Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

Democratic justice and status inequality in temporary labor migration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 December 2024By Mario J. Cunningham Matamoros Institute of Philosophy, KU, Leuven, BelgiumMario J Cunningham Matamoros is a FWO Fundamental Research PhD Fellow at Research in Political Philosophy & Ethics Leuven (RIPPLE) of KU Leuven’s Hoger Instituut voor Wijsbegeerte in Leuven, Belgium. His work focuses on political philosophy and migration ethics.
Denizenship and democratic equality
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 December 2024By Suzanne A. Bloks Daniel Häuser a Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UKb Department of Social Sciences, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanyDaniel Häuser is a PhD Researcher at the Department of Social Sciences, Universität Hamburg.Suzanne Bloks is a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
Can there be special rights for some citizens?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 December 2024By Andreas Niederberger Department of Philosophy, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, GermanyAndreas Niederberger is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany. His research focuses on cosmopolitan philosophy, especially on transnational democracy, human rights, and migration.
To take offence – or not to? Introduction to the symposium on Emily McTernan’s On Taking Offence (OUP 2023)
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 December 2024By Christian Schemmel Department of Politics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKChristian Schemmel is Senior Lecturer in Political Theory at Mancept, Department of Politics, University of Manchester.
On the ‘only joking’ defence against offence
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 November 2024By Richard Child Department of Politics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKRichard Child is a lecturer in Political Theory at the University of Manchester. He works on theories of nationalism, global justice, and punishment. He has published articles in journals such as Law and Philosophy, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, and Jurisprudence.
Taking offence as a civic virtue, on and offline
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 November 2024By Miriam Ronzoni Politics Department, University of Manchester, UKMiriam Ronzoni is Professor of Political Theory at the University of Manchester
Democracy and the ethics of voting
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 November 2024By Annabelle Lever Ecole Doctorale, and Cevipof, Sciences Po, Paris, FranceAnnabelle Lever is Professor of Political Philosophy at Sciences Po, Paris and a Permanent Researcher at Cevipof. Her research centrally concerns democratic theory, the political theory of elections and the ethics of voting, and ethics of public policy – especially issues of privacy, equality and security. She is the author of On Privacy (Routledge, 2011), editor of New Frontiers in the Philosophy of Intellectual Property (Cambridge, 2012) and co-editor of The Routledge Handbook of Ethics and Public Policy (Routledge, 2017) and Ideas that Matter: Democracy, Justice, Rights (Oxford 2019) and is a co-editor of CRISPP. She was the coordinator of the Horizon Europe project, ‘Reconstructing Democracy in Times of Crisis: A Voter-Centred Perspective’ https://www.redem-h2020.eu/ and initated and helps to run the ECPR group on The Political Theory of Elections. https://ecpr.eu/group/political-theory-elections Her Personal website is www.alever.net
A perfectionist original position?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 November 2024By Cécile Laborde Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKCécile Laborde holds the Nuffield Chair of Political Theory at the University of Oxford. She is the author of Pluralist Thought and the State (2000), Critical Republicanism (2008) and Liberalism’s Religion (2017). Her work on republicanism, non-domination, secularism, and religion has appeared in Journal of Political Philosophy, American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, Law and Philosophy, Legal Theory, British Journal of Political Science, European Journal of Political Theory, Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy and Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.
The emotion(s) of offense and victimhood culture
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 November 2024By Macalester Bell Department of Philosophy, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, USAMacalester Bell is an associate professor of philosophy at Bryn Mawr College.
Perfecting justice and legitimacy?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 November 2024By Paul Billingham Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKPaul Billingham is an Associate Professor of Political Theory at the University of Oxford. His research focuses on debates concerning political liberalism, public reason, and religion and politics. His work has been published in various journals in moral, political, and legal philosophy, including Journal of Moral Philosophy; European Journal of Political Theory; Politics, Philosophy & Economics; Legal Theory; and The Philosophical Quarterly.
In defence of taking offence: a reply to critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 November 2024By Emily McTernan Department of Political Science, School of Public Policy, University College London, London, UKEmily McTernan is Associate Professor in Political Theory at University College London.
Freedom, fairness, and sufficiency in Tahzib’s perfectionist theory of justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 November 2024By Jonathan Quong School of Philosophy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USAJonathan Quong is Professor of Philosophy and Law at the University of Southern California. He works in political, moral, and legal philosophy. He is the author of Liberalism Without Perfection (OUP 2011), and The Morality of Defensive Force (OUP 2020).
A Perfectionist Theory of Justice: Replies to Billingham, Laborde and Quon
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 November 2024By Collis Tahzib School of Philosophy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USACollis Tahzib is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. He works on moral and political philosophy. He is the author of A Perfectionist Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2022).
As-if trust
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 November 2024By Michael K. MacKenzie Alfred Moore a Department of Political Studies, Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canadab Department of Politics and International Relations, University of York, York, UKMichael K. MacKenzie is the Jarislowsky Chair in Trust and Political Leadership and a Professor of Political Studies at Vancouver Island University. He is the author of Future Publics: Democracy, Deliberation, and Future-Regarding Collective Action (Oxford University Press, 2021). He is co-editor (with Maija Setälä and Simo Kyllönen) of Democracy and the Future: Future-Regarding Governance in Democratic Systems (Edinburgh University Press, 2023). He has published numerous other articles on democratic theory, deliberation, democratic institutions, philanthropy, intergenerational relations, trust, and leadership.Alfred Moore is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Politics at the University of York. He is the author of Critical Elitism: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Politics of Expertise (Cambridge University Press, 2017). He has written widely on topics in democratic theory, including the politics of expertise, anonymity and deliberation, and democratic non-participation. In 2020-21 he held a British Academy Mid-Career Fellowship for the project Rethinking Political Competition.
On the coherence of the Rawlsian non-minimalist methodological approach
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 November 2024By Jeffrey Carroll Department of General Business, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USAJeffrey Carroll is an Assistant Professor of General Business in the John Chambers College of Business and Economics at West Virginia University. His research interests include the methodology of political philosophy, democratic theory, the morality of markets, and many other applied issues. He has published in The Journal of Politics, Journal of Business Ethics, Utilitas, Social Theory and Practice, Inquiry, Res Publica, Erasmus Journal of Philosophy and Economics, The Independent Review, the HEC Forum, amongst others.
Should I get angry – or just take offence? A response to McTernan
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 November 2024By Christopher Bennett Department of Philosophy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UKChristopher Bennett is a professor in the Department of Philosophy, University of Sheffield, U.K. Much of his research has concerned punishment, blame, apology, forgiveness, emotion, and expressive action. He is the author of The Apology Ritual (Cambridge, 2008), as well as articles in journals such as Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy and Public Affairs, and the Journal of the American Philosophical Association.
Introduction to the symposium on A Perfectionist Theory of Justice by Collis Tahzib
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 October 2024By Paul Billingham Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKPaul Billingham is an Associate Professor of Political Theory at the University of Oxford. His research focuses on debates concerning political liberalism, public reason, and religion and politics. His work has been published in various journals in moral, political, and legal philosophy, including Journal of Moral Philosophy; European Journal of Political Theory; Politics, Philosophy & Economics; Legal Theory; and The Philosophical Quarterly.
The right to information about future climate regulations
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 October 2024By Rutger Lazou Philosophisches Seminar and Heidelberg Center for the Environment, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyRutger Lazou is a postdoctoral researcher in practical philosophy at the University of Heidelberg, where he does research on the duty to inform about the regulatory and non-regulatory change in the context of the climate transition. He obtained his PhD at the University of Graz, having investigated what is owed to the losers of the energy transition, fossil fuel owners in particular. During his doctoral research, he worked as a visiting researcher at the University of Louvain-la-Neuve and the London School of Economics and Political Sciences. He also did research on the just energy transition in Austria for the TransFair project at the University of Graz. Before this, he studied moral sciences at the University of Ghent. In his master’s thesis, he focused on animal ethics, after which he published his book De toekomst van de kat [The Future of Cats] in collaboration with Uitgeverij Houtekiet.
The ultimate political question? Realism and omnicide
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 October 2024By Max Bouttell Annette Freyberg-Inan a Department of History, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlandsb Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsMax Bouttell is a PhD candidate in the Department of History at Maastricht University. His current research into the history and legacy of adaptive architecture considers the connections among counterculture, cybernetics, and neoliberalism.Annette Freyberg-Inan is Professor of International Relations Theory at the University of Amsterdam. She researches and teaches in the fields of International Relations, International Political Economy, European Politics, Political Theory, and Social Science Methodology. Her most recent publications include Universitas: Why Higher Education Must Be International (Lexington Books, 2024); “Critical Theories”, in Routledge Handbook of Great Power Competition, eds. Brian C.H. Fong and Ian Chong (Routledge, 2023); “Herman Gorter: An Introduction to the End of a World”, with Alex van Eijk, in The Handbook of Global Politics in the 22nd Century, eds. Laura Horn et al. (Palgrave, 2022); and “Critical Theories and Change in International Relations,” in: Oxford Handbook on Peaceful Change in International Relations, eds. T.V. Paul et al. (Oxford University Press, 2020).
Citizen liabilities for state-perpetrated injustices in non-democracies: toward a new authorisation account
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 October 2024By Brian Wong Yue Shun Department of Philosophy, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, ChinaBrian Wong Yue Shun is an Assistant Professor in Philosophy at the University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, China. His research interests concern primarily the intersection of political theory, applied ethics, and nascent technologies. His most recent works include ‘Towards A Confucian Ethics Governing Human-AI Relations’ in Dao Companion to Confucian Applied Ethics. New York: Springer Publishing, forthcoming, and ‘How Should Liberal Democratic Governments Treat Conscientious Disobedience as a Response to State Injustice?: A Proposal’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 2022, 91:141 – 167, co-authored with Joseph Chan Cho Wai (Academica Sinica). Brian is currently working on a book on a novel account of reparations for historical injustice.
Have we (really) done enough? Strengthening “outcome responsibility” in assessing moral duties toward refugees of protracted crises
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 September 2024By Muhammet Ali Asil Department of Government and International Affairs, Augustana University, Sioux Falls, SD, USAMuhammet Ali Asil is a Visiting Assistant Professor of Government and International Affairs at Augustana University. His primary research areas are the ethics of forced displacement, refugees, and moral political philosophy.
Care, democracy and ‘being part of the story’
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 September 2024By Chikako Endo Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, JapanChikako Endo is Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University. Her research interests include democratic theory and the political theory of work and welfare. Her recent article, ‘Structural Change Through “Collective Action as Democratic Practice”: Linking Grassroots Democracy with Social Justice’ (2023) appears in Political Studies.
From legitimate boundaries to legitimate boundary-making: towards a theory of post-sovereign membership politics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 August 2024By Svenja Ahlhaus Institute for Political Science, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanySvenja Ahlhaus is an Assistant Professor in Political Theory at the University of Münster. She is the leader of the research project “Democratic Legitimacy of Strategic Litigation in the Context of Religion” in the Cluster of Excellence “Religion and Politics” (EXC 2060). Her research interests focus on democratic theory, especially on belonging, legal mobilisation, and political representation. Ahlhaus is the author of “Die Grenzen des Demos” (Campus 2020) and has also published in Constellations and Philosophy & Social Criticism.
The moral roles of democratically elected politicians and civil servants
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 August 2024By Tine Hindkjaer Madsen Department of Design, Media and Educational Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DenmarkTine Hindkjaer Madsen is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Southern Denmark. Her research interests focus on issues such as the roles of politicians, civil servants and experts in democratic decision-making, democratic theory, evidence-based policy, and civil disobedience. She has published in Evidence and Policy (2024), The Journal of Moral Philosophy (2021), Criminal Law and Philosophy (2021), and Res Publica (2019). Her current research is funded by The Independent Research Fund Denmark (1023-00002B).
Property, nature, and the freedom to roam
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 August 2024By David Rischel Politics and International Studies, Warwick University, Coventry, UKDavid Rischel is a PhD-student at the Department of Politics and International Studies, Warwick University. His research focus on issues such as territorial justice and its relation to social justice more broadly, territorial jurisdiction, secession, political autonomy, and democracy.
The biodiversity crisis and global justice: a research agenda
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 August 2024By Chris Armstrong Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKChris Armstrong is Professor of Political Theory at the University of Southampton. These days he primarily works on the ocean, the biodiversity crisis, climate justice, territorial rights, and various themes in environmental justice. He is the author of many books, including most recently Global Justice and the Biodiversity Crisis (2024), A Blue New Deal: Why We Need a new Politics for the Ocean (2022), and Why Global Justice Matters (2019).
Socialism and non-domination: a relational egalitarian approach
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 July 2024By Callum Zavos MacRae Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, PolandCallum Zavos MacRae is a Marie Skłodowska–Curie POLONEZ BIS Fellow at the Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics at Jagiellonian University, Krakow, where he is principal investigator for the project “Equality, Freedom, and Domination”. His research covers various topics in political philosophy, such as theories of equality and freedom, the political philosophy of socialism, and economic justice. He has published papers in Erkenntnis (2023), The Journal of Value Inquiry (2023), and Res Publica (2023).
Global egalitarianism and climate change: against integrationism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 July 2024By Alex McLaughlin Department of Politics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UKAlex McLaughlin is a Lecturer in Political Theory at the University of Exeter. His work focuses on questions of global and intergenerational justice, particularly as they arise in relation to climate change.
The political implications of state neutrality as a range concept
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 May 2024By Ben Van de WallInstitute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumBen Van de Wall obtained his PhD as a member of RIPPLE (Research in Political Philosophy and Ethics Leuven) at the Institute of Philosophy at KU Leuven in Belgium. This article is part of a research project that investigates the relationship between state neutrality and political identity.
The moral ought in conjectural history
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 May 2024By Lea YpiGovernment Department, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UKLea Ypi is Professor in Political Theory in the Government Department, London School of Economics. She is the author of several academic monographs published by Oxford University Press and, most recently, of “Free: Coming of Age at the End of History”, which won the Royal Society of Literature Ondaatje Prize. Her work has been translated into more than 30 languages.
The political value of letting hopes die
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 May 2024By Dana HowardDepartment of Biomedical Anatomy and Education and Department of Philosophy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USADana Howard is an Assistant Professor at the Ohio State University Division of Bioethics, which is housed in the Department of Biomedical Anatomy and Education in the College of Medicine with a joint appointment in the Philosophy Department. Her work often focuses on the role that our anticipatory attitudes like hope and retrospective attitudes like regret should play in our decision-making both in political and medical contexts.
Hope in the time of climate change. A Kantian perspective
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 April 2024By Claudia BlöserDepartment of Philosophy, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyClaudia Blöser is Professor of Philosophy with a focus on Ethics at the University of Augsburg (Germany). Her research focuses on practical philosophy broadly construed, including the history of ethics (especially Kant), moral psychology (especially forgiveness, hope, and the philosophy of the emotions in general), and practical rationality. Blöser is the author of Zurechnung bei Kant (de Gruyter, 2014), and co-editor, with Titus Stahl, of The Moral Psychology of Hope (Rowman & Littlefield, 2020) as well as the entry “Hope” in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Introduction: the political philosophy of hope
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 April 2024By Jakob HuberInstitute of Philosophy, Freie Universität, Berlin, GermanyJakob Huber is Principal Investigator of the Junior Research Group “Democratic Hope” at Freie Universität Berlin. In his current book project, he brings together a broader interest in Immanuel Kant’s practical philosophy, recent debates about the nature and norms of hope as well as ‘Frankfurt School‘ ideas about history and progress in order to develop a political philosophy of hope. Earlier work focused on questions of migration, membership and boundaries. In his first book (published 2022 with Oxford University Press), he developed a novel reading of Kant’s cosmopolitanism as spelling out the implications of the simple fact that a plurality of corporeal agents coinhabit the earth’s spherical surface.
The power of hope? Powerlessness and strong democratic hope
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 April 2024By Katharina BauerSchool of Philosophy, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsKatharina Bauer is Associate Professor at the Erasmus School of Philosophy of Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. She does research on (techno)moral resilience, hope in times of crisis, dignity, and personal practical necessity.
The miraculous end of political hope
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 April 2024By Loren GoldmanDepartment of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USALoren Goldman is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania. In addition to many scholarly journal articles and book chapters, he is author of The Principle of Political Hope (Oxford University Press, 2023) and co-translator of Ernst Bloch’s Avicenna and the Aristotelian Left (Columbia University Press, 2019).
Ideological hope
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 April 2024By Titus StahlFaculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The NetherlandsTitus Stahl is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Groningen, working on systematic and historical issues in critical theory, the philosophy of hope, and the philosophy of privacy.
Making sense of feasibility constraints. An agent-centered account
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 April 2024By Federico ZuoloDepartment of Classics, Philosophy and History, University of Genova, Genova, ItalyFederico Zuolo is Associate professor of Political Philosophy at the University of Genoa, Italy. His research interests focus on feasibility, animal ethics, public reason, the basis of equality and disobedience. He is the author of Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason (Palgrave 2020). He has also published in The Journal of Applied Philosophy, The Journal of Value Inquiry, The Journal of Social Philosophy, The European Journal of Political Theory, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Utilitas, The International Journal of Philosophical Studies.
Supersession and compensation for historical injustice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 March 2024By Lukas H. MeyerTimothy Waligorea Department of Philosophy, University of Graz, Graz, Austriab Department of Political Science, Pace University, New York, USALukas H. Meyer is Professor of Philosophy at Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria.Timothy Waligore is Associate Professor of Political Science at Pace University, New York, US.
Cook Ding meets homo oeconomicus. Contrasting Daoist and economistic imaginaries of work
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 March 2024By Lisa HerzogMan-Kong LiTatiana Llagunoa Faculty of Philosophy, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, Netherlandsb Department of Social Science, The Hang Seng University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaLisa Herzog is a professor of political philosophy and director of the Center for Philosophy, Politics and Economics at the University of Groningen, Netherlands. She works on economic justice, organizational ethics, the philosophy of markets, workplace democracy, and political epistemology. Her latest monograph Citizen Knowledge. Markets, experts, and the infrastructures of democracy was published with OUP in 2023.Man-kong Li is an assistant professor and associate director of the Philosophy, Politics and Economics (PPE) program at the Department of Social Science, Hang Seng University of Hong Kong. He received his PhD in Political Science from Central European University. His research interests include political theory of socialism, history of political economy, urban social movements, and jurisprudence.Tatiana Llaguno is a postdoctoral researcher at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen. She obtained her PhD with distinction from the New School for Social Research in New York. She specializes in 19th-century European philosophy (esp. Hegel and Marx), social and political philosophy, and critical theory. Her work has been published in the Journal of Social Philosophy and Environmental Values.
Cancelling fiduciary excuses
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 February 2024By Robert E. GoodinPhilosophy, Australian National University, Canberra, AustraliaRobert Goodin is Emeritus Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at Australian National University. His research focuses on political theory and public policy. He is author of, most recently, Perpetuating Advantage: Mechanisms of Structural Injustice (2023) and Consent Matters (2024), both with Oxford University Press.
On corrupt institutions
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 February 2024By David M. C. MitchellFaculty of Humanities, Northeastern University London, London, UKDavid Mitchell is an associate professor of philosophy at Northeastern University, London. His research interests include institutional ethics, ancient Greek ethics and political philosophy, and imagination. He has recently published articles in Cortex (2021).
Everyday immigration ethics: Colombia, Venezuela and the case for vernacular response
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 February 2024By Dan BulleySchool of Law and Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UKDan Bulley is Professor of International Relations at Oxford Brookes University. His research focuses on the interaction of ethics, power and space in international politics, particularly in humanitarianism and migration. Dan is author ofEthics as Foreign Policy (2009), Migration, Ethics and Power (2017) and A Relational Ethics of Immigration (2023),as well as co-editor (with Jenny Edkins and Nadine El-Enany) ofAfter Grenfell: Violence, Resistance and Response (2019).
Does public justification face an ‘expert problem’? Some thoughts in light of the COVID-19 pandemic
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 February 2024By Andrew ReidPolitical Theory, University of Reading, Reading, UKAndrew Reid is a lecturer in political theory at the University of Reading. He works primarily on theories of public justification, issues around free speech, and mental health in political theory.
Cosmopolitan realism and the inward turn
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 February 2024By Eric W. ChengSchool of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University, Tokyo, JapanEric W. Cheng is an assistant professor of political theory at Waseda University, Japan. His research interests focus on the challenges, opportunities, and limits of liberal democratic citizenship and social inclusion. Cheng is the author of Hanging Together: Role-Based Constitutional Fellowship and the Challenge of Difference and Disagreement (Cambridge University Press 2022). He has also published in The Review of Politics (2019), Constellations (2022), Philosophy and Social Criticism (2022), Contemporary Political Theory (2023), and The Good Society (2024).
Mills, The racial contract and ideal theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 February 2024By D. C. MatthewDepartment of Philosophy, York University, Toronto, CanadaD. C. Matthew is a philosopher at York University in Toronto, Ontario, where he received his PhD in 2012. He is the author of “Racial Integration and the Problem of Relational Value,” Dialogue (2023), and other papers have appeared in Social Theory and Practice, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, and other journals. He is interested in political philosophy, philosophy of race and Africana philosophy.
The limits of nonideal duties: a partial vindication of fair shares
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy02 February 2024By Naima ChahbounDepartment of Political Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenNaima Chahboun is a researcher at the Department of Political Science, Stockholm University. This article forms part of her postdoctoral project “Slack-taking as Effective Rights Protection: The Cases of Refugee Admission and Climate Mitigation”, 2022-23, funded by Anna Ahlström and Ellen Terserus foundation. Previous work has been published in Politics, Philosophy & Economics (2023), Social Theory and Practice (2019), Res Publica (2017) and European Journal of Political Theory (2015).
When does attachment to natural resources count?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 January 2024By Virginia De BiasioDepartment of Politics, University of York, York, UKVirginia De Biasio is a doctoral student in the Department of Politics at the University of York (UK). Her research focuses on natural resources justice, territorial rights and the capabilities approach.
What’s wrong with relying on targeted advertising? Targeting the business model of social media platforms
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy29 January 2024By Hwa Young KimPhilosophy, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandHwa Young Kim is a Postdoc at the Chair of Political Philosophy at the University of Zurich. His current research interests are on integration and political polarisation.
What is an ally?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy29 January 2024By Holly Lawford-SmithWilliam Tuckwella School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiab School of Social Work and Arts, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, AustraliaHolly Lawford-Smith is an Associate Professor in the School of Historical and Philosophical Studies at the University of Melbourne. She works in social, moral, and political philosophy, with a particular interest in feminism. She is the author of four books: Is it Wrong to Buy Sex? A Debate (with Angie Pepper) (Routledge, forthcoming); Sex Matters: Essays in Gender Critical Feminism (Oxford University Press, 2023); Gender Critical Feminism (Oxford University Press, 2022), and; Not In Their Name: Are Citizens’ Culpable for Their States’ Actions (Oxford University Press, 2019).William Tuckwell is a postdoctoral research fellow at Charles Sturt University in Australia. He works primarily in epistemology and social and political philosophy. His work has been published in Thought: A Journal of Philosophy (2020), Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy (2022), Social Epistemology (2022), The Oxford Handbook to Consequentialism (2020), and the Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2017, 2019).
Strategic ignorance, is it appropriate for indigenous resistance?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 January 2024By Andrea Sullivan-ClarkeDepartment of Philosophy, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, CanadaAndrea Sullivan-Clarke is an Assistant Professor and Indigenous Peoples Scholar at the University of Windsor. She is a member of the wind clan of the Muscogee Nation of Oklahoma and conducts research in the area of social epistemology.
Charles Mills’ The Racial Contract at 25: Reconsiderations
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 January 2024By Lucius T. OutlawProfessor of Philosophy, Emeritus W. Alton Jones Chair, Emeritus, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USALucius T. Outlaw, Jr., author of On Race and Phiosophy and Critical Social Theory in the Interests of Black Folks (among other writings), was born and raised in Starkville, Mississippi, is a graduate of Fisk University (1967) and earned a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Boston College (1972). Recently retired (2023), he served on the faculties of Fisk University, Morgan State University, Haverford College, and Vanderbilt University, and as a visiting professor at Spelman College, Howard University, Hamilton College, and Boston College. He resides in Nashville, Tennessee, with wife Freida enriched by life shared with nearby four grandchildren and their parents, and extended family elsewhere.
Do agent-neutral & agent-relative reasons have a place in the Racial Contract?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 January 2024By Frank M. KirklandCUNY Hunter College Department of Philosophy & CUNY Graduate Center PhD Program in Philosophy, New York, USAFrank M. Kirkland is associate professor of philosophy at Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York (CUNY). He co-edited with Bill Lawson Frederick Douglass: A Critical Reader. His articles on Kant, Hegel, Husserl, Douglass, Du Bois, & Crummell have appeared in many journals and anthologies, Including “Philosophy & Phenomenological Research”, “Philosophy Compass”, “Critical Philosophy of Race”, “Kantian Review”, Blackwell’s Companion to African American Philosophy, and African American Political Thought. He is currently working on Hegel’s Idealism and the Black Atlantic Tradition.
“A paradigm shift in normative political theory: grappling with Mills’s the racial contract 25 Years Later”
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 January 2024By Elvira BasevichPhilosophy, University of California, DavisElvira Basevich is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at University of California, Davis. Her research focuses on how historical experiences should inform philosophical methods for defining normative concepts, such as freedom and justice. Her second monograph, A Duboisian Democracy: On Method and Practice is forthcoming with Oxford University Press.
“The roots (and routes) of the epistemology of ignorance”
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 January 2024By Linda Martín AlcoffDepartments of Philosophy, Graduate Center and Hunter College, City University of New YorkLinda Martín Alcoff is Professor of Philosophy at Hunter College and the Graduate Center, CUNY. Recent books include Rape and Resistance; (Polity 2018); The Future of Whiteness (Polity 2015); Visible Identities: Race, Gender and the Self (Oxford 2006).
On the importance of justice-promoting projects besides reform intervention
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 December 2023By Jennifer C. RubensteinDepartment of Politics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USAJennifer C. Rubenstein is an associate professor in the Department of Politics at the University of Virginia. She is the author of Between Samaritans and States: the Political Ethics of Humanitarian INGOs (OUP, 2015) as well as numerous articles and book chapters. She is working on a book about emergency politics.
Rethinking the bounds of politics: a symposium on Lucia Rafanelli’s promoting justice across borders: the ethics of reform intervention (Oxford University Press, 2021)
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 December 2023By Shuk Ying ChanUniversity College London, London, UKShuk Ying Chan is a Lecturer/Assistant Professor in Political Theory in the Department of Political Science at University College London. Her work has appeared in Politics, Philosophy & Economics and the American Political Science Review. Her forthcoming book, Postcolonial Global Justice (with Princeton University Press), grapples with the moral and political implications of decolonization as an unfinished project of global justice.
On the object and subject of reform intervention: comments on Lucia Rafanelli’s promoting justice across borders
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 December 2023By Paulina Ochoa EspejoDepartment of Political Science, Haverford College, Haverford, PA, USAPaulina Ochoa Espejo is the William Penn Foundation Professor at Haverford College (Pennsylvania, USA). She writes on borders and territorial rights, democratic theory, and populism. She is co–editor of the Oxford Handbook of Populism (OUP, 2017) and the author of On Borders: Territories, Legitimacy and the Rights of Place (OUP, 2020), The Time of Popular Sovereignty: Process and the Democratic State (PSUP, 2011), and articles in the American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Political Philosophy and Journal of Politics among others.
What toleration is not
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 December 2023By Arash AbizadehDepartment of Political Science, McGill University, Montreal, CanadaArash Abizadeh is R.B. Angus Professor of Political Science and Associate Member of Philosophy at McGill University. He is the author of Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics.
Whose duty? Which reform?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 December 2023By David OwenDepartment of Politics and International Relations/Centre for Democratic Futures, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKDavid Owen (FBA, FAcSS) is Professor of Social and Political Philosophy at the University of Southampton. His most recent books are The Political Philosophy of Internal Displacement, co-edited with Jamie Draper (Oxford University Press, forthcoming 2024); Displacement, Human Rights, and Sexual and Reproductive Health, co-authored with Natalia Cintra and Pia Riggirozzi (Bristol University Press, 2023); Democratic Multiplicity, co-edited with Jim Tully et al. (Cambridge University Press, 2022); What do we owe to refugees? (Polity 2020).
Reflections on reform intervention: a reply to critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 December 2023By Lucia M. RafanelliDepartment of Political Science and the Elliott School of International Affairs, The George Washington University, Washington, USALucia M. Rafanelli is an Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at The George Washington University. Her research interests include global justice, the ethics of intervention, the ethics of resistance, group agency, and ethics and artificial intelligence. She is the author of Promoting Justice Across Borders: The Ethics of Reform Intervention (Rafanelli, 2021).
Taking responsibility responsibly: looking forward to remedying injustice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 December 2023By Susan ErckDepartment of Philosophy & Religion, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, USASusan Erck is an assistant professor of Philosophy at Mississippi State University. She completed her PhD in Philosophy at the CUNY Graduate Center. She specializes in Social Philosophy and Political Philosophy. She is interested in etiology of injustice and moral and political questions surrounding the achievement of ecological sustainability.
Productive freedom
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 November 2023By Tully RectorFaculty of Law, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsTully Rector is Assistant Professor in the Philosophy of Law at Radboud University, in The Netherlands. He works primarily on problems at the intersection of political theory, moral philosophy, and the philosophy of economics. He has recently published papers in the Review of Social Economy, Cambridge Journal of Economics, and the Journal of Law and Political Economy.
The shallow ecology of public reason liberalism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 November 2023By Fred MatthewsDepartment of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKFred Matthews is studying for a PhD in philosophy at the University of Bristol, specializing in moral and political philosophy. He previously studied an MPhil in political theory at the University of Oxford, and a BA in philosophy at the University of East Anglia. His research interests include liberal political theory, virtue ethics, applied epistemology, and environmental ethics.
Realism against delegitimation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 November 2023By Dominik AustrupFaculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, DFG Graduate Program 'Collective Decision-Making', University of Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanyDominik Austrup is a doctoral researcher in political theory at the University of Hamburg. He is a member of the DFG Graduate Program ‘Collective Decision-Making’ and works mainly in the fields of political realism and democratic theory. His research has recently been published in ZPTh – Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie (2023).
Constructivist and well-being based justifications of human rights. Rivals or allies?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 November 2023By Christian BaatzDepartment of Philosophy, Kiel University, Kiel, GermanyChristian Baatz is Juniorprofessor of Climate Ethics, Sustainability and Global Justice at Kiel University, Germany. He is leading three research projects on the ethics of Carbon Dioxide Removal and a junior research group on the just distribution of climate change adaptation finance. He has published in WIRES Climate Change (2023), Analyse & Kritik (2018) and Environmental Values (2016), among others.
Who are the people? Associative freedom and the democratic boundary problem
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 November 2023By Frank DietrichInstitute of Philosophy, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyFrank Dietrich, PhD, is a professor of ethics and political philosophy at the Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Germany. His research focuses, inter alia, on liberal pluralism, territorial rights, and secession and has been published in journals including Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, International Theory, Journal of Social Philosophy, and Journal of Applied Philosophy.
Normative behaviourism: groups it cannot reach?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 November 2023By Simon StevensDepartment of Politics and International Relations, De Montfort University, Leicester, UKSimon Stevens is a senior lecturer at De Montfort University whose research interests are civil disobedience, homelessness and methods in political philosophy. He won first prize in the ISRF International essay competition (2017), has also published in The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (Stevens, 2023), and is the author of Leper Islands and The Bureaucratisation of Civil Disobedience (2021) (Stevens, 2023). He is currently writing a political theory textbook for SAGE, that aims to transform, decolonise and diversify the curriculum, and won the 2022 Political Studies Association Bernard Crick Prize for Outstanding Teaching.
Boundaries and varieties of republicanism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 November 2023By Adrián HerranzLaw Department, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, SpainAdrián Herranz is a PhD candidate at Pompeu Fabra University. His research interests include republican political philosophy, economic democracy, labour relations and social theory related to the former topics.
A Lockean account of the moral status of undocumented immigrants
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 November 2023By J.K. NumaoDepartment of Foreign Languages and Liberal Arts, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, JapanJ.K. Numao is an Associate Professor of Foreign Languages and Liberal Arts in the Faculty of Science and Technology at Keio University. His research interests are in political theory and the history of political thought, especially the ideas of the seventeenth-century English thinker John Locke. He has written on topics ranging from toleration to emigration.
The claim-right to exclude and the right to do wrong
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 October 2023By Sahar AkhtarMcDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, USASahar Akhtar is faculty at Georgetown University and writes at the intersection of philosophy, politics, and economics. Her book, Immigration and Discrimination, is forthcoming with Oxford University Press, UK. She has published many articles on immigration, including recently in Ethics.
Introduction to the symposium: intentional citizenship and citizens’ remedial obligation to share the compensation burden
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 October 2023By Jinyu SunDepartment of Sociology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaJinyu Sun is an Associate Researcher at the Department of Sociology, Zhejiang University. Her research interests include collective action, political obligation, and responsibility for injustice.
Responsible citizens of responsible states
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 October 2023By Jeff KingFaculty of Laws, University College London, London, UKJeff King is a Professor of Law at the Faculty of Laws, University College London and Research Director at the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law. His research interests span UK and comparative public law, including the international law of sovereign debt, as well as legal and constitutional theory. He is the author of Judging Social Rights (CUP 2012) and co-editor of The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism (CUP 2018) and of the forthcoming The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory (CUP 2024) (with Richard Bellamy). Between 2019-21 he was specialist legal adviser to the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution. The author thanks Professors Richard Bellamy and Massimo Renzo for comments on an earlier draft.
Poetry, myth and storytelling in the history of political theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 October 2023By Sophie SmithDepartment of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKSophie Smith is Associate Professor of Political Theory in the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Oxford and a Tutorial Fellow of University College. Her research focuses on early modern political thought and twentieth-century intellectual history, especially the history of feminist political theory.
Testing intentional citizenship
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 October 2023By Jinyu SunDepartment of Sociology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaJinyu Sun is an Associate Researcher at the Department of Sociology, Zhejiang University. Her research interests include collective action, political obligation, and responsibility for injustice.
Intentional participation in the state
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 October 2023By David MillerNuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKDavid Miller is Professor of Political Theory and Senior Research Fellow at Nuffield College, Oxford. His research interests include nationality, territory and immigration, and he is currently beginning a new project on climate migration. His books include National Responsibility and Global Justice (Oxford University Press, 2007) Strangers in Our Midst: the Political Philosophy of Immigration (Harvard University Press, 2016) and Is Self-Determination a Dangerous Illusion? (Polity, 2020).
Obedience responsibility
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 October 2023By Richard VernonDepartment of Political Science, Western University, London, CanadaRichard Vernon is a Distinguished Professor at the Department of Political Science, Western University. He works on contemporary political theory, especially issues of global and historical justice, and selected issues (such as toleration and citizenship) in the history of political thought.
A republican fiscal constitution for the EMU
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 September 2023By Stefano Merloa UCL Department of Political Science, JohnStuart Mill College, London, UKb VU Amsterdam, John Stuart Mill College, Amsterdam, NLStefano Merlo is a PhD candidate at the John Stuart Mill College VU Amsterdam and Assistant Lecturer at UCL’s Department of Political Science. He researches at the intersection of political theory, political science and macroeconomics and has published in the Journal of Politics, the Swiss Political Science Review, the Review of Social Economy and the Journal of European Integration.
Individuals’ responsibilities to remove carbon
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 September 2023By Hanna SchübelUniversity of Fribourg Environmental Sciences and Humanities Institute, SwitzerlandHanna Schübel is a PhD student in Environmental Humanities and a research assistant at the University of Fribourg Environmental Sciences and Humanities Institute, Switzerland. In her dissertation on the ethics of carbon dioxide removal, she investigates the moral responsibilities of different agents to remove carbon dioxide to mitigate climate change. Her research interests include climate justice and environmental justice and particularly the responsibilities of individuals and corporations in these contexts.
Civic virtue in non-ideal republics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 August 2023By M. Victoria Costa
Correcting unjust enrichment: explaining and defending the duty to disgorge the benefits of wrongdoing
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 August 2023By Edward A. Page
The great reconciliation of reason and myth
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 August 2023By Bryan Garsten
Philosophical discourse and myth
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 August 2023By Kinch Hoekstra
Introduction: Myths of Plato, myths of modernity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 August 2023By Tae-Yeoun Keum
On the political and normative implications of myth as philosophical discourse
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 August 2023By Carmen Lea Dege
Should Rawlsian end-state principles be constrained by popular beliefs about justice?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 August 2023By Kim Angell
The forward-looking polluter pays principle for a just climate transition
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 August 2023By Fausto Corvino
If you polluted, you’re included: the all-affected principle and carbon tax referenda
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 July 2023By David Matias Paaske
Casting the first stone: did Cohen have standing to condemn Israel’s condemnation of terrorism?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 July 2023By Daniel Statman
Political liberalism and the metaphysics of languages
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 July 2023By Renan Silva
The political speech rights of the tokenized
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 July 2023By Connor K. Kianpour
“Human” dignity beyond the human
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 July 2023By Matthew Wray Perry
From lived urban experiences to cross-contextual theory: a selection dilemma
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 July 2023By Marta Wojciechowska
Compromise between realism and moralism: Towards an integrated theoretical framework
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 June 2023By Patrick Overeem
Global justice, sovereign wealth funds and saving for the future
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 June 2023By Elizabeth Finneron-Burns
On the reasonability of reasoning with the religiously unreasonable
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 June 2023By Marilie Coetsee
Democracy and pluralism after European integration: Incorporating the contested character of the EU
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 May 2023By Bertjan Wolthuis
Down with this sort of thing: why no public statue should stand forever
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 May 2023By Carl Fox
Voter incompetence and the legitimacy of representative democracy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 May 2023By Andreas T. Christiansen
The asymmetry between domestic and global legitimacy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 May 2023By Matthias Brinkmann
A fair division of the surplus?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 April 2023By Pietro Maffettone
Global public reason: too thick or too thin
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 March 2023By Maximillian Afnan
Common-pool resources and democracy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 March 2023By Spencer McKay
´Kevin Vallier’ Trust in a Polarized Age
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 March 2023By Chandran Kukathas
Two questions for Professor Vallier
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 March 2023By Paul Weithman
An empirical perspective on improving trust in a polarized age
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 March 2023By Diana C. Mutz
Trust in a polarized age: a reply to critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 February 2023By Kevin Vallier
Introduction: public justification, legitimacy, and social trust
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 February 2023By Adam Gjesdal
Does the empirical trust literature tell us how to restore trust?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 February 2023By Pierre-Guillaume Méon
Institutional design beyond democratic innovations
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 February 2023By Claudia Landwehr
Justifying types of representative democracy: a response
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 January 2023By Steffen Ganghof
Inward internationalisation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 January 2023By Tadhg Ó Laoghaire
Semi-parliamentarism and the challenges of institutional design
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 January 2023By Sarah Birch
Inclusion and the design of democratic executives in Steffen Ganghof’s Beyond presidentialism and parliamentarism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 December 2022By Kevin J. Elliott
Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarianism introduction to the symposium
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 December 2022By Albert Weale
Political equality and institutional choice: lessons from Steffen Ganghof’s beyond parliamentarism and presidentialism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 December 2022By James Lindley Wilson
Bureaucratic discretion, legitimacy, and substantive justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 December 2022By Kate Vredenburgh
‘Power concedes nothing without a demand’: the structural injustice of climate change
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 November 2022By Lukas Sparenborg
Immigration enforcement and justifications for causing harm
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 October 2022By Kevin K. W. Ip
Are citizens responsible for global wrongs?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 October 2022By Anna Stilz
Meaningful work, nonperfectionism, and reciprocity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 October 2022By Caleb Althorpe
The Kantian case against democracy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 October 2022By Alon Harel
Kantian democracy and public administration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 October 2022By Anna Stilz
Symposium on The Privatized State
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 October 2022By Cécile Laborde
The privatized state and our own
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 October 2022By Emma Saunders-Hastings
Kantian democracy and administrative legitimacy: a reply to my critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 October 2022By Chiara Cordelli
Criminalising (cubes of) truth: animal advocacy, civil disobedience, and the politics of sight
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 October 2022By Serrin Rutledge-Prior
In defense of voting method publicity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 October 2022By Aylon Manor
Against the status quo: the social as a resource of critique in realist political theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 September 2022By Manon Westphal
Doing Realist Political Theory: Introduction
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 September 2022By Manon Westphal
Do global justice theorists need to alter their normative focus to accommodate changing empirical circumstances?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 September 2022By Teppo Eskelinen
Can real actions justify realist principles? Normative behaviourism as a member of the realist family
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 September 2022By Jonathan Floyd
Realism and real politics. The gap between promise and practice in Bernard Williams’ realism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 September 2022By Janosch Prinz
The multidimensional recognition of religion
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 September 2022By Simon Thompson
Political realism and the relationship between ideal and non-ideal theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 September 2022By Greta Favara
Data based radicalism? data usage and the problem of critical distance in contextual and empirical political theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 September 2022By Nahshon Perez
Can business corporations be legally responsible for structural injustice? The social connection model in (legal) practice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 September 2022By Barbara Bziuk
Is political realism barren?: normativity and story-telling
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 September 2022By Nat Rutherford
Data-owning democracy or digital socialism?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 September 2022By James Muldoon
Gentrification as domination
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 September 2022By David Jenkins
Introduction: corporate power and political domination
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 August 2022By Christian Neuhäuser
Firms as coalitions of democratic cultures: towards an organizational theory of workplace democracy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 August 2022By Roberto Frega
Business interest in human rights regulation: shaping actors’ duties and rights
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 August 2022By Doris Fuchs
Corporate knowledge and corporate power. Reining in the power of corporations as epistemic agents
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 August 2022By Lisa Herzog
The natural right to slack
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 August 2022By Stanislas Richard
Digital freedom and corporate power in social media
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 August 2022By Andreas Oldenbourg
Wealth creation without domination. The fiduciary duties of corporations
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 August 2022By Rutger Claassen
Monetary-policy delegation for democrats
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 August 2022By Clemens Pinnow
‘But it’s your job!’ the moral status of jobs and the dilemma of occupational duties
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 August 2022By Lisa Herzog
Contributivist views on democratic inclusion: on economic contribution as a condition for the right to vote
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 July 2022By Jonas Hultin Rosenberg
Freedom, security, and the COVID-19 pandemic
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 July 2022By Josette Anna Maria Daemen
Guarding against imperium: The implications of Pettit’s theoretical framework for a model of neo-republican democracy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 July 2022By Nicholas Dzoba
Nonhuman animals and the all affected interests principle
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 July 2022By Pablo Magaña
Introduction: methodology and non-ideal theory in Christine Hobden’s Citizenship in a Globalised World
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 May 2022By Stephanie Collins
The problems democracy can solve
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 May 2022By Matthew Chick
Facing up to complexity again: author’s reply to critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 May 2022By Christine Hobden
The elitist defence of democracy against populists using education and money
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 May 2022By Tore Vincents Olsen
Cosmopolitan state citizenship: realistic utopias and their limits
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 May 2022By Ashwini Vasanthakumar
Should socialists be republicans?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 May 2022By Jan Kandiyali
Equal responsibility in an unequal world?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 May 2022By Shuk Ying Chan
Educating citizens to public reason: what can we learn from interfaith dialogue?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 May 2022By Aurélia Bardon
Against the budget view in climate ethics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 April 2022By Lukas Tank
Fighting fire with fire: the ethics of retaliatory gerrymandering
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 April 2022By Gianni Sarra
Legislative expatriate representation: a conditional defence of overseas constituencies
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 April 2022By Marcus Carlsen Häggrot
Is child disenfranchisement justified?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 April 2022By Nico Brando
What’s wrong with the presentist bias? On the threat of intergenerational domination
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 April 2022By Anja Karnein
Homelessness and freedom
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 April 2022By Katy Wells
Should refugees in the European Union have voting rights?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 April 2022By Ali Emre Benli
Electoral representation revisited: Introduction
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 April 2022By Benjamin Boudou
Representing non-citizens: a proposal for the inclusion of all affected interests
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 April 2022By Benjamin Boudou
Universal enfranchisement for citizens with cognitive disabilities – A moral-status argument
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 April 2022By Regina Schidel
The supersession of Indigenous understandings of justice and morals
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 April 2022By Gordon Christie
Supersession, non-ideal theory, and dominant distributive principles
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 April 2022By Burke A. Hendrix
Superseding historical injustice? New critical assessments
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 April 2022By Lukas H. Meyer
Group agency and the challenges of repairing historical injustice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 April 2022By Jeff Spinner-Halev
Superseding structural linguistic injustice? Language revitalization and historically-sensitive dignity-based claims
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 April 2022By Seunghyun Song
Indigenous governance now: settler colonial injustice is not historically past
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 April 2022By Esme G. Murdock
Colonialism and rights supersession: a Kant-inspired perspective
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 April 2022By Julio Montero
The supersession thesis, climate change, and the rights of future people
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 April 2022By Santiago Truccone-Borgogno
Supersession: A reply
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 April 2022By Jeremy Waldron
In defence of progressive political change: against conservative progress and other normative troubles
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 March 2022By Ilaria Cozzaglio
EU Citizenship for a European Republic of the Free and Equals or of States
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 March 2022By Dimitrios Efthymiou
The European Union and diminished state sovereignty
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 March 2022By Carmen E. Pavel
How political is Republicanism? Walking the fine line between moralism and realism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy02 March 2022By Dorothea Gädeke
Demoicracy and domination in a G2 world
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 February 2022By Glyn Morgan
A reply to my critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 February 2022By Richard Bellamy
A Republican Europe of States: synopsis and introduction to the symposium
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 February 2022By Richard Bellamy
The open borders debate, migration as settlement, and the right to travel
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 February 2022By Ugur Altundal
Republican intergovernmentalism as a realistic Utopia
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 February 2022By Valentina Gentile
On the edge of anarchism: a realist critique of philosophical anarchism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 February 2022By Zoltán Gábor Szűcs
Symmetry and interpretation: a deliberative framework for judging recognition claims
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 January 2022By Diana Elena Popescu
On the need for political integration in cities
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 December 2021By Katarina Pitasse Fragoso
Capable deliberators: towards inclusion of minority minds in discourse practices
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 December 2021By Thomas Schramme
The future of work: freedom, justice and capital in the age of artificial intelligence
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 December 2021By Filippo Santoni de Sio
Can transitional amnesties promote restorative justice?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 December 2021By Patrick Lenta
Legitimacy as the right to function
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 December 2021By Sören Hilbrich
Colonial Genealogies of Immigration Controls, Self-Determination, and the Nation-State
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy02 December 2021By Torsten Menge
The function of the ideal in liberal democratic contexts
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 November 2021By Kaveh Pourvand
On popular votes and the problems of self-government a systemic case for ordinary popular vote processes
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 November 2021By Joseph Lacey
On popular votes and the problems of self-government: A systemic case for ordinary popular vote processes
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 November 2021By Joseph Lacey
The role of political ontology for Indigenous self-determination
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 October 2021By Matthias Kramm
Disadvantage, disagreement, and disability: re-evaluating the continuity test
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 September 2021By Jessica Begon
Distributive sufficiency, inequality-blindness and disrespectful treatment
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 July 2021By Vincent Harting
Should refugees govern refugee camps?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 July 2021By Felix Bender
The practical relevance of ideal theory as part of the ideal guidance approach
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 May 2021By Jürgen Sirsch
John Locke on historical injustice: the redemptive power of contract
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 May 2021By Brian Smith
Work, Rest, Play… and the Commute
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 May 2021By David Jenkins
Education for autonomy, and for care: a comment on Asha Bhandary’s Freedom to Care
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 May 2021By Andrea C. Westlund
Conditions of radical care: a response to Asha Bhandary’s Freedom to Care
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 May 2021By Kelly Gawel
The theory of liberal dependency care: a reply to my critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 May 2021By Asha Bhandary
Précis: Freedom to Care
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 May 2021By Asha Bhandary
Just add care and stir? The limits of mainstream liberal theory for taking on dependency care
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 May 2021By Daniel Engster
Justice, autonomy and care: symposium on Asha Bhandary’s freedom to care: liberalism, dependency care and justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 May 2021By Amy Mullin
Compensatory justice and the wrongs of deportation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 May 2021By Juan Espindola
Agency, global responsibility, and the speculations of ordinary life
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 May 2021By Vafa Ghazavi
Political Liberalism and Cognitive Disability: an Inclusive Account
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 April 2021By Areti Theofilopoulou
Institutions of justice and intuitions of fairness: contesting goods, rules and inequalities
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 April 2021By Udo Pesch
Homophobes, Racists, and the child’s right to be loved unconditionally
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 March 2021By Riccardo Spotorno
Civic equality as a democratic basis for public reason
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 March 2021By Henrik D. Kugelberg
Unearthing grounded normative theory: practices and commitments of empirical research in political theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 March 2021By Brooke Ackerly
Taming dignity for multiculturalism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 March 2021By Helder De Schutter
Beyond a diachronic indifference? Grounding the normative commitment towards intergenerational justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy02 March 2021By Alberto Pirni
In praise of dystopias: a Hobbesian approach to collective action
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 March 2021By Ioannis D. Evrigenis
Justice, emotions, and solidarity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 February 2021By Francesco Tava
Justice, emotions, socially disruptive technologies
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 February 2021By Benedetta Giovanola
Emotions and challenges to justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 February 2021By Roberto Mordacci
When is lack of emotion a problem for justice? Four views on legal decision makers’ emotive life
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 February 2021By Patricia Mindus
Is blame warranted in applying justice?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 February 2021By Erin I. Kelly
Compliance with justice: shared values and modus vivendi
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 February 2021By Francesca De Vecchi
The radical realist critique of rawls: a reconstruction and response
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 February 2021By Paul Raekstad
The radical realist critique of Rawls: a reconstruction and response
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 February 2021By Paul Raekstad
Righting domestic wrongs with refugee policy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 February 2021By Matthew Lindauer
Review article: the ethics of population policies
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 February 2021By Henrik Andersson
The tales we tell: Bombay, Mumbai and I
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 February 2021By Farah Godrej
Qingdao: the city of ideals
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 February 2021By P. Wang
Istanbul: city of layers and counter-currents
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 February 2021By Kateri Carmola
Amsterdam: tolerance and inclusion
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 January 2021By Avner de Shalit
Introduction: cities and identities
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 January 2021By Daniel A. Bell
Tokyo: city of fires and flowers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 January 2021By Leanne Ogasawara
London: a city of humanism and power
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 January 2021By Mark Bevir
Basic human needs: abstraction, indeterminacy and the political account of need
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 January 2021By George Boss
The duty to naturalise refugees
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 January 2021By Rebecca Buxton
From self-defense to violent protest
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 January 2021By Edmund Tweedy Flanigan
The practice and its authority: an elaboration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 December 2020By Charles R. Beitz
Charles Beitz’ idea of human rights and the limits of law
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 December 2020By Alain Zysset
Global (in)justice and the human right to housing. A practice-based approach
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 December 2020By Regina Kreide
Developments and Challenges for a Political Ideal of Human Rights.
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 December 2020By David Álvarez
Developments and Challenges for a Political Idea of Human Rights.
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 December 2020By David Álvarez
Immigration and state system legitimacy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 December 2020By Daniel Sharp
Are human rights associative rights? The debate between humanist and political conceptions of human rights revisited
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 December 2020By Cristina Lafont
Which practice? – Rescuing the practical conception of human rights
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 December 2020By Luise K. Müller
Add international courts to The Idea of Human Rights and stir … on Beitz’ The Idea of Human Rights after 10 years
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 December 2020By Andreas Follesdal
Human rights practices
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 December 2020By Andrea Sangiovanni
Review article: a liberal theory of collective rights
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 November 2020By Mohammed Ben Jelloun
Secession and political capacity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 November 2020By Kim Angell
Social wrongs
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 November 2020By Arto Laitinen
May political parties refuse to govern? On integrity, compromise and responsibility
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 November 2020By Fabian Wendt
An epistemic case for confucian democracy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 October 2020By Elena Ziliotti
Colonialism, injustices of the past, and the hole in Nine
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 October 2020By Daniel Weltman
In defence of fear: COVID-19, crises and democracy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 October 2020By Dan Degerman
Does collective unfreedom matter? Individualism, power and proletarian unfreedom
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 October 2020By Andreas T. Schmidt
Facts, principles, and global justice: does the ‘real world’ matter?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 August 2020By Johann Go
The representative system
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 August 2020By Felipe Rey
Neo-classical liberalism, ‘market freedom’, and the right to private property
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 August 2020By Gavin Kerr
The choice of efficiencies and the necessity of politics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy29 July 2020By Michael Bennett
Populism on the periphery of democracy: moralism and recognition theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 July 2020By Charlene McKibben
Democratic silence: two forms of domination in the social contract tradition
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 July 2020By Toby Rollo
Silence in political theory and practice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 July 2020By Mónica Brito Vieira
Occupancy rights: life planners and the Navajos
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 July 2020By Margaret Moore
Property without authority? Between natural law and the Kantian state
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 July 2020By Jakob Huber
Legitimacy, self-determination, and conditional cooperators
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 July 2020By Arthur Hill
The great wall of silence: voice–silence dynamics in authoritarian regimes
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 July 2020By Mónica Brito Vieira
Symposium on Anna Stilz, territorial sovereignty. A philosophical exploration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 July 2020By Margaret Moore
The Hero’s Silences: Vulnerability, Complicity, Ambivalence
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 July 2020By Mihaela Mihai
Occupancy rights: dynamic as well as located
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 July 2020By Alejandra Mancilla
Silence and democratic institutional design
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 July 2020By Sean W. D. Gray
Self-determination, group identity and the common will
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 July 2020By Cara Nine
Reply to my critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 July 2020By Anna Stilz
Mind the gaps: silences, political communication, and the role of expectations
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 July 2020By Theo Jung
Two forms of responsibility: Reassessing Young on structural injustice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 June 2020By Valentin Beck
The limit of climate justice: unfair sacrifice and aggregate harm
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 June 2020By Alex McLaughlin
Towards Rawlsian ‘property-owning democracy’ through personal data platform cooperatives
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 June 2020By Michele Loi
What militant democrats and technocrats share
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 June 2020By Anthoula Malkopoulou
A Care Ethical Justification for an Interest Theory of Human Rights
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 June 2020By Thomas E. Randall
Can political realism be action-guiding?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 June 2020By Luke Ulaş
Democracy, respect for judgement and disagreement on democratic inclusion
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 June 2020By Jonas Hultin Rosenberg
To think and act ecologically: the environment, human animality, nature
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 May 2020By Didier Zúñiga
Cosmopolitanism and unipolarity: the theory of hegemonic transition
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 May 2020By Jelena Belic
Colonialism, territory and pre-existing obligations
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 May 2020By Cara Nine
Beyond the state: the moral nexus between corporations and refugees
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 May 2020By Benedikt Buechel
But anyone can mix their labor: a reply to Cheneval
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 May 2020By Jakob Thrane Mainz
On world order and opportunities not to be wasted
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 May 2020By Christof Royer
Can liberal integrity handle disagreement? Perhaps not
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 March 2020By Alexander S. Kirshner
Friend of the people
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 March 2020By Robert Sparling
The limits of liberal integrity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 March 2020By Jeff Spinner-Halev
The people’s integrity and property – a reply to my critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 March 2020By Shmuel Nili
Public property, collective integrity, and environmental justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 March 2020By Elisabeth Ellis
The liberal populism of Shmuel Nili’s The People’s Duty
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 March 2020By James Lindley Wilson
The people’s duty
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 March 2020By Shmuel Nili
A republican argument for the rule of law
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 March 2020By Frank Lovett
Taking back control
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 March 2020By Robert Jubb
Sovereignty over natural resources
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 March 2020By Ioannis Kouris
Long-term urgent interests and human rights practice: a challenge to the political conception
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 March 2020By Andre Santos Campos
The costs and benefits of prosecution: a contractualist justification of amnesty
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 March 2020By Robert Patrick Whelan
Deliberative disagreement and compromise
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 March 2020By Ian O’Flynn
Should vegans compromise?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy02 March 2020By Josh Milburn
Health, migration and human rights
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 February 2020By Johannes Kniess
Domination and misframing in the refugee regime
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 January 2020By Jamie Draper
Easterlin-paradox: a revisionist account for the enlightened politician
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy29 January 2020By Shiri Cohen Kaminitz
The social bases of freedom
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 January 2020By Harrison Frye
Free to be you and me: an introduction to Ghosh’s De-Moralizing Gay Rights
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 January 2020By Patti Tamara Lenard
The significance of being gay in Ghosh’s De-Moralizing Gay Rights
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 January 2020By Kerri Woods
On being good gay: ‘covering’ and the social structure of being LGBT+
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 January 2020By Annamari Vitikainen
Laborde, liberalism, and religion
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy02 January 2020By Aurélia Bardon
De-Moralizing Gay Rights – an overview
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 December 2019By Cyril Ghosh
Moralizing queer dialectics: a response to Cyril Ghosh
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 December 2019By H. Howell Williams
De-moralizing gay rights: a reply to my critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 December 2019By Cyril Ghosh
Covering and the moral duty to resist oppression
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 December 2019By Peter Higgins
Green republicanism and a ‘Just Transition’ from the tyranny of economic growth
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 December 2019By John Barry
The Justice and Legitimacy of Geoengineering
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 December 2019By Stephen Gardiner
Why indigenous land rights have not been superseded – a critical application of Waldron’s theory of supersession
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 December 2019By Kerstin Reibold
Violence and the materiality of power
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 December 2019By Torsten Menge
Vulnerability and non-domination: a republican perspective on natural limits
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 December 2019By Peter F. Cannavò
Educational adequacy and educational equality: a merging proposal
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 December 2019By Fernando de los Santos Menéndez
The Anthropocene and the republic
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 December 2019By Marcel Wissenburg
Preference transformation through ‘green political judgement formation’? Rethinking informal deliberative citizen participation processes
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 December 2019By Carolin Bohn
The irrelevance of poverty for the morality of the lending system
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 November 2019By Cristian Dimitriu
The Justice and Legitmacy of Geoengineering
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 November 2019By Stephen Gardiner
Against the anticosmopolitan basic structure argument: the systemic concept of distributive justice and economic divisions of labor
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 November 2019By Edward Andrew Greetis
Republican environmental rights
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 November 2019By Ashley Dodsworth
Reconfiguring non-domination: green politics from pre-emption to inoperosity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 November 2019By Luigi Pellizzoni
Three approaches to social unity and solidarity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 November 2019By Tuğba Sevinç
Democratic authority to geoengineer
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 November 2019By Holly Lawford-Smith
Freedom and ecological limits
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 November 2019By Jorge Pinto
A mission-driven research program on solar geoengineering could promote justice and legitimacy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 November 2019By David R. Morrow
Geoengineering the climate and ethical challenges: what we can learn from moral emotions and art
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 November 2019By Sabine Roeser
Fighting risk with risk: solar radiation management, regulatory drift, and minimal justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 November 2019By Jonathan Wolff
The Panglossian politics of the geoclique
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 November 2019By Catriona McKinnon
Why not uncivil disobedience?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 November 2019By William E. Scheuerman
Towards a non-ideal theory of climate migration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 August 2019By Joachim Wündisch
Kant, coercion, and the legitimation of inequality
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 August 2019By Benjamin L. McKean
Accessibility, pluralism, and honesty: a defense of the accessibility requirement in public justification
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 August 2019By Baldwin Wong
Review article: forget populism?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 August 2019By Andy Scerri
Rationalism and the silencing and distorting of Indigenous voices
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 July 2019By Yann Allard-Tremblay
The mirage of mark-to-market: distributive justice and alternatives to capital taxation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 July 2019By Charles Delmotte
Democracy in contested territory: on the legitimacy of global legal pluralism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 July 2019By Anna Jurkevics
The neorepublican challenge to egalitarian-liberalism: evaluating justifications of redistributive institutions
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 July 2019By Jürgen Sirsch
Popular sovereignty facing the deep state. The rule of recognition and the powers of the people
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 July 2019By Ludvig Beckman
Parental compromise
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 July 2019By Marcus William Hunt
Political violence and the imagination: an introduction
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 June 2019By Mihaela Mihai
Nonalienation among peoples: Symposium on Catherine Lu’s Justice and Reconciliation in World Politics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 June 2019By Peter Niesen
Rectification and alienation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy29 May 2019By Kimberly Hutchings
Structural injustice and the legitimacy of the state-centric system
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 May 2019By Reinhard Wolf
Structural injustice and alienation: a reply to my critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 May 2019By Catherine Lu
On structural injustice, reconciliation and alienation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 May 2019By Alasia Nuti
The simplicity of toleration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 May 2019By Peter Königs
Rescuing toleration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 May 2019By Anna Elisabetta Galeotti
Toleration and modus vivendi
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 May 2019By John Horton
Education, epistemic virtues, and the power of toleration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 May 2019By Johannes Drerup
What liberals should tolerate internationally
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 May 2019By Andrew Jason Cohen
Global reserve currencies from the perspective of structural global justice: distribution and domination
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 May 2019By Lisa Herzog
Can a value-neutral liberal state still be tolerant?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 May 2019By Michael Kühler
The politics and ethics of toleration: introduction
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 May 2019By Johannes Drerup
Toleration, neutrality, and freedom: a reply
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 May 2019By Peter Balint
A realistic conception of politics: conflict, order and political realism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 May 2019By Carlo Burelli
Pluralism and the authority of groups to discriminate
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 May 2019By Avigail Eisenberg
Toleration, neutrality, and exemption
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 April 2019By Peter Jones
Introduction to a Symposium on Peter Balint’s Respecting Toleration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 April 2019By Jonathan Seglow
Respecting multiculturalism? Respecting religion?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 April 2019By Jonathan Seglow
The good of toleration: changing social relations or maximising individual freedom?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 April 2019By Emanuela Ceva
Arendt and political realism: towards a realist account of political judgement
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 April 2019By Gisli Vogler
Accommodating toleration: on Balint’s classical liberal response to the multiculturalism challenge
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 April 2019By Sune Lægaard
Conceptualising toleration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 April 2019By John Horton
Democracy and territory. A necessary link?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 April 2019By Anna Meine
The new democracy: anarchist or populist?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 March 2019By Paul Raekstad
Basic income, social freedom and the fabric of justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 February 2019By Nicholas H. Smith
Deliberative systems theory and activism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 February 2019By Ben Cross
Why we should care about poverty and inequality: exploring the grounds for a pluralist approach
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 February 2019By Irene Bucelli
The dominating effects of economic crises
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17 February 2019By Alexander Bryan
Democratic compatibilism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 February 2019By Peter J. Josse
Must refugees return?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 February 2019By Mollie Gerver
Differentiating hate speech: a systemic discrimination approach
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 February 2019By Katharine Gelber
The end of discretionary immigration policy ? A blueprint to prevent multidimensional domination
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy04 February 2019By Johan Rochel
Our wildest imagination: violence, narrative, and sympathetic identification
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 January 2019By Jade Schiff
Legitimacy and institutional purpose
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 January 2019By N. P. Adams
Legitimacy beyond the state: institutional purposes and contextual constraints
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 January 2019By N. P. Adams
A normative foundation for statism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 January 2019By Patrick Taylor Smith
The arts of refusal: tragic unreconciliation, pariah humour, and haunting laughter
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 January 2019By Bronwyn Anne Leebaw
How America disguises its violence: colonialism, mass incarceration, and the need for resistant imagination
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 January 2019By Shari Stone-Mediatore
The international rule of law
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 January 2019By Carmen E. Pavel
The UN Security Council, normative legitimacy and the challenge of specificity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 January 2019By Antoinette Scherz
The arbitrary circumscription of the jurisdiction of the international criminal court
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 January 2019By Thomas Christiano
On representation(s): art, violence and the political imaginary of South Africa
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 January 2019By Eliza Garnsey
Understanding complicity: memory, hope and the imagination
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 January 2019By Mihaela Mihai
The legitimacy of occupation authority: beyond just war theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 January 2019By Cord Schmelzle
The subversive potential of Leo Tolstoy’s ‘defamiliarisation’: a case study in drawing on the imagination to denounce violence
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 January 2019By Alexandre Christoyannopoulos
Global democracy and feasibility
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 January 2019By Eva Erman
The art and politics of imagination: remembering mass violence against women
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 January 2019By Maria Alina Asavei
‘More open borders and deep structural transformation’
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 January 2019By Adam James Tebble
Grow Heathrow: a Lockean analysis
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 January 2019By Eloise Harding
Normative theorizing and political data: toward a data-sensitive understanding of the separation between religion and state in political theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 December 2018By Nahshon Perez
Pluralism, conflict, and justification: the stability function of religious exemptions
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 December 2018By David Golemboski
On a radical democratic theory of political protest: potentials and shortcomings
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 December 2018By Christian Volk
Migration, membership, and republican liberty
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 October 2018By J. Matthew Hoye
Foucauldian security and the threat to democratic policy-making
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 October 2018By Richard Togman
Differences of difference
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 October 2018By David Jenkins
Property rights of personal data and the financing of pensions
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 October 2018By Francis Cheneval
Instability and modus vivendi
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 October 2018By Nat Rutherford
Morally evaluating human smuggling: the case of migration to Europe
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 September 2018By Eamon Aloyo
A recognition-sensitive phenomenology of hate speech
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 August 2018By Suzanne Whitten
Enfranchising the Youth
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 August 2018By Lachlan Montgomery Umbers
Political liberalism and the false neutrality objection
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 August 2018By Étienne Brown
Political philosophy and the nature of expertise
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 August 2018By Robert Lamb
Normative behaviourism as a solution to four problems in realism and non-ideal theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 August 2018By Jonathan Floyd
On cosmopolitan humility and the arrogance of states
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy29 July 2018By Luis Cabrera
Transparency as a justification for legislative supremacy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 July 2018By Eoin Daly
‘Everybody’s gotta do something’: neutrality and work
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 July 2018By David Jenkins
Rethinking the epistemic case against epistocracy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 July 2018By Udit Bhatia
Defending broad neutrality
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 July 2018By Jeffrey W. Howard
Three cheers for liberal modesty
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 July 2018By Cécile Laborde
Laborde’s religion
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 June 2018By Sune Lægaard
The integrity of religious believers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 June 2018By Paul Bou-Habib
Liberalism and religion: the plural grounds of separation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 June 2018By Chiara Cordelli
On Liberalism’s Religion
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 June 2018By Jean L. Cohen
Religion and discrimination: extending the ‘disaggregative approach’
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 June 2018By Daniel Sabbagh
Introduction: Laborde, liberalism, and religion
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 June 2018By Aurélia Bardon
The deep error of political libertarianism: self-ownership, choice, and what’s really valuable in life
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 June 2018By Dan Lowe
Individual integrity, freedom of association and religious exemption
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 June 2018By Peter Jones
Is epistemic accessibility enough? Same-sex marriage, tradition, and the Bible
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 June 2018By Aurélia Bardon
Interactive justice, the boundary problem, and proportionality
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 June 2018By Laura Valentini
Interactive justice and democratic authority
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 June 2018By Simon C. May
Emanuela Ceva’s Interactive Justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 June 2018By Cheyney Ryan
Interactive justice, pluralism and oppression
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 June 2018By Valeria Ottonelli
Framing and reframing R2P—a responsibility to protect humanity from evil
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 June 2018By Christof Royer
Why states have no right to privacy, but may be entitled to secrecy: a non-consequentialist defense of state secrecy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 June 2018By Dorota Mokrosinska
Interactive justice: an introduction
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 June 2018By Emanuela Ceva
Why outcomes matter: reclaiming distributive justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 June 2018By Peter Lindsay
Democracy and the limits of political realism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 June 2018By Roberto Frega
Liberal nationalism, immigration, and the problem of multiple national identities
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 June 2018By Lior Erez
Cracking the whip: the deliberative costs of strict party discipline
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 June 2018By Udit Bhatia
Reply: what interactive justice in conflict management requires
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 June 2018By Emanuela Ceva
The indispensability of sufficientarianism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 June 2018By Anders Herlitz
The indirect gender discrimination of skill-selective immigration policies
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 June 2018By Desiree Lim
Sharing the costs of fighting justly
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 June 2018By Sara Van Goozen
Global justice in the shadow of security threats
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 April 2018By Yuchun Kuo
A structural approach to the human right to just and favourable working conditions
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 March 2018By Elizabeth Kahn
On Who matters: extending the scope of luck egalitarianism to groups
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 March 2018By Sara Amighetti
How generous should egalitarians be?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 March 2018By Zofia Stemplowska
Unequally egalitarian? Defending the credentials of social egalitarianism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 February 2018By David V. Axelsen
Emotional labour: a case of gender-specific exploitation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 February 2018By Mirjam Müller
Justice as fairness and bad luck
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 February 2018By Robert van der Veen
Equality, value pluralism and relevance: Is luck egalitarianism in one way good, but not all things considered?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 February 2018By Tim Meijers
Brexit anxiety: a case study in the medicalization of dissent
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 February 2018By Dan Degerman
Equality, responsibility, and justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 February 2018By David V. Axelsen
Are inequalities between us and the dead intergenerationally unjust?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 February 2018By Axel Gosseries
On the presumption of equality
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 February 2018By Juha Räikkä
Deliberative democracy as a critical theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 February 2018By Marit Hammond
Precís of luck egalitarianism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 February 2018By Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen
A Political Theory of Territory: an overview
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 February 2018By Margaret Moore
Self-determination, non-domination and constraints on territorial rights
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy25 January 2018By Mira Bachvarova
Contested territories and corrective justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 January 2018By Amandine Catala
Locating the people
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 January 2018By Avery Kolers
The limits of collective self-determination
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 January 2018By Joseph H. Carens
The injustice of the ‘migrant journey’ to the United States
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 January 2018By Amy Reed-Sandoval
Against institutional conservatism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 January 2018By David V. Axelsen
Fact of the matter: Rawls, political ideals, and worldview consensus
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 December 2017By Jeremy Neill
Rescuing self-ownership: tackling the pollution problem
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 December 2017By Nicola Mulkeen
Fact-sensitive political theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 December 2017By Theresa Scavenius
Against international criminal tribunals: reconciling the global justice norm with local agency
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 December 2017By Peter J. Verovšek
A republic of rules: procedural arbitrariness and total institutions
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 December 2017By Orlando Lazar
Multiculturalism in contemporary Britain: policy, law and theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 December 2017By Richard T. Ashcroft
Liberal democracy, nationalism and culture: multiculturalism and Scottish independence
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy29 November 2017By Richard T. Ashcroft
Childhood bads, parenting goods, and the right to procreate
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy29 November 2017By Sarah Hannan
Facts, norms, and dignity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 November 2017By Pablo Gilabert
Towards a democracy-centred ethics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 November 2017By Annabelle Lever
The role of interpretation of existing practice in normative political argument
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 November 2017By Sune Lægaard
Kant and the critique of the ethics-first approach to politics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy18 November 2017By Christian F. Rostbøll
What Mr. Spock told the earthlings: the aims of political philosophy, action-guidingness and fact-dependency
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 November 2017By Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen
How practices do not matter
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 November 2017By Eva Erman
National Identity – A Multiculturalist’s Approach
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 November 2017By Varun Uberoi
Equality and family values: conflict or harmony?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 November 2017By Colin M. Macleod
On the permissibility of shaping children’s values
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 November 2017By Andrée-Anne Cormier
Engaging the reluctant taxpayer
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 November 2017By Michael Joel Kessler
Racial structural solidarity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 November 2017By Mara Marin
Family values reconsidered: a response
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 November 2017By Harry Brighouse
Solidarity and social rights
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 November 2017By Margaret Kohn
Justice as a claim to (social) property
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 November 2017By Rutger Claassen
Why should we care about competition?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 November 2017By Waheed Hussain
What undermines solidarity? Four approaches and their implications for contemporary political theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 November 2017By Charles H. T. Lesch
For a political philosophy of parent–child relationships
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 November 2017By Daniel Weinstock
Flourishing children, flourishing adults: families, equality and the neutralism-perfectionism debate
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 November 2017By Christine Sypnowich
Religious accommodation law in the UK: five normative gaps
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 November 2017By Jonathan Seglow
The challenge of cultural diversity: the limited value of the right of exit
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 November 2017By Andrew Fagan
The critique of multiculturalism in Britain: integration, separation and shared identification
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 November 2017By Andrew Mason
The theory and politics of solidarity and public goods
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 November 2017By Avigail Ferdman
Solidarity as environmental justice in brownfields remediation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 November 2017By Avery Kolers
Why the intrinsic value of public goods matters
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 November 2017By Avigail Ferdman
Global justice, states, and the relational view
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 November 2017By Christine Hobden
What abolishing the family would not do
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy02 November 2017By Anca Gheaus
Deciding the demos: three conceptions of democratic legitimacy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 October 2017By Ludvig Beckman
Universal jurisdiction, pirates and vigilantes
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 October 2017By Luise K. Müller
Foucault, democracy and the ambivalence of rights
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 September 2017By Guy Aitchison
Democratic epistemology and democratic morality: the appeal and challenges of Peircean pragmatism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy28 July 2017By Annabelle Lever
The labors of justice: democracy, respect, and judicial review
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 June 2017By Jeffrey W. Howard
A tax dead on arrival: classical liberalism, inheritance, and social mobility
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 June 2017By Åsbjørn Melkevik
Compromise, pluralism, and deliberation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy02 June 2017By Daniel Weinstock
Non-ideal climate justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 June 2017By Eric Brandstedt
Introduction: democracy, diversity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 May 2017By Enrico Biale
Pluralism and consensus in deliberative democracy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy26 May 2017By José Luis Martí
Cultural conflicts: a deflationary approach
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 May 2017By Anna Elisabetta Galeotti
A multidimensional account of democratic legitimacy: how to make robust decisions in a non-idealized deliberative context
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 May 2017By Enrico Biale
Democratic deliberation, respect and personal storytelling
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 May 2017By Valeria Ottonelli
Democratic respect and compromise
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy15 May 2017By Christian F. Rostbøll
Republican ecological citizenship in the 2015 Papal Encyclical on the environment and climate change
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 April 2017By Chris Hilson
Political realism as ideology critique
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 March 2017By Janosch Prinz
Methodological moralism in political philosophy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 March 2017By David Estlund
Realist liberalism: an agenda
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 March 2017By Andrew Sabl
Ethics, morality and the case for realist political theory
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 March 2017By Edward Hall
Political realism and the realist ‘Tradition’
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 March 2017By Alison McQueen
Political realism meets civic republicanism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 March 2017By Philip Pettit
The new realism and the old
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 March 2017By Terry Nardin
‘Ownness created a new freedom’: Max Stirner’s alternative concept of liberty
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 January 2017By Saul Newman
The preference satisfaction model of linguistic advantage
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 December 2016By Brian Carey
Obligations of productive justice: individual or institutional?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 December 2016By Brian Berkey
Parental rights and the importance of being parents
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy30 November 2016By Liam Shields
Can liberal egalitarians protect the occupational freedom of the economically talented?
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy29 November 2016By Joseph Mazor
Fair trade: global problems and individual responsibilities
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 November 2016By Sarah C. Goff
High liberalism and weak economic freedoms
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 November 2016By Katy Wells
Self-respect and public reason
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy06 October 2016By Gregory Whitfield
Global equality of opportunity and self-determination in the context of immigration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy05 October 2016By Eszter Kollar
On David Miller on immigration control
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy03 October 2016By Chandran Kukathas
Migration, political philosophy, and the real world
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy27 September 2016By Sarah Fine
Idealism, realism, and immigration: David Miller’s Strangers in Our Midst
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy21 September 2016By Phil Parvin
Refugees, economic migrants and weak cosmopolitanism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 September 2016By David Owen
Is unauthorized immigration an immoral act? On David Miller’s ‘weak cosmopolitan’ defense of the right to exclude
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy14 September 2016By Oliviero Angeli
Strangers in our midst: an overview
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy12 September 2016By David Miller
Migration and justice: a reply to my critics
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 September 2016By David Miller
Justified state partiality and the vulnerable subject in migration
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 September 2016By Christine Straehle
State borders as defining lines of justice: why the right to exclude cannot be justified
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy31 August 2016By Julie Arrildt
BEPS, tax sovereignty and global justice
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 August 2016By Laurens van Apeldoorn
On monarchy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13 June 2016By Detlef von Daniels
Emotional appeals in politics and deliberation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 June 2016By Keith Dowding
Animal ethics and the political
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy09 June 2016By Alasdair Cochrane
No right to unilaterally claim your territory: on the consistency of Kantian statism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy08 June 2016By Jakob Huber
Membership ballots and the value of intra-party democracy
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 March 2016By Fabio Wolkenstein
Justice in a non-ideal world: the case of climate change
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22 February 2016By Alexandre Gajevic Sayegh
What is democratic reliability? Epistemic theories of democracy and the problem of reasonable disagreement
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy19 January 2016By Felix Gerlsbeck
Luck egalitarianism and what valuing responsibility requires
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16 November 2015By Alexandra Couto
Transparency: from Bentham’s inventory of virtuous effects to contemporary evidence-based scepticism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 November 2015By Sandrine Baume
Privatising war: assessing the decision to hire private military contractors
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy02 October 2015By Isaac Taylor
Majesty and mercy: undocumented immigration, deferred removal action, and the spectacle of sovereign exceptionalism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24 July 2015By Joanna Mosser
Transforming (but not transcending) the state system? On statist cosmopolitanism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 June 2015By Luke Ulaş
The ideal and reality of epistemic proceduralism
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11 June 2015By James Gledhill
Fairness to non-participants: a case for a practice-independent egalitarian baseline
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy01 June 2015By Merten Reglitz
Can my religion influence my conception of justice? Political liberalism and the role of comprehensive doctrines
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23 April 2015By Paul Billingham
Review article: the moral right to health: a survey of available conceptions
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy07 April 2015By Benedict E. Rumbold
‘Supreme Emergencies’, ontological holism, and rights to communal membership
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy10 March 2015By J. Toby Reiner

Do you want to see other content?