- Regulating abortion after ectogestation
- Ethical analysis examining the prioritisation of living donor transplantation in times of healthcare rationing
- Identity-relative paternalism fails to achieve its apparent goal
- Ethical theories as multiple models
- Identity-relative paternalism and allowing harm to others
- Proposal to support making decisions about the organ donation process
- Paternalism, with and without identity
- Reimagining research ethics to include environmental sustainability: a principled approach, including a case study of data-driven health research
- Engagement without entanglement: a framework for non-sexual patient-physician boundaries
- The harm principle, personal identity and identity-relative paternalism
- Making psychiatry moral again: the role of psychiatry in patient moral development
- Identity-relative paternalism is internally incoherent
- Medical choices and changing selves
- Reasoning and reversibility in capacity law
- Does identity-relative paternalism prohibit (future) self-sacrifice? A reply to Wilkinson
- Prescribing safe supply: ethical considerations for clinicians
- Chronicity: a key concept to deliver ethically driven chronic care
- Implications of identity-relative paternalism
- On Wilkinson: unpacking Parfit, paternalism and the primacy of autonomy in contemporary bioethics
- Bringing context into ethical discussion: what, when and who?
- Health disparities from pandemic policies: reply to critics
- UK Research Ethics Committees review of the global first SARS-CoV-2 human infection challenge studies
- Towards a new model of global health justice: the case of COVID-19 vaccines
- What type of inclusion does epistemic injustice require?
- Parent-initiated posthumous-assisted reproduction revisited in light of the interest in genetic origins
- Intercultural global bioethics
- Beyond regulatory approaches to ethics: making space for ethical preparedness in healthcare research
- Ethics of non-therapeutic research on imminently dying patients in the intensive care unit
- Heritable human genome editing is ‘currently not permitted, but it is no longer ‘prohibited: so says the ISSCR
- Some barriers to knowledge from the global south: commentary to Pratt and de Vries
- How useful is the category of ‘assisted gestative technologies?
- Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics
- Repairing moral injury takes a team: what clinicians can learn from combat veterans
- Knowledge from the global South is in the global South
- Root causes of epistemic (in)justice for the global south in health ethics and bioethics
- Lessons learned from the Last Gift study: ethical and practical challenges faced while conducting HIV cure-related research at the end of life
- Epistemic justice in bioethics: interculturality and the possibility of reparations
- Epistemic justice and feminist bioethics in global health
- Global health justice: epistemic theory and pandemic practice
- Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness: reply to comments
- Expanded terminal sedation: dangerous waters
- Expanded terminal sedation: too removed from real-world practice
- Different approach to medical decision-making in difficult circumstances: Kittays Ethics of Care
- Surgery should be routinely videoed
- Call to action: empowering patients and families to initiate clinical ethics consultations
- Translating Cultural Safety to the UK
- Expanded terminal sedation in end-of-life care
- Pandemic justice: fairness, social inequality and COVID-19 healthcare priority-setting
- Implications of extended terminal sedation
- Suffering, existential distress and temporality in the provision of terminal sedation
- Expanding choice at the end of life
- Clinical law: what do clinicians want to know? The demography of clinical law
- Ethical uncertainty and COVID-19: exploring the lived experiences of senior physicians at a major medical centre
- Imagination and idealism in the medical sciences of an ageing world
- Against visitor bans: freedom of association, COVID-19 and the hospital ward
- Humility
- Diversity in clinical research: public health and social justice imperatives
- For the sake of multifacetedness. Why artificial intelligence patient preference prediction systems shouldnt be for next of kin
- Endosex
- AI knows best? Avoiding the traps of paternalism and other pitfalls of AI-based patient preference prediction
- The Patient preference predictor and the objection from higher-order preferences
- Artificial intelligence paternalism
- Vaccine mandates for healthcare workers beyond COVID-19
- ‘VaxTax: a follow-up proposal for a global vaccine pandemic response fund
- Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice
- Artificial Intelligence algorithms cannot recommend a best interests decision but could help by improving prognostication
- ‘Climate change mitigation is a hot topic, but not when it comes to hospitals: a qualitative study on hospital stakeholders perception and sense of responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions
- What you believe you want, may not be what the algorithm knows
- Verification and trust in healthcare
- Fracking our humanity
- The scope of patient, healthcare professional and healthcare systems responsibilities to reduce the carbon footprint of inhalers: a response to commentaries
- Patient portal access for caregivers of adult and geriatric patients: reframing the ethics of digital patient communication
- Surrogacy: beyond the commercial/altruistic distinction
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Broadening the debate: the future of JME feature articles
- Orphans cannot be after-birth aborted: a response to Bobier
- Green inhaler prescribing and the ethical obligations of physicians
- Clinical challenges to the concept of ectogestation
- Why the wrongness of intentionally impairing children in utero does not imply the wrongness of abortion
- Youth should decide: the principle of subsidiarity in paediatric transgender healthcare
- My body, still my choice: an objection to Hendricks on abortion
- Research in the USA on COVID-19s long-term effects: measures needed to ensure black, indigenous and Latinx communities are not left behind
- Barriers to green inhaler prescribing: ethical issues in environmentally sustainable clinical practice
- Dual duties to patient and planet: time to revisit the ethical foundations of healthcare?
- Do doctors have a responsibility to help patients import medicines from abroad?
- ‘Green bioethics widens the scope of eligible values and overrides patient demand: comment on Parker
- Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data
- Green prescribing is good, but patients do not have a duty to accept it
- Strategic and principled approach to the ethical challenges of epilepsy monitoring unit triage
- Critical role of pathology and laboratory medicine in the conversation surrounding access to healthcare
- Commitment devices: beyond the medical ethics of nudges
- Navigating our way through a hospital ransomware attack: ethical considerations in delivering acute orthopaedic care
- Evaluating interventions to improve ethical decision making in clinical practice: a review of the literature and reflections on the challenges posed
- Ethics of generative AI
- Spanish regulation of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
- Open notes and broader parallels in digital health: a commentary on C. Bleases ‘Sharing online clinical notes with patients
- Emergency department patients attitudes towards the use of data in their clinical record for research without their consent
- Response to commentaries on sharing online clinical notes with patients: implications for nocebo effects and health equity
- To be, or not to be? The role of the unconscious in transgender transitioning: identity, autonomy and well-being
- Nocebo effects: a price worth paying for full transparency?
- Differences between sperm sharing and egg sharing are morally relevant
- Public justification and expert disagreement over non-pharmaceutical interventions for the COVID-19 pandemic
- Sharing online clinical notes with patients: implications for nocebo effects and health equity
- Using open notes to advance nocebo research: challenges and opportunities
- Training to proficiency in surgery using simulation: is there a moral obligation?
- Nocebo effects from clinical notes: reason for action, not opposition for clinicians of patients with medically unexplained symptoms
- Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson
- Open notes: Unintended consequences and teachable moments
- Informed consent in pragmatic trials: results from a survey of trials published 2014-2019
- COVID-19 and the orthopaedic surgeon: who gets redeployed?
- Where the ethical action is
- How not to count the health benefits of family planning
- The unconscious and the nuances of autonomy
- The devil is in the details: an analysis of patient rights in Swiss cancer registries
- Watson, autonomy and value flexibility: revisiting the debate
- Tale of two countries: attitudes towards older persons in Italy and Israel during the COVID-19 pandemic as seen through the looking-glass of the media
- Dementia and Nussbaums capabilities approach to dignity: a response to the commentators
- Ethical impact of suboptimal referrals on delivery of care in radiology department
- CESS process and outcome: expanding the theoretical understanding of CESS and its impact on QI
- The draw of the few: the challenge of crisis guidelines for extremely scarce resources
- Its still about ethics, isnt it?
- Culture, normativity and morisprudence: a response to the commentaries
- Accessing unproven interventions in the COVID-19 pandemic: discussion on the ethics of ‘compassionate therapies in times of catastrophic pandemics
- Capacity and decision making
- Relevance of a normative framework for evaluating the impact of clinical ethics support services in healthcare
- Facial recognition law in China
- Towards organisational quality in ethics through patterns and process
- Initiating technology dependence to sustain a childs life: a systematic review of reasons
- Materialising and fostering organisational morisprudence through ethics support tools
- Supplementing the capabilities approach
- Flourishing is not a conception of dignity
- The ethics of semantics in medicine
- Vaccine passports and health disparities: a perilous journey
- Neurofeedback as placebo: a case of unintentional deception?
- How low can you go? Justified hesitancy and the ethics of childhood vaccination against COVID-19
- Protecting privacy in mandatory reporting of infectious diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives from a developing country
- Fertility preservation for transgender children and young people in paediatric healthcare: a systematic review of ethical considerations
- Public attitudes about equitable COVID-19 vaccine allocation: a randomised experiment of race-based versus novel place-based frames
- Relational autonomy, vulnerability and embodied dignity as normative foundations of dignified dementia care
- Care for well-being or respect for dignity? A commentary on Soofis ‘what moral work can Nussbaums account of human dignity do in the context of dementia care?
- What moral work can Nussbaums account of human dignity do in the context of dementia care?
- Medical ethics and the climate change emergency
- Does overruling Roe discriminate against women (of colour)?
- Does the General Medical Councils 2020 guidance on consent advance on its 2008 guidance?
- How is COVID-19 changing the ways doctors make end-of-life decisions?
- Risk-relativity is still a nonsense
- Dignity in dementia care: a capability approach
- Reproductive carrier screening: responding to the eugenics critique
- Dignity and exclusion
- COP27 climate change conference: urgent action needed for Africa and the world
- Arguments for ‘ocular donation as standardised terminology to reduce the ‘ick factor of ‘eye donation
- Proportionality, wrongs and equipoise for natural immunity exemptions: response to commentators
- Wabi-sabi: a virtue of imperfection
- Measuring the impact of clinical ethics support services: further points for consideration
- Making a case for the inclusion of refractory and severe mental illness as a sole criterion for Canadians requesting medical assistance in dying (MAiD): a review
- Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement
- Fallacy of the last bed dilemma
- Moral motivation regarding dementia risk testing among affected persons in Germany and Israel
- Randomised controlled trials in medical AI: ethical considerations
- Placement of long-acting reversible contraception for minors who are mothers should not require parental consent
- Response to: Correspondence on ‘Organisational failure: rethinking whistleblowing for tomorrows doctors by Taylor and Goodwin
- Before and beyond trust: reliance in medical AI
- Bioethics to the rescue! A response to Emmerich
- Family experiences with non-therapeutic research on dying patients in the intensive care unit
- Broad concepts and messy realities: optimising the application of mental capacity criteria
- Borderline personality disorder, therapeutic privilege, integrated care: is it ethical to withhold a psychiatric diagnosis?
- Genetic exceptionalism, revisionism, pluralism and convergence in the ethics of insurance: response to commentators
- Time and time again: the reincarnations of coerced sterilisation
- Directed and conditional uterus donation
- The values and rules of capacity assessments
- Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials
- Compulsory treatment of physical illness under MHA 1983
- Where the ethical action also is: a response to Hardman and Hutchinson
- Integrity and rights to gender-affirming healthcare
- Risk-related standards of competence are a nonsense
- Disability: leaning away from the curve
- Can we learn from hidden mistakes? Self-fulfilling prophecy and responsible neuroprognostic innovation
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach
- Pragmatic argument for an acceptance-refusal asymmetry in competence requirements
- Should coronavirus policies remain in place to prevent future paediatric influenza deaths?
- Principlist approach to multiple heart valve replacements for patients with intravenous drug use-induced endocarditis
- Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice
- Investigation of post-trial access views among study participants and stakeholders using photovoice and semistructured interviews
- COVID-19 vaccination status should not be used in triage tie-breaking
- Doctors have an ethical obligation to ask patients about food insecurity: what is stopping us?
- Reflections of methodological and ethical challenges in conducting research during COVID-19 involving resettled refugee youth in Canada
- Why we should stop using animal-derived products on patients without their consent
- Physician perspectives on placebo ethics
- Clinical ethics support services during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a cross-sectional survey
- Physician moral injury in the context of moral, ethical and legal codes
- Ethics of genomic passports: should the genetically resistant be exempted from lockdowns and quarantines?
- Ethics of split liver transplantation: should a large liver always be split if medically safe?
- Intimacy for older adults in long-term care: a need, a right, a privilege–or a kind of care?
- Privacy, autonomy and direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a response to Vayena
- Whistleblowing in the NHS: the need for a new generation to learn the lessons
- The ‘haves and ‘have-nots of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: the ethics of emerging inequalities amongst healthcare workers
- A vaccine tax: ensuring a more equitable global vaccine distribution
- Three for me and none for you? An ethical argument for delaying COVID-19 boosters
- COVID-19 vaccines: a look at the ethics of the clinical research involving children
- Root causes of organisational failure: look up, not down
- Organisational failure: rethinking whistleblowing for tomorrows doctors
- To what extent can tomorrows doctors prevent organisational failure by speaking up?
- Manufacturing safer medics
- A note on psychological continuity theories of identity and neurointerventions
- Research abuses against people of colour and other vulnerable groups in early psychedelic research
- Defining the undefinable: the black box problem in healthcare artificial intelligence
- ‘First Do No Harm: physician discretion, racial disparities and opioid treatment agreements
- Lord Sumption and the values of life, liberty and security: before and since the COVID-19 outbreak
- Dr Daly’s principlist defence of multiple heart valve replacements for continuing opiate users: the importance of Aristotles formal principle of justice
- Rare diseases in healthcare priority setting: should rarity matter?
- Do coronavirus vaccine challenge trials have a distinctive generalisability problem?
- Costa, cancer and coronavirus: contractualism as a guide to the ethics of lockdown
- Two dilemmas for medical ethics in the treatment of gender dysphoria in youth
- Defending two dilemmas
- Embryo research: destiny is what counts
- Flawed reasoning on two dilemmas: a commentary on Baron and Dierckxsens (2021)
- Ethics of digital twins: four challenges
- Machine learning in medicine: should the pursuit of enhanced interpretability be abandoned?
- Future persons, future attributes and potential persons: commentary on Savulescu and colleagues
- Survey of German medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: attitudes toward volunteering versus compulsory service and associated factors
- Two kinds of embryo research: four case examples
- Values for victims and vectors of disease
- Risk stratification: an important tool in the special review of research using oocytes and embryos
- Civil commitment for opioid misuse: do short-term benefits outweigh long-term harms?
- Concise argument: impact and pandemic reasonableness
- Medical ethics when moving towards non-anonymous gamete donation: the views of donors and recipients
- Ethics of digital contact tracing wearables
- Correction: Medically assisted gender affirmation: when children and parents disagree
- A world away and here at home: a prioritisation framework for US international patient programmes
- COVID-19 conscience tracing: mapping the moral distances of coronavirus
- Why we should not ‘just use age for COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation
- Open notes in patient care: confining deceptive placebos to the past?
- Priority vaccination for mental illness, developmental or intellectual disability
- Can routine screening for alcohol consumption in pregnancy be ethically and legally justified?
- Junior doctors and conscientious objection to voluntary assisted dying: ethical complexity in practice
- Healthcare students support opt-out organ donation for practical and moral reasons
- #warriors: sick children, social media and the right to an open future
- Ethical decision making during a healthcare crisis: a resource allocation framework and tool
- COVID-19 vaccination and the right to take risks
- Are conscientious objectors morally obligated to refer?
- The Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court regarding assisted suicide: a template for pluralistic states?
- Appropriately framing maternal request caesarean section
- In defence of newborns: a response to Kingma
- Knowing who to trust: women and public health
- Euthanasia and organ donation still firmly connected: reply to Bollen et al
- Who should have access to assisted gestative technologies?
- US adults preferences for race-based and place-based prioritisation for COVID-19 vaccines
- The inconsistency argument: why apparent pro-life inconsistency undermines opposition to induced abortion
- Design publicity of black box algorithms: a support to the epistemic and ethical justifications of medical AI systems
- My body, not my choice: against legalised abortion
- Why appeals to the moral significance of birth are saddled with a dilemma
- WHOs allocation framework for COVAX: is it fair?
- Assisted gestative technologies
- Commentary on Romanis Assisted Gestative Technologies
- Fraud and retraction in perioperative medicine publications: what we learned and what can be implemented to prevent future recurrence
- Framing gestation: assistance, delegation, and beyond
- Delegating gestation or ‘assisted reproduction?
- Assisted gestative technologies, or on treating unlike cases alike
- If it ducks like a quack: balancing physician freedom of expression and the public interest
- Physician outreach during a pandemic: shared or collective responsibility?
- What is common and what is different: recommendations from European scientific societies for triage in the first outbreak of COVID-19
- Challenges to biobanking in LMICs during COVID-19: time to reconceptualise research ethics guidance for pandemics and public health emergencies?
- Inconsistency arguments still do not matter
- Looking back and looking forward
- Moral status of the fetus and the permissibility of abortion: a contractarian response to Thomsons violinist thought experiment
- The unnaturalistic fallacy: COVID-19 vaccine mandates should not discriminate against natural immunity
- Beyond individualisation: towards a more contextualised understanding of womens social egg freezing experiences
- In defence of our model for just healthcare systems: why an explicit philosophy is needed in addition to the law, and how Scanlon helps derive just policies
- Vaccine mandates need a clear rationale to identify which exemptions are appropriate
- Rawlsian justice in healthcare: a response to Cox and Fritz
- What money cant buy: an argument against paying people to get vaccinated
- Is the international regulation of medical complicity with torture largely window dressing? The case of Israel and the lessons of a 12-year medical ethical appeal
- No right answer: officials need discretion on whether to allow natural immunity exemptions
- Abortion and the veil of ignorance: a response to Minehan
- Wrong question and the wrong standard of proof
- Value assessment frameworks: who is valuing the care in healthcare?
- Who commits the unnaturalistic fallacy?
- Developing a competency framework for health research ethics education and training
- Trial by Triad: substituted judgment, mental illness and the right to die
- Framework for evaluation research on clinical ethical case interventions: the role of ethics consultants
- Should healthcare workers be prioritised during the COVID-19 pandemic? A view from Madrid and New York
- Legitimising values
- Sense and sensitivity: can an inaccurate test be better than no test at all?
- Surrogate uncertainty: who decides?
- Autonomy, identity and health: defining quality of life in older age
- Autonomy, shared agency and prediction
- Moral obligations in conducting stem cell-based therapy trials for autism spectrum disorder
- Sovereignty, authenticity and the patient preference predictor
- Self-reported physician attitudes and behaviours towards incarcerated patients
- Commentary to ‘surrogate decision making in crisis
- Nursing commentary to “Surrogate decision-making in crisis”
- Animal researchers shoulder a psychological burden that animal ethics committees ought to address
- Environmental sustainability and the carbon emissions of pharmaceuticals
- Surrogate decision making in crisis
- Why the term ‘persistent therapy is not worse than the term ‘medical futility
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Commentary on ‘Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- What can data trusts for health research learn from participatory governance in biobanks?
- Genomic privacy, identity and dignity
- Meta-surrogate decision making and artificial intelligence
- Age–not sex or gender–makes the case of Ellie Anderson Complex
- Agree to disagree: the symmetry of burden of proof in human-AI collaboration
- Taking the burden off: a study of the quality of ethics consultation in the time of COVID-19
- Philosophical evaluation of the conceptualisation of trust in the NHS Code of Conduct for artificial intelligence-driven technology
- Ethics of vaccine refusal
- Balancing rules in postmortem sperm donation
- The complex case of Ellie Anderson
- Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement: ethical and epistemological challenges of using AI in clinical diagnostic contexts
- Are physicians requesting a second opinion really engaging in a reason-giving dialectic? Normative questions on the standards for second opinions and AI
- Canadian perspective on ageism and selective lockdown: a response to Savulescu and Cameron
- AI decision-support: a dystopian future of machine paternalism?
- Ethical issues in computational pathology
- Pandemic prioritarianism
- Vaccine confidence, public understanding and probity: time for a shift in focus?
- Personal perspectives: having the time to observe the patient
- ‘Who is going to put their life on the line for a dollar? Thats crazy: community perspectives of financial compensation in clinical research
- Hospital chaplains as ethical consultants in making difficult medical decisions
- When the frameworks dont work: data protection, trust and artificial intelligence
- Can we know if donor trust expires? About trust relationships and time in the context of open consent for future data use
- AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care
- Understanding Japans response to the COVID-19 pandemic
- Zero COVID and health inequities: lessons from Singapore
- The ethics of disease-modifying drugs targeting Alzheimer disease: response to our commentators
- From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
- The capacity to designate a surrogate is distinct from decisional capacity: normative and empirical considerations
- Dividing line between organ donation and euthanasia in a combined procedure
- Does birth matter?
- LGBT testimony and the limits of trust
- High ideals: the misappropriation and reappropriation of the heroic label in the midst of a global pandemic
- Expanding insurance coverage for in vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing: putting the cart before the horse
- Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing
- Does Zero-COVID neglect health disparities?
- ‘Value, values and valued: a tripod for organisational ethics
- Trust and medical ethics
- Duty of candour and communication during an infection control incident in a paediatric ward of a Scottish hospital: how can we do better?
- Sequential organ failure assessment, ventilator rationing and evolving triage guidance: new evidence underlines the need to recognise and revise, unjust allocation frameworks
- Challenges of economic evaluation in rare diseases
- Ethics briefing – December 2021
- Transitions in decision-making authority at the end of life: a problem of law, ethics and practice in deceased donation
- Ethics of fetal reduction: a reply to my critics
- Case for persuasion in parental informed consent to promote rational vaccine choices
- Twin pregnancy reduction is not an ‘all or nothing problem: a response to Räsänen
- CRISPR immunity: a case study for justified somatic genetic modification?
- Should rare diseases get special treatment?
- Rare and common diseases should be treated equally and why the article by de Magalhaes somewhat misses its mark
- Unweighted lotteries and compounding injustice: reply to Schmidt et al
- Prioritisation for therapies based on a disorders severity: ethics and practicality
- Twin pregnancy, fetal reduction and the ‘all or nothing problem
- Double bad luck: Should rare diseases get special treatment?
- Informed consent and compulsory medical device registries: ethics and opportunities
- Practising what we preach: clinical ethicists professional perspectives and personal use of advance directives
- Rationing, racism and justice: advancing the debate around ‘colourblind COVID-19 ventilator allocation
- Does NICE apply the rule of rescue in its approach to highly specialised technologies?
- Promoting equity with a multi-principle framework to allocate scarce ICU resources
- Centring race, deprivation, and disease severity in healthcare priority setting
- High court should not restrict access to puberty blockers for minors
- Ethics of telepsychiatry versus face-to-face treatment: let the patients make their autonomous choice
- Mind the gap please: ethical considerations in the transition of virtual consultations from crisis to usual care
- Avoiding hypersensitive reluctance to address parental responsibility in childhood obesity
- Operating room time as a limited resource: ethical considerations for allocation
- Withholding conflicts of interest: the many flaws of the new ICMJE disclosure form
- ‘Can you hear me?: communication, relationship and ethics in video-based telepsychiatric consultations
- In the room when it happens
- ‘Yes we hear you. Do you hear us?. A sociopolitical approach to video-based telepsychiatric consultations
- Value of choice
- Patients and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence
- Sustainable healthcare resource allocation, grounding theories and operational principles: response to our commentators
- Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents
- Voluntary sterilisation of young childless women: not so fast
- Withholding or withdrawing life support in long-term neurointensive care patients: a single-centre, prospective, observational pilot study
- Deidentification of facial photographs: a survey of editorial policies and practices
- The concise argument – choice, choices and the choice agenda
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in Chinas higher education institutions
- Conflict before the courtroom: challenging cognitive biases in critical decision-making
- Is this person with dementia (currently) competent to request euthanasia? A complicated and underexplored question
- SARS-CoV-2 challenge studies: ethics and risk minimisation
- In vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing: the need for expanded insurance coverage
- Compulsory medical intervention versus external constraint in pandemic control
- Challenges faced by patients, relatives and clinicians in end-stage dementia decision-making: a qualitative study of swallowing problems
- The good, the bad and the ugly: pandemic priority decisions and triage
- Assessment of patient decision-making capacity in the context of voluntary euthanasia for psychic suffering caused by psychiatric disorders: a qualitative study of approaches among Belgian physicians
- Social egg freezing and donation: waste not, want not
- Moral distress and moral residue experienced by transplant coordinators
- Examining the ethical underpinnings of universal basic income as a public health policy: prophylaxis, social engineering and ‘good lives
- Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach
- Constructing authentic decisions: proxy decision making for research involving adults who lack capacity to consent
- Control, trust and the sharing of health information: the limits of trust
- Research guidelines for embryoids
- Open data, trials and new ethics of using others’ work
- Character failings in the surgeon fallen from grace: a thematic analysis of disciplinary hearings against surgeons 2016-2020
- Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship of academic conferences: ethics of conflict of interest
- Mitigating ethical conflict and moral distress in the care of patients on ECMO: impact of an automatic ethics consultation protocol
- Why unethical papers should be retracted
- Conflicts of interest in clinical ethics consults
- Valid consent to medical treatment
- Covert medication and patient identity: placing the ethical analysis in a worldwide context
- More than just filler: an empirically informed ethical analysis of non-surgical cosmetic procedures in body dysmorphic disorder
- A new kind of paternalism in surrogate decision-making? The case of Barnsley Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v MSP
- Without a trace: Why did corona apps fail?
- Risk, double effect and the social benefit requirement
- Investigative genetic genealogy: can collective privacy and solidarity help?
- Conventional revolution: the ethical implications of the natural progress of neonatal intensive care to artificial wombs
- Strengthened impairment argument: restating Marquis?
- Gestaticide: killing the subject of the artificial womb
- At the limits of patient autonomy: an ethical re-evaluation of coroners postmortems
- US direct-to-consumer medical service advertisements fail to provide adequate information on quality and cost of care
- Suffering and the moral orientation of presence: lessons from Nazi medicine for the contemporary medical trainee
- Ethics of pursuing targets in public health: the case of voluntary medical male circumcision for HIV-prevention programs in Kenya
- Are my religious beliefs anyones business? A framework for declarations in health and biomedicine
- Consent and living organ donation
- Is there room for privacy in medical crowdfunding?
- Against the strengthened impairment argument: never-born fetuses have no FLO to deprive
- Compensation and hazard pay for key workers during an epidemic: an argument from analogy
- Do private German health insurers invest their capital reserves of {euro}353 billion according to environmental, social and governance criteria?
- Consenting to consent
- Hope and therapeutic privilege: time for shared prognosis communication
- Three models for the regulation of polygenic scores in reproduction
- Prevention in the age of personal responsibility: epigenetic risk-predictive screening for female cancers as a case study
- Justifying risk-related standards of capacity via autonomy alone
- How to reach trustworthy decisions for caesarean sections on maternal request: a call for beneficial power
- Ethical conflicts during the process of deciding about ICU admission: an empirically driven ethical analysis
- A stakeholder meeting exploring the ethical perspectives of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery
- Congenitally decorticate childrens potential and rights
- Prize, not price: reframing rewards for kidney donors
- Ethically incentivising healthy behaviours: views of parents and adolescents with type 1 diabetes
- Applying futility in psychiatry: a concept whose time has come
- Creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders
- Ethical climate in contemporary paediatric intensive care
- Ethics and ego dissolution: the case of psilocybin
- Recognising our ‘invisible infants: there is no internationally agreed definition of live birth–is this ethically acceptable?
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘health benefits are morally irrelevant
- Healthcare professionals responsibility for informing relatives at risk of hereditary disease
- How can we decide a fair allocation of healthcare resources during a pandemic?
- Conscientious participants and the ethical dimensions of physician support for legalised voluntary assisted dying
- How to fairly incentivise digital contact tracing
- Equity in access to facial transplantation
- Ethical examination of deep brain stimulations ‘last resort status
- Views of disability rights organisations on assisted dying legislation in England, Wales and Scotland: an analysis of position statements
- Need for patient-developed concepts of empowerment to rectify epistemic injustice and advance person-centred care
- Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic
- Ethics of resuscitation for extremely premature infants: a systematic review of argument-based literature
- Is informed consent required for the diagnosis of brain death regardless of consent for organ donation?
- More than consent for ethical open-label placebo research
- Mental capacity assessment: a descriptive, cross-sectional study of what doctors think, know and do
- How individual ethical frameworks shape physician trainees experiences providing end-of-life care: a qualitative study
- Demonstrating ‘respect for persons in clinical research: findings from qualitative interviews with diverse genomics research participants
- SARS-CoV-2 safer infection sites: moral entitlement, pragmatic harm reduction strategy or ethical outrage?
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Allocating scarce life-saving resources: the proper role of age
- Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective
- Correction: Ethical considerations for epidemic vaccine trials
- Prolife hypocrisy: why inconsistency arguments do not matter
- ‘There is a lot of good in knowing, but there is also a lot of downs: public views on ethical considerations in population genomic screening
- Neurointerventions and informed consent
- Strengthened impairment argument does not restate Marquis
- The need for empathetic healthcare systems
- Reviewing the womb
- Trust, trustworthiness and sharing patient data for research
- Audio and panoramic video recording in the operating room: legal and ethical perspectives
- Prepared for practice? UK Foundation doctors confidence in dealing with ethical issues in the workplace
- Disclosure of non-recent (historic) childhood sexual abuse: What should researchers do?
- Ethical aspects of time in intensive care decision making
- ‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
- Assessing data protection and governance in health information systems: a novel methodology of Privacy and Ethics Impact and Performance Assessment (PEIPA)
- Three pitfalls of accountable healthcare rationing
- Reconsidering scarce drug rationing: implications for clinical research
- Implementation of the EU clinical trial regulation transforms the ethics committee systems and endangers ethical standards
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- ‘Advice, not orders? The evolving legal status of clinical guidelines
- Love thy neighbour? Allocating vaccines in a world of competing obligations
- The right to know: ethical implications of antibody testing for healthcare workers and overlooked societal implications
- Frauds in scientific research and how to possibly overcome them
- Association of medical futility with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) code status in hospitalised patients
- Ethicists, doctors and triage decisions: who should decide? And on what basis?
- The time has come to extend the 14-day limit
- To test or not to test: genetic cancer predisposition testing in paediatric patients with cancer
- Indigenous perspectives on breaking bad news: ethical considerations for healthcare providers
- Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity and protect health
- Phantom premise and a shape-shifting ism: reply to Hassoun
- ‘Witness in White medical ethics learning tours on medicine during the Nazi era
- Against vaccine nationalism
- Cancer Research UKS obesity campaign in 2018 and 2019: effective health promotion or perpetuating the stigmatisation of obesity?
- Insurance-based inequities in emergency interhospital transfers: an argument for the prioritisation of patient care
- Moving through capacity space: mapping disability and enhancement
- Public health nudges: weighing individual liberty and population health benefits
- Allocation of scarce biospecimens for use in research
- Testimonial injustice: discounting womens voices in health care priority setting
- Look for injustice and youll probably find it: a commentary on Harcourts ‘epistemic injustice, children and mental illness
- Testimonial injustice: considering caregivers in paediatric behavioural healthcare
- Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness
- Shadow of HIV exceptionalism 40 years later
- Is withdrawing treatment really more problematic than withholding treatment?
- Pre-diabetes in the elderly and the see-saw model of paternalism
- Mature minors and gender dysphoria: a matter for clinicians not courts
- Persuasion, not coercion or incentivisation, is the best means of promoting COVID-19 vaccination
- Prescribing meaning: hedonistic perspectives on the therapeutic use of psychedelic-assisted meaning enhancement
- Ethics briefing – August 2021
- Physician unionisation in the USA: ethical and empirical considerations and the free-rider problem
- Why we should not extend the 14-day rule
- Procedural safeguards cannot disentangle MAiD from organ donation decisions
- Taking the long view on slippery slope objections
- Trust and consent: a prospective study on parents perspective during a neonatal trial
- Meaningful futility: requests for resuscitation against medical recommendation
- Experiment on identical siblings separated at birth: ethical implications for researchers, universities, and archives today
- Social determinants of health and slippery slopes in assisted dying debates: lessons from Canada
- MAIDs slippery slope: a commentary on Downie and Schuklenk
- Eligibility for assisted dying: not protection for vulnerable people, but protection for people when they are vulnerable
- Eligibility and access to voluntary assisted dying: a view from Victoria, Australia
- Family members, ambulance clinicians and attempting CPR in the community: the ethical and legal imperative to reach collaborative consensus at speed
- Should higher-income countries pay their citizens to move to foreign care homes?
- Taking it to the bank: the ethical management of individual findings arising in secondary research
- Futility: a perennial issue for medical ethics
- Medical ethics and law for doctors of tomorrow: the consensus statement restructured and refined for the next decade
- Military metaphors and pandemic propaganda: unmasking the betrayal of ‘Healthcare Heroes
- Red herrings, circuit-breakers and ageism in the COVID-19 debate
- Emotional support animals are not like prosthetics: a response to Sara Kolmes
- Fine-tuning the impairment argument
- Justice in COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: rethinking the approach
- Are emotional support animals prosthetics or pets? Body-like rights to emotional support animals
- Commentary to ‘Novel drug candidates targeting Alzheimers disease: ethical challenges with identifying the relevant patient population
- Join the Lone Kidney Club: incentivising live organ donation
- Novel drug candidates targeting Alzheimers disease: ethical challenges with identifying the relevant patient population
- Selecting the target population for new Alzheimer drugs: challenges and expectations
- Limits of remote working: the ethical challenges in conducting Mental Health Act assessments during COVID-19
- Who will receive the last ventilator: why COVID-19 policies should not prioritise healthcare workers
- Whats yours is ours: waiving intellectual property protections for COVID-19 vaccines
- Unethical informed consent caused by overlooking poorly measured nocebo effects
- Words
- Payment of COVID-19 challenge trials: underpayment is a bigger worry than overpayment
- The perils of a broad approach to public interest in health data research: a response to Ballantyne and Schaefer
- In defence of a broad approach to public interest in health data research
- Lessons from Frankenstein 200 years on: brain organoids, chimaeras and other ‘monsters
- Do we really know how many clinical trials are conducted ethically? Why research ethics committee review practices need to be strengthened and initial steps we could take to strengthen them
- Justifiable discrimination? on Cameron et als proportionality test
- A focused protection vaccination strategy: why we should not target children with COVID-19 vaccination policies
- Challenging misconceptions about clinical ethics support during COVID-19 and beyond: a legal update and future considerations
- Ethics of selective restriction of liberty in a pandemic
- Money is not everything: experimental evidence that payments do not increase willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19
- Voluntary COVID-19 vaccination of children: a social responsibility
- COVID-19 controlled human infection studies: worries about local community impact and demands for local engagement
- Institutional conflict of interest: attempting to crack the deferiprone mystery
- Science, politics, ethics and the pandemic
- Accessing medical biobanks to solve crimes: ethical considerations
- How to obtain informed consent for psychotherapy: a reply to criticism
- Ethical considerations for universal newborn hearing screening in the Pacific Islands: a Samoan case study
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: a human rights issue
- MIP does not save the impairment argument against abortion: a reply to Blackshaw and Hendricks
- Genetic information, social justice, and risk-sharing institutions
- Response to our reviewers
- Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics
- Non-maleficence and the ethics of consent to cancer screening
- Psychotherapy is still failing patients: revisiting informed consent–a response to Garson Leder
- Allocation of COVID-19 vaccination: when public prioritisation preferences differ from official regulations
- Communities of practice: acknowledging vulnerability to improve resilience in healthcare teams
- Human rights and COVID-19 triage: a comment on the Bath protocol
- Development of a structured process for fair allocation of critical care resources in the setting of insufficient capacity: a discussion paper
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- Spoonful of honey or a gallon of vinegar? A conditional COVID-19 vaccination policy for front-line healthcare workers
- Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions
- Strengthening the impairment argument against abortion
- Social insurance, mutualistic insurance and genetic information
- Psychotherapy, placebos, and informed consent
- Value promotion as a goal of medicine
- Open therapy and its enemies
- Potential for epistemic injustice in evidence-based healthcare policy and guidance
- Towards collective moral resilience: the potential of communities of practice during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond
- Language matters: the ‘digital twin metaphor in health and medicine
- Trust does not need to be human: it is possible to trust medical AI
- Digital twins running amok? Open questions for the ethics of an emerging medical technology
- Aligning patient and physician views on educational pelvic examinations under anaesthesia: the medical student perspective
- Near-term ethical challenges of digital twins
- Instruments of health and harm: how the procurement of healthcare goods contributes to global health inequality
- WHO guidance on ethics in outbreaks and the COVID-19 pandemic: a critical appraisal
- Levels of stress in medical students due to COVID-19
- ‘Represent me: please! Towards an ethics of digital twins in medicine: Commentary
- Represent me: please! Towards an ethics of digital twins in medicine
- Covert administration of medication in food: a worthwhile moral gamble?
- Simulating (some) individuals in a connected world
- Should a medical digital twin be viewed as an extension of the patient’s body?
- Orphans and the relational significance of birth: a response to Singh
- Ethical considerations of recruiting migrant workers for clinical trials
- Perspectives on digital twins and the (im)possibilities of control
- COVID-19 pandemic, the scarcity of medical resources, community-centred medicine and discrimination against persons with disabilities
- Balancing professional obligations and risks to providers in learning healthcare systems
- Present and future
- Imperfect by design: the problematic ethics of surgical training
- Gender dysphoria in adolescents: can adolescents or parents give valid consent to puberty blockers?
- Ethical considerations for protecting the options of subjects in primary epidemic vaccine trials
- Concerning a seemingly intractable feature of the accountability gap
- Is one narrative enough? Analytical tools should match the problems they address
- Public health decisions in the COVID-19 pandemic require more than ‘follow the science
- National health system cuts and triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and Spain: ethical implications
- Vaccine ethics: an ethical framework for global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines
- Balancing health worker well-being and duty to care: an ethical approach to staff safety in COVID-19 and beyond
- In defence of gestatelings: response to Colgrove
- Should age matter in COVID-19 triage? A deliberative study
- Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI
- We might be afraid of black-box algorithms
- Trustworthy medical AI systems need to know when they dont know
- Process of risk assessment by research ethics committees: foundations, shortcomings and open questions
- Transparent AI: reliabilist and proud
- Triage, consent and trusting black boxes
- Medical assistance in dying for the psychiatrically ill reply to Buturovic
- Promoting racial equity in COVID-19 resource allocation
- Ethics briefing – February 2021
- Pros and cons of prosent as an alternative to traditional consent in medical research
- Old problems in need of new (narrative) approaches? A young physician-bioethicists search for ethical guidance in the practice of physician-assisted dying in the Netherlands
- Blockchain, consent and prosent for medical research
- Ethical issues raised by intergenerational monitoring in clinical trials of germline gene modification
- Impact of ectogenesis on the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth
- Postmortem non-directed sperm donation: quality matters
- Forced caesareans: applying ordinary standards to an extraordinary case
- Non-directed postmortem sperm donation: some questions
- A surrogates secrets are(nt) safe with me: patient confidentiality in the care of a gestational surrogate
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- Sleep softly: Schubert, ethics and the value of dying well
- Death and the neonate
- Art of accepting the ‘least bad death
- Dissonance and consonance about death
- Time and meaning in the void between hope and despair
- Ethics of placebo use in clinical practice: why we need to look beyond deontology
- Non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments: reply to Moen, Segers and Campo-Engelstein
- Ethics of research at the intersection of COVID-19 and black lives matter: a call to action
- Parental obligation and compelled caesarean section: careful analogies and reliable reasoning about individual cases
- Embracing slippery slope on physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia could have significant unintended consequences
- Less nonsense upon stilts: the analysis of rights in medical ethics
- Insight is a useful construct in clinical assessments if used wisely
- Roles of genetics and blood type in clinical responses to COVID-19: ethical and policy concerns
- Triage and justice in an unjust pandemic: ethical allocation of scarce medical resources in the setting of racial and socioeconomic disparities
- Disentangling the individualisation argument against non-medical egg freezing from feminist critiques
- Delineating the role of penile transplantation when traditional male circumcisions go wrong in South Africa
- Discussing social hierarchies and the importance of genetic ties: a commentary on Petersen
- Defending the distinction between pregnancy and parenthood
- Ethical allocation of future COVID-19 vaccines
- Global equitable access to vaccines, medicines and diagnostics for COVID-19: The role of patents as private governance
- Can bioethics be an honest way of making a living? A reflection on normativity, governance and expertise
- Parental responsibilities and moral status
- A discussion on controversies and ethical dilemmas in prostate cancer screening
- Should mitochondrial replacement therapy be funded by the National Health Service?
- Arguments on thin ice: on non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments
- Individual solutions to social problems
- COVID-19 ventilator rationing protocols: why we need to know more about the views of those with most to lose
- A matter of time: grappling with everyday ethical tensions at the confluence between policy and practice in a psychiatric unit
- Pain versus suffering: a distinction currently without a difference
- Advancing technologies as both our saviour and our doom
- Sex robots for older adults with disabilities: reply to critics
- Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?
- How the past matters for the future: a luck egalitarian sustainability principle for healthcare resource allocation
- Withdrawing treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: the presumption in favour of the maintenance of life is legally robust
- Dont stop thinking about tomorrow
- Using a biomarker acutely to identify babies at risk of serious adverse effects from antibiotics: where is the ‘Terrible Moral and Medical Dilemma?
- Ethical challenges for womens healthcare highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic
- Mistrust and inconsistency during COVID-19: considerations for resource allocation guidelines that prioritise healthcare workers
- Sustainability principle for the ethics of healthcare resource allocation
- Terrible choices in the septic child: a response to the PALOH trial round table authors
- Moral flux in primary care : the effect of complexity
- What does solidarity do for bioethics?
- Grow the pie, or the resource shuffle? Commentary on Munthe, Fumagalli and Malmqvist
- Promoting the sustainability of healthcare resources with existing ethical principles: scarce COVID-19 medications, vaccines and principled parsimony
- Solidarity is for other people: identifying derelictions of solidarity in responses to COVID-19
- Reflective disequilibrium: a critical evaluation of the complete lives framework for healthcare rationing
- Sustainability, equal treatment, and temporal neutrality
- Solidarity, sustainability and medical ethics
- Becoming a medical assistance in dying (MAiD) provider: an exploration of the conditions that produce conscientious participation
- Redefining liberty: is natural inability a legitimate constraint of liberty?
- Experiences with counselling to people who wish to be able to self-determine the timing and manner of ones own end of life: a qualitative in-depth interview study
- How should the ‘privilege in therapeutic privilege be conceived when considering the decision-making process for patients with borderline capacity?
- Commentary on Jecker
- Considering sex robots for older adults with cognitive impairments
- Sex robot fantasies
- Are sex robots enough?
- Incoming ethical issues for deep brain stimulation: when long-term treatment leads to a ‘new form of the disease
- Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities
- Paramedic delivery of bad news: a novel dilemma during the COVID-19 crisis
- Doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic: what are their duties and what is owed to them?
- Fair and equitable subject selection in concurrent COVID-19 clinical trials
- Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of COVID-19: what do people think?
- Robots and sexual ethics
- In the name of science: animal appellations and best practice
- Ethics Briefing
- Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants?
- Fair go: pay research participants properly or not at all
- Payment in challenge studies from an economics perspective
- On measuring attitudes about payment for research
- Compensating for research risk: permissible but not obligatory
- Commentary on ‘Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model’
- Uncertainty, error and informed consent to challenge trials of COVID-19 vaccines: response to Steel et al
- Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model
- Why continuing uncertainties are no reason to postpone challenge trials for coronavirus vaccines
- The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality
- Integrating philosophy, policy and practice to create a just and fair health service
- Health justice in the Anthropocene: medical ethics and the Land Ethic
- Raising the profile of fairness and justice in medical practice and policy
- Why NIPT should be publicly funded
- Gender, gestation and ectogenesis: self-determination for pregnant people ahead of artificial wombs
- Impact of gender bias on women surgeons: a South African perspective
- Why public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) might still be wrong: a response to Bunnik and colleagues
- Decision-making at the border of viability: determining the best interests of extremely preterm infants
- Three scenarios illustrating ethical concerns when considering bariatric surgery in obese adolescents with Prader-Willi syndrome
- New way of being a person?
- Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong
- Who is Phoenix?
- COVID-19 and beyond: the ethical challenges of resetting health services during and after public health emergencies
- How to overcome lockdown: selective isolation versus contact tracing
- Maternal request caesareans and COVID-19: the virus does not diminish the importance of choice in childbirth
- Ethics of sharing medical knowledge with the community: is the physician responsible for medical outreach during a pandemic?
- Are healthcare workers obligated to risk themselves during the COVID-19 pandemic according to Jewish law? A response to Solnica et al
- Forever young? The ethics of ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults
- Lockdown and levelling down: why Savulescu and Cameron are mistaken about selective isolation of the elderly
- Commentary on: ‘Forever young? The ethics of ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults
- ‘Harm threshold: capacity for decision-making may be reduced by long-term pubertal suppression
- Identity, well-being and autonomy in ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults: a response to the commentaries
- Uncovering social structures and informational prejudices to reduce inequity in delivery and uptake of new molecular technologies
- Protecting health privacy even when privacy is lost
- Lockdown, public good and equality during COVID-19
- More philosophical work needed in One Health on ethical frameworks and theory
- Paediatric deep brain stimulation: ethical considerations in malignant Tourette syndrome
- Ethical issues for large-scale hearing aid donation programmes to the Pacific Islands: a Samoan perspective
- Applying safeguards of research integrity to unethical organ donation and transplantation
- Tragic choices in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic: on fairness, consistency and community
- Passport to freedom? Immunity passports for COVID-19
- Immunity passports, fundamental rights and public health hazards: a reply to Brown et al
- Ethical framework for adult social care in COVID-19
- Community organisation-researcher partnerships: what concerns arise for community organisations and how can they be mitigated?
- Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant research
- Respect women, promote health and reduce stigma: ethical arguments for universal hepatitis C screening in pregnancy
- The ethics of the unmentionable
- Revisiting the equity debate in COVID-19: ICU is no panacea
- Responding to unethical research: the importance of transparency
- Is it unethical to publish data from Chinese transplant research?
- Should professional interpreters be able to conscientiously object in healthcare settings?
- COVID-19 and justice
- Public interest in health data research: laying out the conceptual groundwork
- Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19: critiquing the impact of disease public profile on policy and clinical decision-making
- Age change in healthcare settings: a reply to Lippert-Rasmussen and Petersen
- The legacy of Caster Semenya: examining the normative basis for the construction of categories in sport
- One health ethics: a response to pragmatism
- On Lolands conception of fair equality of opportunity in sport
- The case against meta-consent: not only do Ploug and Holm not answer it, they make it even stronger
- Caster Semenyas life and achievements are cause for celebration, respect and inclusion; her exclusion is consequential
- Medical students and COVID-19: the need for pandemic preparedness
- Controlled human infection with SARS-CoV-2 to study COVID-19 vaccines and treatments: bioethics in Utopia
- When patients refuse COVID-19 testing, quarantine, and social distancing in inpatient psychiatry: clinical and ethical challenges
- The Cohen problem of informed consent
- Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport
- Clinical ethics report on the resuscitation of a patient in the emergency department with an uncertain resuscitation status and an implantable cardiac defibrillator
- The ‘Expiry Problem of broad consent for biobank research – And why a meta consent model solves it
- Sex, money and luck in sport
- Consent in the time of COVID-19
- Age change, official age and fairness in health
- Human infection challenge studies in endemic settings and/or low-income and middle-income countries: key points of ethical consensus and controversy
- Response to commentaries on ‘Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport
- Caster semenya and a level playing field
- Using biomarkers in acute medicine to prevent hearing loss: should this require specific consent?
- Genetic testing in the acute setting: a round table discussion
- Artificial wombs, birth and ‘birth: a response to Romanis
- Withdrawing treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: the wrong answer is what the wrong question begets
- Hope or despair: a response to ‘Do not despair about severity–yet
- Expressivism at the beginning and end of life
- Great idea: what a fuss about a swab
- Commentary on ‘expressivism at the beginning and end of life
- Disability and the problem of suffering
- Reed on expressivism at the end of life: a bridge too far
- Devaluation of persons by biotechnology-facilitated practices at the beginning and at the end of life
- Response to commentaries on ‘Expressivism at the beginning and end of life
- Do not despair about severity–yet
- Explanatory frameworks and managing randomness
- Surgery during COVID-19 crisis conditions: can we protect our ethical integrity against the odds?
- Relational ethical approaches to the COVID-19 pandemic
- Ethical guidelines for deliberately infecting volunteers with COVID-19
- ‘Healthcare Heroes: problems with media focus on heroism from healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Dying individuals and suffering populations: applying a population-level bioethics lens to palliative care in humanitarian contexts: before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic
- Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: a stronger role for justice
- Children of COVID-19: pawns, pathfinders or partners?
- Multivalue ethical framework for fair global allocation of a COVID-19 vaccine
- Use of cadavers to train surgeons: what are the ethical issues? — body donor perspective
- ‘Your country needs you: the ethics of allocating staff to high-risk clinical roles in the management of patients with COVID-19
- The ethical case for non-directed postmortem sperm donation
- Parental manual ventilation in resource-limited settings: an ethical controversy
- Limits of trust in medical AI
- Triage during the COVID-19 epidemic in Spain: better and worse ethical arguments
- Use of cadavers to train surgeons: closing comment
- Ethics of instantaneous contact tracing using mobile phone apps in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic
- What healthcare professionals owe us: why their duty to treat during a pandemic is contingent on personal protective equipment (PPE)
- Allocation of scarce resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Jewish ethical perspective
- Use of cadavers to train surgeons: respect for donors should remain the guiding principle
- The healthcare worker at risk during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Jewish ethical perspective
- Can Chinas ‘standard of care for COVID-19 be replicated in Europe?
- Best interests versus resource allocation: could COVID-19 cloud decision-making for the cognitively impaired?
- Who gets the ventilator? Important legal rights in a pandemic
- Consent in childrens intensive care: the voices of the parents of critically ill children and those caring for them
- Use of cadavers to train surgeons: what are the ethical issues?
- Ethical considerations for epidemic vaccine trials
- From undergraduate to postgraduate uses of the dead human body: consequential ethical shift
- COVID-19 current controversies
- Old consent and new developments: health professionals should ask and not presume
- From preferences to policies? Considerations when incorporating empirical ethics findings into research policymaking
- The right to a self-determined death as expression of the right to freedom of personal development: The German Constitutional Court takes a clear stand on assisted suicide
- Response to commentaries on ‘Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens jury study in the UK
- Is there a right not to know?
- Minority report: can minor parents refuse treatment for their child?
- Balancing the duty to treat with the duty to family in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
- Whose life to save? Scarce resources allocation in the COVID-19 outbreak
- Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens jury study in the UK
- Considering medical assistance in dying for minors: the complexities of childrens voices
- Methodological challenges in deliberative empirical ethics
- Research using free text data in medical records could benefit from dynamic consent and other tools for responsible governance
- Remote monitoring of medication adherence and patient and industry responsibilities in a learning health system
- Pandemic medical ethics
- ‘Delusional consent in somatic treatment: the emblematic case of electroconvulsive therapy
- Technological moral enhancement or traditional moral progress? Why not both?
- Navigating difficult decisions in medical care and research
- Taking one for the team: a reiteration on the role of self-blame after medical error
- Obligations and preferences in knowing and not knowing: the importance of context
- Can there be wrongful life at the end of life? German courts revisit an old problem in a new context
- Paediatric xenotransplantation clinical trials and the right to withdraw
- Some notes on the nature and limits of posthumous rights: a response to Persad
- How should we think about clinical data ownership?
- Medically assisted gender affirmation: when children and parents disagree
- The right not to know and the obligation to know
- Commentary on ‘The right not to know and the obligation not to know
- Sexual rights puzzle: re-solved?
- ‘The right not to know and the obligation to know, response to commentaries
- Is the right not to know an instance of ‘bad faith?
- Autonomy, voluntariness and assisted dying
- ICU triage in an impending crisis: uncertainty, pre-emption and preparation
- Towards responsible ejaculations: the moral imperative for male contraceptive responsibility
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Blame and its consequences for healthcare professionals: response to Tigard
- Ethics in a time of coronavirus
- Understanding choice, pressure and markets in kidneys
- Implicit bias, women surgeons and institutional solutions: commentary
- Design thinking in medical ethics education
- Just caring: screening needs limits
- Physician, heal thyself: a cross-sectional survey of doctors personal prescribing habits
- Four types of gender bias affecting women surgeons and their cumulative impact
- Commentary on ‘Four types of gender bias affecting women surgeons, and their cumulative impact by Hutchison
- Stop the bleeding: we must combat explicit as well as implicit biases affecting women surgeons
- Abortion and the Epicurean challenge
- Arrogance of ‘but all you need is a good index finger: A narrative ethics exploration of lack of universal funding of PSA screening in Canada
- Wrongdoing and responsibility in the context of cumulative harms: a response to commentators
- Have ignorance and abuse of authorship criteria decreased over the past 15 years?
- Prescribing medical cannabis: ethical considerations for primary care providers
- Decolonising ideas of healing in medical education
- Prioritarian principles for digital health in low resource settings
- Continuing conversations about abortion and deprivation
- Systems thinking in gender and medicine
- Contacting gamete donors to facilitate diagnostic genetic testing for the donor-conceived child: what are the rights and obligations of gamete donors in these cases? A response to Horton et al
- Responding to Simkulets objections to the two tragedies argument
- On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare
- Reconceptualising risk-benefit analyses: the case of HIV cure research
- Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access
- The ethics of testing and research of manufactured organs on brain-dead/recently deceased subjects
- Intergenerational monitoring in clinical trials of germline gene editing
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Understanding peoples ‘unrealistic optimism about clinical research participation
- Ethical concerns with online direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical companies
- Confused out of care: unanticipated consequences of a ‘Hostile Environment
- Somewhere between dystopia and utopia
- The end of religious exemptions from immunisation requirements?
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?
- Chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis: ethical considerations of the Belgian approach
- ‘Serious factor–a relevant starting point for further debate: a response
- Are the irreversibly comatose still here? The destruction of brains and the persistence of persons
- Will you give my kidney back? Organ restitution in living-related kidney transplantation: ethical analyses
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- Ethics of socially assistive robots in aged-care settings: a socio-historical contextualisation
- ‘Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective response to commentaries
- Conscientious objection and moral distress: a relational ethics case study of MAiD in Canada
- Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective
- What does ‘quality add? Towards an ethics of healthcare improvement
- Imagine a world… where ectogenesis isnt needed to eliminate social and economic barriers for women
- Commentary on ‘Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective
- Reproductive technologies are not the cure for social problems
- Education versus screening: the use of capacity to consent tools in psychiatric genomics
- Partial ectogenesis: freedom, equality and political perspective
- ‘Serious science: a response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers
- Is the ‘serious factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers
- Betting on CPR: a modern version of Pascals Wager
- Importance of systematic deliberation and stakeholder presence: a national study of clinical ethics committees
- Medical ethics and broadening the context of debate
- Continuing the conversation about medical assistance in dying
- Deciding when a life is not worth living: Animperative to measure what matters
- In response to an argument against penile transplantation
- Randomised evaluation of government health programmes does present a challenge to standard research ethics frameworks
- Strengthening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- Ottawa Statement does not impede randomised evaluation of government health programmes
- Distinction between euthanasia and palliative sedation is clear-cut
- Worth living or worth dying? The views of the general public about allowing disabled children to die
- Is ‘best interests the right standard in cases like that of Charlie Gard?
- Relationships help make life worth living
- Palliative opioid use, palliative sedation and euthanasia: reaffirming the distinction
- Public views about quality of life and treatment withdrawal in infants: limitations and directions for future research
- Revising ethical guidance for the evaluation of programmes and interventions not initiated by researchers
- The relational threshold: a life that is valued, or a life of value?
- Reconsidering fetal pain
- A response to critics: weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- Training clinical ethics committee members between 1992 and 2017: systematic scoping review
- Ethical end-of-life palliative care: response to Riisfeldt
- The concise argument
- Feasibility of an ethics and professionalism curriculum for faculty in obstetrics and gynecology: a pilot study
- Familial disclosure by genetic healthcare professionals: a useful but sparingly used legal provision in France
- Evaluation of medical ethics competencies in rheumatology: local experience during national accreditation process
- Deal with the real, not the notional patient, and dont ignore important uncertainties
- To die, to sleep, perchance to dream? A response to DeMichelis, Shaul and Rapoport
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
- Responding to objections to gatekeeping for hormone replacement therapy
- A Defence of medical ethics as uncommon morality
- Hormone replacement therapy: informed consent without assessment?
- On Rhodess failure to appreciate the connections between common morality theory and professional biomedical ethics
- Is the exclusion of psychiatric patients from access to physician-assisted suicide discriminatory?
- Why only common morality?
- Objectives and outcomes of clinical ethics services: a Delphi study
- Evidence first, practice second in arthroscopic surgery: use of placebo surgery in randomised controlled trial
- Why not common morality?
- Uncommon misconceptions and common morality
- Roles, professions and ethics: a tale of doctors, patients, butchers, bakers and candlestick makers
- Common morality and medical ethics: not so different after all
- The ethical concept of medicine as a profession discovery or invention?
- Doctors should be morally common: a reply to Rosamond Rhodes
- Reply to ‘Hormone replacement therapy: informed consent without assessment?
- Medical error in the care of the unrepresented: disclosure and apology for a vulnerable patient population
- Consistency is not overrated
- Instrumental rationality and suicide in schizophrenia: a case for rational suicide?
- How to get your article published as a JME feature article and why they matter for the field
- Ethical dangers of facial phenotyping through photography in psychiatric genomics studies
- Remaining ambiguities surrounding theological negotiation and spiritual care: reply to Greenblum and Hubbard
- Ethics of organ procurement from the unrepresented patient population
- The importance of prudence within inclusive bioethics
- Too much medicine: not enough trust? A response
- Doing theology in medical decision-making
- Coercion in psychiatry: is it right to involuntarily treat inpatients with capacity?
- When does an advantage become unfair? Empirical and normative concerns in Semenyas case
- Responding to religious patients: why physicians have no business doing theology
- Public reasons private roles: legitimising disengagement from religious patients and managing physician trauma
- What constitutes a reasonable compensation for non-commercial oocyte donors: an analogy with living organ donation and medical research participation
- Professionalism eliminates religion as a proper tool for doctors rendering advice to patients
- Too much medicine and the poor climate of trust (authors response)
- Responding (appropriately) to religious patients: a response to Greenblum and Hubbards ‘Public Reason argument
- Physicians duty to refrain from religious discourse: a response to critics
- Ulysses Contracts in psychiatric care: helping patients to protect themselves from spiralling
- Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetuses)
- Subjects of ectogenesis: are ‘gestatelings fetuses, newborns or neither?
- Whither religion in medicine?
- Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Comment on Brown and Savulescu
- Why the BMA guidance on CANH is dangerous
- Delaying and withholding interventions: ethics and the stepped wedge trial
- Importance of being persistent. Should transgender children be allowed to transition socially?
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine: a reply to Clarke, Emmerich, Minerva and Saad
- Current controversies and irresolvable disagreement: the case of Vincent Lambert and the role of ‘dissensus
- Responsibility in healthcare across time and agents
- Personal responsibility for health: conceptual clarity, and fairness in policy and practice
- Professional duties of conscientious objectors
- Applying Brown and Savulescu: the diachronic condition as excuse
- Response to Commentaries on ‘Responsibility in Healthcare Across Time and Agents
- Responsibility in healthcare: whats the point?
- Guest editorial: a tribute to the Very Reverend Edward Shotter (FCMME)
- Uterus transplantation in women who are genetically XY
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- Off-label use of bevacizumab in the treatment of retinal disease: ethical implications
- Conscientious objection: unmasking the impartial spectator
- Responsibility for health
- Moral ambivalence towards the Cancer Drugs Fund
- Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals priorities
- Meeting the needs of underserved populations: setting the agenda for more inclusive citizen science of medicine
- Is UNESCOs Undergraduate Bioethics Integrated Curriculum (Medical) fit for purpose?
- Protecting privacy to protect mental health: the new ethical imperative
- Does the harm component of the harmful dysfunction analysis need rethinking?: Reply to Powell and Scarffe
- Response to commentaries on Powell/Scarffe feature article
- We should eliminate the concept of disease from mental health
- Whose values? Whose reasons? A commentary on ‘Rethinking disease: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment by Powell and Scarffe
- Resourcefulness of an empirically informed and thickly normative account of disease
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment
- Ethics of limb disposal: dignity and the medical waste stockpiling scandal
- Junior doctors and moral exploitation
- Making concepts work
- Ethical position of medical practitioners who refuse to treat unvaccinated children
- The ‘serious factor in germline modification
- Genome editing, Goldilocks and polygenic risk scores
- The need for feasible compromises on conscientious objection: response to Card
- Commentary on ‘Moral reasons to edit the human genome: this is not the moral imperative we are looking for
- No we shouldnt be afraid of medical AI; it involves risks and opportunities
- ‘Inglan is a bitch: hostile NHS charging regulations contravene the ethical principles of the medical profession
- Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives?
- Goldilocks and the two principles. A response to Gyngell et al
- Should we be afraid of medical AI?
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- Two Tragedies Argument: Two Mistakes
- The moral argument for heritable genome editing requires an inappropriately deterministic view of genetics
- Practical allocation system for the distribution of specialised care during cellular therapy access scarcity
- Why it is unethical to charge migrant women for pregnancy care in the National Health Service
- The significance of ‘severity
- Medical crowdfunding in China: empirics and ethics
- We need to talk about imperatives
- What a drag it is getting old: a response to Räsänen