- An Anatheistic Wager for Bioethics
- Navigating Contested Harms and Competing Metaphysics: Humility and Ethics Consultation
- Design Bioethics and Digital Research Creep
- Powers and Perils
- Principles over Propositions: Or, How to Reject Metaphysical Neutrality in Bioethics
- Advancing Methods in Empirical Bioethics: Bioxphi Meets Digital Technologies
- Design Bioethics, Not Only as a Research Tool but Also a Pedagogical Tool
- What about Ethics in Design Bioethics?
- Strangers at the Altar
- Design Justice for Design Bioethics
- “Let’s Test Crazy Ideas!” A Laboratory for Experimental Bioethics
- Ontology: A Bridge between Bioethics and Data-Driven Inquiry
- Focusing on Neutrality When Resolving Religious Conflicts in Pediatric Medical Care
- Metaphysics, Reason, and Religion in Secular Clinical Ethics
- Bioethicist as Partisan Ideologue
- The Costs of Purposeful Games: When Building a Tool Means Building a Market
- Between Usual and Crisis Phases of a Public Health Emergency: The Mediating Role of Contingency Measures
- Postponed Withholding: Balanced Decision-Making at the Margins of Viability
- Health Disparities, Systemic Racism, and Failures of Cultural Competence
- Preparing for the Next Generation of Ethical Challenges Concerning Heritable Human Genome Editing
- Lies of Omission and Commission, Providing and Withholding Treatment, Local and Global Autonomy – There Are Reasons for Clinical Ethicists to Attend to All of These Distinctions
- Informed Consent, Understanding, and Trust
- Ethicists’ Deception: Theory, Role, Concepts, and Applications
- More than Conveying Information: Informed Consent as Speech Act
- Varieties of Minimalism about Informed Consent
- Why Truthfulness is the First of the Virtues
- Truth and Communication in Ethics Consultation
- Trust, Transparency, and Trauma Informed Care
- Lying is Not an Option for Clinical Ethics Consultants
- Deceptive Omissions, Half-Truths, and the Moral Exemplar in Clinical Ethics
- Hare’s Archangel, Human Fallibility, and Utilitarian Justification(?) of Deception
- Lies, Damned Lies, and Bioethicists
- Should the Clinical Ethicist Document Her Complicity in Intentional Deception?
- When Does Nudging Represent Fraudulent Disclosure?
- Promoting Disclosure and Understanding in Informed Consent: Optimizing the Impact of the Common Rule “Key Information” Requirement
- Utilizing Community Research Committees to Improve the Informed Consent Process
- When First We Practice to Deceive
- Informed Consent Conversations: Neither the Beginning nor the End
- The Grounds of the Disclosure Requirement for Informed Consent
- Controversial Analysis of “Deception” Prevents Adequate Moral Analysis
- Why Have Uniform Informed Consent Documents When the Research Volunteers Are So Diverse?
- Chinese Clinical Ethicists Accept Physicians’ Benevolent Deception of Patients
- Falling on One’s Sword for Truth: Deception by Ethicist Should Be Narrow
- Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome Edit
- E-Cigarettes and the Multiple Responsibilities of the FDA
- Neutrality and Perfectionism in Public Health
- Some Contributions on How to Formulate Drug Policies and Provide Evidence-Based Regulation
- Ending the War on Drugs: Public Attitudes and Incremental Change
- Fostering Relationships in Pediatric Oncology Research: A Relational Ethics Approach to Clinically Integrated Research
- Acknowledging Angst: Research Ethics Consultation in Disclosing Experimental Research Results of Uncertain Benefit
- Ending the War on People with Substance Use Disorders in Health Care
- Risks to Relationships in Kidney Transplant Research with Living Donors and Recipients
- The Underdeveloped “Gift”: Ethics in Implementing Precision Medicine Research
- “Second Chance” Mechanisms as a First Step to Ending the War on Drugs
- Ending the War on Drugs Requires Decriminalization. Does It Also Require Legalization?
- “It’s a War on People …”
- Racial Justice and Economic Efficiency Both Require Ending the War on Drugs
- The Importance of Rights to the Argument for the Decriminalization of Drugs
- The “War on Drugs” Affects Children Too: Racial Inequities in Pediatric Populations
- Drug Legalization is Not a Masterstroke for Addressing Racial Inequality
- Beyond Decriminalization: Ending the War on Drugs Requires Recasting Police Discretion through the Lens of a Public Health Ethic
- A Value-Oriented Framework for Precision Medicine
- Reciprocity’s Baggage
- Relieving Investigator Angst After an Appropriate But Concerning Ethics Consultation
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries: Distinguishing the “Gift” from “Donation” as a Path toward Reciprocity and Relational Ethics
- Ending the War on Drugs Is an Essential Step Toward Racial Justice
- Ending the War on Drugs Need Not, and Should Not, Involve Legalizing Supply by a For-Profit Industry
- Legalization of Drugs and Human Flourishing
- Supporting Investigators in Challenging Cases: Unease in the Face of an Ethically Appropriate Action
- Gift, Reciprocity and Learning Health Systems
- Aporia of the Gift: Precision Medicine’s Obligations Without Expectations
- Conjoined Consent: Informed Consent When Donor and Recipient Are Both Research Participants
- Responsible Research with Human Tissues: The Need for Reciprocity Toward Both Collectives and Individuals
- Precision Medicine, Data, and the Anthropology of Social Status
- Respecting Donor-Recipient Relationships in Research Decision-Making Commentary on: When Living Donor and Kidney Transplant Recipient Are Both Research Subjects
- Experiences at a Federally Qualified Health Center Support Expanded Conception of the Gifts of Precision Medicine
- We Have “Gifted” Enough: Indigenous Genomic Data Sovereignty in Precision Medicine
- Moving Beyond Standard Informed Consent for Interventional Organ Transplant Research
- Researchers Experience Moral Distress Too!
- The Gift in Precision Medicine: Unwrapping the Significance of Reciprocity and Generosity
- Ethics Consultation in U.S. Hospitals: A National Follow-Up Study
- Ethics Consultation in U.S. Hospitals: Determinants of Consultation Volume
- Ethics Consultation in U.S. Hospitals: Opinions of Ethics Practitioners
- An Open Dialogue on Health Disparities and Structural Racism: Response to Open Peer Commentaries
- Looking Forward: A Response to Commentaries on “Race, Power and COVID-19: A Call for Advocacy within Bioethics”
- Plumbing the Depths of Ethical Payment for Research Participation
- Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation
- Acquiescence is Not Agreement: The Problem of Marginalization in Pediatric Decision Making
- Two Minds, One Patient: Clearing up Confusion About “Ambivalence”
- Time to Professionalize Service to Research? Pay Nothing or Full Wage for Labor
- Race, Racism, and Structural Injustice: Equitable Allocation and Distribution of Vaccines for the COVID-19
- Review of Bioethics in Action Baylis, Francoise and Dreger, Alice, eds. Bioethics in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. vii + 177 pp. $29.00 (978-1107543935)
- Dear President Biden: We Need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission
- Reifying Racism in the COVID-19 Pandemic Response
- Research Participants Should Be Rewarded Rather than “Compensated for Time and Burdens”
- Considering the Importance of Context for Ethical Practice on Reimbursement, Compensation and Incentives for Volunteers in Human Infection Controlled Studies
- Paying the Right Amount to Challenge Trial Participants – We Need to Use Behavioral Science Insights to Sell What’s Right
- What Fairness Demands: How We Can Promote Fair Compensation in Human Infection Challenge Studies and Beyond
- Promoting Ethical Payments in Human Challenge Studies Conducted in LMICs: Are We Asking the Right Questions?
- The Role of Race in Pandemic Vaccine Allocation
- Structural Racism in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Don’t Forget about the Children!
- Health Equity and the Public Health Code of Ethics: Rebuilding Trust from the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Truth and Reconciliation of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities: A Case Study of COVID-19
- Incentive Payments and Research Related Risks—No Reason to Change
- Addressing COVID-19 Health Disparities & Latinidad
- Paying for Fairness? Incentives and Fair Subject Selection
- A Call for Radical Transparency regarding Research Payments
- Latinos and Structural Racism
- What’s True in Truth and Reconciliation? Why Epistemic Justice is of Paramount Importance in Addressing Structural Racism in Healthcare
- The Birth of Injustice: COVID-19 Hospital Infection Control Policy on Latinx Birth Experience
- The Invisibility of Asian Americans in COVID-19 Data, Reporting, and Relief
- Equitable Access to Research Benefits: Considerations for COVID-19 Vaccine Development and Clinical Trial Crossover
- Promoting Ethical Payment in Human Infection Challenge Studies
- Against the Reification of Race in Bioethics: Anti-Racism without Racial Realism
- Counteracting COVID-19 Healthcare Inequity: Supporting Antiracist Practices at Bedside
- Race and Power at the Bedside: Counter Storytelling in Clinical Ethics Consultation
- Transforming Bioethics: The Need for Strong Objectivity and Standpoints
- Addressing Racism in Medicine Requires Tackling the Broader Problem of Epistemic Injustice
- The White Coat: A Counter Narrative
- True Colors: Whiteness in Bioethics
- Updating Race-Based Risk Assessment Algorithms in Clinical Practice: Time for a Systems Approach
- Putting Anti-Racism into Practice as a Healthcare Ethics Consultant
- Systemic Racism in America and the Call to Action
- To What Extent Are Calls for Greater Minority Representation in COVID Vaccine Research Ethically Justified?
- Black Women and Babies Matter
- Racial Injustice and Meaning Well: A Challenge for Bioethics
- Race-Conscious Bioethics: The Call to Reject Contemporary Scientific Racism
- Beyond the Medical Model: Retooling Bioethics for the Work Ahead
- It’s Time for a Black Bioethics
- Racism, Broadly Speaking, and the Work of Bioethics: Some Conceptual Matters
- Beyond Seeing Race: Centering Racism and Acknowledging Agency Within Bioethics
- Can a Global Bioethical Lens Engender Color Blindness? An Examination of Public Health Disasters
- Counternarrative Themes
- The Loud Silence of Racism: It is Killing Us All
- COVID-19 is Not a Story of Race, but a Record of Racism—Our Scholarship Should Reflect That Reality
- Bioethics as Engaged Activity
- From Paternalism to Engagement: Bioethics Needs a Paradigm Shift to Address Racial Injustice During COVID-19
- How to Eliminate Racism in Health Care: Building Diversity Competency in a Regional Health Authority in Canada
- Bioethics Advocacy in Ethos, Practice and Metrics
- Addressing Meso-Level Mechanisms of Racism in Medicine
- Design Bioethics: A Theoretical Framework and Argument for Innovation in Bioethics Research
- Bioethics, (Funding) Priorities, and the Perpetuation of Injustice
- Informed Consent: What Must Be Disclosed and What Must Be Understood?
- Implementing Expanded Prenatal Genetic Testing: Should Parents Have Access to Any and All Fetal Genetic Information?
- A New Ethical Framework for Assessing the Unique Challenges of Fetal Therapy Trials
- Extending Research Protections to Tribal Communities
- Toward a Framework for Assessing Privacy Risks in Multi-Omic Research and Databases
- Racial Justice Requires Ending the War on Drugs
- Unjustified Asymmetry: Positive Claims of Conscience and Heartbeat Bills
- Artificial Intelligence, Social Media and Depression. A New Concept of Health-Related Digital Autonomy
- Deception and the Clinical Ethicist
- A Sickle-Cell Patient Displaced by the Pandemic: Is a Request for Opioids Legitimate, or Sign of a Deeper Problems?
- The Moral Relevance of Humanization
- In Science We Trust? Being Honest About the Limits of Medical Research During COVID-19
- Standardize or Adapt? Treatment Diversity as an Ethical Issue
- Relational Autonomy in an Era of Limited Visitation: What’s a Son, Mother, and Medical Team to Do?
- Human Brain Surrogates Research: The Onrushing Ethical Dilemma
- Self-Defeating Codes of Medical Ethics and How to Fix Them: Failures in COVID-19 Response and Beyond
- A Review of “Love Drugs: The Chemical Future of Relationships”
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries for “There’s No Harm in Talking: Reestablishing the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics”
- Codes of Ethics, Human Rights and Forced Migration
- Philosophy is Still Missing from the Human-Mouse Chimera Debate
- The Centrality of Relational Autonomy and Compassion Fatigue in the COVID-19 Era
- When Doctors Refuse to Prescribe Opiates to a Patient in Pain: How Healthcare Ethics Consultants Can Be Most Effective
- “I’m in Pain; Why Don’t You Believe Me?” Pain Management in Sickle Cell Disease
- A Crisis of Compromised Companionship in the Time of COVID-19
- Justice and the Ethical Response to Suffering
- Broadening the Scope of Moral Responsibility of Clinicians: What Medical Ethics Can Learn from Public Health Ethics
- Communication as Compassion
- Brain Surrogates—Empty or Full Makes the Difference
- The Duty to Support Learning Health Systems: A Broad Rather than a Narrow Interpretation
- Don’t Blame Hippocrates for Low Enrollment in Clinical Trials
- Cracking the Code: COVID-19 and the Future of Professional Promises
- Responding to Human Brain Surrogates Research: The Value of Empirical Ethics
- Expert Communication and the Self-Defeating Codes of Scientific Ethics
- The Consequences of Access to Unproven Treatments: Medical Ethics Didn’t Create the Problem, and It Isn’t the Solution
- Against the Precautionary Approach to Moral Status: The Case of Surrogates for Living Human Brains
- Testing the Correlates of Consciousness in Brain Organoids: How Do We Know and What Do We Do?
- Scientific and Ethical Uncertainties in Brain Organoid Research
- Human Brain Surrogates: Models or Distortions?
- Secular Clinical Ethicists Should Not Be Neutral Toward All Religious Beliefs: An Argument for a Moral-Metaphysical Proceduralism
- Supported Decision Making With People at the Margins of Autonomy
- The Ethical Defensibility of Harm Reduction and Eating Disorders
- From Reciprocity to Autonomy in Physician-Assisted Death: An Ethical Analysis of the Dutch Supreme Court Ruling in the Albert Heringa Case
- Structural Racism in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Moving Forward
- Obligations of the “Gift”: Reciprocity and Responsibility in Precision Medicine
- Racism and Bioethics: The Myth of Color Blindness
- Race, Power, and COVID-19: A Call for Advocacy within Bioethics
- Frailty Triage: Is Rationing Intensive Medical Treatment on the Grounds of Frailty Ethical?
- Race Based Medicine, Colorblind Disease: How Racism in Medicine Harms Us All
- Ethical Analysis and Beyond! How Christian Anthropology and the Concept of Dignity Can Also Address Moral Distress in End-of-Life Care
- Vulnerable Life: Reflections on the Relationship Between Theological and Philosophical Ethics
- Public Reason as the Way for Dialogue
- A Data-Driven Argument in Bioethics: Why Theologically Grounded Concepts May Not Provide the Necessary Intellectual Resources to Discuss Inequality and Injustice in Healthcare Contexts
- “‘There’s No Harm in Talking’…True…But It Depends on How We Talk and What We Then Do”
- Correlating Bioethics and Theology
- Theorizing Religion in Its Meanings for Bioethics
- Harming Children to Benefit Others: A Reply
- A Pandemic Refocuses Bioethics on “The Big Questions”
- Purely Faith-Based vs. Rationally-Informed Theological Bioethics
- There’s No Harm in Talking: Re-Establishing the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics
- Pluralism in the Jewish Ethical Tradition
- Community, Complicity, and Critique: Christian Concepts in Secular Bioethics
- What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological”
- The Social Context of Religion in the Jurisdictions of Bioethics
- Methodological Clarity in Religious Perspectives of Bioethical Issues: Lessons from Islamic Studies
- Talking at Cross Purposes: Why We Shouldn’t Re-Establish the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics
- Talking Can Be Harmful Depending on What You Say
- A Framework to Evaluate Ethical Considerations with ML-HCA Applications—Valuable, Even Necessary, but Never Comprehensive
- Planning for the Known Unknown: Machine Learning for Human Healthcare Systems
- Accountability in the Machine Learning Pipeline: The Critical Role of Research Ethics Oversight
- Review of Robert Klitzman’s Designing Babies
- Response to Open Peer Commentary “Making It Count: Extracting Real World Data from Compassionate Use and Expanded Access Programs”
- Addressing the “Wicked” Problems in Machine Learning Applications – Time for Bioethical Agility
- It is Time for Bioethicists to Enter the Arena of Machine Learning Ethics
- Needs to Prepare for “Post-COVID-19 Syndrome”
- Identifying Ethical Considerations for Machine Learning Healthcare Applications
- An Evaluation of the Pipeline Framework for Ethical Considerations in Machine Learning Healthcare Applications: The Case of Prediction from Functional Neuroimaging Data
- Respect and Trustworthiness in the Patient-Provider-Machine Relationship: Applying a Relational Lens to Machine Learning Healthcare Applications
- AI Ethics Is Not a Panacea
- An Ethical Framework to Nowhere
- Where Bioethics Meets Machine Ethics
- Keeping the Patient at the Center of Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Embedded Ethics Could Help Implement the Pipeline Model Framework for Machine Learning Healthcare Applications
- Structural Disparities in Data Science: A Prolegomenon for the Future of Machine Learning
- Machine Learning in Healthcare: Exceptional Technologies Require Exceptional Ethics
- Machine Learning Healthcare Applications (ML-HCAs) Are No Stand-Alone Systems but Part of an Ecosystem – A Broader Ethical and Health Technology Assessment Approach is Needed
- What’s in the Box?: Uncertain Accountability of Machine Learning Applications in Healthcare
- Deepening the Normative Evaluation of Machine Learning Healthcare Application by Complementing Ethical Considerations with Regulatory Governance
- What Counts as “Clinical Data” in Machine Learning Healthcare Applications?
- The Fundamental Ethical Concern Is Lack of School Resources to Ensure Student Well-Being
- HIV Molecular Epidemiology: Tool of Oppression or Empowerment?
- Respecting Parental Permission and Maintaining Flexibility in Online Research Involving Adolescent Participants
- How Obvious is Obvious? The Role of Technology in Public Health
- Reassessing the Ethics of Molecular HIV Surveillance in the Era of Cluster Detection and Response: Toward HIV Data Justice
- Where Data Meets Action: Linking Health Surveillance with Community Partnership
- Duties When an Anonymous Student Health Survey Finds a Hot Spot of Suicidality
- Molecular HIV Surveillance and Public Health Ethics: Old Wine in New Bottles
- Big Data, Corporate Surveillance and Public Health
- Constrained Adolescent Autonomy for Healthcare Should Include Participation in Survey Research
- Adding a Voice to the Unique Ethical Considerations in Molecular HIV Surveillance
- A Therapeutic Conundrum: Should a Physician Serve Simultaneously as Caregiver and Researcher?
- Digital Negotiations: Navigating Parental Permission and Adolescent Assent for On-Line Survey Participation
- What is a Bioethics of the Oppressed in the Age of COVID-19?
- Inherent Conflict of Interest in Clinical Research: A Call for Effective Guidance
- Furthering Discussion of Ethical Implementation of HIV Cluster Detection and Response
- Ambulance Charters during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Equitable Access to Scarce Resources
- Not All Conflicts Are Bad: Why Some Conflicts of Interests Advance Patients’ Interests
- Advancing Data Justice in Public Health and Beyond
- Comments Confirm That Student Health Surveillance Needs Ethics Guidelines to Act on Risk-Cluster Findings
- Conflicts of Interest and Recommendations for Clinical Treatments That Benefit Researchers
- Click Here to Complete This Survey: Online Research, Adolescents, and Parental Consent
- We Are People, Not Clusters!
- Wise Use of Surveillance Data: Evolving HIV Policy and Emerging Considerations Regarding COVID-19
- From Subject to Fellow Researcher: Reconceptualising Research Relationships to Safeguard Potentially Vulnerable Survey Participants
- An Ethics for Public Health Surveillance
- Incidental Findings in Public Health Research: The Importance of Maintaining Trust
- Benefit of HIV Molecular Surveillance is Unclear, but Risks to Prevention Norms Are Clear
- Structural Deprioritization and Stigmatization of Mental Health Concerns in the Educational Setting
- Ethical Convergence and Ethical Possibilities: The Implications of New Materialism for Understanding the Molecular Turn in HIV, the Response to COVID-19, and the Future of Bioethics
- The Importance of Assessing Mental Health Issues and Preventing Suicidality in Studies on Healthy Participants
- Conceptualizing a Bioethics of the Oppressed: Oppression, Structure, and Inclusion
- Fourth Pillar or “Third Rail?:” Towards a Community-Centered Understanding of the Role of Molecular HIV Surveillance in Ending the HIV Epidemic in the United States
- Technology Changes the Ethical Stakes in HIV Surveillance and Prevention: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Reassessing the Ethics of Molecular HIV Surveillance in the Era of Cluster Detection and Response”
- Encouraging Vaccination Ethically: How Can Pox Parties for Grannies and Vaccine-Preventable Diseases Be Avoided?
- The Inherent Unfairness of COVID-19 Drug Access Pathways
- The Decision to Enroll in a Clinical Trial Should Be Unencumbered
- Guiding Difficult Decisions on Scarce Investigational Therapeutic Agents in the COVID-19 Pandemic
- The Limits of Individualism: Potential Societal Harms from the EAP for Convalescent Plasma
- Pox Parties for Grannies? Chickenpox, Exogenous Boosting, and Harmful Injustices
- Ethically Allocating COVID-19 Drugs Via Pre-approval Access and Emergency Use Authorization
- Physicians’ Ethical and Professional Obligations about Right-to-Try Amidst a Pandemic
- Adopting an Anti-Racist Model of COVID-19 Drug Allocation and Prioritization
- Unintended Effects, Iatrogenic Harms, and the Challenge of Population-Wide Vaccination Compliance
- Using Individuals as (Mere) Means in Management of Infectious Diseases without Vaccines. Should We Purposely Infect Young People with Coronavirus?
- Introducing Routine Varicella Vaccination? Not so Fast!
- How to Be Fair, and Power Research? Select Patients by Flipping a Coin
- The Strawman at the Pox Party
- Varicella Vaccination, Counting Harms and Benefits, and Obligations to Others
- Fairness and Protection for the Vulnerable: Lessons from Esketamine
- The Case for Methodological Pluralism in Medical Science
- Allocating Remdesivir Under Scarcity: Social Justice or More Systemic Racism
- Allocating Scarce Unproven Interventions during Public Health Emergencies: Insights from the WHO MEURI Framework
- Not Society’s Sacrificial Lambs: It is Wrong to Withhold Vaccination from Children to Benefit Others
- Vaccine-Associated Shingles: What Do We Owe Varicella Vaccine Recipients in Adulthood?
- Are Generational Welfare Trades Always Unjust?
- Aggregate Wellbeing as Foundation to Discourage Childhood Chickenpox Vaccination
- No Easy Answers in Allocating Unapproved COVID-19 Drugs Outside Clinical Trials
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Solidarity and Community Engagement in Global Health Research”
- Enriching, Rather than Revising, the Conceptual Toolbox on Germline Interventions
- Revising, Correcting and Transferring Genes: Germline Editing Versus Natural Reproduction
- Beyond Precedent Autonomy and Current Preferences: A Narrative Perspective on Advance Directives in Dementia Care
- It Is Time to Consult the Children: A Mother Who Faced Mitochondrial Replacement and Her Son Consider the Limits of Genetic Modification
- Beyond Cognition: Psychological and Social Transformations in People Living with Dementia and Relevance for Decision-Making Capacity and Opportunity
- New Barriers on the Slippery Slope?
- The Moral Weight of Preferences: Death, Sex, and Dementia
- Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes
- The Nexus of Medical Professional Ethics and Business Ethics
- Advance Directives for Dementia Can Survive Altered Preferences
- Suicide Attempts and the Obligations of Medical Providers
- Personal Transformation and Advance Directives: An Experimental Bioethics Approach
- Comfort Care after Self-Immolation: Is the Physician Complicit?
- Why We Should Not Let the Cheerfully Demented Die
- Surprise Billing as a Source of Vulnerability—An Ethics Question Indeed
- Surprise Billing in the Emergency Department: What’s a Clinical Ethics Consultant to Do?
- Living Will Versus Will to Live? How to Navigate Through Complex Decisions for Persons With Dementia
- Surprise Billing in a Hospital Emergency Department – An Ethical, Contractual, and Legislative Conundrum
- Where Do You End, and I Begin? How Relationships Confound Advance Directives in the Care of Persons Living with Dementia
- Host as a Unique Ethical Dimension of Germline Interventions
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Partnering with Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research”
- Upstream Ethical Mapping of Germline Genome Editing
- Losing Rather than Choosing: A Defense of Advance Directives in the Context of Dementia
- Days of Future Past: Reply to Open Peer Commentaries on “Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes”
- Advanced Care Planning: Promoting Autonomy in Caring for People with Dementia
- Dementia, Cognitive Transformation, and Supported Decision Making
- A Critical Dialogue on the Transformational Nature of Dementia: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Cognitive Transformation, Dementia, and the Moral Weight of Advance Directives”
- Holding On: A Community Approach to Autonomy in Dementia
- Germline Gene Editing: Minding the Past and the Future
- Whose Preferences?
- Ethically Problematic Medical Device Representation
- Assessing the Ethical Distinctions Between Different Types of Prospective Human Germline Genetic Interventions
- Gremlins in the Germline
- Of the Rights and Best Interests of Future Generations
- Understanding Advance Directives as a Component of Advance Care Planning
- Ethical Framework for Next-Generation Genome and Epigenome Editing
- Advance Directives and Transformative Experience: Resilience in the Face of Change
- Technical Categories and Ethical Justifications: Why Cwik’s Approach is the Wrong Way Around for Categorizing Germ-Line Gene Editing
- Non-Human Germline Interventions
- Is It All About Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes?
- Cognitive Transformation, Dementia, and the Moral Weight of Advance Directives
- Treatment Refusal in the Setting of Self-Immolation
- The Irrelevance of Origins: Dementia, Advance Directives, and the Capacity for Preferences
- “Why Should Adamancy of an Uninformed View Give Moral Weight?”
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How Payment for Research Participation Can Be Coercive”
- Honoring a Request for Comfort Measures Only After Self-Harm
- Germline Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease
- Defending the Inclusion of Categorical Exclusion Criteria in Crisis Standard of Care Frameworks
- Corona and Community: The Entrenchment of Structural Bias in Planning for Pandemic Preparedness
- Why Healthcare Workers Ought to Be Prioritized in ASMR During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
- Why Healthcare Workers Should Not Be Prioritized in Ventilator Triage
- Ethical Triage Demands a Better Triage Survivability Score
- Ethical Considerations for “Reopening” Health Care Organizations Amid COVID-19
- Justice and Guidance for the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Rationing Crisis: Bogus Standards of Care Unmasked by Covid-19
- Making It Count: Extracting Real World Data from Compassionate Use and Expanded Access Programs
- Ventilator Allocation for Pediatrics during COVID-19 – How We Avoided Drawing Lots for Tots
- Ethical Challenges in Advance Care Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- The Shield and Sword of Biosecurity: Balancing the Ethics of Public Safety and Global Preparedness
- To Procure or Not to Procure: Hospitals Face Significant Ethical Dilemmas Regarding Organ Donation During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Implementing VA’s Authoritative Ethical Guidance in a Pandemic
- From Ventilators to Vaccines: Reframing the Ethics of Resource Allocation
- Allocating Ventilators During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Conscientious Objection
- Using a Public Health Ethics Framework to Unpick Discrimination in COVID-19 Responses
- Beyond Ventilators and Prematurity: Most Rationing Dilemmas Are Morally Fraught
- Compassionate Release as a “Right” in the Age of COVID-19
- Ethics as Usual? Unilateral Withdrawal of Treatment in a State of Exception
- When Exclusion Criteria Are Appropriate
- A Conceptual Framework for Clearer Ethical Discussions About COVID-19 Response
- More than Warm Fuzzy Feelings: The Imperative of Institutional Morale in Hospital Pandemic Responses
- Reopening Economies during the COIVD-19 Pandemic: Reasoning about Value Tradeoffs
- Rights Don’t Stand Alone: Responsibility for Rights in a Pandemic
- A Call for Dialysis-Specific Resource Allocation Guidelines During COVID-19
- Maryland’s Experience With the COVID-19 Surge: What Worked, What Didn’t, What Next?
- Flattening the Rationing Curve: The Need for Explicit Guidelines for Implicit Rationing during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Are Immunity Licenses Just?
- COVID in NYC: What New York Did, and Should Have Done
- It’s Not Easy Bein’ Fair
- Using Functionality Rather than Elective Nature to Characterize Neurosurgeries During Pandemic Triage
- COVID-19, Pandemic Triage, and the Polymorphism of Justice
- Preserving the Reproductive Rights of Girls and Women in the Era of COVID-19: The Need for a Least Restrictive Solution
- Embedding the Problems Doesn’t Make Them Go Away
- Disability and Contingency Care
- Guiding Principles of Global Health Governance in Times of Pandemics: Solidarity, Subsidiarity, and Stewardship in COVID-19
- The Moral Status of Newborns: Before, during, and after the Pandemic
- Research Ethics during a Pandemic: A Call for Normative and Empirical Analysis
- Examining Public Trust in Categorical versus Comprehensive Triage Criteria
- Saving the Babies or the Elderly in a Time of Crisis?
- A Novel Approach Using Social Media to Solve Medical Ethical Dilemmas and Legal Risks in the Emergencies of COVID-19
- Ethical Dilemmas in Covid-19 Medical Care: Is a Problematic Triage Protocol Better or Worse than No Protocol at All?
- Ethical Allocation of Remdesivir
- Periviability in a Pandemic: Good Ethics Still Considered Essential
- The Regulation of COVID-19 “Challenge” Studies
- Resource Allocation in COVID-19 Research: Which Trials? Which Patients?
- Racial Disparities in Preemies and Pandemics
- Bioethics Emergencies Can Be Used to Perform a Real-World Test of Utilitarian Policies
- Reconceptualizing Triage to Incorporate Principles of Risk and Uncertainty: An Example from Deep Brain Stimulation Patients with Treatment-Resistant Disorders
- People With Disabilities in COVID-19: Fixing Our Priorities
- The Meaning of Care and Ethics to Mitigate the Harshness of Triage in Second-Wave Scenario Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Ethics Lessons From Seattle’s Early Experience With COVID-19