- Preserving Complexity of Agent-Regret in Healthcare
- Demonstrated Consent and the Common Good: On Withdrawal of Consent in Stem Cell Research
- Further Beyond the Representational View: Response to Commentaries
- Asilomar Revisited
- Institutional Access to Gene Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease – Treatment on a Clinical Trial or Receive a Newly Approved Therapy?
- Informed Consensus: The Future of Respect for Persons in Biomedical Research
- Clinical Trials or FDA-Approved Therapies? The Ethics of Sickle Cell Gene Therapy Access
- Beyond Words: Extending a Pragmatic View of Language to Large Language Models for Informed Consent
- Experimental Bioethics, Linguistic Pragmatism, and Public Attitudes Toward Brain Organoids Research
- Technologies Do Not Build Trust, People Do: A Critical Response to Promises of Trust in Biobanking Through Blockchain and Generative AI
- When All Is Said and Done: In Support of the Pragmatic Approach to Language in Bioethics
- The Logic of Conflict Should Not Apply to Medicine and Medical Sanctions
- In Defense of Thinking and Talking in Bioethics and Shared Decision-Making
- From Representation to Pragmatics to Ritual
- Healthcare Under Siege: The Ethics of Sanctions, Problematic Dichotomies, and the Misuse of the Concept of Dual-Use
- Two Practical Applications of Pragmatic Bioethics
- War Profiteers and Peace Brokers: The Responsibilities of Third Parties in Armed Conflict
- On the Complexities of Enabling Demonstrated Consent
- Selling Ethics
- Balancing Health Equity in Medical Sanctions: Addressing Values Tradeoffs and Ethical Implications
- Recruitment and Informed Consent for Experimental Gene Therapy Trials When New FDA-Approved Treatments are not Widely Available
- A Call for Pragmatic, Ethically Complex Narratives of Disability
- Appreciating Language in Bioethics: From Theory to Practice
- Power in the Pragmatic View
- Medical Sanctions Against Russia: Arresting Aggression or Abrogating Healthcare Rights
- Informed Consent and Comprehension after the Pragmatic Turn
- Reframing Language in Bioethics: Strengths and Gaps in the Pragmatic Turn
- Medical Sanctions and Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Companies: Extending Gross’ Conclusion
- Representationalism and the Language of the Clinic
- A Scalpel, Not a Sword: The Case for Narrow Medical Sanctions
- Everyday Phrases as a Source of Clinical Miscommunication: Potential Solutions to a Hidden Problem
- Global Pharmaceutical Companies’ Obligations to Restart Clinical Research in Ukraine
- When Sanctions Meet Corruption: Reframing Healthcare Access in Russia
- Consent, Legal Certainty and the Need for Governance
- Consent at the Ease of a Click? Technosolutionist Fixes Cannot Replace Human Relations and Solidarity
- The Structural Inequality of Status Quo Clinical Communication
- Implications of a Pragmatic View of Language for Clinical Ethics
- Gene Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease: Striking a Balance Between Approved Therapies and Clinical Trials
- Consent Is Dead, Long Live Ethical Oversight: Integrating Ethically Sourced Data into Demonstrated Consent Models
- Narrative Transparency in AI-Driven Consent
- Allocation of Gene Therapy for Rare Diseases: FDA Approved Therapy or Clinical Trial for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease?
- In Search of Durable Models for Research Consent in Emerging Computing Environments
- Challenges to Demonstrated Consent in Biobanking: Technical, Ethical, and Regulatory Considerations
- The Concept of Personal Utility in Genomic Testing: Three Ethical Tensions
- Germline Genome Editing May Never Have Any Clinical Utility
- Wanted, but Elusive: Clear Solutions for Addressing Potential Group Harm in Data-Centric Research
- The Proper Uses and Constraints on Exercises of Conscience in Cases of Profound Neurological Injury: A Dialogue with Our Colleagues
- Focusing on Service User Perspectives to Uncover the Boundary Between Treatment Pressure and Informal Coercion
- Mapping, Moralizing, and More: Response to Commentaries
- Hospital Ethics Committees and Consultants: How Do Clinicians Perceive Their Utility in Resolving Disagreements About Life-Sustaining Treatments?
- Disclosure as Absolution in Medicine: Disentangling Autonomy from Beneficence and Justice in Artificial Intelligence
- Challenges in Pursuing AI Transparency
- Conscientious Objection, Life-Continuation Values, and the Protection of Normative Minorities
- Physicians Versus Surgeons: Conscientious Objection and Inappropriate Treatments
- Notice and Explanation in Healthcare AI: Lessons from California’s Proposition 65 Experience
- The Not So Obvious Benefits of Ethics Committees: What Is Lost Without Them
- Good Clinical Ethics Requires Access to Diverse Community Perspectives
- (Ir)Relevance of Ethics Committees: The Continued Value of Hospital Ethics Committees in Programs with Professional Ethicist Staffing
- Clarifying When Consent Might Be Illusory in Notice and Explanation Rights
- The Power of Professional Clinical Ethicists in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Ethiopian Perspective
- Balancing Transparency and Trust: Reevaluating AI Disclosure in Healthcare
- Replacing Ethics Committees: No Ethical Loss?
- Procedure Versus Patient-Centered Conscientious Objection
- Invidious Discrimination v. Conscientious Objection: C’mon, a rose is a rose is a rose!
- Beyond Disclosure: Rethinking Patient Consent and AI Accountability in Healthcare
- Two Justifications for Refusing to Provide Medical Interventions
- What Can Committees Demonstrate That Professional Ethicists Can’t? Impartial Review with Adequate Due Process
- Community-Based Consent Model, Patient Rights, and AI Explainability in Medicine
- Mitigating Placebo Effect in Human-AI Interaction: Expanding the Role(s) of the Right to Notice and Explanation
- A Heuristic for Notifying Patients About AI: From Institutional Declarations to Informed Consent
- Cultivating Patient-Centered Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Transparency: Considerations for AI Documentation
- Is Treating Permanently Unconscious Patients Futile? Quality of Life Presupposes Conscious Awareness
- Consenting to and Contesting AI Use – Different Functions but Both Are Necessary
- Bring a ‘Patient’s Medical AI Journey’ to the Hill
- Taking the Right to Notice and Explanation Seriously: The Critical Importance of Evidence and Oversight for Healthcare AI
- The Value of Preserving Ethics Committees
- On Camels and Committees
- Predicting the Future: Informational Agency and the Right to Notice and Explanation in the Use of Personal Information
- Informed Agency: Reimagining Patient Autonomy in the Age of Machine-Assisted Healthcare
- Building Trauma-Informed Hospital Ethics Cultures
- Complexity of Establishing “Reasonability” in Conscientious Objection Claims
- Reasonable But Not Permissible: Conscientious Objection and Reasonable Disagreement
- Social Bioethics and Healthcare AI: Insights for Medical Decision Making
- More to Know Could Not be More to Trust: Open Communication as a Moral Imperative for AI Systems in Healthcare
- Conscientious Objection and PVS: Proceed with Caution
- Inappropriate Interventions in Disorders of Consciousness: Due Process, Not Conscientious Objection
- Inaccurate Criteria for Conscientious Objection and Invidious Discrimination Threaten Patients’ Access
- Conscientious Objection: A Morally Compromising and Needless Distraction in Medical Practice
- Why Stop at a Right to Notice for AI Systems Used in Patient Care? The Need for Greater Specificity
- Clinical Ethics at Early Stages: What Growing Strategy?
- The Perils of AI over-Exceptionalism in Healthcare
- Aligning Ongoing Care Teams and Proceduralists About Inappropriate Interventions Requires More Than Conscientious Objection
- Building Better Medicine: Translational Justice and the Quest for Equity in US Healthcare
- Substituted Judgment and The Paradigm Case Mistake
- Beyond Doomsday Fears: Why We Need to Consider the Potential Harms of AI Psychotherapy
- Abortion and Embodiment
- Digital Doppelgängers Cannot Be Ethically Created
- Agent-Regret and Clinical Realities: Responding to the “Nearly-Faultless Harmer”
- Extending the Self: Examining Motivations and Philosophies in Life Extension Communities
- Digital Doppelgängers, Grief Bots, and Transformational Challenges
- How Anticipation of Agent-Regret Can Undermine Clinical Decision-Making
- Getting to the Heart of the Matter: How Should Family Support Be Considered in Pediatric Transplant Evaluations?
- The Authenticity Requirement: Why Using Digital Twins for Achieving Person-Span Extension Goods Can Be Self-Defeating
- Collective Risks and the Social Disvalue of Research
- Research and Reasons: In Defense of the Common Rule’s Preclusionary Statement
- Agent-Regret in Healthcare: Toward a More Precise and Empirical-Based Look into the Dynamics of Agent-Regret Experiences
- Beyond Individual Consent: The Hidden Crisis of Group Harm in the AI and Genomics Era
- Digital Doppelgängers: Dilemmas of Death, Data, and Deference
- Common Rule Revisions to Govern Machine Learning on Indigenous Data: Implementing the Expectations
- Agent Regret Among Patient Families and Hospital Chaplains
- Group Risks: Thinking Outside the Box
- Stewardship or Punishment? Ethical Analysis of Transplant Candidacy for a Child from a Low-Resourced Family
- Why Revise When We Should Reconcile?
- Equity or Utility? Considering Social Factors in Pediatric Transplant
- Ethics at the Intersection of Technology and Dementia Care: The Case of WanderGuard
- Wired Ethics: When Love, Dementia, and Surveillance Collide in Long-Term Care
- Death Is Too High a Price to Pay for Being Born an Impoverished and Ill Child
- Location Tracking in Dementia Care to Address Sexual Behavior: No Ad-Hoc Decisions, More Talk Is Needed
- Worth the Risk?
- Digital Doppelgängers: They Will Matter When Conscious
- The Specter of Corporate Necromancy: Who Controls the Dead in the Age of Digital Doppelgängers?
- I Contain Multitudes: A Typology of Digital Doppelgängers
- Correcting Course: How Should an Ethics Consultant Respond to a Surrogate’s Request for Remote Monitoring?
- Bytes the Dust: Normative Notions in Decommissioning Digital Doppelgängers
- Beyond Individual Responsibility: Group Harms in Genomic (Data-Centric) Research Ethics Require Structural, Justice-Oriented Solutions
- Consensus and Solidarity: Protecting All People from Group Harms
- Integrating Agent-Regret with Frameworks for Mitigating Moral Distress
- Integrating Community Voices in Data-Centric Research: Overcoming Barriers to Meaningful Engagement
- The Relational Aspect of Agent-Regret
- From Data to Harm: Exploring Ethical and Social Implications of Polygenic Scores for Social Traits
- Fitting Agent-Regret in Healthcare
- Putting the Agency in Agent-Regret
- Who Achieves What? The Subjective Dimension of the Objective Goods of Life Extension in the Ethics of Digital Doppelgängers
- Integrating Counterfactual Thinking and Economic Definitions of Regret into Discussions of Agent-Regret in Healthcare
- Agent-Regret and Moral Distress: Is There Really a Distinction?
- Just Tradeoffs in Health Research Decision-Making: A Gap in the Common Rule
- Addressing Risk in Data Centric Research via Community Engagement
- Looking Beyond the IRB
- Same Same but Different: On Psychedelic Exceptionalism
- Managing the Hope and Hype of Psychedelics
- Embracing Epistemic Humility: Rethinking Psychedelic Exceptionalism Through Diverse Perspectives
- Excusing Psychedelics and Accommodating Psychedelics
- Psychedelic Ethics in Palliative Care
- Psychedelic Exceptionalism: The Oregon Example
- Relationality and Ethics in MDMA-Assisted Therapy
- Critiquing Medical Exceptionalism: Toward a Transcultural Psychedelic Bioethics
- Psychedelic Ethics Beside Institutions
- Psychedelic Exceptionalism, Indigeneity, and the War on Drugs: Antiracism and Decolonizing Psychedelic Plant Medicine
- From Safe Touch to Sexual Abuse: Walking the Tightrope of Patient Safety in Psychedelic Therapy
- Psychedelics in a Deregulated Policy Climate: What Might 2025 Bring?
- Is There a Right to Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy?
- Focused Bodywork as Facilitated Communication: Cautionary Perspectives on Touch in Psychedelic Therapy
- Indigenous Wisdom and Underground Knowledge Are Exceptional
- Holding Without Touch: Supportive Touch in Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy
- Ketamine and the Consequences of Positive Psychedelic Exceptionalism
- From Theory to Practice: The Importance of Operationalizing and Measuring Ethical Touch in Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy
- The Pain Gap: Epistemic Justice in Psychedelic Ethics
- Measuring and Understanding the Meaning of Exceptionalism to Bolster Ethics Oversight of Psychedelics Research
- Exceptional Stigma: Parallels Between Marginalized Groups and Psychedelic Medicine
- Equipoise and Personal Experience: Maintaining Objectivity in Psychedelic Research
- Identity-Based Decisional Capacity and Psychedelic Treatments: Furthering the Case Against Psychedelic Ethical Exceptionalism
- Psychedelics and Psychotherapy: What Can be Learned from a Historical Analysis of General Anesthesia and Surgery?
- Continuity in Claims of Exception in Biomedical Technologies
- Narrative Hermeneutics and Bioethics: Understanding the Psychedelic Value Changes
- Wolves Among Sheep: Sexual Violations in Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy
- Ethics Without Borders: Modernizing Care Beyond Traditional Clinical Approaches
- Psychedelic Medicine Exceptionalism
- Irreversibility of Transformative Experience as a Criterion for Exceptionalism
- Supportive Touch in Psychedelic Assisted Therapy
- Distinctive But Not Exceptional: The Risks of Psychedelic Ethical Exceptionalism
- Canadian Medical Assistance in Dying: Provider Concentration, Policy Capture, and Need for Reform
- Narrow, Broad, and Future Considerations for Populations with Non-English Language Preference
- Hippocratic Beneficence: The Ethical Grounding of Remedial Germline Editing
- ARIE: A Health Equity Framework for Public Health Interventions Informed by Critical Race Theory and Critical Gerontology
- Bioethicists Tomorrow: Identity, Inclusiveness, and Future Directions
- Taking on Systems That Produce Moral Stress
- Treatment Pressure: A Step Forward, but Not the Final Word on “Informal Coercion”
- Moral Stress: A Systems Problem Requiring a Systems Solution
- Moral Stress, Distress, and Injury: Clarifications Using the ADC Model of Moral Judgment
- Informal Coercion Is Both Unavoidable and (Sometimes) Ethically Justifiable
- Navigating Moral Stress and Moral Distress in Moral Case Deliberation: A Joint Endeavor
- “Treatment Pressures” and “Informal Coercion”: “Threats” in Mental Healthcare
- Moral Stress and Moral Distress: Confronting Challenges in Post-Dobbs Contexts
- Psychiatry’s Unruly Practices and Their Implications for the Ethics of Psychiatry
- A Difference in Degree, Not Kind: Moral Stress, Distress, and Injury
- You Say Potato, I Say Potahto: Should We Call the Whole Thing Off?
- Moral Stress and Moral Distress in a Novel Space of Virtual Healthcare
- The Role of Law Enforcement in Coercive Psychiatric Interventions
- You Might Think You’re Being Coerced When You Aren’t—And Vice Versa
- The Conflation of All Suffering
- Context-Sensitivity and the Inclusion of Subjective Beliefs Have Broad Implications
- Confronting Moral Stress and Fostering Change with Humanism and Human Dignity
- Systems, Stress, and Embodied Inequality in Community Health
- Context Matters
- You Don’t Have to Be Bad to Work Here: Sustaining Ideals Inside Healthcare Institutions
- Steady Hands, Heavy Hearts and the Path Forward to Moral Resilience in Organ Transplantation
- Context Sensitive Informal Coercion and Coercive Offers
- Moral Reflection and the Feeling of Powerlessness
- From Pressures to Enforcement: Understanding Undue Influence in Community Mental Health Care
- Recognizing the Systemic Root Causes of Moral Distress
- Counteracting Informal Coercion from Within Coercive Contexts: Can a Wrong Approach Be Practiced Rightly?
- Distinguishing Moral Stress from Moral Distress: Moving Beyond the Individual to Expose the Systemic Ethical Challenges
- Examining Moral Stress and Moral Distress Through the Lens of Non-Human Animal Clinicians: Understanding Challenges in Animal Healthcare Systems
- Reframing Coercion in Mental Health Care: A Focus on Treatment Trust
- Moral Distress and Moral Stress Among Nurses Facing Challenges in a Health Care System Under Pressure
- Coercion, Power Relations, and the Expectations Patients Bring to Mental Health Treatment
- Expanding the Scope of Justified Beliefs Relevant to Coercion
- Digital Doppelgängers and Lifespan Extension: What Matters?
- Enabling Demonstrated Consent for Biobanking with Blockchain and Generative AI
- Allocation of Treatment Slots in Elective Mental Health Care—Are Waiting Lists the Ethically Most Appropriate Option?
- Errors, Omissions, and Pediatric Gender Medicine
- The Ethical Standard for End-of-Life Decisions for Unrepresented Patients
- We Need a Framework – But Should the Focus Be Broader?
- The Bilingual Patient’s Dilemma: Same Question, Different Answer
- Beyond Suppressing Testosterone: Overlooked Considerations Impacting Female Athletic Performance
- Language, Stigma, and Neuropsychiatry in Limited English Proficiency Populations
- Medical Interpretation Services: Challenges for LEP Communities
- Federalism and Infrastructural Responsibility
- Integrating Intersectionality: Legal Status, Health Disparities, and LEP Populations
- Evaluating Fairness in Sports: Beyond Testosterone Suppression
- Role of Terminology for Linguistic Preferences in Clinical and Public Health Communication
- Patients with Limited English Proficiency: Legal Mandates for Language Assistance Services
- Inclusivity as Fairness
- The Elite Sport Classification System Needs Improvement, Not Replacement
- Beyond Policing Bodies: A Broader Conception of Fairness in Women’s Sports
- Why It Could Be Ethical to Return to Biological Categories in Sport: Values-Based Rules
- Is It Ever OK to Reclassify Someone Out of Their Birth-Observed Sex Without Personal Consent? How Do We Manage Competing Methods of Classifying Sex?
- Operationalizing Fairness
- Bridging Ethics and Evidence: Language as a Critical Determinant of Health Equity
- How Does the Categorical System Account for Socioeconomic Background and Embodied Advantage? A Policy Development Dialogue
- When Worlds Collide: The Problem of Health Inequities and Anti-Immigrant Politics
- In Praise of Logical Inconsistency: World Athletics and the Evidence Bar of the “Reasonable Person in Good Faith”
- Categorically Complicated
- What Is Considered “Fair” Depends on the Purposes of Elite Sports
- Ideal Fairness in Sport is Impossible
- Patient Consent and The Right to Notice and Explanation of AI Systems Used in Health Care
- Some Extensions of the Loop: A Response to the Comments on Machine Learning-Driven Decision Aids
- Race Illiteracy as a Barrier to Antiracist Reform in Healthcare and Bioethics
- Addressing Discrimination and Epistemic Injustices in Bioethics and Medicine
- Disclosing Interim Results to Parents Offered Enrollment in a Fetal Intervention Trial
- Challenging the Centrality of Anti-Racism in Bioethics
- Learning From Those Who Were Not REDI
- Thinking Through How Race, Disability, and Gender Work Together
- Adaptive Machine Learning in Medicine: Not Human Subjects Research, Not Research at All
- REDI in Bioethics Cannot Be Achieved Without the Promotion of Anti-Ableism
- Using Activism to Combat Systemic Racism in Bioethics and Healthcare
- REDI in Practice: A Need to Expand Our Knowledge Pool
- Prudently Evaluating Medical Adaptive Machine Learning Systems
- Bolder Bioethics: Demanding a Gold Standard in REDI Recommendations
- Centering More than Trauma Experiences: Reflections from Launching a Graduate Course on Bioethics & Racial Justice in Canada
- Doing What We Do Well: How Bioethicists Can Assist in Promoting Racial Justice
- REDI, Set, Caution
- Achieving Live Birth is Not an Endpoint but a Steppingstone
- Machine Learning-Generated Clinical Data as Collateral Research: A Global Neuroethical Analysis
- From Classification to Governance: Ethical Challenges of Adaptive Learning in Medicine
- The Role of Perinatal Palliative Care to Support Parental Decision-Making about Clinical Research for Seriously Ill Children in the Neonatal Period
- The Need for an Evolving Informed Consent Process in a Fetal Therapy Trial
- Adaptive Medical Machine Learning Models Should Not Be Classified as Perpetual Research, but Do Require New Regulatory Solutions
- Beyond the Goodness of REDI and Racism’s Evil: On the Colonial Power of Bioethics
- Bioethics, Equity, and Inclusion: How Do We Not Add to the Minority Tax?
- The Epistemological Nuances of Interpreting Adaptive Machine Learning Systems Through the Lens of Surgical Innovation
- Whether Designated as Research or Not, Who Resolves Ethical Considerations Emerging with Healthcare AI?
- Beyond Consent: The MAMLS in the Room
- A Bioethics Assessment of Continuous Learning in Medicine and AI
- Using Health Justice to Achieve Racial Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Bioethics
- Adaptive Machine Learning Systems in Medicine: The Post-Authorization Phase
- The Fine Balance Between Complete Data Integrity in Medical Adaptive Machine Learning Systems and the Protection of Research Participants
- Anti-Racism in Clinical Ethics Fellowships: Rising to the Occasion
- Adaptive Machine Learning Systems in Medicine – More Learner, Less Machine
- Designing Regulatory Frameworks for Machine Learning Systems in Medicine—Time for Balance and Practicality
- Adaptive Machine Learning as Research: Does the Cure Fit the Disease?
- Discerning the Nature of MAMLS: Research, Quality Improvement, or Both?
- The Incommensurability of Caring: ML, Clinical Decision-Making, and Human Reasoning in Healthcare
- In Assessing the Character and Quality of Contemporary Bioethical Discourse, “Counting Heads” May Not Be Very Helpful
- ASBH and the VIBeS Survey
- Transparency, Evaluation and Going From “Ethics-Washing” to Enforceable Regulation: On Machine Learning-Driven Clinician Decision Aids
- Knowing You Know Better
- Coverage Error and Generalizability: Concerns about the “Views in Bioethics Survey”
- The Future of Bioethics: Striving for a More Diverse and Inclusive Bioethics
- Disrespect for Deontology
- Co-reasoning by Humans in the Loop as a Goal for Designers of Machine Learning-Driven Algorithms in Medicine
- Limitations of Patient-Physician Co-Reasoning in AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems
- Patient Diversity and Collaborative Co-Reasoning for Ethical Use of Machine Learning-Driven Decision Support Systems
- Early AI Lifecycle Co-Reasoning: Ethics Through Integrated and Diverse Team Science
- What and For Whom Is Bioethics?
- A Holistic, Multi-Level, and Integrative Ethical Approach to Developing Machine Learning-Driven Decision Aids
- The Black Box Dilemma: Challenges in Human-AI Collaboration in ML-CDSS
- Comparing the Results of Two Surveys on the Views of Bioethicists
- Safety in Numbers and Other Questions from Pierson et al.’s Bioethics Survey
- Scapegoat-in-the-Loop? Human Control over Medical AI and the (Mis)Attribution of Responsibility
- Diversifying Bioethics: Taking Action, Making Progress, Sustaining Success
- A Knower Without a Voice: Co-Reasoning with Machine Learning
- The Predictive Value of Moral Diversity in Bioethics
- Co-Reasoning and Epistemic Inequality in AI Supported Medical Decision-Making
- What Are Patients Doing in the Loop? Patients as Fellow-Workers in the Everyday Use of Medical AI
- Co-Reasoning in Context: Collaboration in Critical Care
- What Does “Bioethics” Mean? Education, Training, and Shaping the Future of Our Field
- What Do We Do with Physicians When Autonomous AI-Enabled Workflow is Better for Patient Outcomes?
- Suppose We Told Them Fully What an Ethics Consult Is
- Inclusion Not Conformity: A Response to a Call for Diversity Based on a Recent Survey of American Bioethicists
- From Human-in-the-Loop to Human-in-Power
- From “Human in the Loop” to a Participatory System of Governance for AI in Healthcare
- Ableist Bias Persists Among Bioethicists: Interpreting the Views in Bioethics Survey’s “Disability” Findings
- Bioethics Should Not Seek to Reflect Public Opinion
- Bioethics: Then, Now and Tomorrow
- Bridging the Gap Between Bioethicists and the Public: A Living Ethics Perspective
- Reasons in the Loop: The Role of Large Language Models in Medical Co-Reasoning
- Does It Matter That Surveyed Bioethicists Are Not Similar to Patients in Clinical Ethics Consultations
- Clinical Ethics Fellowship Programs in the U.S. and Canada: A Descriptive Study of Program Characteristics and Practices
- Do Reasons Matter? Navigating Parents’ Reasons in Healthcare Decisions for Children
- Breaching Confidentiality in Genetic and Non-Genetic Cases: Two Problematic Distinctions
- Capacity, Disability, and Hedonic Adaptation
- What Reasons Are Really at Play in Reproduction?
- The Hypothetical Embryo and the Prosecutor’s Fallacy
- Banning Puberty-Pausing Medications Endangers Transgender Adolescents
- Beyond Supported Decision-Making: The Need for Supported Engagement for Neurodivergent Adults
- Challenges in Assessing Affect and Values in Decision-Making Capacity
- Medical Treatment, Genetic Selection, and Gene Editing: Beyond the Distinction Between Person-Affecting and Impersonal Reasons
- Regarding Reasons and Reproduction
- Enhancing Decision-Making Capacity Assessments Beyond Outlier Cases: A Multi-Faceted Health Care Systems Approach
- Process and Rigor in Decision-Making Capacity Evaluations: A Disability Ethics Perspective
- Let’s Not Be Hasty: A Framework for Honoring Imprudent Health Care Decisions
- Appreciating Your Interests
- To Assess or Not to Assess? Physician-Patient Disagreement as the Primary Trigger for Capacity Testing in Clinical Practice
- Barriers to Overriding Refusal for Patients Who Lack Capacity
- Gene Editing vs. Genetic Selection
- A Disability Critique of the Comparative View
- Grounded in Reality: Integrating Community Values and Priorities of End Users in Human Gene Editing
- Gene Editing, Genetic Selection, and Reasons That Matter
- Place-Based Thoughtfulness and Decision-Making in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection
- The Right to Make Fatal Decisions
- Emphasizing Future Personhood: Implications for Access to Abortion and in Vitro Fertilization
- Prudence, Preferences, and Power: The (Ir)Relevance of Decision-Making Capacity in Medical Decision Making
- Repro-Timing Harm and Benefit in Assisted Reproduction: Person-Affecting Reasons Before the Advent of Genome Editing
- When Patients Are Not Themselves
- Complexities in Capacity Assessment for Persons with Severe and Enduring Anorexia
- Better than What?: Embryo Selection, Gene Editing, and Evaluative Counterfactuals
- From Personal Interests to Practical Wisdom
- From CRISPR to Conscience: Ethical Dilemmas in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection
- What’s the Alternative? Comparative Benefits in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection
- Medical Decision-Making Capacity Under Oppressive Conditions
- Person-Affecting Reasons for Prenatal Gene-Editing?
- Reasons, Persons, Eugenics and an Argument in Favour of Gene Editing
- More, Fewer, Reconceptualized, or Relational Criteria? Recent Trends in Bioethics Scholarship on Decision-Making Capacity
- Embryo Gene Editing is Not Morally Better than Selection Even If Person-Affecting
- Against Genetic Determinism of Welfare and Behavior
- In Defense of a More Antinatalist Bioethics
- The True Self and Decision-Making Capacity
- How to Think About Difficult Capacity Assessments: Are We Making Progress?
- When Gene Editing Should Be Mandatory
- Tracking Personal Interests: Thinking More Holistically About Values and Subjectivity in Capacity Assessments
- Racial Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Bioethics: Recommendations from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors Presidential Task Force
- War, Bioethics, and Public Health
- Reestablishing Circulation in Donors: To What Degree Does It Matter?
- Genital Modifications in Prepubescent Minors: When May Clinicians Ethically Proceed?
- Defining Death: Toward a Biological and Ethical Synthesis
- The Social Value Misconception in Clinical Research
- The Uniform Determination of Death Act is Not Changing. Will Physicians Continue to Misdiagnose Brain Death?
- Near Fatal Opioid Overdose: A Paradigm Case Where Principlism Fails
- Should SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination be Required for Heart Transplant Listing
- Responsibility – Crime, and Punishment: Why We Should Not Allocate Intensive Care Based on Vaccination Status
- Priority is Not a Proportional, Fitting, or Fair Return for Vaccination
- The Problematic “Existence” of Digital Twins: Human Intention and Moral Decision
- When “Next of Kin” Isn’t “Who Knows Best”: the Ethics of Choosing a Surrogate Decision Maker
- Ethical Complexities in Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Surrogate Decision Making
- Against a New Wave of Vaccine Apartheid: Reconceptualizing Justice in Vaccine-Sensitive Rationing
- On the Differing Role of Counterexamples in Philosophical Theory and Health Policy
- Predicting Patient Preferences with Artificial Intelligence: The Problem of the Data Source
- The Ethics of Using Vaccination Status as a Rationing Criterion: Luck Egalitarianism and Discrimination
- Dealer’s Choice?: Choosing Among Surrogate Decision Makers with Different Decisions and Knowledge of the Patient
- Can P4 Support Family Involvement and Best Interests in Surrogate Decision-Making?
- Social Coercion, Patient Preferences, and AI-Substituted Judgments
- Is Resource Allocation that is Sensitive to Vaccination Status Coercive? Who Cares?
- Justice Pluralism during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Weighing Patient Preferences: Lessons for a Patient Preferences Predictor
- How to Evaluate an Individual’s Decision Whether to Vaccinate during a Pandemic: Better by a Knowledge Commons than by Luck Egalitarianism
- Who Should Decide When the Patient Can’t: When Ethics and Law Collide
- Respect for Autonomy Requires a Mental Model
- Harm-Prevention Arguments are Easier to Confuse Than to Rebut
- The Personalized Patient Preference Predictor: A Harmful and Misleading Solution Losing Sight of the Problem It Claims to Solve
- Navigating Tensions Between Law and Ethics in Surrogate Decision Making
- Emergency Department Boarding of a Teen Requiring Complex Care: How Should an Ethics Consultant Respond?
- Machine Learning Algorithms in the Personalized Modeling of Incapacitated Patients’ Decision Making—Is It a Viable Concept?
- Artificial Intelligence, Digital Self, and the “Best Interests” Problem
- Adolescent Boarding in the ED: Issues of Autonomy, Nonmaleficence, and Distributive Justice
- Eliminating or Calibrating the Role of Chance? Acute Resource Scarcity as a Challenge for Luck Egalitarianism
- The Patient Preference Predictor: A Timely Boost for Personalized Medicine
- Potentially Perilous Preference Parrots: Why Digital Twins Do Not Respect Patient Autonomy
- Personal but Necessarily Predictive? Developing a Bioethics Research Agenda for AI-Enabled Decision-Making Tools
- Good Ethics Begin With Good Facts—Vaccination Sensitive Strategies for Scarce Resource Allocation Are Impractical as Well as Unethical
- Vexing Vaccine Ethics: Denying ICU Care to Vaccine Refusers
- As an AI Model, I Cannot Replace Human Dialogue Processes. However, I Can Assist You in Identifying Potential Alternatives
- Vaccine-Sensitive Allocation – Another Divide to Divide Us?
- Personalized Patient Preference Predictors Are Neither Technically Feasible nor Ethically Desirable
- Parrots at the Bedside: Making Surrogate Decisions with Stochastic Strangers
- Vaccination-Sensitive Healthcare Rationing: Overlooked Conditions, Translational Ethics, and Climate-Related Challenges
- Navigating the Ethical Dilemmas of Youth Boarding in the Emergency Department: Strategies for Respecting Developing Autonomy While Also Reducing Risk
- Fairly Incorporating Vaccination Status into Scarce Resource Allocation Frameworks
- Is Suffering a Useless Concept?
- NRP: Neither Perfusion nor Regional
- Change the Law to Optimize Organ Donation
- The Challenge of Framing the Discourse of Normothermic Regional Perfusion
- Medicine, Bioethics, and the Search for Truth: Does “Declaring” Death Make It So?
- Distinguishing Ethical from Diagnostic Concerns About NRP-cDCD
- To Procure Organs for Transplantation, Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Brain Death Dislocate Circulation and Brain from an Integrated Concept of Embodied Persons
- The Unified Brain-Based Determination of Death: Conceptual Challenges
- Gerrymandering Circulation: Why NRP is Inconsistent with the Dead Donor Rule
- A Legal Pathway Aligning Law and the Practice of NRP
- A Clarified Interpretation of Permanence Justifies Death Determination in NRP Protocols
- Revivification in ECPR and TA-NRP: A Consideration of Intent and Impact
- New Reasons to Revise the UDDA: Controversies Related to Death by Circulatory-Respiratory Criteria
- Public Opinion of DDR and Public Trust
- Moving Forward With Normothermic Regional Perfusion Amidst Ethical Controversy
- An Ethics Committee’s Evaluation of Normothermic Regional Perfusion (NRP) in 2018–Unsatisfactory Answers Then—and Now
- Normothermic Regional Perfusion, Public Reason, and the Idea of Integrated Organismic Function
- “Essentially as One of Fact to Be Determined by Physicians”: Applying Lessons Learned From Brain Death to Normothermic Regional Perfusion
- Requesting an Autopsy of the Dead Donor Rule: Improving, Not Abandoning, the Guiding Rule in Organ Donation
- “Time Is Brain:” DCDD-NRP Invalidates the Unified Brain-Based Determination of Death
- Restoring the Organism as a Whole: Does NRP Resurrect the Dead?
- The Unified Brain Based Determination of Death and DCCD/NRP: Curb Your Enthusiasm
- Resuscitating the Dead: NRP and Language
- NRP Possibly Violates “Do No Harm” and Is Not Worth Risking the Perception That It Does
- Ethical and Equity Guidance for Transplant Programs Considering Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion (TA-NRP) for Procurement of Hearts
- The Unified Brain-Based Determination of Death Conceptually Justifies Death Determination in DCDD and NRP Protocols
- Health Consequences of an Ideological Perspective on Population Growth in Iran
- Beyond Trade-Offs: Autonomy, Effectiveness, Fairness, and Normativity in Risk and Crisis Communication
- What Are Humans Doing in the Loop? Co-Reasoning and Practical Judgment When Using Machine Learning-Driven Decision Aids
- Bioethicists Today: Results of the Views in Bioethics Survey
- The Hopkins-Oxford Psychedelics Ethics (HOPE) Working Group Consensus Statement