- Legitimacy and Non-Domination in Solar Radiation Management Research
- Two Mutually Exclusive Concepts of Harm? Retrospective and Structural Wrongful Harm at the Bases of a Compensatory-Based Approach for Loss and Damage
- Indigeneity in Geoengineering Discourses: Some Considerations
- Sustainability for a Warming Planet
- Toward Legitimate Governance of Solar Geoengineering Research: A Role for Sub-State Actors
- Institutional Legitimacy and Geoengineering Governance
- Climate Change, Climate Engineering, and the ‘Global Poor’: What Does Justice Require?
- Two Concepts of Wrongful Harm: A Response
- Why are we waiting? The logic, urgency, and promise of tackling climate change
- Recognitional Justice, Climate Engineering, and the Care Approach
- Beware of the Toll Keepers: The Ethics of Geoengineering Ethics
- Examining the Implications of the Tollgate Principles for the Governance of Geoengineering
- The Tollgate Principles for the Governance of Geoengineering: Moving Beyond the Oxford Principles to an Ethically More Robust Approach
- Caution in Defining the Public for Legitimate Geoengineering Governance
- Environmental Trolley Problems and Ethical Assumptions in the Geoengineering Debate
- Putting the Tollgate Principles into Practice
- A Different Kind of Rigor: What Climate Scientists Can Learn from Emergency Room Doctors
- Responsibility in Practice: Hans Jonas as Environmental Political Theorist
- ‘More than an Idea or a Norm’: Religion, Justice, and Practicality in Dialog with the Tollgate Principles
- Agricultural Technologies as Living Machines: Toward a Biomimetic Conceptualization of Smart Farming Technologies
- Is Climate Change Morally Good from Non-Anthropocentric Perspectives?
- Year One of Donald Trump’s Presidency on Climate and the Environment
- If You’re ‘Still In’ the Paris Climate Agreement, Then Show Us the Money
- An Analysis of Potential Ethical Justifications for Mammoth De-extinction And a Call for Empirical Research
- Commutative Justice and Access and Benefit Sharing for Genetic Resources
- The Case for Preserving Bears Ears
- Those Who Bring From the Earth: Anti-Environmentalism and the Trope of the White Male Worker
- Social Constructivism and Beyond. On the Double Bind Between Politics and Science
- Equitable Local Climate Action Planning: Sustainable & Affordable Housing
- From a National Monument to a National Disgrace
- The Axiological Problem with Trump’s Wall and Endangered Species
- The Dangers of Replacing ‘Adaptation to Climate Change’ with ‘Resilient Solutions’
- Bristol Bay and Pebble Mine: Mutual Flourishing or Midas’ Touch
- Trump’s Military as the De Facto Environmental Leader
- Rational Coherence in Environmental Policy: Paris, Montreal, and Kigali
- Climate Change, Moral Integrity, and Obligations to Reduce Individual Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Two Moral Arguments for a Global Social Cost of Carbon
- To Trump’s Chagrin, Non-nationals Are Still In
- Going to Alone: Cities and States for Climate Action
- Opposing California’s WaterFix: The Trump Administration and the Future of Environmental Advocacy
- The Politics of Apathy: Trumping the Ethical Imperative of Climate Change
- Distributing Risks: Allocation Principles for Distributing Reversible and Irreversible Losses
- Humanism, Biocentrism, and the Problem of Justification
- The Value of Weather Event Science for Pending Climate Policy Decisions
- Something Wicked This Way Comes
- Preserving Opportunity: A Précis of Living Well Now and in the Future: Why Sustainability Matters
- Can We Survive Sustainability?
- Why Sustainability Principles should integrate Global Justice Concerns
- Neorepublicanism and the Domination of Posterity
- Reflections on Curren and Metzger
- Can Corporations Have (Moral) Responsibility Regarding Climate Change Mitigation?
- Expanding Opportunity in the Anthropocene
- Light Pollution: A Case Study in Framing an Environmental Problem
- Field Notes on the Meaning of Rewilding
- Addressing the Harms of Climate Change: Making Sense of Loss and Damage
- Two Concepts of Wrongful Harm: A Conceptual Map for the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage
- How Will We Pay for Loss and Damage?
- Values and Harms in Loss and Damage
- Climate-Related Insecurity, Loss and Damage
- Loss of Epistemic Self-Determination in the Anthropocene
- Mitigating Loss for Persons Displaced by Climate Change through the Framework of the Warsaw Mechanism
- Challenges and Opportunities for Understanding Non-economic Loss and Damage
- The Importance of Nature, Green Spaces, and Gardens in Human Well-Being
- Humans in the Land. The Ethics and Aesthetics of the Cultural Landscape ISBN 978-82-7477-343-1
- Defending Place in the Google Earth Age
- Anne Frank’s Tree: Thoughts on Domination and the Paradox of Progress
- NIMBY, Agent-Relative Reasons and Public Reason: An Open Peer Commentary on Simon Feldman and Derek Turner’s ‘Why Not NIMBY?’
- Why Not Environmental Injustice?
- Hypocrisy, NIMBY, and the Politics of Everybody’s Backyard
- NIMBY and the Ethics of the Particular
- NIMBY Claims, Free Riders and Universalisability
- A Call for Clarity and a Review of the Empirical Evidence: Comment on Felman and Turner’s ‘Why Not NIMBY?’
- Why Not NIMBY?