- A Case of Patient Abandonment, or an Abandonment of Patients?
- Ethical Restraint Use With Incapable Absconding Patients: Goals, Proportionality, and Surrogates
- Regulatory Angels and Technology Demons? Making Sense of Evolving Realities in Health Data Privacy for the Digital Age
- Protecting Health Privacy through Reasonable Inferences
- An All-Too-Human Enterprise
- How to Use AI Ethically for Ethical Decision-Making
- Using Algorithms to Make Ethical Judgements: METHAD vs. the ADC Model
- Alzheimer’s Disease and the Invisible Person: The Missing Patient Voice
- Health Privacy, Racialization, and the Causal Potential of Legal Regulations
- Patient Abandonment in the Emergency Department?
- The AI Needed for Ethical Decision Making Does Not Exist
- Automating Justice: An Ethical Responsibility of Computational Bioethics
- AIgorithmic Ethics: A Technically Sweet Solution to a Non-Problem
- Protecting Privacy While Optimizing the Use of (Health)Data: The Importance of Measures and Safeguards
- Disproof of Concept: Resolving Ethical Dilemmas Using Algorithms
- Privacy and the Genetic Community
- Wrongful Birth: AI-Tools for Moral Decisions in Clinical Care in the Absence of Disability Ethics
- Implicit Fuzzy Specifications, Inferior to Explicit Balancing
- Rise of the Bioethics AI: Curse or Blessing?
- In Search of a Mission: Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Ethics
- Important Design Questions for Algorithmic Ethics Consultation
- Ethical Algorithmic Advice: Some Reasons to Pause and Think Twice
- “For Your Own Good”? Is It Ethical to Use Chemical Restraints on Patients Who Lack Capacity but Wish to Leave the Hospital against Medical Advice?
- The Medical Incapacity Hold—the Most Appropriate Solution to a Complex Clinical Problem
- When Protection From Risk-to-Self Causes Harm: A Brief Analysis of Restraint Use to Prevent Elopement
- Privacy, Health, and Race Equity in the Digital Age
- Who’s Abandoning Whom? The Role of Ethics Consultation for Unaccompanied Emergency Department Patients with Dementia
- Data, Privacy, and Agency: Beyond Transparency to Empowerment
- Healthcare Organizations Should Be Accountable Stewards of Patient Data
- The Principle of Autonomy in Biomedical- and Neuroethics
- On Certification’s Real Role
- Is It Ethical to Mandate Vaccination among Incarcerated Persons? Consider Enforcement and Ask People Living in Prisons and Jails
- Beyond Abortion: The Consequences of Overturning Roe
- The Ethics of Access: Reframing the Need for Abortion Care as a Health Disparity
- From Bridge to Destination? Ethical Considerations Related to Withdrawal of ECMO Support over the Objections of Capacitated Patients
- When Parents Prefer to Defer: Is ‘Deferral’ Always Problematic in Pediatric Decision-Making?
- When Clinicians Marginalize Decision-Makers
- Voice, Vulnerability and Dependency of the Child: Guiding Concepts for Shared-Decision Making
- Culturally Aware Communication Promotes Ethically Sensitive Care
- Respect for Readiness
- One Goal, Two Roles: Clinicians and Clinical Ethicists Should Approach Patients’ Ambivalence Differently
- Examining Interpersonal Factors in Patient Ambivalence
- Blood is Thicker than Water, or is It? The Possible Role of Stepparents in Pediatric Decision Making
- Supporting Marginalized Decision-Maker’s Autonomy(ies)
- One Patient, No Good Options: The Real Roots of Ambivalence in Medical Decision Making
- Exposing the Technological Roots of Ambivalence
- Appreciating the Role of the Unconscious in Situations of Patient Ambivalence
- The Role of Self-Illness Ambiguity and Self-Medication Ambiguity in Clinical Decision-Making
- Time Is Short, Social Relations Are Complex: Bioethics as Typology Industry
- Nudging, the Nocebo Effect, and Ambivalence
- Emotion as a Signpost in Complicated Pediatric Decision-Making
- Ambivalence: The Patient’s Perspective Counts
- From “How” to “Why”: Reasons for Magnifying and Marginalizing Voices in Pediatric Decision-Making
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries: On Social Harms, Big Tech, and Institutional Accountability
- The End of Roe v. Wade
- IRBs and the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma: Finding a Balance
- Research on the Clinical Translation of Health Care Machine Learning: Ethicists Experiences on Lessons Learned
- Bridging the AI Chasm: Can EBM Address Representation and Fairness in Clinical Machine Learning?
- Trauma and Community: Trauma-Informed Ethics Consultation Grounded in Community-Engaged Principles
- Extending Trauma-Informed Principles to Hospital System Policy Development
- A Systemic Approach to the Oversight of Machine Learning Clinical Translation
- My Story is Traumatic, You Probably Would Not Understand
- Challenges of Local Ethics Review in a Global Healthcare AI Market
- What Happened to Dad? The Complexity of Paternal Trauma and Ethical Care
- Broadening the Ethical Scope
- Rethinking the AI Chasm
- Trauma-Informed Ethics and Relational Health
- When Obligations Conflict: Necessary Violations of Trauma Informed Care in Ethics Consultation?
- Promoting Ethical Deployment of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Scaling up the Research Ethics Framework for Healthcare Machine Learning as Global Health Ethics and Governance
- Trauma-Informed Approaches in Healthcare Ethics Consultation: A Missing Element in Healthcare for People Who Use Drugs during the Overdose Crisis?
- The Need for a Global Approach to the Ethical Evaluation of Healthcare Machine Learning
- Emerging Paradigms for Ethical Review of Research Using Artificial Intelligence
- Think Pragmatically: Investigators’ Obligations to Patient-Subjects When Research is Embedded in Care
- Review of Jennifer S. Blumenthal-Barby, Good Ethics and Bad Choices: The Relevance of Behavioral Economics for Medical Ethics
- Incorporating Ethics Consultations into Public Health Practice
- No Justification to Exclude State Ward from Pediatric Transplant Research
- Life-Saving Experimental Treatment for a Teenage Ward of the State
- Ethics Consultations in a Fetal Health Center
- The Existential Crisis of Clinical Ethics Consultants
- All Healthcare Ethics Consultation Services Should Meet Shared Quality Standards
- View Across the Pond: Insights from a National Survey on Clinical Ethics Services in Switzerland
- Ethics Consultant Training Standards: Don’t Lower the Bar Without Benefit
- The ASBH’s Obligation to Create Cost-Free Basic HEC Training
- Fuzzy Logic: How the Practicalities of State Involvement Shape the Most Ethically Supportable Way Forward
- Enrolling Foster Youth in Clinical Trials: Avoiding the Harm of Exclusion
- Improving Ethics Support: Seeing and Organizing Ethics Support Differently
- A Call for Evidence-Based Clinical Ethics Consultation
- Assistant Coach, Advice Columnist, or Seasoned Diplomat: Distinguishing Between Formal, Informal, and “FYI” Ethics Consultations
- Ethics Consultation: Data and the Path to Professionalization
- Enrolling Adolescents with Rare Disease for Early Phase Clinical Trials While Under the Care of Child Protection Services: Balancing Protection and Access
- Ethics Consultation Services as a Resource and its Implications for Evaluation Activities
- Quality Healthcare Ethics Consultation: How Do We Get It and How Do We Measure It
- A Hub and Spoke Model for Improving Access and Standardizing Ethics Consultations Across a Large Healthcare System
- It’s About Heterogeneity! Strategies to Advance the Evaluation of Ethics Consultation
- Measuring Value with Volume
- The Good, the Bad, and the Inconvenient
- Mitigating Moral Distress through Ethics Consultation
- Ethics Considerations Regarding Artificial Womb Technology for the Fetonate
- Conversational Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy: A New Therapeutic Tool or Agent?
- Algorithms for Ethical Decision-Making in the Clinic: A Proof of Concept
- Moral Distress: What Are We Measuring?
- Materialized Oppression in Medical Tools and Technologies
- Beyond Good Intentions: Student Run Free Clinics as a Reflection of a Broken System
- Ethical Considerations for the Just Utilization of House Staff During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- The Relational and Gendered Nature of Reproductive Medicine
- “Racialized Disablement” as a Key Heuristic for Addressing Racism in Bioethics
- Multidisciplinary Ethics Review for Liminal Cases in Maternal-Fetal Surgery: A Model
- What Lies Beneath the Framework: The Importance of Grounding Ethical Discussions of Maternal-Fetal Therapy
- The Racial Data Gap: Lack of Racial Data as a Barrier to Overcoming Structural Racism
- Race, Racism, and Bioethics: Are We Stuck?
- Deconstructing Structural Injustices in the Clinic, Classroom, and Boardroom
- Fetal Therapies and Clinical Research: Beyond Risk and Benefit
- Maternal-Fetal Therapy: The (Psycho)Social Dilemma
- Consents (and Contents) Under Pressure: Maintaining Space for Moral Engagement in Research Protocols
- A New Ethical Framework for Assessing the Unique Challenges of Fetal Therapy Trials: Response to Commentaries
- Addressing Whiteness in Bioethics Curricula as Praxis for Transformation
- The Fetus as a Research Subject
- Erasing Blackness From Bioethics
- Considering Reprogenomics in the Ethical Future of Fetal Therapy Trials
- Making Structural Discrimination Visible: A Call for Intersectional Bioethics
- The Need for Praxis in Combating the Race Idea in Bioethics: Theory, Reflection, and Action
- Restrictions on Abortion, Social Justice and the Ethics of Research in Maternal-Fetal Therapy Trials
- Privacy and Health Practices in the Digital Age
- Heroism Is Not a Plan—From “Duty to Treat” to “Risk and Rewards”
- Access to Expanded Prenatal Genetic Testing: Response to Open Peer Commentaries
- Does Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death Violate the Dead Donor Rule?
- Vaccination Mandates, Physically Forced Vaccination, and Rationing in the Intensive Care Unit: Searching for Ethical Coherence in the COVID-19 Pandemic
- What Really Matters Now in Prenatal Genetics
- The Serious Factor in Expanded Prenatal Genetic Testing
- Genetic Testing Is Messier in Practice than in Theory: Lessons from Neonatology
- An Autonomy-Based Approach to Justifying Physician-Assisted Death: A Recent Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court
- Does Anyone Need to Regulate Parental Access to Fetal Genetic Information?
- How Ought Decisions That Weigh on Life and Death Be Justly Informed and Governed to Benefit More than the Privileged Few with Access to a Trusted Clinician?
- The Unstable Boundary of Suffering-Based Euthanasia Regimes
- The Role of Suffering in the “Tired of Life” Debate
- Meaningful Respect for the Autonomy of Persons with “Completed Life”: An Analysis in Light of Empirical Research
- Capacities and Limitations of Using Polygenic Risk Scores for Reproductive Decision Making
- Intertwined Interests in Expanded Prenatal Genetic Testing: The State’s Role in Facilitating Equitable Access
- Certainties and Uncertainties in Genetic Information: Good Ethics Starts with Good Data
- Delineating the Scope of NIPT: Ethics Meets Practice
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Developing a Reflexive, Anticipatory, and Deliberative Approach to Unanticipated Discoveries: Ethical Lessons from iBlastoids”
- Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: A Comparative Analysis of Dutch and East Asian Cases
- Restricting Access, Stigmatizing Disability?
- Expanded Prenatal Testing: Maintaining a Non-Directive Approach to Promote Reproductive Autonomy
- Suffering and the Completed Life
- A Research Ethics Framework for the Clinical Translation of Healthcare Machine Learning
- No Place like (Dying at) Home: Supporting Patients’ Desires to Die without Medical Intrusion
- Georgia on My Mind: Daughters, Dementia and Discharge
- When Parents Don’t Want Their Teenager to be Vaccinated against COVID-19, Who Calls the Shots?
- Until Adolescents Can Consent for Vaccination, Protecting Them from COVID-19 Will Require Counseling Skeptical Parents
- A Minor Question of Vaccine Consent: Not for Ethics Alone to Answer
- Preference vs. Safety: Clinician and Caregiver Stress in the Care of Demented Patients
- Governance of Emerging Biotechnologies: Lessons from Two Chinese Cases
- There Are Priorities and Then There Are Priorities: A Prior Question About the Perpetuation of Injustice Through Bioethics Research Funding
- Anticipatory Governance and Foresight in Regulating for Uncertainty
- How Ethics Can Better Anticipate the Consequences of Emerging Biotechnologies
- Bioethics Must Exemplify a Clear Path toward Justice: A Call to Action
- Whose Neglect? Exploring Patient and Caregiver Boundaries in Advanced Dementia
- Amplifying the Call for Anticipatory Governance
- Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: How Bioethics Can Learn from Organized Medicine
- “I Can Decide for Myself:” Adolescents Who Wish to Consent for Covid-19 Vaccination
- The Need for “Big Bioethics” Research
- Undoing Funding Injustices for Bioethics Research on Racial Justice
- A RAD Approach to iBlastoids with a Moral Principle of Complexity
- How to Identify Priority Questions for Bioethics Research
- Why iBlastoids (Embryo-like Structures) Do Not Rise Significant Ethical Issues
- Supported Decision Making with People at the Margins of Autonomy: Response to Commentaries
- Injustice in Bioethics Research Funding: Going Further Upstream
- A New Dawn of Bioethics: Advocacy and Social Justice
- Diversifying the Bioethics Funding Landscape: The Case of TMS
- Social and Epistemic Justice: Are We Really Including Africa in the Bioethics Discourse?
- Integrating Equity Work throughout Bioethics
- Meeting the Moment: Bioethics in the Time of Black Lives Matter
- Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for “Non-Medical” Traits: Ensuring Consistency in Ethical Decision-Making
- Dementia, Frailty and Triage in a Pandemic
- Another Cautionary Lesson from COVID Research
- Avoiding Exceptionalism and Silver Bullets: Lessons from Public Health Ethics and Alzheimer’s Disease
- What Can We Learn from COVID-19 Drug Development and Access for Non-Pandemic Diseases? A Chinese Perspective
- Why Exceptional Public Investment in the Development of Vaccines Is Justified for COVID-19, But Not for Other Unmet Medical Needs
- Exceptionalism, Information Categories and the Relevance of Gender
- Please, Don’t Fly Me to the Moon
- Whose Data, Whose Risk? Omics Privacy Concerns Should be Defined by Individuals, not Researchers
- Scrutinizing Privacy in Multi-Omics Research: How to Provide Ethical Grounding for the Identification of Privacy-Relevant Data Properties
- Decisions on Innovation or Research for Devastating Disease
- From “Ought” to “Is”: Surfacing Values in Patient and Family Advocacy in Rare Diseases
- Whose Data Are They Anyway? Identification of Relatives and Genetic Exceptionalism
- Data Properties or Analytical Methodologies: Too Much Attention to the Former Ignores Concerns About the Latter
- Physician Responsibility to Discuss Palliative Unproven Therapies With Out-of-Option Patients
- Is Dupras and Bunnik’s Framework for Assessing Privacy Risks in Multi-Omic Research and Databases Still Too Exceptionalist?
- Ownership of Genetic Data: Between Universalism and Contextualism?
- “If It’s Ethical During a Pandemic…”: Lessons from COVID-19 for Post-Pandemic Biobanking
- Utilitarian Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic for Non-Pandemic Diseases
- Realizing Supported Decision-Making: What It Does—and Does Not—Require
- Implementing Ethical and Legal Supported Decision Making: Some Unresolved Issues
- Doing Justice to Patients with Dementia in ICU Triage
- Supported Decisions as the Patient’s Own?
- Disability, Aging, and the Importance of Recognizing Social Supports in Medical Decision Making
- The Frailty of Disability: A Controversial Triage Criterion
- Integrating Supported Decision-Making into the Clinical Research Process
- Triage: Medical Details and Words Matter
- Triage Criteria: Medically, Ethically or Socially Defined?
- Supported Decision Making: A Concept at the Margins vs. Center of Autonomy?
- The Doctrine of Informed Consent Doesn’t Need Modification for Supported Decision Making
- Frailty, an Imperfect ICU Rationing Criterion
- The Complex Relationship between Disability Discrimination and Frailty Scores
- Healthcare Decisions Are Always Supported Decisions
- The Other Side of Triage: When Access to Intensive Care Measures May Do More Harm than Good
- A Critique of the Use of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Triage
- Reconciling Supported Decision Making with Shared Decision Making in the Context of Potential Vulnerability
- Supported Decision-Making for People with Dementia Should Focus on Their Values
- Evaluating Tradeoffs between Autonomy and Wellbeing in Supported Decision Making
- Combining Supported Decision-Making with Competence Assessment: A Way to Protect Persons with Impaired Decision-Making Capacity against Undue Influence
- Helpful Lessons and Cautionary Tales: How Should COVID-19 Drug Development and Access Inform Approaches to Non-Pandemic Diseases?
- Is It Ethical to Mandate SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinations among Incarcerated Persons?
- Developing a Reflexive, Anticipatory, and Deliberative Approach to Unanticipated Discoveries: Ethical Lessons from iBlastoids
- Identity and Liberalism in Public Health: A Response to the Open Peer Commentaries
- Ethical Issues in Using Behavior Contracts to Manage the “Difficult” Patient and Family
- Community Partnered Participatory Research in Southeast Louisiana Communities Threatened by Climate Change: The C-LEARN EXPERIENCE
- Methodological and Ethical Risks Associated with the Epistemic Unification of Tribe Members
- Rethinking Research Protections for Tribal Communities
- Engaging the Sickle Cell Community in Participatory Research
- Chickens & Eggs, Pigs and Their Lipstick: The Trouble with Asking Principlism to Do Too Much
- Beyond the Belmont Report
- Deliberative Forums to Bolster Tribal Self-Determination
- When Professional Meets Personal: How Should Research Staff Advertise on Social Media for Research Opportunities?
- Sharing Research Opportunities on Personal Social Media Accounts and Fair Subject Selection
- Leveraging Academic Institutional Structures to Support Asian American Community Organizations’ Engagement in Research: The Korean Community Service Center
- How Should Investigators Advertise on Social Media for Research Opportunities?
- Considering “Respect for Sovereignty” Beyond the Belmont Report and the Common Rule: Ethical and Legal Implications for American Indian and Alaska Native Peoples
- Solidarity without Sovereignty: Extending the Belmont Principles Further?
- Solidarity in the Absence of Sovereignty: Expanding Group Protections in New Research Contexts
- Supporting Community-Academic Research Partnerships: Reflections from the Ground
- Group Solidarity Versus Individual Autonomy in Research Involving American Indian/Alaskan Native Communities
- Health-Related Digital Autonomy. A Response to the Commentaries
- Solidarity as an Aspirational Basis for Partnership with Tribal Communities
- Being in Good Community: Engagement in Support of Indigenous Sovereignty
- Solidarity: A Missing Component of Research Ethics
- Teaching about Health Disparities: Pedagogy, Curriculum, and Learning Theory
- Liberalism and Identity
- The Current State of Efforts to Address Disparities, Racism and Cultural Humility in Medical Education
- Grounding Medical Education in Health Equity: The Time is Now
- Health Disparities, Systemic Racism, and Failures of Cultural Competence: Authors’ Response to Commentaries
- Cultural Competence as New Racism: Working as Intended?
- Materializing Systemic Racism, Materializing Health Disparities
- Making Culture a Verb: Implications for Health Equity
- Disability Cultural Competence for All as a Model
- Reasons, Respect, and Identity in Public Health Decision Making
- The Disruptive Power of Intersectionality
- Global Health Disparities: Can Liberal Perfectionism Better Address the Problem?
- Trading Cultural Competency for Trauma Informed Care
- Political Liberalism and Public Health
- Bans, Taxes or Product Placement? Applying the Liberal Perfectionist Proviso to Public Health Food Policy
- Improving Community Engagement and Social Justice in Public Health Policymaking during the COVID Pandemics: Insights from Participatory Action-Research in Western Switzerland
- Bioethics Theory-Building for Public Health
- Three Kinds of Decision-Making Capacity for Refusing Medical Interventions
- Limitations to Contingency Measures: Reflections from COVID-19 Surges in the UK
- Contingency Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: An Analysis Based on a New Ethical Framework
- Neither ‘Crisis Light’ nor ‘Business as Usual’: Considering the Distinctive Ethical Issues Raised by the Contingency and Reset Phases of a Pandemic
- Does Medicine Need to Accommodate Positive Conscientious Objections to Morally Self-Correct?
- Conscience Clauses and Ideological Bias
- Justified Asymmetries: Positive and Negative Claims to Conscience in Reproductive Health Care
- Conscience Claims and Cost: Tribunals and the Asymmetry Debate
- Insights from Blood Products Management for Pre-Crisis Ethical Resource Allocation
- What Makes Conscientious Refusals Concerning Abortion Different
- The Need for an Ethics of Care in the Contingency Response to Public Health Emergencies
- A Real-World Ethical Analysis of Contingency Measures Enacted for Crisis Standards of Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Standard Racism: Trying to Use “Crisis Standards of Care” in the COVID-19 Pandemic
- The Divided Principle of Justice: Ethical Decision-Making at Surge Capacity
- Addressing a Missing Link in Emergency Preparedness: New Insights on the Ethics of Care in Contingency Conditions from the Minnesota COVID Ethics Collaborative
- Putting the Asymmetry Debate in Its Place
- Justifying Positive Appeals to Conscience: The Debate We Can’t Avoid
- Finding Our Balance in the Asymmetry Debate
- Supporting Real-Time Ethical Deliberation in Contingency Capacity During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Ethically Navigating the Murky Waters of “Contingency Standards of Care”
- Medical Disobedience and the Conscientious Provision of Prohibited Care
- Ethics Frameworks and Beyond—Advancing Our Understanding of the Contingency Phase to Improve Health Care Quality During Public Health Emergencies
- The Wrong Argument for a Bad Law
- Harmful Choices, the Case of C, and Decision-Making Competence
- Pathways to Drug Liberalization: Racial Justice, Public Health, and Human Rights
- The Place of Philosophy in Bioethics Today