysis of Narrative Bioethics
- After Conflicts of Interest: From Procedural Short-Cut to Ethico-Political Debate
- Status, Respect, and Stigma: A Qualitative Study of Non-financial Interests in Medicine
- Genome Editing for Longer Lives: The Problem of Loneliness
- A Continent Aflame: Ethical Lessons From the Australian Bushfire Disaster
- Human Dignity and Gene Editing: Additional Support for Raposo’s Arguments
- Formulating an Ethics of Pharmaceutical Disinvestment
- Lead Essay: Money, Equity and Access to Medicines
- “Hunting Down My Son’s Killer”: New Roles of Patients in Treatment Discovery and Ethical Uncertainty
- Does Consumer Engagement in Health Technology Assessment Enhance or Undermine Equity?
- Deciding For When You Can’t Decide: The Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 (Vic)
- Deliver Us From Injustice: Reforming the U.S. Healthcare System
- New Zealand Policy on Frozen Embryo Disputes
- Pharmaceutical Ethics and Grassroots Activism in the United States: A Social History Perspective
- The Consent Form in the Chinese CRISPR Study: In Search of Ethical Gene Editing
- Beyond Mendelian Genetics: Anticipatory Biomedical Ethics and Policy Implications for the Use of CRISPR Together with Gene Drive in Humans
- A Response to “Fragile Objects”
- Social Justice and the Ethical Goals of Community Engagement in Global Health Research
- Developing and Implementing new TB Technologies: Key Informants’ Perspectives on the Ethical Challenges
- Why High Drug Pricing Is A Problem for Research Ethics
- Elective Impairment Minus Elective Disability: The Social Model of Disability and Body Integrity Identity Disorder
- “A Real Bucket of Worms”: Views of People Living with Dementia and Family Members on Supported Decision-Making
- Pure Altruistic Gift and the Ethics of Transplant Medicine
- An Issue that is not Going Away: Recent Developments in Surrogacy in South Australia
- Remember Evil: Remaining Assumptions In Autonomy-based Accounts Of Conscience Protection
- Designing Preclinical Studies in Germline Gene Editing: Scientific and Ethical Aspects
- Tissue vs Liquid Biopsies for Cancer Detection: Ethical Issues
- Picking and Choosing Among Phase I Trials
- More Than “Spending Time with the Body”: The Role of a Family’s Grief in Determinations of Brain Death
- All Across the Universe: Bioethics Across Cultures
- Clarifying legal tests: Who a parent is and how to warn of unknown risks
- Using the Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah to Furnish an Islamic Bioethics: Conceptual and Practical Issues
- A Journey Through Global Bioethics
- US Hospice Structure and its Implications for the “Right to Die” Debate
- The Landscape of the “Spirit of Sport”
- A Response to Meyerson’s Defence of the American Right to Try
- Right to Try: In response
- What Is Enough? Sufficiency, Justice, and Health
- Moral Equality, Bioethics, and the Child
- Subsidizing PGD: The Moral Case for Funding Genetic Selection
- Women’s Control Over Decision to Participate in Surrogacy
- Design and Validation of an Instrument To Measure a Minor’s Maturity When Faced with Health Decisions
- Epistemic Virtue, Prospective Parents and Disability Abortion
- Competing Ethical Interests Regarding Privacy and Accountability in Psychotherapy
- Planning Ahead for Dementia Research Participation: Insights from a Survey of Older Australians and Implications for Ethics, Law and Practice
- The struggle for clinical ethics in Jordanian Hospitals
- Enhanced Interrogation, Consequential Evaluation, and Human Rights to Health
- Identity and the Ethics of Eating Interventions
- Pride Before a Fall: Shame, Diagnostic Crossover, and Eating Disorders
- Not Sick: Liberal, Trans, and Crip Feminist Critiques of Medicalization
- Dementia: Unwelcome change has arrived and we are not ready!
- Co-payment for Unfunded Additional Care in Publicly Funded Healthcare Systems: Ethical Issues
- A Return Journey: Hope and Strength in the Aftermath of Alzheimer’s
- A response to “Fragile objects: a visual essay”
- Learning From the Cultural Challenge of Dementia
- Realigning the Neural Paradigm for Death
- The liminal world of dementia
- Considering the boundaries of decision-making authority: An NHS Trust v Y [2018] UKSC 46
- Dementia and the Paradigm of the Camp: Thinking Beyond Giorgio Agamben’s Concept of “Bare Life”
- Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest
- To Your Good Health! Going to the Pub With Friends, Nursing Dying Patients, And ‘ER’ Receptionists: the Ubiquitous Rise of Risk Management and Maybe A ‘Prudential’ Bioethics?
- Fragile objects: A visual essay
- Towards an Ecology of Dementia: A Manifesto
- The Catastrophic Consequences of Negligent Misinformation— Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50
- Misconceiving “Neutrality” in Bioethics: Rejoinder to “Bioethics and the Myth of Neutrality”
- Gene Editing, the Mystic Threat to Human Dignity
- Correction to: A Morally Permissible Moral Mistake? Reinterpreting a Thought Experiment as Proof of Concept
- Stakeholders’ Views on Early Diagnosis for Alzheimer’s Disease, Clinical Trial Participation and Amyloid PET Disclosure: A Focus Group Study
- Withholding Treatment From the Dying Patient: The Influence of Medical School on Students’ Attitudes
- Mapping Bioethics in Latin America: History, Theoretical Models, and Scientific Output
- The Right to Accessible and Acceptable Healthcare Services. Negotiating Rules and Solutions With Members of Ethnocultural Minorities
- Exploring Ethical Issues Related to Patient Engagement in Healthcare: Patient, Clinician and Researcher’s Perspectives
- Dementia Beyond Pathology: What People Diagnosed Can Teach Us About Our Shared Humanity
- The “Violent Resident”: A Critical Exploration of the Ethics of Resident-to-Resident Aggression
- Maqasid al-Shariah Based Islamic Bioethics: A Comprehensive Approach
- Pub Philosophy
- Two-Hourly Repositioning for Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in the Elderly: Patient Safety or Elder Abuse?
- The Boundaries of Embryo Research: Extending the Fourteen-Day Rule
- New Zealand District Health Boards’ Open Disclosure Policies: A Qualitative Review
- Accounting for the Moral Significance of Technology: Revisiting the Case of Non-Medical Sex Selection
- Medicine is Patriarchal, But Alternative Medicine is Not the Answer
- The Looping Effects of Enhancement Technologies
- On Replacement Body Parts
- To the Barricades or the Blackboard: Bioethical Activism and the “Stance of Neutrality”
- Human Enhancement: Enhancing Health or Harnessing Happiness?
- What Is the Good of It—Ethical Controls of Human Subject Health Research?
- Medium-Range Narratives as a Complementary Tool to Principle-Based Prioritization in Sweden: Test Case “ADHD”
- Correction to: Vulnerability, Harm, and Compromised Ethics Revealed by the Experiences of Queer Birthing Women in Rural Healthcare
- Bioethics and the Myth of Neutrality
- Vulnerability, Harm, and Compromised Ethics Revealed by the Experiences of Queer Birthing Women in Rural Healthcare
- Should Gender Reassignment Surgery be Publicly Funded?
- Intersexual Births: The Epistemology of Sex and Ethics of Sex Assignment
- Embedded Journalists or Empirical Critics? The Nature of The “Gaze” in Bioethics
- “I Don’t See That as a Medical Problem”: Clinicians’ Attitudes and Responses to Requests for Cosmetic Genital Surgery by Adolescents
- LGBT+ Individuals’ Perceptions of Healthcare Services in Turkey: A Cross-sectional Qualitative Study
- Intersex Activists in Israel: Their Achievements and the Obstacles They Face
- Impossible “Choices”: The Inherent Harms of Regulating Women’s Testosterone in Sport
- On Female Genital Cutting: Factors to be Considered When Confronted With a Request to Re-infibulate
- Patient Representation and Advocacy for Alzheimer Disease in Germany and Israel
- Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques
- One For All, All For One? Collective Representation in Healthcare Policy
- Why Do Medical Professional Regulators Dismiss Most Complaints From Members of the Public? Regulatory Illiteracy, Epistemic Injustice, and Symbolic Power
- Medicolegal Complications of Apnoea Testing for Determination of Brain Death
- Social Media: The Unnamed Plaintiff
- Are ME/CFS Patient Organizations “Militant”?
- Singapore Modifies the U.K. Montgomery Test and Changes the Standard of Care Doctors Owe to Patients on Medical Advice
- Bioethics and the Freedom Road. The JBI Community and the Change We Want To See
- Ethical Issues of Using CRISPR Technologies for Research on Military Enhancement
- Legislating Patient Representation: A Comparison Between Austrian and German Regulations on Self-Help Organizations as Patient Representatives
- Attitudes Towards the Donation of Human Embryos for Stem Cell Research Among Chinese IVF Patients and Students
- Representative Claims in Healthcare: Identifying the Variety in Patient Representation
- Responsibility as an Obstacle to Good Policy: The Case of Lifestyle Related Disease
- Parental Moral Distress and Moral Schism in the Neonatal ICU
- Commodification and Human Interests
- Representing Whom? U.K. Health Consumer and Patients’ Organizations in the Policy Process
- Forget Evil: Autonomy, the Physician–Patient Relationship, and the Duty to Refer
- Strategies to Guide the Return of Genomic Research Findings: An Australian Perspective
- The “Normalization” of Intersex Bodies and “Othering” of Intersex Identities in Australia
- Ethical and Legal Concerns With Nevada’s Brain Death Amendments
- The Beneficence of Hope: Findings from a Qualitative Study with Gout and Diabetes Patients
- The Power of Knowledge, Responses to Change, and the Gymnastics of Causation
- Correction to: Predictive Psychiatric Genetic Testing in Minors: An Exploration of the Non-Medical Benefits
- Beyond Compliance Checking: A Situated Approach to Visual Research Ethics
- The Voice Is As Mighty As the Pen: Integrating Conversations into Advance Care Planning
- Can the Ethical Best Practice of Shared Decision-Making lead to Moral Distress?
- Review of the Ethical Issues of a Biomarker-Based Diagnoses in the Early Stage of Alzheimer’s Disease
- Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia
- The Enduring Influence of a Dangerous Narrative: How Scientists Can Mitigate the Frankenstein Myth
- Family Resemblances: Human Reproductive Cloning as an Example for Reconsidering the Mutual Relationships between Bioethics and Science Fiction
- A Morally Permissible Moral Mistake? Reinterpreting a Thought Experiment as Proof of Concept
- Raising Rates of Childhood Vaccination: The Trade-off Between Coercion and Trust
- Erratum to: Ethical Considerations of Physician Career Involvement in Global Health Work: A Framework
- Erratum to: AIDS Panic in the Twenty-First Century: The Tenuous Legal Status of HIV-Positive Persons in America
- Erratum to: Inhospitable Healthcare Spaces: Why Diversity Training on LGBTQIA Issues Is Not Enough
- Comparing Non-Medical Sex Selection and Saviour Sibling Selection in the Case of JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the Welfare of the Child?
- Assisted Dying in Australia and Limiting Court Involvement in Withdrawal of Nutrition and Hydration
- Rearranging Deck Chairs on a Sinking Ship?
- Disciplining Bioethics: The Debate Over Human Embryo Research
- The Ethics of Discharging Asylum Seekers to Harm: A Case From Australia
- Truth Disclosure Practices of Physicians in Jordan
- Engendering Harm: A Critique of Sex Selection For “Family Balancing”
- Ethical Implications in Vaccine Pharmacotherapy for Treatment and Prevention of Drug of Abuse Dependence
- Law as Clinical Evidence: A New ConstitutiveModel of Medical Education and Decision-Making
- Minority Veterans Are More Willing to Participate in Complex Studies Compared to Non-minorities
- A Critical View of “On TB Vaccines, Patients’ Demands, and Modern Printed Media in Times of Biomedical Uncertainties: Buenos Aires, 1920–1950”
- Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth
- Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges
- An Exploration of the Protective Effects of Investigators’ Ethical Awareness upon Subjects of Drug Clinical Trials in China
- Mode 2 Knowledge Production in the Context of Medical Research: A Call for Further Clarifications
- Predictive Psychiatric Genetic Testing in Minors: An Exploration of the Non-Medical Benefits
- Disclosure is Inadequate as a Solution to Managing Conflicts of Interest in Human Research
- Knowing, Anticipating, Even Facilitating but Still not Intending: Another Challenge to Double Effect Reasoning
- Protecting Participants in Thought Experiments: The Role of the Research Ethics Committee
- Controlling futures? Online Genetic Testing and Neurodegenerative Disease
- Reflecting Before Testing
- Power to the People?
- The Dangers of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Alzheimer’s Disease
- Personal Genomic Testing, Genetic Inheritance, and Uncertainty
- Ethics and Epistemology of Big Data
- The Future Emerges from the Past
- When Doctors and Parents Don’t Agree: The story of Charlie Gard
- The President’s Physician: An African Play
- Parents’ and Physicians’ Perceptions of Children’s Participation in Decision-making in Paediatric Oncology: A Quantitative Study
- The Ethics of Biomedical Big Data
- Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance
- The Issues of Freedom and Happiness in Moral Bioenhancement: Continuing the Debate With a Reply to Harris Wiseman
- Digital Humanitarians: How Big Data Is Changing the Face of Humanitarian Response
- Morally-Relevant Similarities and Differences Between Assisted Dying Practices in Paradigm and Non-Paradigm Circumstances: Could They Inform Regulatory Decisions?
- Big Data and Health Research—The Governance Challenges in a Mixed Data Economy
- Health Professionals “Make Their Choice”: Pharmaceutical Industry Leaders’ Understandings of Conflict of Interest
- Criminal Prohibition of Wrongful Re‑identification: Legal Solution or Minefield for Big Data?
- Measles Vaccination is Best for Children: The Argument for Relying on Herd Immunity Fails
- Stretching the Boundaries of Parental Responsibility and New Legal Guidelines for Determination of Brain Death
- Exploring Vaccine Hesitancy Through an Artist–Scientist Collaboration
- A Feminist Critique of Justifications for Sex Selection
- A 450 Year Old Turkish Poem, Art as a Qualitative Investigation Tool, Buddhist Deathways, Karma and Eudaimonia in Death and Organ Donation: The Wonders of Truly Diverse Bioethical Inquiry!
- A Virtuous Death: Organ Donation and Eudaimonia
- Access to High Cost Cancer Medicines Through the Lens of an Australian Senate Inquiry—Defining the “Goods” at Stake
- Erratum to: Bioethics and Biopolitics: Presents and Futures of Reproduction
- Including People with Dementia in Research: An Analysis of Australian Ethical and Legal Rules and Recommendations for Reform
- Political Minimalism and Social Debates: The Case of Human-Enhancement Technologies
- Futile Treatment—A Review
- A 450-Year-Old Turkish Poem on Medical Ethics
- Are Wrongful Life Actions Threatening the Value of Human Life?
- Decision-Making Capacity and Unusual Beliefs: Two Contentious Cases
- Medical Negligence Determinations, the “Right to Try,” and Expanded Access to Innovative Treatments
- Bioethics and Biopolitics: Presents and Futures of Reproduction
- Sex, Drugs, and a Few Other Things
- The Perfect Womb: Promoting Equality of (Fetal) Opportunity
- Ethical and Regulatory Challenges with Autologous Adult Stem Cells: A Comparative Review of International Regulations
- Autonomy and Reproductive Rights of Married Ikwerre Women in Rivers State, Nigeria
- Discovering the Neural Nature of Moral Cognition? Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Challenges in Bioethical Research with Electroencephalography (EEG)
- Never Die Alone: Death and Birth in Pure Land Buddhism
- Stigma and Self-Stigma in Addiction
- Regulating the New: A Consideration of CRISPR and Approaches to Professional Standards of Practitioners of Chinese Medicine in Australia and Accessing the NDIS
- Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation and Ethical Considerations: A Scoping Review
- Levels of Intervention: How Are They Used in Quebec Hospitals?
- Ethics and Epistemology in Big Data Research
- Race Research and the Ethics of Belief
- How Sex Selection Undermines Reproductive Autonomy
- Against Cursory Treatments in Ethics of Medical Migration from Underserved Countries
- The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients
- The Ninth Circle: Who and What Do We Trust In Today’s World?
- Prestidigitation vs. Public Trust: Or How We Can Learn to Change the Conversation and Prevent Powers From “Organizing the Discontent”
- Investigating Public trust in Expert Knowledge: Narrative, Ethics, and Engagement
- Four Reasons Why Assisted Dying Should Not Be Offered for Depression
- The Biopolitics of Lifestyle: Foucault, Ethics and Healthy Choices
- The Value of Vagueness in the Politics of Authorship
- Considering Professional Misconduct and Best Interests of a Child (Palliative Orders)
- Gestational Diabetes Testing, Narrative, and Medical Distrust
- Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain
- A Response to Penders: The Disvalue of Vagueness in Authorship