- Data, Metadata, Mental Data? Privacy and the Extended Mind
- Ambiguous Agency as a Frame on Neural Device User Experience
- Why Neuroethical Analyses of Invasiveness in Psychiatry Should Engage with Mental Health Service User Movement Knowledges and Considerations of Social In/Justice
- Knowing Your Body Best: The Role of Clinicians and Neural Data in Patient Self Perception of Illness
- From ‘What’ to ‘Why:’ Culture, History, Power and the Experiential Salience of Invasiveness in Psychiatric Treatment
- Perceptions of Invasiveness: A Moving Target for Neuromodulation
- Invasiveness is Inevitable in Psychiatric Neurointerventions
- Perceived Invasiveness and Therapeutic Acceptability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Is Theory Fading Away from Reality? Examining the Pathology Rather than the Technology to Understand Potential Personality Changes
- Perceptions of Invasiveness and Fear of Stigmatization in Mental Health Care
- The Normative Evaluation of Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice: From Invasiveness to Human Rights
- Neurotechnologies and Identity Changes: What the Narrative View Can Add to the Story
- Journeying to Ixtlan: Ethics of Psychedelic Medicine and Research for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias
- Non-Human Moral Status: Problems with Phenomenal Consciousness
- The Prospects of Artificial Consciousness: Ethical Dimensions and Concerns
- Revisiting Neuroethics Through the Lens of Buddhist Theory: A Call for Integration
- Beyond “Ensuring Understanding”: Toward a Patient-Partnered Neuroethics of Brain Device Research
- AJOB-Neuroscience Top Abstract Award Winners from the 2021 International Neuroethics Society Annual Meeting
- Buddhism and Neuroethics Research: On Catching a Snake
- Loving Wisdom, Living Wisdom, Teaching Wisdom
- Neuroethics, Consciousness and Death: Where Objective Knowledge Meets Subjective Experience
- Not-So-Straightforward Decisions to Keep or Explant a Device: When Does Neural Device Removal Become Patient Coercion?
- Situating Empirical Bioethics in Discussions of Post-Trial Responsibility
- Leaving Users in the Dark: A Call to Define Responsibilities toward Users of Neural Implanted Devices
- Brain Device Research and the Underappreciated Role of Care Partners before, during, and Post-Trial
- Mistaken Compassion and Mistaken Application: The Challenge of Buddhist Neuroethics in Clinical Practice
- Too Much Satisfaction? The Impact of the Interview Timing on the Meaning-Making Processes
- The Conditions for Ethical Chemical Restraints
- An Ethical Argument for Ending Human Trials of Amyloid-Lowering Therapies in Alzheimer’s Disease
- VR in the Prison System: Ethical and Legal Concerns
- Envisioning a Path toward Equitable and Effective Digital Mental Health
- Digital Mental Health Deserves Investment but the Questions Are Which Interventions and Where?
- A Call for Greater Regulation of Digital Mental Health Technologies
- Extended Frameworks for Extended Reality: Ethical Considerations
- Technophiles and Technophobes: Will Digital Technologies Solve All Our (Mental Health) Problems?
- Assessing Digital Mental Health Apps: The Importance of Patient-Centric Measures of Utility
- Qualitative Evidence for Concern: Digital Health Technologies and the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Can Public Health Investment and Oversight save Digital Mental Health?
- Neurorights for Incarcerated Persons: Should We Curb Inflation?
- A Virtual Prosthesis for Morality? Experiential Learning through XR Technologies for Autonomy Enhancement of Psychiatric Offenders
- Making Progress in the Ethics of Digital and Virtual Technologies for Mental Health
- Extended Reality, Mental Liberty, and State Power in Forensic Settings
- Giving Digital Mental Health Technologies the Benefit of the Doubt, Rather than Doubting the Benefits
- We’re Not on a Holodeck, Yet. A Social Experiment Approach to Introducing Extended Reality in Forensic Psychiatry
- Shouldn’t Our Virtual Avatars be Granted Human Rights Too?
- If We Want an App for That, We Should Fund It
- Researcher Views on Changes in Personality, Mood, and Behavior in Next-Generation Deep Brain Stimulation
- Contextual and Cultural Perspectives on Neurorights: Reflections Toward an International Consensus
- Research Comparing iPSC-Derived Neural Organoids to Ex Vivo Brain Tissue of Postmortem Donors: Identity After Life?
- Neurons Embodied in a Virtual World: Evidence for Organoid Ethics?
- Cerebral Organoids and Biological Hybrids as New Entities in the Moral Landscape
- Public Engagement With Brain Organoid Research and Application: Lessons From Genome Editing
- What Brain Organoid Research Can Gain From Engaging Biospecimen Donors
- Pursuit of Perfection? On Brain Organoids as Models
- Toward Responsible Public Engagement in Neuroethics
- Citizen and Patient Participation in Precision Medicine: Epilepsy Treatment Using Brain Organoids Derived from iPS Cells
- Donation, Control and the Ownership of Conscious Things
- Ethical Issues of Brain Organoids: Well Beyond “Consciousness”?
- The Public’s Ethical Issues with Brain Organoid Research and Application
- Big Decisions on a Small Scale: From Evidence-Based Medicine to Personalized Medicine
- The Promise of Regenerative Medicine and Applications of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSC) in Attenuating Current Racial Disparities in Epilepsy Therapeutics
- Cognitive Enhancement and Social Mobility: Skepticism from India
- The Accelerated Approval of Aducanumab Invites a Rethink of the Current Model of Drug Development for Alzheimer’s Disease
- On the Relevance of Experimental Philosophy to Neuroethics
- Are Neuroethicists Confident That the Neural Device Industry Incorporate Ethical Concerns into the Design Process? Is Everything for Sale Even Highly Sensitive Data?
- Continuums of Capacity, Binaries of Guilt: The Sociopolitical Role of Neuroethics in Criminal Justice
- Ethical Challenges in the Commercialization of Neurotechnology: Contending with Competing Priorities
- Recognizing a Plurality of Industry Perspectives in the Responsible Innovation of Neurotechnologies
- Neuroethics as a New Kind of Scientific Anthropology
- What Exactly “History Has Taught us”? Enhancing the Socio-Political Perspective in Neuroethics
- Farewell and With Gratitude
- Addressing and Managing Systemic Benefit, Burden and Risk of Emerging Neurotechnology
- Trust in Neuroethics
- Commercialization, Consent, and the Neural Device Industry
- The Quantified Scientist: Citizen Neuroscience and Neurotechnology
- Eugenic Technologies Are Developed in Eugenic Eras: Why We Must Include Historical Circumstances in Socio-Political Perspectives for Neuroethics
- The Socio-Political Perspectives of Neuroethics: An Approach to Combat the Reproducibility Crisis in Science?
- Context-Dependent Risk & Benefit Sensitivity Mediate Judgments About Cognitive Enhancement
- Between Neurodiscourse and Ideology: Expanding on the Socio-Political Dimension in Neuroethics
- Has the Socio-Political Role of Neuroethics Been Neglected?
- Translational Neuroethics: A Vision for a More Integrated, Inclusive, and Impactful Field
- Prophylactic Amyloidectomy? Reasons for Caution in Moving to Biomarker-Based Dementia Interventions in Asymptomatic Individuals
- Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease – Blessing or Curse for Patients?
- Seeing the Forest for the Trees: The Importance of Unifying Ethical and Legal Considerations for Non-Validated Practice of Neurotherapies
- Eliciting Explanatory Models to Facilitate Improved Communication in Complex Patient Care
- The Need for Preservation of Medical Decision Making with Diminished Cognitive Capacity
- Personal Utility and Early Intervention in Alzheimer’s Disease
- Deaf, Not Invisible: Sign Language Interpreting in a Global Pandemic
- Critical Need for Inclusion of Under-Served Minorities in the Emerging Clinical Landscape for Alzheimer’s Disease
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Preclinical and Prodromal Alzheimer’s Disease: Integrating Beneficence, Non-Maleficence, and Autonomy Considerations Through Responsible Innovation
- Shifting the Focus of Dementia Prevention: Ethical Considerations
- Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease Benefits Research, Quality of Life, and End-of-Life Planning
- Are Alternative Neurotherapies Exempted from Using Current Scientific Evidence?
- There Is No Such Thing as Alternative Medicine
- Stop the Madness: Dementia, “Radical Medicalization,” and Straw Men
- Early Detection of AD Biomarkers and the Ethical Criteria for Screening Programs
- (Un)Ethical Early Interventions in the Alzheimer’s “Marketplace of Memory”
- Dementia Risk Reduction in Mid-Life: The Real Ethical Challenge
- Revering Individual Autonomy During Goals of Care Family Meetings
- The Family as a Unit of Care in End-of-Life Conversations
- What Justifies the Allocation of Scarce Health Care Resources to Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: Response to Commentaries
- Supported Decision-Making: Non-Domination Rather than Mental Prosthesis
- Frequent Preservation of Neurologic Function in Brain Death and Brainstem Death Entails False-Positive Misdiagnosis and Cerebral Perfusion
- Closed-Loop Neuromodulation and Self-Perception in Clinical Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy
- “They Are Invasive in Different Ways.”: Stakeholders’ Perceptions of the Invasiveness of Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions
- Microbiome in Precision Psychiatry: An Overview of the Ethical Challenges Regarding Microbiome Big Data and Microbiome-Based Interventions
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Systems for Personalising Epilepsy Treatment: Research Ethics Challenges and New Insights for the Ethics of Personalised Medicine
- How Soon is Now? A Temporal Account of Moral Disruption in Alzheimer’s Dementia
- Exit from Brain Device Research: A Modified Grounded Theory Study of Researcher Obligations and Participant Experiences
- Mistaken Compassion: Tibetan Buddhist Perspectives on Neuroethics
- Personality and Authenticity in Light of the Memory-Modifying Potential of Optogenetics: A Reply to Objections about Potential Therapeutic Applicability of Optogenetics
- 2020 International Neuroethics Society Annual Meeting Top Abstracts
- Is There an App for That?: Ethical Issues in the Digital Mental Health Response to COVID-19
- Why Moral Enhancement is Unavoidably Normative
- Rationalizing Resources for Disorders of Consciousness Care
- The Development of Self-Trust in DBS Patients
- Losing Our (Moral) Self in the Moral Bioenhancement Debate
- Moral Enhancement Frameworks and Narrative Identity
- A Misguided yet Informative Approach
- Mapping the Dimensions of Agency: The Narrative as Unifying Mechanism
- Precautionary Personhood: We Should Treat Patients with Disorders of Consciousness as Persons
- Responsibility, Authenticity and the Self in the Case of Symbiotic Technology
- What’s So Great about Consciousness?
- A Closer Look at the Adequacy of Proposed Frameworks for a “Virtue Theory for Moral Enhancement”
- Mapping the Other Side of Agency
- Identity, Virtue Theory, and the Death of Moral Enhancement
- Bioenhanced “Virtues” May Threaten Personal Identity
- Enhancing Virtue without Becoming Ned Flanders?
- Patients with Disorders of Consciousness in the Real World
- Operationalizing Agency in Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Research
- In Pursuit of Agency Ex Machina: Expanding the Map in Severe Brain Injury
- DoC and COVID Vaccinations: A Complex Decision
- Agency and Authenticity
- Empiricism and Rights Justify the Allocation of Health Care Resources to Persons with Disorders of Consciousness
- Challenges and Opportunities of Creating Conceptual Maps
- Dimensions of Agency: Conceptual and Data-Driven Approaches
- Can Moral Enhancement Address Our Environmental Crisis? A Call for Collective Virtue-Oriented Action
- Prospective Benefit plus Moral Status: A Hybrid Model
- Disorders of Consciousness and Theories of Well-Being
- Emerging Consciousness at a Clinical Crossroads
- What’s the Appropriate Target of Allocative Justification?
- Enhancing Fabiano’s Virtue Theory for Moral Enhancement
- The Rhythms of Virtue
- The Evolving Science of Disorders of Consciousness Calls for an Inclusive Framework for Healthcare Resource Allocation
- Moral Enhancement Where It Would Make the Most Difference
- Should We Trust Patient-Reported Outcomes?
- The Cost of Compassion: Resource Allocation and Disorders of Consciousness
- An Unusual Conversation about Dying during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Neurosurgery Resident’s Experience
- National Institutes of Mental Health Data Archive: Privacy, Consent, and Diversity Considerations and Options for Improvement
- Virtue Theory for Moral Enhancement
- The Socio-Political Roles of Neuroethics and the Case of Klotho
- What Justifies the Allocation of Health Care Resources to Patients with Disorders of Consciousness?
- Neuroethics Inside and Out: A Comparative Survey of Neural Device Industry Representatives and the General Public on Ethical Issues and Principles in Neurotechnology
- Is Virtually Everything Possible? The Relevance of Ethics and Human Rights for Introducing Extended Reality in Forensic Psychiatry
- Mapping the Ethical Issues of Brain Organoid Research and Application
- Ethics of Early Intervention in Alzheimer’s Disease
- Mapping the Dimensions of Agency
- Ethical and Legal Considerations of Alternative Neurotherapies
- Can Memory Make a Difference? Reasons for Changing or Not Our Autobiographical Memory
- Taking Relational Authenticity Seriously: Neurotechnologies, Narrative Identity, and Co-Authorship of the Self
- Optogenetic Memory Modification and the Many Facets of Authenticity
- Dynamic Consent in Neuroscience Too?
- Memory, Authenticity, and Optogenethics
- Optogenetic Manipulation of Maladaptive Memory – New Challenges or New Solutions for Personal Authenticity?
- Burnt in Your Memory or Burnt Memory? Ethical Issues with Optogenetics for Memory Modification
- Getting into Their Heads: When the Investigator is also the Treating Physician
- Saving Elizabeth: Radical Control & the Puzzle of Authenticity
- Why Authenticity Hinges on Narrative Identity
- Memory Deletion Threatens Authenticity by Destabilizing Values
- Informed Consent and Voluntariness: Balancing Ethical Demands During Trial Recruitment
- The Value of Heterogeneity in Practices to Promote Ethical Research
- The Need for Guidance around Recruitment and Consent Practices in Intracranial Electrophysiology Research
- Forgetting Myself: Self-regarding Ethical Responsibilities in the Use of Memory Modifying Technologies
- Memory, Authenticity, and Alienation
- Authenticity, Self-Defining Memories, and the Direction of Change
- Treatment Search Fatigue and Informed Consent
- The Value of Patient Perspectives in an Ethical Analysis of Recruitment and Consent for Intracranial Electrophysiology Research
- A Qualitative Analysis of Ethical Perspectives on Recruitment and Consent for Human Intracranial Electrophysiology Studies
- Personality and Authenticity in Light of the Memory-Modifying Potential of Optogenetics
- Neural Safeguards against Global Impacts of Memory Modification on Identity: Ethical and Practical Considerations
- Avoiding Therapeutic Misconception and Reassessing the Concept of Vulnerability
- Yoga/Sāṃkhya, Memory Modifying Technologies, and Authenticity
- Recognizing the Diversity of Cognitive Enhancements
- Why Socio-Political Beliefs Trump Individual Morality: An Evolutionary Perspective
- The Dark Side of Morality: Grayer than You Think?
- What We Talk About When We Talk About Morality
- Virtues-Based Policies for Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement
- Cognitive Enhancement: Toward a Rational Public Consensus
- Service and Status Competition May Help Explain Perceived Ethical Acceptability
- The Ethics of Getting Ahead When All Heads Are Enhanced
- We Need Deeper Understanding About the Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Moral Righteousness in an Era of Online Vigilantism and Cancel Culture
- Conceptual Definitions and Meaningful Generalizability in Cognitive Enhancement
- The Dark Side of Morality – Neural Mechanisms Underpinning Moral Convictions and Support for Violence
- Public Opinion on Cognitive Enhancement Varies across Different Situations
- Selected Abstracts From the 2019 International Neuroethics Society Annual Meeting
- How Public Opinion Can Inform Cognitive Enhancement Regulation
- Cognitive Enhancement and Autonomous Vehicles: What Differences in Social and Individual Endorsement Imply
- Speaking About Enhancement—Methodological Issues and Historical Examples
- Using Social Learning Theories to Better Understand the Variation of the Moral Acceptability of Performance Enhancement Drug Use
- When People of Color Are Left out of Research, Science and the Public Loses
- Morality, Valuation and Coalitional Psychology
- Empirical Data Is Failing to Break the Ethics Stalemate in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate
- Justice, Justification, and Neuroethics as a Tool
- The Quest for Personal Significance and Ideological Violence
- From Research to Clinical Practice: Ethical Issues with Neurotechnology and Industry Relationships
- The BRAIN Initiative and Neuroethics: Enabling and Enhancing Neuroscience Advances for Society
- Fostering Neuroethics Integration with Neuroscience in the BRAIN Initiative: Comments on the NIH Neuroethics Roadmap
- Non-Epistemological Values in Collaborative Research in Neuroscience: The Case of Alleged Differences Between Human Populations
- Asking the Right Questions about Research with Nonhuman Primates
- Ethical Implications of BRAIN 2.0: Beyond Bioethics, Beyond Borders
- Integrating Neuroethics and Neuroscience: A Framework
- The Urgent Need to Better Integrate Neuroscience and Neuroethics
- Fostering Neuroethics Integration: Disciplines, Methods, and Frameworks
- Neuroethics, Neuroscience, and the Project of Human Self-Understanding
- Reflecting on a Neuroethics Roadmap in a Global Crisis
- Moonshots and Other Metaphors: The BRAIN Initiative
- Neuroethical Consciousness
- Racial Injustice and Neuroethics: Time for Action
- Neuroethics in the Shadow of a Pandemic
- The Road Not Mapped: The Neuroethics Roadmap on Research with Nonhuman Primates
- A “Salad Bowl” Approach to Neuroethics Collaboration
- NeuroEthics and the BRAIN Initiative: Where Are We? Where Are We Going?
- Insiders and Outsiders: Lessons for Neuroethics from the History of Bioethics
- Neuroethics: Fostering Collaborations to Enable Neuroscientific Discovery
- Of Ethical Frameworks and Neuroethics in Big Neuroscience Projects: A View from the HBP
- We Have Met AI, and It Is Not Us
- Obviously You, Maybe You, Artificial You: Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence Technologies on Consciousness and Personal Identity
- Anthropomorphism in AI
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience: Methodological and Ethical Challenges
- Deep Fakes and Memory Malleability: False Memories in the Service of Fake News
- Artificial Intelligence in Service of Human Needs: Pragmatic First Steps Toward an Ethics for Semi-Autonomous Agents
- Superethics Instead of Superintelligence: Know Thyself, and Apply Science Accordingly
- “Sorry I Didn’t Hear You.” The Ethics of Voice Computing and AI in High Risk Mental Health Populations
- The Continuity of BCI-Mediated and Conventional Action
- Assessing Competence: Narrative Coherence or Practical Reasoning?
- BCI-Mediated Behavior, Moral Luck, and Punishment
- The Narrative Coherence Standard Adds Either Too Much, or Nothing at All
- Does Mental Discipline Partially Restore the Responsibility of BCI Users?
- Narrative Coherence is Neither Sufficient nor Necessary for Determining Capacity
- BCI Mediated Action and Responsibility: Questioning the Distinction Between Recreation and Necessity
- With NCS, the Clinician May Get Stuck in the Past or Lost in the Present
- Legal Ramifications of Brain-Computer-Interface Technology
- How Bioethics and Case Law Diverge in Assessments of Mental Capacity: An Argument for a Narrative Coherence Standard
- The Differing Role of Narrative Unity in the Concepts of Capacity Versus Competence
- The Narrative Coherence Standard and the Dangers of Excessive Paternalism
- Narrative Coherence and Mental Capacity in Anorexia Nervosa
- Thematic Coherence Within Narratives: A Feature or a Bug?
- Applying the Narrative Coherence Standard in Non-Medical Capacity Assessments
- Is the Problem Bioethics Versus Law or the Principles of Doctors
- How to Do Things with BCIs
- BCI-Mediated Action, Blame, and Responsibility
- The Narrative Coherence Standard and Child Patients’ Capacity to Consent
- Brain-Computer Interfaces and the Philosophy of Action
- When Thinking is Doing: Responsibility for BCI-Mediated Action
- A Narrative Coherence Standard for the Evaluation of Decisional Capacity: Turning Back the Clock
- The Ethical Imperative for Neuro-Entrepreneurs
- To Be Involved in Neuroethics: A Must for Entrepreneurs and for Healthcare as a Whole
- Neuralink: The Ethical ‘Rithmatic of Reading and Writing to the Brain
- To Be or Not To Be Involved in Neuroethics: An Entrepreneurial Perspective
- Beyond Flourishing: Intersecting Uses and Interests in the Neurotechnology Marketplace
- Dimensions of Ethical Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies
- Facts and Authenticity
- The Human Right to Science and Direct to Consumer Neurotechnologies
- Neuroconsumerism and Comprehensive Neuroethics
- Ethical and Regulatory Concerns About Direct-to-Consumer Brain Stimulation for Athletic Enhancement
- Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnology: What Is It and What Is It for?
- Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnology: A Grounded Appraisal
- Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies and Quantified Relationship Technologies: Overlapping Ethical Concerns
- Taking a Step Back: The Ethical Significance of DTC Neurotechnology
- The Ethics of DTC Neurotechnologies: Mapping Out Social Questions in Advance of Technological Innovation
- Human Flourishing as an Ethical Guideline for Emerging Neurotechnologies
- Ethical and Social Considerations for Increasing Use of DTC Neurotechnologies
- Data as a Cross-Cutting Dimension of Ethical Importance in Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies
- Toward a More-Than-Human Approach to Neurotechnologies
- Ethical Oversight of Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies: The FDA, the FTC, or Self-Regulation?
- Filling the Governance Gap: International Principles for Responsible Development of Neurotechnologies
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethical Dimensions of Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies”
- Fanon’s Police Inspector
- The Need for a Conceptual Expansion of Neuroethics
- Erasing Trauma: Ethical Considerations to the Individual and Society
- Do We Need Neuroethics?
- Neuroethics at 15: The Current and Future Environment for Neuroethics
- Neuroethics of the Nonhuman
- Neuroethics and the Naturalistic Fallacy
- The Future of Neuroethics and the Relevance of the Law
- Neuroethics at 15: Keep the Kant but Add More Bacon
- Scientific Practice and the Moral Task of Neurophilosophy
- A Global Vision for Neuroethics Needs More Social Justice: Brain Imaging, Chronic Pain, and Population Health Inequalities
- Ethical Contexts for the Future of Neuroethics
- It Is Time to Expand the Scope and Reach of Neuroethics
- Brain Models in a Dish: Ethical Issues in Developing Brain Organoids
- Divergent Values and Adaptive Preferences: A Chinese Challenge?
- Social Impact Under Severe Uncertainty: The Role of Neuroethicists at the Intersection of Neuroscience, AI, Ethics, and Policymaking
- Biomarkers for PTSD Susceptibility and Resilience, Ethical Issues
- Ethical Perspectives on Neuromarketing: An Interview With Will Allred
- Disabling Language and the Nuances of Stigmatization
- Neuromarketing and AI—Powerful Together, but Needing Scrutiny
- The Shifting, Elusive, and Sometimes Contradictory Language of Disability—Insights from Keywords for Disability Studies
- Disability Language and Our Momentary Preferences
- Worlding Disability: Categorizations, Labels, and the Making of People
- A Cross-Cultural Neuroethics View on the Language of Disability
- Neurotechnologies Cannot Seize Thoughts: A Call for Caution in Nomenclature
- Enhancement, Authenticity, and Social Acceptance in the Age of Individualism
- How Do We Conduct Fruitful Ethical Analysis of Speculative Neurotechnologies?
- Cognitive Enhancement and Metaphor Choice as Moral Choice
- Five Criteria for Assessing the Implications of NTA Technology
- The Last Refuge of Privacy
- More Harm Than Good: Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Forensic Psychiatry
- The Ethics of Counting Neural Activity as Proof
- Privacy Concerns in Brain–Computer Interfaces
- Thought Apprehension: The “True” Self and The Risks of Mind Reading
- Ethical Analysis of “Mind Reading” or “Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension”: Keeping Potential Limitations in Mind
- “There Is No Man Living Who Isn’t Capable of Doing More Than He Thinks He Can Do” … With Cognitive Enhancement
- Can Attitudes Toward Genome Editing Better Inform Cognitive Enhancement Policy?
- “Sounds Fine, But No Thanks!”: On Distinguishing Judgments About Action and Acceptability in Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement
- Consideration of Context and Meanings of Neuro-Cognitive Enhancement: The Importance of a Principled, Internationally Capable Neuroethics
- Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement: The Role of Metaphor and Context
- Ethical Issues to Consider Before Introducing Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Psychiatry
- Select Interviews From the INS Annual Meeting—Keith Humphreys, Tom Insel, Uma Karmarkar, Carl Marci, Ariel Cascio, Winston Chiong, Frederic Gilbert, Cynthia Kubu, and Jonathan Pugh
- Further Ethical Concerns for Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Medicine
- Interpreting Patients’ Beliefs About Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: The Need for Caution and for Context
- Vulnerability in Varying Contexts Affecting Decision Making in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Contemplating Deep Brain Stimulation: Implications for Clinicians
- Consent for Deep Brain Stimulation in Depression: A Perspective From Investigators
- Moving the Discussion Forward—Empirically
- DBS for Depression? Lessons From Patients’ Beliefs for Research, Treatment, and Noninvasive Brain Modulation
- Selected Abstracts From the 2018 International Neuroethics Society Annual Meeting
- Trusting Oneself and Others: Relational Vulnerability and DBS for Depression
- How Relationships Matter: The Need for Closer Attention to Relationality in Neuroethical Studies
- Questioning Assumptions About Vulnerability in Psychiatric Patients
- Do Psychiatrists Hear Their Patients’ Voices? The Importance of Qualitative Research on Brain-Related Technologies
- Patients’ Weighing of the Long-Term Risks and Consequences Associated With Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Depression
- Alienation, Quality of Life, and DBS for Depression
- Listening to Patients: A Pillar for the Epistemology of Neurointerventions
- What’s in a Name? How “Deep Brain Stimulation” May Influence Patients’ Perceptions
- Patients’ Beliefs About Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression
- Mental Integrity and Intentional Side Effects
- If Criminal Intentions Are Nonvoluntary, Mandatory Neurointerventions Might Be Permissible
- Intending Versus Merely Foreseeing Harm: When Does It Make a Difference?
- ‘But What Do You Mean, Doctor?’ War Metaphors, Chronic Health Impacts, and Pain Threshold: The Physician as a Talking Placebo or Nocebo
- Placebo Analgesia as Nocebo Reduction
- Mandatory Neurointerventions Could Enhance the Mental Integrity of Certain Criminal Offenders
- Placebos and a New Exception to Informed Consent
- Punishment and Rehabilitation in the Use of Neurointerventions for Criminals
- The Negative Effects of Neurointerventions: Confusing Constitution and Causation
- Placebos Are Pharmacologically Inert Even If They Generate a Placebo Effect
- Rhetoric, Experimental Philosophy, and Irrelevance
- Mandatory Neurointervention: A Lesser Evil Than Incarceration?
- Neurointerventions in Offenders: Ethical Considerations
- Neurointerventions, Recidivist Sex Offenders, and Situated Moral Agency: An Approach From the Margins
- Differences in the Interior Design of Prisons and Persons
- Contextualizing and Individualizing Truth-Telling About Pain in a Tough and Unjust World
- Mechanisms and Mind Sets: The Roles of Terminology and Patient Mind Set in Clinician Truth-Telling and Placebo Use
- Truth-Telling and Respect for Autonomy
- Telling the Truth About Pain: Informed Consent and the Role of Expectation in Pain Intensity
- Neurointerventions: Punishment, Mental Integrity, and Intentions
- Pain Medicine During an Opioid Epidemic Needs More Transparency, Not Less
- Why I Do Not Agree That Neurointervention Is Less Ethical Than Incarceration
- Deception, Harm, and Expectations of Pain
- Pain, Placebos, and the Benefits of Disclosure
- Is Incarceration Better than Neurointervention? On the Intended Harms of Prison
- Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions
- Mandatory Neurointerventions and the Risk of Racial Disparity
- Cognition Doesn’t Only Modulate Pain Perception; It’s a Central Component of It
- Honoring the Multiple Dimensions of Autonomy in All Phases of Treatment and Care
- Social Uncertainty in Disorders of Consciousness: Shedding Light on the Various Perspectives of Family Caregivers and Surrogates
- Bridging Matters of Uncertainty: The Importance of Focusing on “States in Between” for Disorders of Consciousness
- The Persisting Problem of Precedent Autonomy Among Persons in a Minimally Conscious State: The Limitations of Philosophical Analysis and Clinical Assessment
- Pure Experience and Disorders of Consciousness
- Of Meatballs, Autonomy, and Human Dignity: Neuroethics and the Boundaries of Decision Making Among Persons with Dementia
- Caring About Meatballs, Autonomy, and Human Dignity: Neuroethics and the Boundaries of Decision Making Among Persons With Dementia
- Choices and Relationships
- Of Meatballs And Invasive Neurotechnological Trials: Additional Considerations for Complex Clinical Decisions
- What Role is “Pure Experience” Consciousness Supposed to Play in Medical Ethics?: Pure Experience, Moral Status, and Clinical Decisions
- Domains of Well-Being in Minimally Conscious Patients: Illuminating a Persistent Problem
- The Sources of Uncertainty in Disorders of Consciousness
- Neural Correlates of Pure Experience, Anesthesia, and Meditation States
- He’s in There Somewhere! Reflecting on the Past, Present, and Future of Disorders of Consciousness
- The Road to HEAVEN Is Paved With Good Intentions: Transplanting Heads, Manipulating Selves, and Reassigning Genders
- The Rubicon Already Crossed
- Married to HEAVEN: Some Ethical Concerns in Response to “HEAVEN in the Making” by Ren and Canavero
- Ahead of Our Time: Why Head Transplantation Is Ethically Unsupportable
- Whose Head, Which Body?
- Head Transplants: Ghoulish Takes on New Definition
- Animal Testing and Medical Ethics in Human Head Transplantation
- HEAVEN in the Making: Between the Rock (the Academe) and a Hard Case (a Head Transplant)
- Reasonable Default in Organ Donation Policy
- “The Failure of Peer Review”
- The Ethical Asymmetry Between a Head/Body Transplant and Multiple Organ Transplants: Overall Health, Justice, and Risk
- HEAVEN, Equipoise, and What’s Best for the Patient
- Ethics Transplants? Addressing the Risks and Benefits of Guiding International Biomedicine
- Is There a Place for Humility in HEAVEN?
- Personal Identity and Head Transplant: A Psychological Analysis
- The New Age of Head Transplants: A Response to Critics
- Why HEAVEN Is Not About Saving Lives at All
- Throwing the Ethics (Hand)Book at Professional Organizations in the Neurological Sciences
- The Need for Further Fine-Grained Distinctions in Discussions of Authenticity and Deep Brain Stimulation
- Differences That Make a Difference in Disorders of Consciousness
- The Uncertainty of Consciousness and Why It Is Important
- DBS as a ‘Technological Fix’ or a ‘Regime of Care’? Recognizing the Importance of Narrative Identity in Neurosurgical Services
- Known Unknowns: Diagnosis and Prognosis in Disorders of Consciousness
- Unconscious Volition
- Changing the Conversation: A Capabilities Approach to Disordered Consciousness
- Reclaiming Narrative Identity and Recovery in Psychiatry
- Narrative Identity: Challenges for Retribution in the Criminal Justice System
- Against “We,” or an Argument for a Pluralistic Definition of Personhood in Bioethics
- Distributed Survival
- Others’ Contributions to an Individual’s Narrative Identity Matter
- Moral Responsibility, Alienation, and Multiplex Selves
- On the Ambiguity of ‘the Same Person’
- “Consciousness” as a Vague Predicate
- Personal Identity and Patient-Centered Medical Decision Making
- Does Narrative Identity Enhance Medical Decision Making?
- Brain–Computer Interfaces and Interactive Capacity in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness
- “I Just Wanna Get My Self, or My Story, Back Again”: Narrative Identity, Neurosurgical Intervention, and the Temporary Change Argument
- Cogitas Ergo Es? Metaphysical Humility in Disorders of Consciousness
- The Problems With Fixating on Consciousness in Disorders of Consciousness
- Is That the Same Person? Case Studies in Neurosurgery
- Sometimes, It’s Okay to Judge a Patient by Their Diagnosis
- A Taxonomy for Disorders of Consciousness That Takes Consciousness Seriously
- Identity Consistency and Medical Interventions
- Why Narrative Identity Matters: Preserving Authenticity in Neurosurgical Interventions
- Positive Outcomes and Causal Insufficiency Do Not Rule Out the Risk (and Importance) of DBS-Related Identity Changes
- The Missing Empirical Studies of DBS Recipients’ Views of Self
- Recognizing the Role of the Clinician in Agency-Influencing Interventions
- A Place for Subjectivity in Psychiatry
- Hypo- and Hyperagentic Psychiatric States, Next-Generation Closed-Loop DBS, and the Question of Agency
- Should We Be Concerned About Preserving Agency and Personal Identity in Patients With Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Systems?
- Beyond the Technology: Attribution and Agency in Treatments for Mental Disorders
- The Songs of the Sirens and the Wax in the Ears: An Autonomy-Based Tool for DBS Device Users
- Does DBS Alienate Identity or Does It Simply Fail to Restore Identity Already Eroded by Illness?
- The Biomedical Self and the Machine
- Could Closed-Loop DBS Enhance a Person’s Feeling of Being Free?
- Missing Oneself or Becoming Oneself? The Difficulty of What “Becoming a Different Person” Means
- The Impact of Closed-Loop DBS on Agency: An Open Question
- Three Kinds of Agency and Closed-Loop Neural Devices
- The Patient’s Voice in DBS Research: Advancing the Discussion through Methodological Rigor
- Two Concerns Regarding Subjectively Perceived Self-Estrangement
- What Neuroscience and Neurophilosophy Can Tell Us About the Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation on the Self
- Quantitative Anticipatory Ethical Analysis Should Inform Neurotechnology Development
- Relational Agency: Yes—But How Far? Vulnerability and the Moral Self
- Neuroessentialism in Discussions About the Impact of Closed-Loop Technologies on Agency and Identity
- The Multidimensionality and Context Dependency of Selves
- Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation and Its Compatibility With Autonomous Agency
- “I Miss You Too”: More Voices Needed to Examine the Phenomenological Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation
- Staying in the Loop: Relational Agency and Identity in Next-Generation DBS for Psychiatry
- I Miss Being Me: Phenomenological Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation
- Ethics, Ethicists, and Professional Organizations in the Neurological Sciences
- In Defense of Legal Obscurity
- Ethical and Legal Concerns Associated With the Comprehension of Legal Language and Concepts
- Crowdsourced tDCS Research: Feasible or Fanciful?
- Legal Language of Health Care Consent Forms: Complexity, Comprehension, and Impact on Patient Decision Making
- Science and Law Separated by Impenetrable Language Barriers: Overcoming Impediments to Much Needed Interactions
- Decision Making and Semiotic Vulnerability
- tDCS Research in a World With FDA Regulation
- Neuroethics for Neurology Residents: Concepts and Contingencies of a Pilot Neuroethics Curriculum
- Improving Ethics Standardization Through Examination
- What Can We Do for You? The Role of Ethics Experts in Neuroscience
- Moral Case Deliberation: Its Value for Neuroethics
- Beyond “Sign at the X”: In Pursuit of Comprehension
- The Role and Obligations of Ethicists as Members of Ethics Committees in Professional Organizations
- Ethics Education and Ethics Committees for Neuroscience Research Is a Timely Proposition
- Selected Abstracts From the 2016 International Neuroethics Society Annual Meeting
- Language Impairment and Legal Literacy: Is a Degree of Perfectionism Unavoidable?