- Ethical Advocacy Across the Autism Spectrum: Beyond Partial Representation
- Like Autism, Representation Falls on a Spectrum
- Patient Representation: Mind the Gap Between Individual and Collective Claims
- Implementation Science and Bioethics: Lessons From European Empirical Bioethics Research?
- Ethical Training Can Turn an “Ought” to a “Can”
- Beyond Translating Ethical Norms Into Practice: Integrating Implementation and Assessment Mindsets
- Parents of Autistic Children Are Deserving of Support
- Additional Challenges to Fair Representation in Autistic Advocacy
- Implementation Science Can Do Even More for Translational Ethics
- Bioethical Ideals, Actual Practice, and the Double Life of Norms
- Making Ethics Happen: Addressing Injustice in Health Inequalities
- Clearing Muddy Waters: The Need to Reconceptualize Minor Increase over Minimal Risk in Pediatric Rare Disease Research
- An “Implementation Mindset” in Normative Bioethics Will Have Unintended Consequences
- Responsible Innovation For and From Ethical Integration
- Patenting Foundational Technologies: Recent Developments in the CRISPR Patent Struggle
- Representing the Autism Spectrum
- Flexibility Required: Balancing the Interests of Children and Risk in Drug Development for Rare Pediatric Conditions
- Neurodiversity and Autism Advocacy: Who Fits Under the Autism Tent?
- The Feasibility of Implementing Normative Claims That Are Especially Strong and Important
- Ethical Drug Development for Rare Childhood Diseases: When There Are Limited But Promising Data in Adults, How to Choose Between Safety or Efficacy Studies?
- When Higher Risk Does Not Equal Greater Harm: Doing the Most Good in a Limited Pediatric Study Population
- Implementation in Bioethics: A Plea for a Participatory and Dialogical Approach
- Ethical Representation by Patient Advocacy Organizations Also Requires Responsible Management of Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest
- Autistic Self Advocacy in the Developmental Disability Movement
- Autism Advocacy Before and After DSM-5
- Representation Is Never Perfect, But Are Parents Even Representatives?
- Non-Electoral Representation and Promoting Welfare—Beyond Descriptive Representation
- Hope Springs Eternal: Pitfalls of Partial Representation by Advocates Who Only Want the Best
- Beyond Autism: Advocacy for Neurodevelopmental Differences
- A Care Ethics Approach to Ethical Advocacy for Community Conditions
- The Use of Pediatric Extrapolation to Avoid Unnecessary Pediatric Clinical Trials
- Mind the Gap: How Should We Translate Specific Ethical Norms Into Interventions?
- Greater Than Minimal Risk, No Direct Benefit – Bridging Drug Trials and Novel Therapy in Pediatric Populations
- Civic Engagement, Autism and Deliberative Democracy: Prioritizing the Inclusion of Marginalized Perspectives
- Translational Ethics and Challenges Involved in Putting Norms Into Practice
- Using Implementation Science to Enact Specific Ethical Norms: The Case of Code Status Policy
- Balancing Scientific Progress With Pediatric Protections: No Direct Benefit Now, But Potential Novel Therapy in the Future
- Meaningful Fissures: The Value of Divergent Agendas in Patient Advocacy
- Bringing Known Drugs to Pediatric Research: Safety, Efficacy, and the Ambiguous Minor Increase in Minimal Risk
- Balancing Risk and Reward: Greater Research Oversight Is Appropriate for Novel Therapies for Children With Life-Limiting Illness
- The “Ought-Is” Problem: An Implementation Science Framework for Translating Ethical Norms Into Practice
- Reconciling the HEC-C and Clinical Ethics Fellowship Training Programs: Implications of the Baylor Experience
- What the HEC-C? An Analysis of the Healthcare Ethics Consultant-Certified Program: One Year in
- Beneficence, Interests, and Wellbeing in Medicine: What It Means to Provide Benefit to Patients
- To Be Coherently Beneficient, Be Communitarian
- Credentialing Ethics Expertise
- Value Theory, Beneficence, and Medical Decision-Making
- Examining the Doing of Ethics Support Staff. A Dialogical Approach Toward Assessing the Quality of Facilitators of Moral Case Deliberation
- Revisiting Beneficence: What Is a ‘Benefit’, and by What Criteria?
- Worth Our Salt: Reflections of an Early Career Clinical Ethicist
- A Nudge Without a Wink!
- You Kids Get off My Ethics Lawn!: An Admitted Curmudgeonly Critique of Credentialing Individual Clinical Ethics Consultants
- Beneficence in Maternity Care: Objective Aspects of Subjective Goals
- Cost Considerations Within a Duty of Beneficence
- When “Objectivity” in Clinical Benefit is Seen Through Different Lenses
- Virtues and Phronesis: Making Decisions in the Clinical Context
- The Healthcare Ethics Consultant-Certified Program: Fair, Feasible, and Defensible, But Neither Definitive Nor Finished
- First Steps: Inclusive or Exclusive?
- Beneficence and Wellbeing: A Critical Appraisal
- Looking to Other Professions to Advance the Health Care Ethics Consultant Certification Program
- Ensuring Certified Healthcare Ethics Consultants Are Competent to Practice
- Have the Cobbler’s Children Come Home to Roost?
- HEC-C: From Halsted’s Perspective
- A Call for Diversity and Inclusivity in the HEC-C Program
- A Capabilities-Based Account of Wellbeing
- By Various Ways We Arrive at the Same End
- Certification Assesses Minimal Competency for Healthcare Ethics Consultants, But What About Assessing Interpersonal Skills?
- A Profession Without Expertise? Professionalization in Reverse
- Goal-Concordant Care Within the Range of the Possible
- Healthcare Ethics Consultant Certification: The Big Picture
- Decisional Humility and the Marginally Represented Patient
- Upstream Influences and Fair Subject Selection
- Moral Intimacy, Authority, and Discretion
- The Fifth Face of Fair Subject Selection: Population Grouping
- Bolstering Surrogate Decision Making for Marginally Represented and Unrepresented Patients: One System’s Approach and Experience
- Clinical Research Subject Selection during Public Health Disasters: Reconceptualizing Fairness in a Global Ethical Context
- Marginally Represented Patients, Best Interests, and Ends-in-Themselves
- The Challenge of Selecting Participants Fairly in High-Demand Clinical Trials
- Compassionate Care for the Unconscious and Incapacitated
- Context is Needed When Assessing Fair Subject Selection
- Redistributing Fair Subject Selection
- From Solo Decision Maker to Multi-Stakeholder Process: A Defense and Recommendations
- Risk Limits in Fair Subject Selection
- Fair Inclusion and the Pursuit of Robustly Generalizable Clinically Relevant Knowledge
- Epistemic Burdens, Moral Intimacy, and Surrogate Decision Making
- Fair Subject Selection Procedures Must Consider Scientific Uncertainty and Variability in Risk and Benefit Perception
- Four Faces of Fair Subject Selection
- On Surrogates’ Moral Authority: A Reply to Berger
- Addressing the Perceived Duality of Represented and Unrepresented Patients: Legal Findings in a Moral Context
- Marginally Represented Patients and the Moral Authority of Surrogates
- Can the Principles of Research Ethics Help Us Distribute Clinical Resources More Fairly?
- Letter to the Editor: The Necessity of Teaching Medical Students to Voice Their Values
- Improving Comparative Effectiveness Trials
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Misrepresenting ‘Usual Care’ in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error”
- Traditional, Not the Usual: On Misrepresenting Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network Lower Tidal Volume Trial (ARMA)
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries “Taxonomizing Views of Clinical Ethics Expertise”
- From Epistemic Trespassing to Transdisciplinary Cooperation: The Role of Expertise in the Identification of Usual Care
- Is It Time to Rethink Health Care Ethics?
- The CER Experiment
- Drug Testing Is No Substitute for Honesty or Addiction Risk Reduction
- It Does Not Matter Whether Research Interventions Are Usual Care
- Diverting Opioid Diversion: Does It Justify Randomly Screening Palliative Care Patients?
- “Unusual Care”: Groupthink and Willful Blindness in the SUPPORT Study
- You Can’t Always Get What You Want… We Will Help You Get What You Need
- What Research Ethics (Often) Gets Wrong about Minimal Risk
- Re-envisioning “Doing Everything” for an Infant with Trisomy 18
- The Importance of Describing as Well as Defining Usual Care
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethics and Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials”
- Misrepresenting “Usual Care” in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error
- Randomized Trials are Deeply Offensive
- Ethics and Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
- Pragmatic Clinical Trial-Collateral Findings: Recognizing the Needs of Low-Resource Research Participants
- Collateral Findings from Pragmatic Clinical Trials: What Responsibility Do We Have to Enrolled and Future Patients?
- The Collateral Finding of What?
- Partial Entrustment in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
- Misuse of “Usual Care” in Emergency Care Research: A Call for Adapting Rules Governing Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC) Studies
- Human Subjects Research Without Consent: Duties to Return Individual Findings When Participation was Non-Consensual
- Ethics and the Importance of Good Clinical Practices
- Let It Be: The Evolving Standard of Care for Trisomy 18
- You’re in…But This Service Requires Drug Testing
- Getting Beneath the Tip of the Iceberg: Suspected Opioid Diversion
- Frontiers in Bioethics
- The Inner Lives of Doctors: Physician Emotion in the Care of the Seriously Ill
- Hopes, Therapeutic Honesty, and Adaptation in the Midst of Dying and Death
- Agency at Life’s End
- Predicting a “Lazarus Effect” in Patients With Advanced Cancer Near the End of Life: Prognostic Uncertainty, Oncologists’ Emotions, and Ethical Questions
- Elisabeth Kübler-Ross as Astrophysicist: Emotional Intelligence and Resilience Unlock the Black Hole of Physician Burnout, Moral Distress, and Compassion Fatigue
- The Premodern Sensibility of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross in a Metamodern Age: What On Death and Dying Means Now
- Elisabeth Kübler-Ross: A Pioneer Thinker, Influential Teacher and Contributor to Clinical Ethics
- Kübler-Ross and Bioethics: A Cautionary Tale
- On Death and Dying at the Beginning of Life: Grieving the Stillborn Baby
- Diverse Approaches to Meaning-Making at the End of Life
- Personal-Professional Boundaries and Ethical Issues in Palliative Care
- Holding On and Letting Go: Anticipatory Grief and Surrogate Choices at the End of Life
- To Cure Sometimes, To Relieve Often, and To Comfort Always*
- Deconstructing Dignity in Elisabeth Kübler-Ross’s On Death and Dying
- The Underappreciated Influence of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross on the Development of Palliative Care for Children
- Cultures Shifts and Added Resources: How the Physician Experience in Caring for the Dying Patient has Evolved
- Exploring the Emotional Labor of Medical Trainees in the Setting of Ethics Education
- Dealing With the Tension Between the Patient’s Wish to Die and Professional Attitudes Toward a ‘Good Death’
- Caring for Dying Children
- On Death & Dying: Revisiting the Roots of Palliative Care and a Path Forward
- Thirty Years Later: An Oncologist Reflects on Kübler-Ross’s Work
- Everything I Really Needed to Know to Be a Clinical Ethicist, I Learned From Elisabeth Kübler-Ross*
- Psychotherapy at the End of Life
- Fifty Years Later: Reflections on the Work of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross M.D.
- Recollections of Dr. Elisabeth Kübler-Ross at the University of Chicago (1965–70)
- Appreciating the Legacy of Kübler-Ross: One Clinical Ethicist’s Perspective
- A Little Digital Help: Advancing Social Support for Transplant Patients With Technology
- Gender Equity and Social Support for Transplants
- Ethicist as Healer: Is Offering Justified Normative Recommendations All We Are Doing in Active Patient Cases?
- Taxonomizing Views of Clinical Ethics Expertise
- Clinical Ethics Expertise: Beyond Justified Normative Recommendations?
- Credibility Excess and Social Support Criterion
- Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary
- Justifying Ethical Expertise
- In Search of the Ideal Transplantation Candidate
- The Qualitative Value of Social Support for Liver Transplantation
- Clinical Ethics as a Profession?
- Should Lack of Social Support Prevent Access to Organ Transplantation?
- A Review of David Lemberg’s Ethical and Legal Issues in Healthcare (1st Edition)
- Augment Social Support for Transplant, Do Not Penalize Its Absence
- Should Lack of Family Social Support Be a Contraindication to Pediatric Transplant?
- Ethics Expertise Demystified: Using the Brummett/Salter Taxonomy
- Realism, and Expertise1
- Realism, Correspondence, and Expertise
- Social Support Is Not the Only Problematic Criterion, But If Used at All, “Lack of Social Support” Should Count in Favor of Listing, Not Against
- Engaging With a New Taxonomy for Clinical Ethics Consultation: What Are the Implications?
- Taxonomizing the Clinical Ethics Critics
- Why It is Important to Consider Social Support When Assessing Organ Transplant Candidates?
- Unanswered Questions About Clinical Ethics Expertise
- Moral Normative Force and Clinical Ethics Expertise
- Context, Context, Context
- How Is Ethics Consultation Work Justified?
- Clinical Ethics Expertise as the Ability to Co-Create Normative Recommendations by Guiding a Dialogical Process of Moral Learning
- Ethics of AI in Transplant Matching: Is It Better or Just More of the Same?
- The Hard Question of Justification in Health Care Ethics Consultation
- Should Poor Social Support Be an Exclusion Criterion in Bone Marrow Transplantation?
- A Taxonomy and an Ethicist’s Toolbox: Mapping a Plurality of Normative Approaches
- Absence of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Absence
- Parity Arguments for ‘Physician Aid-in-Dying’ (PAD) for Psychiatric Disorders: Their Structure and Limits
- Euthanasia for Mental Suffering Reduces Stigmatization But May Lead to an Extension of This Practice Without Safeguards
- Reweighing the Ethical Tradeoffs in the Involuntary Hospitalization of Suicidal Patients
- Physician Aid-in-Dying for Individuals With Serious Mental Illness: Clarifying Decision-Making Capacity and Psychiatric Futility
- Improving Care for Suicidal Patients While Protecting Human Subjects: Addressing Ethical Challenges in Mental Health Research Involving Emergency Medical Services Providers
- Moralities of Method: Putting Normative Arguments in Their (Social and Cultural) Place
- Responding to Implicit Bias in Abusive Head Trauma Evaluations and Reporting in the PICU: Ethical Consideration During a Clinical Trial
- The Moral Choices on CRISPR Babies
- The Genetic Revolution Highlights the Importance of Nondiscriminatory and Comprehensive Health Insurance Coverage
- Why Normative Judgment Is Inescapable
- TV Writers and Producers and Ethics: How Can I Help?
- Evaluating PAD Requests in Psychiatry: The Importance of Involving Others
- Clinical Trials Not Causing Harm With Potential for Realizing Benefit Should Continue
- Informed Consent in a Pragmatic Emergency Suicide Trial: Rejecting the Research–Practice Distinction
- Review of Thomas H. Murray, Good Sport: Why Our Games Matter and How Doping Undermines Them
- A Stepwise Approach to Ethically Assess Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials: Implications for Informed Consent for Suicide Prevention Implementation Research
- Issues of Justice and Risk: Setting Stopping Criteria in Cluster-Randomized Trials
- What If They Say No?
- Involuntary Hospitalization of Suicidal Patients: Time for New Answers to Basic Questions?
- Decision-Making Capacity Will Have a Limited Effect on Civil Commitment Practices
- A Cluster Randomized Trial to Screen for Abusive Head Trauma in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit—How to Manage Site-Specific Evidence of Racial/Ethnic Disparity
- Kious and Battin’s Dilemma Resolved: Outlaw Physician Aid-in-Dying
- The Ethics of Nudging and Beyond: Response to Commentaries
- Elevating How Americans Talk About Abortion: Review of Katie Watson’s Scarlet A
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Physician Aid-in-Dying and Suicide Prevention in Psychiatry”
- “When the Fall Is All There Is…”: Refocusing on the Critical (Unique?) Characteristic of “Dying” in Physician Aid-in-Dying
- Medical Aid-in-Dying is an Ethical and Important End-of-Life Care Option
- Deep Uncertainties in the Criteria for Physician Aid-in-Dying for Psychiatric Patients
- Concerning the Basic Idea that the Wish to End Suffering Legitimates Physician Aid in Dying for Psychiatric Patients
- Medically Unnecessary Genital Cutting and the Rights of the Child: Moving Toward Consensus
- A Model Ethics Board for Innovative Practice and Centers of Excellence
- Physician Aid-in-Dying and Suicide Prevention in Psychiatry: A Moral Crisis?
- Physician Aid-in-Dying and Suicide Prevention in Psychiatry: A Moral Imperative Over a Crisis
- The Unbearable Burden of Suffering: Moral Crisis or Structural Failure?
- “I Don’t Want to Go on Living This Way”: Desire for Hastened Death and the Ethics of Involuntary Hospitalization
- When a Theoretical Commitment to Broad Physician Aid-in-Dying Faces the Reality of Its Implementation
- Social Determinants of Mental Health and Physician Aid-in-Dying: The Real Moral Crisis
- A Pragmatic Trial of Suicide Risk Assessment and Ambulance Transport Decision Making Among Emergency Medical Services Providers: Implications for Patient Consent
- Taking Off the Blinders: The Critical Phase of Suicidality Doesn’t End With Discharge From Inpatient Treatment
- Irremediability Is Key
- The Ethics of Suicide in Mental Illness: Novel Neuroscientific Perspectives
- A Pragmatic Trial for Emergency Medical Service Providers’ Prehospital Response to Suidality: Consent Is Not Essential, but Limited Patient Engagement May Be Meaningful
- Partnering, Not Enduring: Citizen Science and Research Participation
- Consent, Threats, and Offers
- Freedom From Subjection to the Will of Others: Study Payments, Labor, and Moral Equality
- Research Payment and Its Social Justice Concerns
- “Paid to Produce Data:” Research Participation as the Labor of Generating Valuable Health Data
- Is Being “Paid to Endure” Compatible With Autonomy? Paid Research Participation and Five (Rather Than Four) Goods of Work
- A Proposal for Fair Compensation for Research Participants
- The Continued Complexities of Paying Research Participants
- Meaningful Work Is Indeed a Matter of Distributive Justice
- Licensing Domination: Foreign Will and Social Benefit
- Clinical Ultimatums: Coercion as Subjection
- Filthy Lucre or Fitting Offer? Understanding Worries About Payments to Research Participants
- Working for the Weekend Is Not Meaningful Work
- The Coercer’s Role in Coercion
- Coercive Offers Without Coercion as Subjection
- Coercion as Subjection and the Institutional Review Board
- Passivity, Research Risks, and Worker-Type Protections for Research Subjects
- The Exploitation of Professional “Guinea Pigs” in the Gig Economy: The Difficult Road From Consent to Justice
- Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Render “Coercion as Subjection” Implausible
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “‘Paid to Endure’: Paid Research Participation, Passivity, and the Goods of Work”
- Why Dax’s Case Still Matters
- Teaching Medical Students to Voice Their Values
- “Paid to Endure”: Paid Research Participation, Passivity, and the Goods of Work
- How Payment for Research Participation Can Be Coercive
- The Ethics of Public and Service User Involvement in Health Research: The Need for Participatory Reflection on Everyday Ethical Issues
- Learning Not Just From But With Citizens: The Importance of Co-Design in Health-Related Social Research
- Should Patient Groups Have the Power to Redirect How Their Samples Are Used?
- Engaging the “Citizen” in Citizen Science: Who’s Actually Included?
- The Challenge of Demandingness in Citizen Science and Participatory Research
- Challenges of Citizen Science: Commons, Incentives, Organizations, and Regulations
- The Importance of Gatekeeping in Citizen Science
- Institutional Review Board Oversight of Citizen Science Research Involving Human Subjects
- Considering Power Relations in Citizen Science
- Biomedical Citizen Science or Something Else? Reflections on Terms and Definitions
- Citizen Science and the Politicization of Epistemology
- The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research
- Co-Production: An Ethical Model for Mental Health Research?
- A Neglected Ethical Issue in Citizen Science and DIY Biology
- Beyond Belmont—and Beyond Regulations
- Parsing the Line Between Professional and Citizen Science
- Who Watches the Step-Watchers: The Ups and Downs of Turning Anecdotal Citizen Science into Actionable Clinical Data
- Ethically Justified Restrictions on Citizen Science: A Perspective from Singapore
- Citizen Science for Biomedical Research and Contributive Justice
- Cultural Considerations in Citizen Health Science and the Case for Community-Based Approaches
- N-of-1 Precision Medicine and Research Oversight
- Avoiding a Tyranny of the Majority: Public Deliberation as Citizen Science, Sensitive Issues, and Vulnerable Populations
- Mind the Gap: The Ethics Void Created by the Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research
- Does Obsolescence Matter? The Real Questions of Genetic Enhancement
- Not Out of Date, But Out of Value
- Shackled at the End of Life: We Can Do Better
- Germline Gene Editing and Genetic Enhancement: The Value of(Non-)Positional Goods
- Yesterday’s Child, Tomorrow’s Therapy Patient: What Are the Roles of Health and Normalcy in Genetic Enhancement?
- Yesterday’s Child, Tomorrow’s Plaintiff: Why We Should Expect an Uptick in Wrongful-Life Suits Following Embryonic Application of Gene-Editing Technologies
- Obsolescence, Genetic Treatment, and Disability
- Tomorrow’s Child: Unlikely to Be Obsolete
- Obsolescence Is Not a Good Reason to Oppose All Types of Enhancement
- Minor Patient, Major Decisions: Caring for a Rural Child With Gender Dysphoria
- A Call to Justice in Serving Hospitalized Prisoners
- Resisting the Post-Truth Era: Maintaining a Commitment to Science and Social Justice in Bioethics
- Review of John McMillan, The Methods of Bioethics: An Essay in Meta-Bioethics
- When Better Becomes Worse
- The Empirical Examination of the Social Process of Genetic Enhancement, Objectification, and Maltreatment
- The Case of Seth: To Treat or Not to Treat
- What Does Ethical Treatment of a Dying Inmate Entail?
- Which Enhancement? What Kind of Obsolescence?
- Navigating the Choppy Waters Between Public Safety and Humane Care of the Prisoner-Patient: The Role of the Ethics Consultant
- Some Optimism About Enhancement
- Begetting as Producing: Who Cares?
- Maximizing Resources: Ensuring Standard of Care for a Transgender Child in a Rural Setting
- Yesterday’s Child: How Gene Editing for Enhancement Will Produce Obsolescence—and Why It Matters
- Embracing Human Obsolescence: Implications for the Enhancement Project
- Are Radical Genetic Enhancements a Type of Contemporary Edenic Deception?
- Toward Realism About Genetic Enhancement
- Rational Freedom and Six Mistakes of a Bioconservative
- Human Self-Understanding
- Could Genetic Enhancement Really Lead to Obsolescence?
- Genomic Obsolescence: What Constitutes an Ontological Threat to Human Nature?
- Providing Puberty Suppression Treatment for Transgender Youth: What Constitutes Competence?
- Review of Christopher Meyers, The Professional Ethics Toolkit
- Withholding Versus Withdrawing Treatment: Why Medical Guidelines Should Omit “Theoretical Equivalence”
- Profit Motives Require a Proscriptive Approach
- Regulating Clinical Innovation: Trachea Transplants and Tissue Engineering
- A Paradox of Choice and Opportunity in the Social Mediated Participant Recruitment Space: Opportunities and Caveats
- Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Using Social Media Platforms to Locate and Track Research Participants
- Innovative Practice, Clinical Research, and the Ethical Advancement of Medicine
- Ethics of Recruiting Research Subjects Through Social Media
- Preapproval Nontrial Access and Off-Label Use: Do They Meet Criteria for Dual-Deviation Review?
- Mountains and Molehills When Using Social Media as a Research Support Tool
- Why the Duty to Research Falls on Institutions Rather Than Individuals
- Innovation in a Learning Healthcare System
- Innovative Practice in Latin America: Medical Tourism and the Crowding Out of Research
- Social Media as an Ethical Tool for Retention in Clinical Trials
- Research Participant Communication Via Social Media Platforms Remains Risky
- Knowing One’s Way Around: The Challenge of Identifying and Overseeing Innovations in Patient Care
- Advancing Medicine Ethically: Important Considerations for Innovative Practice
- Promoting Justice in Locating and Tracking Research Participants Through Social Media
- Involving Families and Children in Online Research
- Let Us Not Take the Ethics Out of Innovative Practice: A Case Against Institutional Review
- Watchful Waiting Doesn’t Mean No Puberty Blockers, and Moving Beyond Watchful Waiting
- Expanding, Augmenting, and Operationalizing Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Using Social Media Platforms in Research and Health Care
- The Surgeon-in-Chief Should Oversee Innovative Surgical Practice
- Response to Commentaries on “Transgender Children and the Right to Transition”
- Innovative Practice Outside of Medical Institutions
- Have We Made Progress in Identifying (Surgical) Innovation?
- Details Matter—Definitions and Context Can’t Be Glossed Over When Managing Innovation
- Ethical Criteria for Health-Promoting Nudges: A Case-by-Case Analysis
- On the Ethical Criteria for Health-Promoting Nudges: The Importance of Conceptual Clarity
- A Nudge Toward Meaningful Choice
- Are Corporations Nudging the Nudgers?
- Reciprocity and the Quest for Meaningful Disclosure
- When a Push Becomes a Shove: Nudging in Elderly Care
- When Going Beyond Gentle Nudges Is Legitimate
- Rejecting “Understanding”: An Ethical Proposal Whose Time Has Come
- Informed Consent Requires Understanding: Complete Disclosure Is Not Enough
- Social Psychological Theories and Nudges as Tools for Health Promotion
- Nudges and Budges
- Disruption, Diversity, and Global Biobanking
- Informed Consent: A Matter of Aspiration Since 1966 (At Least)
- Nudging Good Samaritans: Opting Out of Organ Donation
- What Is Adequate Understanding?
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries: When Is It Ethical for Physician-Investigators to Seek Consent From Their Own Patients?
- Exploring Understanding of “Understanding”: The Paradigm Case of Biobank Consent Comprehension
- Understanding (in) Consent for Governance
- The Unbearable Requirement of Informed Consent
- Being Polite: Why Biobank Consent Comprehension Is Neither a Requirement nor an Aspiration
- Understanding as an Ethical Aspiration in an Era of Digital Technology-Based Communication: An Analysis of Informed Consent Functions
- Context Matters—Why Nudging in the Clinical Context Is Still Different
- Easy Resistible, Means-Paternalist Nudging in the Clinical Context is an Untenable Proposal
- Measuring Understanding and Respecting Trust in Biobank Consent
- In Defense of Nudging When the Stakes Are High
- Ignorance Isn’t Bliss: Retaining a Meaningful Comprehension Requirement for Consent to Research
- Moving From Understanding of Consent Conditions to Heuristics of Trust
- The Value of Consent for Clinical Research Does Not Always Hinge on Understanding
- Why I Support Medicaid Expansion
- Review of Sunita Puri, That Good Night: Life and Medicine in the Eleventh Hour
- Pediatricians Awakened: Addressing Family Immigration Status as a Critical and Intersectional Social Determinant of Health
- Should Research Participants Be Notified About Results of Currently Unknown but Potential Significance?
- Research Participants Should Have the Option to Be Notified of Results of Unknown but Potential Significance
- Undocumented Migration and Evolving Health Care Ethical Issues
- When Is It Ethical for Physician-Investigators to Seek Consent From Their Own Patients?
- Broadening the Conversation About Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine
- The Limitations of “Boilerplate” Language in Informed Consent: Single IRB Review of Multisite Genetic Research in Military Personnel
- Clinical Ethicists Awakened: Addressing Two Generations of Clinical Ethics Issues Involving Undocumented Patients
- The Importance of Listening to Patients and to Evidence Regarding Consent for Research
- Caring for the Undocumented: A View From the Safety Net
- Everything in Moderation: Dual Role Consent and State Law Mandates
- Dual-Role Research and Consent by Unique Specialists
- An Ethical Case for Dual-Role Consent: Increasing Research Diversity as a Matter of Respect and Justice
- Role Synergy Versus Role Conflict in Dual-Role Consent in Usual Care Trials
- Place, Virtue Ethics and Physician-Researcher Dual-Role Consent in Clinical Research
- Consent for Research Participation in Practice
- A Hybrid Approach to Obtaining Research Consent
- Clinical Research Is a Team Sport
- The Equivalence Thesis: Why Timers Do Not Successfully Resuscitate the Acts/Omissions and Withdrawal/Withholding Debate
- What Is a Clinical Ethicist?
- Justifying Investigator/Clinician Consent When The Physician-Patient Relationship Can Support Better Research Decision-Making
- The DNA Test Results That Uncovered a Family Secret
- Don’t We Need Something More in These Extraordinary Times? Response to the Commentaries
- How Conducting “Usual Care” Research Might Affect Obtaining Consent
- The United States as an Isolationist in Global Biomedical Ethics and Human Rights
- Voluntary Informed Consent Is Not Risk Dependent
- Mitigating Challenges in Dual-Role Consent: Honoring Patient Preferences to Discuss Research Participation With Someone They Know
- Moving Beyond Moral Revulsion: A Deeper Analysis of Social Justice Within Clinical Ethics Training
- Revising Our Standards on Dual-Role Physicians: Proceed, but Proceed With Caution
- A Neuroethical Analysis of Physicians’ Dual Obligations in Clinical Research
- Solving the Single IRB/Boilerplate Bind: Establishing Institutional Guidelines
- The Need for National Guidance Around Informed Consent About GBCA Safety
- Single IRBs Are Responsible to Ensure Consent Language Effectively Conveys the Local Context
- The Bane of “Boilerplate” Language in Research Consent Forms: Ensuring Consent Forms Promote Autonomous Authorization
- Why Insurance Companies Should Pay for Medical Cannabis
- Returning Individual Research Results Regarding Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain Is the Preferable Choice
- The New Colossus: Clinical Ethics, Empathy, and Grace