- A Little Digital Help: Advancing Social Support for Transplant Patients With Technology
- Gender Equity and Social Support for Transplants
- Ethicist as Healer: Is Offering Justified Normative Recommendations All We Are Doing in Active Patient Cases?
- Taxonomizing Views of Clinical Ethics Expertise
- Clinical Ethics Expertise: Beyond Justified Normative Recommendations?
- Credibility Excess and Social Support Criterion
- Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary
- Justifying Ethical Expertise
- In Search of the Ideal Transplantation Candidate
- The Qualitative Value of Social Support for Liver Transplantation
- Clinical Ethics as a Profession?
- Should Lack of Social Support Prevent Access to Organ Transplantation?
- A Review of David Lemberg’s Ethical and Legal Issues in Healthcare (1st Edition)
- Augment Social Support for Transplant, Do Not Penalize Its Absence
- Should Lack of Family Social Support Be a Contraindication to Pediatric Transplant?
- Ethics Expertise Demystified: Using the Brummett/Salter Taxonomy
- Realism, and Expertise1
- Realism, Correspondence, and Expertise
- Social Support Is Not the Only Problematic Criterion, But If Used at All, “Lack of Social Support” Should Count in Favor of Listing, Not Against
- Engaging With a New Taxonomy for Clinical Ethics Consultation: What Are the Implications?
- Taxonomizing the Clinical Ethics Critics
- Why It is Important to Consider Social Support When Assessing Organ Transplant Candidates?
- Unanswered Questions About Clinical Ethics Expertise
- Moral Normative Force and Clinical Ethics Expertise
- Context, Context, Context
- How Is Ethics Consultation Work Justified?
- Clinical Ethics Expertise as the Ability to Co-Create Normative Recommendations by Guiding a Dialogical Process of Moral Learning
- Ethics of AI in Transplant Matching: Is It Better or Just More of the Same?
- The Hard Question of Justification in Health Care Ethics Consultation
- Should Poor Social Support Be an Exclusion Criterion in Bone Marrow Transplantation?
- A Taxonomy and an Ethicist’s Toolbox: Mapping a Plurality of Normative Approaches
- Absence of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Absence
- Parity Arguments for ‘Physician Aid-in-Dying’ (PAD) for Psychiatric Disorders: Their Structure and Limits
- Euthanasia for Mental Suffering Reduces Stigmatization But May Lead to an Extension of This Practice Without Safeguards
- Reweighing the Ethical Tradeoffs in the Involuntary Hospitalization of Suicidal Patients
- Physician Aid-in-Dying for Individuals With Serious Mental Illness: Clarifying Decision-Making Capacity and Psychiatric Futility
- Improving Care for Suicidal Patients While Protecting Human Subjects: Addressing Ethical Challenges in Mental Health Research Involving Emergency Medical Services Providers
- Moralities of Method: Putting Normative Arguments in Their (Social and Cultural) Place
- Responding to Implicit Bias in Abusive Head Trauma Evaluations and Reporting in the PICU: Ethical Consideration During a Clinical Trial
- The Moral Choices on CRISPR Babies
- The Genetic Revolution Highlights the Importance of Nondiscriminatory and Comprehensive Health Insurance Coverage
- Why Normative Judgment Is Inescapable
- TV Writers and Producers and Ethics: How Can I Help?
- Evaluating PAD Requests in Psychiatry: The Importance of Involving Others
- Clinical Trials Not Causing Harm With Potential for Realizing Benefit Should Continue
- Informed Consent in a Pragmatic Emergency Suicide Trial: Rejecting the Research–Practice Distinction
- Review of Thomas H. Murray, Good Sport: Why Our Games Matter and How Doping Undermines Them
- A Stepwise Approach to Ethically Assess Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials: Implications for Informed Consent for Suicide Prevention Implementation Research
- Issues of Justice and Risk: Setting Stopping Criteria in Cluster-Randomized Trials
- What If They Say No?
- Involuntary Hospitalization of Suicidal Patients: Time for New Answers to Basic Questions?
- Decision-Making Capacity Will Have a Limited Effect on Civil Commitment Practices
- A Cluster Randomized Trial to Screen for Abusive Head Trauma in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit—How to Manage Site-Specific Evidence of Racial/Ethnic Disparity
- Kious and Battin’s Dilemma Resolved: Outlaw Physician Aid-in-Dying
- The Ethics of Nudging and Beyond: Response to Commentaries
- Elevating How Americans Talk About Abortion: Review of Katie Watson’s Scarlet A
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Physician Aid-in-Dying and Suicide Prevention in Psychiatry”
- “When the Fall Is All There Is…”: Refocusing on the Critical (Unique?) Characteristic of “Dying” in Physician Aid-in-Dying
- Medical Aid-in-Dying is an Ethical and Important End-of-Life Care Option
- Deep Uncertainties in the Criteria for Physician Aid-in-Dying for Psychiatric Patients
- Concerning the Basic Idea that the Wish to End Suffering Legitimates Physician Aid in Dying for Psychiatric Patients
- Medically Unnecessary Genital Cutting and the Rights of the Child: Moving Toward Consensus
- A Model Ethics Board for Innovative Practice and Centers of Excellence
- Physician Aid-in-Dying and Suicide Prevention in Psychiatry: A Moral Crisis?
- Physician Aid-in-Dying and Suicide Prevention in Psychiatry: A Moral Imperative Over a Crisis
- The Unbearable Burden of Suffering: Moral Crisis or Structural Failure?
- “I Don’t Want to Go on Living This Way”: Desire for Hastened Death and the Ethics of Involuntary Hospitalization
- When a Theoretical Commitment to Broad Physician Aid-in-Dying Faces the Reality of Its Implementation
- Social Determinants of Mental Health and Physician Aid-in-Dying: The Real Moral Crisis
- A Pragmatic Trial of Suicide Risk Assessment and Ambulance Transport Decision Making Among Emergency Medical Services Providers: Implications for Patient Consent
- Taking Off the Blinders: The Critical Phase of Suicidality Doesn’t End With Discharge From Inpatient Treatment
- Irremediability Is Key
- The Ethics of Suicide in Mental Illness: Novel Neuroscientific Perspectives
- A Pragmatic Trial for Emergency Medical Service Providers’ Prehospital Response to Suidality: Consent Is Not Essential, but Limited Patient Engagement May Be Meaningful
- Partnering, Not Enduring: Citizen Science and Research Participation
- Consent, Threats, and Offers
- Freedom From Subjection to the Will of Others: Study Payments, Labor, and Moral Equality
- Research Payment and Its Social Justice Concerns
- “Paid to Produce Data:” Research Participation as the Labor of Generating Valuable Health Data
- Is Being “Paid to Endure” Compatible With Autonomy? Paid Research Participation and Five (Rather Than Four) Goods of Work
- A Proposal for Fair Compensation for Research Participants
- The Continued Complexities of Paying Research Participants
- Meaningful Work Is Indeed a Matter of Distributive Justice
- Licensing Domination: Foreign Will and Social Benefit
- Clinical Ultimatums: Coercion as Subjection
- Filthy Lucre or Fitting Offer? Understanding Worries About Payments to Research Participants
- Working for the Weekend Is Not Meaningful Work
- The Coercer’s Role in Coercion
- Coercive Offers Without Coercion as Subjection
- Coercion as Subjection and the Institutional Review Board
- Passivity, Research Risks, and Worker-Type Protections for Research Subjects
- The Exploitation of Professional “Guinea Pigs” in the Gig Economy: The Difficult Road From Consent to Justice
- Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Render “Coercion as Subjection” Implausible
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “‘Paid to Endure’: Paid Research Participation, Passivity, and the Goods of Work”
- Why Dax’s Case Still Matters
- Teaching Medical Students to Voice Their Values
- “Paid to Endure”: Paid Research Participation, Passivity, and the Goods of Work
- How Payment for Research Participation Can Be Coercive
- The Ethics of Public and Service User Involvement in Health Research: The Need for Participatory Reflection on Everyday Ethical Issues
- Learning Not Just From But With Citizens: The Importance of Co-Design in Health-Related Social Research
- Should Patient Groups Have the Power to Redirect How Their Samples Are Used?
- Engaging the “Citizen” in Citizen Science: Who’s Actually Included?
- The Challenge of Demandingness in Citizen Science and Participatory Research
- Challenges of Citizen Science: Commons, Incentives, Organizations, and Regulations
- The Importance of Gatekeeping in Citizen Science
- Institutional Review Board Oversight of Citizen Science Research Involving Human Subjects
- Considering Power Relations in Citizen Science
- Biomedical Citizen Science or Something Else? Reflections on Terms and Definitions
- Citizen Science and the Politicization of Epistemology
- The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research
- Co-Production: An Ethical Model for Mental Health Research?
- A Neglected Ethical Issue in Citizen Science and DIY Biology
- Beyond Belmont—and Beyond Regulations
- Parsing the Line Between Professional and Citizen Science
- Who Watches the Step-Watchers: The Ups and Downs of Turning Anecdotal Citizen Science into Actionable Clinical Data
- Ethically Justified Restrictions on Citizen Science: A Perspective from Singapore
- Citizen Science for Biomedical Research and Contributive Justice
- Cultural Considerations in Citizen Health Science and the Case for Community-Based Approaches
- N-of-1 Precision Medicine and Research Oversight
- Avoiding a Tyranny of the Majority: Public Deliberation as Citizen Science, Sensitive Issues, and Vulnerable Populations
- Mind the Gap: The Ethics Void Created by the Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research
- Does Obsolescence Matter? The Real Questions of Genetic Enhancement
- Not Out of Date, But Out of Value
- Shackled at the End of Life: We Can Do Better
- Germline Gene Editing and Genetic Enhancement: The Value of(Non-)Positional Goods
- Yesterday’s Child, Tomorrow’s Therapy Patient: What Are the Roles of Health and Normalcy in Genetic Enhancement?
- Yesterday’s Child, Tomorrow’s Plaintiff: Why We Should Expect an Uptick in Wrongful-Life Suits Following Embryonic Application of Gene-Editing Technologies
- Obsolescence, Genetic Treatment, and Disability
- Tomorrow’s Child: Unlikely to Be Obsolete
- Obsolescence Is Not a Good Reason to Oppose All Types of Enhancement
- Minor Patient, Major Decisions: Caring for a Rural Child With Gender Dysphoria
- A Call to Justice in Serving Hospitalized Prisoners
- Resisting the Post-Truth Era: Maintaining a Commitment to Science and Social Justice in Bioethics
- Review of John McMillan, The Methods of Bioethics: An Essay in Meta-Bioethics
- When Better Becomes Worse
- The Empirical Examination of the Social Process of Genetic Enhancement, Objectification, and Maltreatment
- The Case of Seth: To Treat or Not to Treat
- What Does Ethical Treatment of a Dying Inmate Entail?
- Which Enhancement? What Kind of Obsolescence?
- Navigating the Choppy Waters Between Public Safety and Humane Care of the Prisoner-Patient: The Role of the Ethics Consultant
- Some Optimism About Enhancement
- Begetting as Producing: Who Cares?
- Maximizing Resources: Ensuring Standard of Care for a Transgender Child in a Rural Setting
- Yesterday’s Child: How Gene Editing for Enhancement Will Produce Obsolescence—and Why It Matters
- Embracing Human Obsolescence: Implications for the Enhancement Project
- Are Radical Genetic Enhancements a Type of Contemporary Edenic Deception?
- Toward Realism About Genetic Enhancement
- Rational Freedom and Six Mistakes of a Bioconservative
- Human Self-Understanding
- Could Genetic Enhancement Really Lead to Obsolescence?
- Genomic Obsolescence: What Constitutes an Ontological Threat to Human Nature?
- Providing Puberty Suppression Treatment for Transgender Youth: What Constitutes Competence?
- Review of Christopher Meyers, The Professional Ethics Toolkit
- Withholding Versus Withdrawing Treatment: Why Medical Guidelines Should Omit “Theoretical Equivalence”
- Profit Motives Require a Proscriptive Approach
- Regulating Clinical Innovation: Trachea Transplants and Tissue Engineering
- A Paradox of Choice and Opportunity in the Social Mediated Participant Recruitment Space: Opportunities and Caveats
- Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Using Social Media Platforms to Locate and Track Research Participants
- Innovative Practice, Clinical Research, and the Ethical Advancement of Medicine
- Ethics of Recruiting Research Subjects Through Social Media
- Preapproval Nontrial Access and Off-Label Use: Do They Meet Criteria for Dual-Deviation Review?
- Mountains and Molehills When Using Social Media as a Research Support Tool
- Why the Duty to Research Falls on Institutions Rather Than Individuals
- Innovation in a Learning Healthcare System
- Innovative Practice in Latin America: Medical Tourism and the Crowding Out of Research
- Social Media as an Ethical Tool for Retention in Clinical Trials
- Research Participant Communication Via Social Media Platforms Remains Risky
- Knowing One’s Way Around: The Challenge of Identifying and Overseeing Innovations in Patient Care
- Advancing Medicine Ethically: Important Considerations for Innovative Practice
- Promoting Justice in Locating and Tracking Research Participants Through Social Media
- Involving Families and Children in Online Research
- Let Us Not Take the Ethics Out of Innovative Practice: A Case Against Institutional Review
- Watchful Waiting Doesn’t Mean No Puberty Blockers, and Moving Beyond Watchful Waiting
- Expanding, Augmenting, and Operationalizing Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Using Social Media Platforms in Research and Health Care
- The Surgeon-in-Chief Should Oversee Innovative Surgical Practice
- Response to Commentaries on “Transgender Children and the Right to Transition”
- Innovative Practice Outside of Medical Institutions
- Have We Made Progress in Identifying (Surgical) Innovation?
- Details Matter—Definitions and Context Can’t Be Glossed Over When Managing Innovation
- Ethical Criteria for Health-Promoting Nudges: A Case-by-Case Analysis
- On the Ethical Criteria for Health-Promoting Nudges: The Importance of Conceptual Clarity
- A Nudge Toward Meaningful Choice
- Are Corporations Nudging the Nudgers?
- Reciprocity and the Quest for Meaningful Disclosure
- When a Push Becomes a Shove: Nudging in Elderly Care
- When Going Beyond Gentle Nudges Is Legitimate
- Rejecting “Understanding”: An Ethical Proposal Whose Time Has Come
- Informed Consent Requires Understanding: Complete Disclosure Is Not Enough
- Social Psychological Theories and Nudges as Tools for Health Promotion
- Nudges and Budges
- Disruption, Diversity, and Global Biobanking
- Informed Consent: A Matter of Aspiration Since 1966 (At Least)
- Nudging Good Samaritans: Opting Out of Organ Donation
- What Is Adequate Understanding?
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries: When Is It Ethical for Physician-Investigators to Seek Consent From Their Own Patients?
- Exploring Understanding of “Understanding”: The Paradigm Case of Biobank Consent Comprehension
- Understanding (in) Consent for Governance
- The Unbearable Requirement of Informed Consent
- Being Polite: Why Biobank Consent Comprehension Is Neither a Requirement nor an Aspiration
- Understanding as an Ethical Aspiration in an Era of Digital Technology-Based Communication: An Analysis of Informed Consent Functions
- Context Matters—Why Nudging in the Clinical Context Is Still Different
- Easy Resistible, Means-Paternalist Nudging in the Clinical Context is an Untenable Proposal
- Measuring Understanding and Respecting Trust in Biobank Consent
- In Defense of Nudging When the Stakes Are High
- Ignorance Isn’t Bliss: Retaining a Meaningful Comprehension Requirement for Consent to Research
- Moving From Understanding of Consent Conditions to Heuristics of Trust
- The Value of Consent for Clinical Research Does Not Always Hinge on Understanding
- Why I Support Medicaid Expansion
- Review of Sunita Puri, That Good Night: Life and Medicine in the Eleventh Hour
- Pediatricians Awakened: Addressing Family Immigration Status as a Critical and Intersectional Social Determinant of Health
- Should Research Participants Be Notified About Results of Currently Unknown but Potential Significance?
- Research Participants Should Have the Option to Be Notified of Results of Unknown but Potential Significance
- Undocumented Migration and Evolving Health Care Ethical Issues
- When Is It Ethical for Physician-Investigators to Seek Consent From Their Own Patients?
- Broadening the Conversation About Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine
- The Limitations of “Boilerplate” Language in Informed Consent: Single IRB Review of Multisite Genetic Research in Military Personnel
- Clinical Ethicists Awakened: Addressing Two Generations of Clinical Ethics Issues Involving Undocumented Patients
- The Importance of Listening to Patients and to Evidence Regarding Consent for Research
- Caring for the Undocumented: A View From the Safety Net
- Everything in Moderation: Dual Role Consent and State Law Mandates
- Dual-Role Research and Consent by Unique Specialists
- An Ethical Case for Dual-Role Consent: Increasing Research Diversity as a Matter of Respect and Justice
- Role Synergy Versus Role Conflict in Dual-Role Consent in Usual Care Trials
- Place, Virtue Ethics and Physician-Researcher Dual-Role Consent in Clinical Research
- Consent for Research Participation in Practice
- A Hybrid Approach to Obtaining Research Consent
- Clinical Research Is a Team Sport
- The Equivalence Thesis: Why Timers Do Not Successfully Resuscitate the Acts/Omissions and Withdrawal/Withholding Debate
- What Is a Clinical Ethicist?
- Justifying Investigator/Clinician Consent When The Physician-Patient Relationship Can Support Better Research Decision-Making
- The DNA Test Results That Uncovered a Family Secret
- Don’t We Need Something More in These Extraordinary Times? Response to the Commentaries
- How Conducting “Usual Care” Research Might Affect Obtaining Consent
- The United States as an Isolationist in Global Biomedical Ethics and Human Rights
- Voluntary Informed Consent Is Not Risk Dependent
- Mitigating Challenges in Dual-Role Consent: Honoring Patient Preferences to Discuss Research Participation With Someone They Know
- Moving Beyond Moral Revulsion: A Deeper Analysis of Social Justice Within Clinical Ethics Training
- Revising Our Standards on Dual-Role Physicians: Proceed, but Proceed With Caution
- A Neuroethical Analysis of Physicians’ Dual Obligations in Clinical Research
- Solving the Single IRB/Boilerplate Bind: Establishing Institutional Guidelines
- The Need for National Guidance Around Informed Consent About GBCA Safety
- Single IRBs Are Responsible to Ensure Consent Language Effectively Conveys the Local Context
- The Bane of “Boilerplate” Language in Research Consent Forms: Ensuring Consent Forms Promote Autonomous Authorization
- Why Insurance Companies Should Pay for Medical Cannabis
- Returning Individual Research Results Regarding Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain Is the Preferable Choice
- The New Colossus: Clinical Ethics, Empathy, and Grace
- Empirical Over Theoretical Ethics: Choosing What Matters to Patients and Families
- Navigating End-of-Life Decisions Using Informed Nondissent
- Dangers of Withholding Treatment in Emergency and Prehospital Settings
- A Global Dialogue on Withholding and Withdrawal of Medical Care: An East Asian Perspective
- Withdrawal Aversion as a Useful Heuristic for Critical Care Decisions
- The Decision to Withdraw in Children With Ventricular Assist Devices
- Withholding and Withdrawing: A Religious–Cultural Path Toward a Practical Resolution
- Sunk Cost Bias and Withdrawal Aversion
- Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Relevance of the Killing Versus Letting Die Distinction
- Withdrawing and Withholding in the Clinical Arena
- “Ceteris Paribus” and Morally Relevant Facts
- Withdrawal Aversion and the Equivalence Test
- Psychological Hesitancy Is Not an Ethical Standard
- To Act or Not to Act, That Is the Question
- Categorical Mistakes and Moral Biases in the Withholding-Versus-Withdrawal Debate
- What to Expect When Expecting CRISPR Baby Number Four
- Withdrawing and Withholding Treatment: What Do Medical Professionals Owe Their Patients?
- No Escalation of Treatment: Moving Beyond the Withholding/Withdrawing Debate
- We Reject the “‘‘Equivalence Thesis”
- Review of Ilana Löwy, Imperfect Pregnancies: A History of Birth Defects & Prenatal Diagnosis
- Review of Ilana Löwy, Imperfect Pregnancies: A History of Birth Defects & Prenatal Diagnosis
- Parental Decision Making and the Limitations of the Equivalence Thesis (and the Harm Principle)
- Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment: Ethically Equivalent?
- Nancy Cruzan and the Withhold Versus Withdraw Dilemma
- Female Genital Cutting (FGC) and the Cultural Boundaries of Medical Practice
- Can Intersectionality Help Lead to More Accurate Diagnosis?
- Addressing the Practical Implications of Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine: Ethical, Embodied and Institutional Dimensions
- Puberty Blockers Are Necessary, but They Don’t Prevent Homelessness: Caring for Transgender Youth by Supporting Unsupportive Parents
- Transgender Children and the Right to Transition: Medical Ethics When Parents Mean Well but Cause Harm
- Transgender Children, Puberty Blockers, and the Law: Solutions to the Problem of Dissenting Parents
- Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine: The Need for a Conceptual Framework
- Intersectionality: A Scientific Realist Critique
- Clinical Encounters: The Social Justice Question in Intersectional Medicine
- A Two-Pronged Approach to Minimizing Harms for Transgender Youth: Medical Interventions and Social Interventions
- Moving Beyond Mismatch
- Intersectionality and Power Imbalances Clinicians of Color Face When Patients Request White Clinicians
- An Argument for the Intersectional Education of Those Working in International Humanitarian Medical Nongovernmental Organizations
- Identification Before Prescription: Necessary Changes for the Support of Transgender Youth
- Multiple Marginalizations: What Bioethics Can Learn From Black Feminism
- Ethical Guidelines for DNA Testing in Migrant Family Reunification
- Intersectionality and Clinical Decision Making: The Role of Race
- The Right to Best Care for Children Does Not Include the Right to Medical Transition
- Is There Cross-Cultural Evidence for an Association Between Intersectionality and Bioethical Decision Making? Not Yet, but Awaiting Advances in Mental Mapping
- PBT and the Rights of Bad Candidates
- Puberty-Blocking Treatment and the Rights of Bad Candidates
- Psychological Maltreatment and Medical Neglect of Transgender Adolescents: The Need for Recognition and Individualized Assessment
- The Social Context of Adolescents’ Right to Transition
- Decision Making and the Long-Term Impact of Puberty Blockade in Transgender Children
- Should Parental Refusal of Puberty-Blocking Treatment be Overridden? The Role of the Harm Principle
- Narrative Ethics and Intersectionality
- True Autonomy/False Dichotomies? Genderqueer Kids and the Myth of the Quick Fix
- Age Difference in the Clinical Encounter: Intersectionality and Phenomenology
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Patenting Foundational Technologies: Lessons From CRISPR and Other Core Biotechnologies”
- Whether, When, and How to Honor Advance VSED Requests for End-Stage Dementia Patients
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Radical Approach to Ebola: Saving Humans and Other Animals”
- Lessons From New York’s Dementia Directive and Applications to Withholding Oral Feedings
- Justifying a Surrogate’s Request to Forego Oral Feeding
- Promoting Professionalism Through Virtue Ethics
- We Can Do Something! Caring for the Ongoing Needs of an Undocumented Patient
- Serious Ethical Violations in Medicine: A Statistical and Ethical Analysis of 280 Cases in the United States From 2008–2016
- Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism
- Genomes in Context
- How Can We Integrate Interests and Reasoned Arguments in Bioethics?
- “DNA Is Information, and Genetics Is Information Technology”: Reconsidering the Genetic Code
- “You Say Unethical, I Say Criminal”: How Definitions Can Influence Approach
- Serious Ethical Violations by Physicians: What’s the Solution?
- Philosophical Bioethics in the Policy Arena: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Just Policy? An Ethical Analysis of Early Intervention Policy Guidance”
- Is Genetic Exceptionalism Past Its Sell-By Date? On Genomic Diaries, Context, and Content
- An Undocumented Immigrant With End-Stage Renal Disease
- Disabusing Physicians of the Assumption of Competing Interests
- Serious Ethical Violations in Medicine: The Irish Situation
- Genomic Contextualism, Genetic Determinism, and Causal Models
- Foregoing Spoon Feeding in End-Stage Dementia
- Unpacking the Concept of a Genomic Result
- Toward Broader Genetic Contextualism: Genetic Testing Enters the Age of Evidence-Based Medicine
- Review of David Alfandre, ed., Against-Medical-Advice Discharges From the Hospital: Optimizing Prevention and Management to Promote High Quality, Patient-Centered Care
- Clarifying the Relationship Between Serious Ethical Violations and Conflicts of Interest
- Bold Societal Responses Are Needed in Tackling Serious Ethical Violations in Medicine
- Thesis, Antithesis, and Fallacious Synthesis: The Troublesome Dialectic of Professional Behavior and Its Regulation
- How Do We Solve Maria’s Problem? A Hospitalist Perspective
- Abusive Doctors: How the Atlanta Newspaper Exposed a System That Tolerates Sexual Misconduct by Physicians
- The Buck Stops Where: The Duty of a Hospital to Provide Medical Care to Undocumented Patients
- Genetic Contextualism and the Value of a Structured Process
- It’s the Idiom, Stupid: A Plea for Formal Rhetorical Analysis in Bioethics
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Health Research Priority Setting: The Duties of Individual Funders”
- Physician Sexual Assault: The Moral Imperative for Gender Equity in Medicine
- Toward More Effective Self-Regulation in Medicine
- Facial Feminization Surgery: Private, Personal Identity, Compensatory Justice, and Resource Allocation
- Facial Feminization Surgery: Privacy, Personal Identity, Compensatory Justice, and Resource Allocation
- The Democratization of Facial Feminization Surgery and the Removal of Artificial Barriers
- Is CRISPR Different? Considering Exclusivity for ResearchTools, Therapeutics, and Everything In Between
- The Biopolitics of Passing and the Possibility of Radically Inclusive Transgender Health Care
- Extending Health Insurance for Body Modifications for Gender Transitions
- Patenting in the Public Interest: The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine Model
- In Favor of Covering Ethically Important Cosmetic Surgeries: Facial Feminization Surgery for Transgender People
- Foundational Technologies and Accountability
- Patenting Foundational Technologies: Lessons From CRISPR and Other Core Biotechnologies
- A Queer, Feminist Bioethics Critique of Facial Feminization Surgery
- Faces Matter
- Sunset on the RAC: When Is It Time to End Special Oversight of an Emerging Biotechnology?
- Gene Patents and the Social Justice Lens
- ‘Medical Necessity’ and Domination
- Laying the Foundation for Foundational Technologies
- The View of CRISPR Patents Through the Lens of Solidarity and the Public Good
- Fair Governance of Biotechnology: Patents, Private Governance, and Procedural Justice
- The Human Right to Science and Foundational Technologies
- Facial Feminization Surgery in Gender Dysphoria Should Be Reimbursed Like Genital Surgery, but the Main Problem Lies Elsewhere
- Accepting Things at Face Value: Insurance Coverage for Transgender Health Care
- Foundational Technologies and Legal Realities
- Acknowledging the Transition Spectrum
- From Interest to Applause to Despair
- CRISPR Patents: Aspiring to Coherent Patent Policy
- Facial Feminization Surgery: The Ethics of Gatekeeping in Transgender Health
- Family Ethics and Public Policy: Beyond the Medical Model
- Response to Commentaries on “Shrinking Poor White Life Spans”
- Asymmetrical Intuitions
- Health Research Priority Setting: A Duty to Maximize Social Value?
- Priority Setting Is More Than Resource Allocation: Reflecting on the Content of Funders’ Duties and Their Implications for Current Practice
- Conceptual, Structural, and Practical Challenges to Ethical Allocation of Research Funds
- Acquired Duties for Ethical Research With American Indian/Alaska Native Populations: An Application of Pierson and Millum’s Framework
- Public Health Disaster-Related Research: A Solidaristic Ethical Prism for Understanding Funders’ Duties
- The Epigenetic Imperative: Responsibility for Early Intervention at the Time of Biological Plasticity
- Aligning Research Priorities to Improve Equity: A Challenge for Health Funders
- Universal Funder Responsibilities That Advance Social Value
- One Health, Bioethics, and Nonhuman Ethics
- Just Ethics? Bioethical Prescriptions for Policymakers Should Remain Communal
- Distinguishing Primary and Secondary Early Intervention Programs: Implications for Families, Clinicians, and Policymakers
- Is There a Business Case for Constitutive Duties of For-Profit Research Funders?
- Beyond Parenting: The Responsibility of Multidisciplinary Health Care Providers in Early Intervention Policy Guidance
- Health Research Priority Setting: The Duties of Individual Funders
- Practical Problems Related to Health Research Funding Decisions
- Pfizer’s Corporate Citizenship
- Health Research Priority Setting: State Obligations and the Human Right to Science
- Just Policy? An Ethical Analysis of Early Intervention Policy Guidance