- No-Right and its Correlative
- Originalism’s Promise
- On Tradition and the Conservation of Equity
- Law, Love, and Freedom: From the Sacred to the Secular Joshua Neoh. Cambridge University Press, 2019 Reviewed by Michael P. Moreland
- The Puzzle of Rights
- Loyalty and Disclosure in Legal Ethics
- Law as a Branch of Morality: The Unity of Practice and Principle
- The Internal Limits on Fiduciary Loyalty
- Motives and Fiduciary Loyalty
- Should Lawyers Be Loyal To Clients, the Law, or Both?
- Replying to Halpin and Kramer: Agreements, Disagreements and No-Agreements
- Legal Validity: The Fabric of Justice Maris Köpcke
- The Real Standard Picture, and How Facts Make It Law: a Response to Mark Greenberg
- Choosing Axioms of Correlativity
- On No-Rights and No Rights
- Intentions and Reflections: The Nature of Legislative Intent Revisited
- Ekins’s Moral Assumptions and Their Impact on the Analysis of Legislation
- Pragmatic Aspects of Legislative Intent
- The Central Case Method in The Nature of Legislative Intent
- The Legislative Assembly and Representative Deliberation
- More Votes, More Irrationality
- On the Centrality of Jurisprudence
- Ekins on Groups and Procedures
- Kant’s Concept of Law
- The Hohfeldian Analysis of Rights*
- Use And the Function of Property
- The Road Not Taken: On MacIntyre’s Human Rights Skepticism
- Lon L. Fuller on Political Obligation
- Replies to the Symposium Articles on Liberalism With Excellence
- Subjectivist Perfectionism
- Liberal Perfectionism, Moral Integrity, and Self-Respect
- Reasonable Disagreement and the Neutralist Dilemma: Abortion and circumcision in Matthew Kramer’s Liberalism with Excellence
- Abortion, Marriage and Cognate Problems
- Confessions of a Quidnunc
- Should I Be Proud of Liberalism with Excellence? On the Collective Grounds of Self-Respect
- Introduction to the Symposium on Matthew Kramer’s Liberalism with Excellence
- The Self-Respect of Democratic People
- Consequentialism, the Action/Omission Distinction, and the Principle of Double Effect: Three Rival Criteria to Solve Vital Conflicts in Cases of Necessity
- Distinguishing Between What is Intended and Foreseen Side Effects
- Kramer’s Delimiting Test for Legal Rights
- Chang’s Parity: An Alternative Way to Challenge Balancing
- The Inherently Political Nature of Subsidiarity
- Truth and Politics: A Symposium on Peter Simpson’s Political Illiberalism: A Defense of Freedom
- Must Rawlsians be Hamiltonians? Small Government and Political Illiberalism
- Comment on Peter Simpson’s Political Illiberalism
- For What May We Hope? An Appreciation of Peter Simpson’s Political Illiberalism
- On Peter Simpson on “Illiberal Liberalism”
- Aristotle and Modern Politics
- Political Illiberalism: A Response to My Critics
- Truth and Complexity: Notes on Music and Liberalism
- The Polemic against Liberalism
- Should We Abolish the State? Neo-Thomist Reflections on Peter Simpson’s Radical Proposal
- Coercion, Political Authority and the Common Good
- Political Philosophy and Political Illiberalism: A Critical Response to Peter Simpson
- Response and Rejoinder: On Voting, Intrinsic Evil, and Ranking of Political Issues
- On Knowing the Natural Law : A Response to Steven Jensen
- Absolute Rights: Some Problems Illustrated
- Autonomy as a Perfection
- End Matter (Back Cover)
- Front Matter (Front Cover)
- Rejoinder by Kevin L. Flannery, S.J.
- The Failure of Joseph Raz’s Account of Legal Obligation