- War, Bioethics, and Public Health
- Reestablishing Circulation in Donors: To What Degree Does It Matter?
- Genital Modifications in Prepubescent Minors: When May Clinicians Ethically Proceed?
- Defining Death: Toward a Biological and Ethical Synthesis
- The Social Value Misconception in Clinical Research
- The Uniform Determination of Death Act is Not Changing. Will Physicians Continue to Misdiagnose Brain Death?
- Near Fatal Opioid Overdose: A Paradigm Case Where Principlism Fails
- Should SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination be Required for Heart Transplant Listing
- Responsibility – Crime, and Punishment: Why We Should Not Allocate Intensive Care Based on Vaccination Status
- Priority is Not a Proportional, Fitting, or Fair Return for Vaccination
- The Problematic “Existence” of Digital Twins: Human Intention and Moral Decision
- When “Next of Kin” Isn’t “Who Knows Best”: the Ethics of Choosing a Surrogate Decision Maker
- Ethical Complexities in Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Surrogate Decision Making
- Against a New Wave of Vaccine Apartheid: Reconceptualizing Justice in Vaccine-Sensitive Rationing
- On the Differing Role of Counterexamples in Philosophical Theory and Health Policy
- Predicting Patient Preferences with Artificial Intelligence: The Problem of the Data Source
- The Ethics of Using Vaccination Status as a Rationing Criterion: Luck Egalitarianism and Discrimination
- Dealer’s Choice?: Choosing Among Surrogate Decision Makers with Different Decisions and Knowledge of the Patient
- Can P4 Support Family Involvement and Best Interests in Surrogate Decision-Making?
- Social Coercion, Patient Preferences, and AI-Substituted Judgments
- Is Resource Allocation that is Sensitive to Vaccination Status Coercive? Who Cares?
- Justice Pluralism during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Weighing Patient Preferences: Lessons for a Patient Preferences Predictor
- How to Evaluate an Individual’s Decision Whether to Vaccinate during a Pandemic: Better by a Knowledge Commons than by Luck Egalitarianism
- Who Should Decide When the Patient Can’t: When Ethics and Law Collide
- Respect for Autonomy Requires a Mental Model
- Harm-Prevention Arguments are Easier to Confuse Than to Rebut
- The Personalized Patient Preference Predictor: A Harmful and Misleading Solution Losing Sight of the Problem It Claims to Solve
- Navigating Tensions Between Law and Ethics in Surrogate Decision Making
- Emergency Department Boarding of a Teen Requiring Complex Care: How Should an Ethics Consultant Respond?
- Machine Learning Algorithms in the Personalized Modeling of Incapacitated Patients’ Decision Making—Is It a Viable Concept?
- Artificial Intelligence, Digital Self, and the “Best Interests” Problem
- Adolescent Boarding in the ED: Issues of Autonomy, Nonmaleficence, and Distributive Justice
- Eliminating or Calibrating the Role of Chance? Acute Resource Scarcity as a Challenge for Luck Egalitarianism
- The Patient Preference Predictor: A Timely Boost for Personalized Medicine
- Potentially Perilous Preference Parrots: Why Digital Twins Do Not Respect Patient Autonomy
- Personal but Necessarily Predictive? Developing a Bioethics Research Agenda for AI-Enabled Decision-Making Tools
- Good Ethics Begin With Good Facts—Vaccination Sensitive Strategies for Scarce Resource Allocation Are Impractical as Well as Unethical
- Vexing Vaccine Ethics: Denying ICU Care to Vaccine Refusers
- As an AI Model, I Cannot Replace Human Dialogue Processes. However, I Can Assist You in Identifying Potential Alternatives
- Vaccine-Sensitive Allocation – Another Divide to Divide Us?
- Personalized Patient Preference Predictors Are Neither Technically Feasible nor Ethically Desirable
- Parrots at the Bedside: Making Surrogate Decisions with Stochastic Strangers
- Vaccination-Sensitive Healthcare Rationing: Overlooked Conditions, Translational Ethics, and Climate-Related Challenges
- Navigating the Ethical Dilemmas of Youth Boarding in the Emergency Department: Strategies for Respecting Developing Autonomy While Also Reducing Risk
- Fairly Incorporating Vaccination Status into Scarce Resource Allocation Frameworks
- Is Suffering a Useless Concept?
- NRP: Neither Perfusion nor Regional
- Change the Law to Optimize Organ Donation
- The Challenge of Framing the Discourse of Normothermic Regional Perfusion
- Medicine, Bioethics, and the Search for Truth: Does “Declaring” Death Make It So?
- Distinguishing Ethical from Diagnostic Concerns About NRP-cDCD
- To Procure Organs for Transplantation, Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Brain Death Dislocate Circulation and Brain from an Integrated Concept of Embodied Persons
- The Unified Brain-Based Determination of Death: Conceptual Challenges
- Gerrymandering Circulation: Why NRP is Inconsistent with the Dead Donor Rule
- A Legal Pathway Aligning Law and the Practice of NRP
- A Clarified Interpretation of Permanence Justifies Death Determination in NRP Protocols
- Revivification in ECPR and TA-NRP: A Consideration of Intent and Impact
- New Reasons to Revise the UDDA: Controversies Related to Death by Circulatory-Respiratory Criteria
- Public Opinion of DDR and Public Trust
- Moving Forward With Normothermic Regional Perfusion Amidst Ethical Controversy
- An Ethics Committee’s Evaluation of Normothermic Regional Perfusion (NRP) in 2018–Unsatisfactory Answers Then—and Now
- Normothermic Regional Perfusion, Public Reason, and the Idea of Integrated Organismic Function
- “Essentially as One of Fact to Be Determined by Physicians”: Applying Lessons Learned From Brain Death to Normothermic Regional Perfusion
- Requesting an Autopsy of the Dead Donor Rule: Improving, Not Abandoning, the Guiding Rule in Organ Donation
- “Time Is Brain:” DCDD-NRP Invalidates the Unified Brain-Based Determination of Death
- Restoring the Organism as a Whole: Does NRP Resurrect the Dead?
- The Unified Brain Based Determination of Death and DCCD/NRP: Curb Your Enthusiasm
- Resuscitating the Dead: NRP and Language
- NRP Possibly Violates “Do No Harm” and Is Not Worth Risking the Perception That It Does
- Ethical and Equity Guidance for Transplant Programs Considering Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion (TA-NRP) for Procurement of Hearts
- The Unified Brain-Based Determination of Death Conceptually Justifies Death Determination in DCDD and NRP Protocols
- Health Consequences of an Ideological Perspective on Population Growth in Iran
- Beyond Trade-Offs: Autonomy, Effectiveness, Fairness, and Normativity in Risk and Crisis Communication
- What Are Humans Doing in the Loop? Co-Reasoning and Practical Judgment When Using Machine Learning-Driven Decision Aids
- Bioethicists Today: Results of the Views in Bioethics Survey
- The Hopkins-Oxford Psychedelics Ethics (HOPE) Working Group Consensus Statement
- Should the Use of Adaptive Machine Learning Systems in Medicine be Classified as Research?
- A Surgeon’s Perspective From the Sharp End of Surgical Innovation
- Reopening the ‘Window to the Soul’?: The Ethics of Eye Transplantation Now and in the Future
- Opioid Overdose and Capacity
- From Opioid Overdose to LVAD Refusals: Navigating the Spectrum of Decisional Autonomy
- Disability Bioethics, Social Inclusion, and Whole-Eye Transplantation
- Confidence in Care Instead of Capacity: A Feminist Approach to Opioid Overdose
- The Ethical Challenges of Whole-Eye Transplantation: Is Recipient Informed Consent Enough?
- Why Patients Leave: The Role of Stigma and Discrimination in Decisions to Refuse Post-Overdose Treatment
- An Eye for an Eye?: Problematic Risk–Benefit Trade-Offs in Whole Eye Transplantation
- Autonomy-Based Obligations to Patients in the Emergency Department Following Opioid Overdose
- Capacity, Rationality, and the Promotion of Autonomy: A Trauma-Informed Approach to Refusals of Care After Opioid Poisoning
- Whether Whole Eye Transplant is a Benefit or Harm Depends on More Than the Observer
- Law Enforcement Interventionism as Determinant of Decision-Making Among Resuscitated Opioid Users
- Autonomy, Thin and Thick
- Revive and Survive: A Critical Lens on the Refusal of Care After Opioid Overdose
- Illuminating the Consequentialist Logic of Harm Reduction After Overdose Through a Hypothetical Randomized Trial
- Revive and Respect: Using Structural Competency and Humility to Reframe Discussions of Decision-Making Capacity
- Current Ethical Considerations of Human Whole Eye Transplantation is Short-Sighted
- Resisting Inadequate Care is Not Irrational, and Coercive Treatment is Not an Appropriate Response to the Drug Toxicity Crises
- Ophthalmic Research’s Unique Challenges: Not All First-in-Human Surgeries Are the Same
- Everyone With an Addiction Has Diminished Decision-Making Capacity
- Equitable Participant Selection Concerns for First-In-Human Whole-Eye Transplantation
- Hospitals Are Not Prisons: Decision-Making Capacity, Autonomy, and the Legal Right to Refuse Medical Care, Including Observation
- Ethical Pathways: Transitioning Whole-Eye Transplantation Into Clinical Practice
- Autonomy and Its Constrictive Effects on Our Ethical Lenses and Imaginations
- Putting a Face on WET Recipients
- Establishing and Defining an Approach to Climate Conscious Clinical Medical Ethics
- Cost-Related Non-Adherence to Prescribed Medicines: What Are Physicians’ Moral Duties?
- Language in Bioethics: Beyond the Representational View
- A Justice-Based Defense of a Litmus Test
- Qatar’s Bioethics Meeting
- The Ethics of International Bioethics Conferencing: Continuing the Conversation
- To Swab or Not to Swab: Waiver of Consent to Collect Perianal Specimens from Incapacitated Patients With Severe Burn Injury
- Bioethics’ Duty to Conference in Qatar: Reply to Magnus
- Think Like a Journalist and Act as a Risk and Crisis Communicator in the Context of Public Health Emergencies
- Collaborations Beyond Conferencing: Exploring Broader Applications of the Anti-Discriminatory, Global, and Inclusive Framework
- Two Models of Bioethics
- The Right Way to Approach Conference Site Selection
- Ethics of Conferencing
- Ethical Tradeoffs in Public Health Emergency Crisis Communication
- The Overlooked Risk of Intimate Violation in Research: No Perianal Sampling Without Consent
- Optimizing the PHERCC Matrix for Risk Communication: Integrating Action-Guiding Models for Enhanced Accessibility and Applicability
- The Ethics of Ethics Conferences: Enhancing Further Transparency
- Ethical Justifications for Waiving Informed Consent for a Perianal Swab in Critical Burn Care Research
- Using the PHERCC Matrix to Define Essential Workers During Public Health Emergencies
- Re-thinking the Ethics of International Bioethics Conferencing
- Thanks IAB, for Caring about Our Planet and Health!
- The International Association of Bioethics Failed Its Rosa Parks Moment
- Zooming in on Justice: The Case for Virtual Bioethics Conferencing
- Green Conferencing, Justice and the “Global South”
- Community Perspectives Are Essential to Assess Risk in Emergent Care Research
- Interrogating Sites of Knowledge Production: The Role of Journals, Institutions, and Professional Societies in Advancing Epistemic Justice in Bioethics
- I’m Not Welcome There: Why I Am Not Attending IAB 2024
- Challenges of Bioethics Frameworks for Non-Democratic Contexts
- International Bioethics Conferencing: “Can the Subaltern Speak?”
- Health and Data Equity in Public Health Emergency Risk and Crisis Communication (PHERCC)
- Synergies in Risk Communication: Integrating Ethical Frameworks and Behavioral Economics in Public Health Emergencies
- Separating the Signal from the Noise in Public Health Messaging: The UK’s COVID-19 Experience
- Standing for Democracy – Bioethics Conferences and Totalitarian Regimens
- Making Ethical Considerations Transparent in the Formulation of Public Health Guidance
- Respect for Persons Is Not Always About Consent: The Importance of Context
- Invisible: People with Disability and (In)equity in Precision Medicine Research
- Addressing Environmental Injustices Requires a Public Health Ethics and/or Human Rights Perspective
- Promising Practices for Inclusive Precision Medicine Research and the Contribution to Public and Population Health
- Moving to Equity in the All of Us Research Program
- Beyond Advocacy: Human Health, the Environment, and Tradeoff Ethics
- Environmental Injustices within Us: The Case of the Human Microbiome and the Need for More Creative Bioethics
- Advocating for a Context Specific Approach to Tackle Inequities
- “All from us” or “All with us”: Addressing Precision Medicine Inequities Requires Inclusion of Intersectionally Minoritized Populations as Partners and Project Leaders
- The Kids Are Not Alright: The Mental Health Toll of Environmental Injustice
- For Bioethics to Center Justice, We Must Reconsider Funding, Training, and the Taxonomy of Bioethics
- From “Inclusion in What” to “Equity in What”: (Re)Thinking the Question of In/Equity in Precision Medicine and Health
- Environmental Justice for Whom?
- Precision Public Health Equity: Another Utopian Mirage?
- Environmental Justice in and of Healthcare
- Environmental Justice: A Missing Core Tenet of Global Health
- Bioethics Interested in Environmental Justice Should First and Foremost Criticize Capitalism
- The Ethical Implications of Environmental Racism: Considerations for Advancing Health Equity
- What Do Rights Have to Do with It?
- Environmental Injustice: Is Bioethics Part of the Solution?
- No Elder Left Behind: The Role of Environmental Justice in Geriatrics and Palliative Care
- Is the Right to a Healthy Environment Enough? Reckoning with a History of Failures in Chemical Valley
- Overcoming Barriers to Health Equity in Precision Medicine Research
- Conflicts of Integrity: Research Ethics Practice and Environmental Justice
- Downstream Exclusion in Rural Rare Disease Precision Medicine Research
- Challenges for Environmental Justice Under Bioethical Principlism
- Implementing Environmental Considerations into HRSA’s Medically Underserved Area Designation
- Missing the “We” in Precision Medicine
- Unhealthy Environments Are a Problem of Structural Injustice
- The Urgent Need for Health Data Justice in Precision Medicine
- Environmental Justice: More Hard Work yet to Be Done
- “Precision Medicine” Is Genomic Medicine
- Do Medically Underserved Individuals Benefit from Participating in All of Us?
- Global Environmental Justice and Bioethics: Overcoming Beneficence and Individual Responsibility
- Medical Sanctions Against Russia: Arresting Aggression or Abrogating Healthcare Rights?
- We Are Not Okay: Moral Injury and a World on Fire
- AUTOGEN and the Ethics of Co-Creation with Personalized LLMs—Reply to the Commentaries
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethical Responsibilities for Companies That Process Personal Data”
- A Different Slippery Slope
- The Tip of the Iceberg—Obstetrical Management and Pregnancy Rights
- Chemical Restraints for Obstetric Violence: Anesthesiology Professionals, Moral Courage, and the Prevention of Forced and Coerced Surgeries
- Return of Results in Digital Phenotyping: Ethical Considerations for Real-World Use Cases
- Clarifying the Philosophical and Legal Foundations of Dobbs
- Bodily Autonomy & the Patient’s Right to Refuse Medical Care
- Dobbs and Rights during Ongoing Pregnancy: Connecting the Dots
- The Contested Future of Patient Autonomy and Fetal Personhood
- Psychiatry, Ethics, and Digital Phenotyping: Moral Challenges and Considerations for Returning Mental Health Research Results to College Students
- Respecting the Value-Laden Nature of Participant Preferences: AI, Digital Phenotyping, and Psychiatry
- Reproductive Justice and Abolition: Important Lessons Black Feminists Have Been Teaching Us for Years
- Patient Agency without Provider Agony: The Need to Address Clinician Moral Distress in Advancing the Rights of Pregnant Persons
- Prescribing Teratogenic Medications Post-Dobbs
- Incorporating Research Burden and Utility Considerations as Limiting Factors in a Framework for Returning IRR
- What Bioethics Owes Reproductive Justice
- If You Are in the Chart, You Help Chart the Course
- From the Front Lines: The Need for Stakeholder Coalitions in Preserving Reproductive Autonomy
- Duty of Care toward Fetuses and the Limits of Maternal Rights to Refusal
- The Right to Refuse Obstetrical Interventions: In Principle, in Practice
- Balancing the Double-Edged Implications of AI in Psychiatric Digital Phenotyping
- The Right to Refusal of Unwanted End-of-Life Interventions for Pregnant Persons: Additional Challenges to Reproductive Rights Post-Roe
- Personalized Roadmaps for Returning Results From Digital Phenotyping
- Reproductive Intrusions: Evidence and Ethics
- Fetal Personhood and the Boundless Responsibilities of Pregnant Persons
- Contending with Real and Perceived Intrusiveness in Digital Phenotyping Research
- When the Right to Abortion is Banned, Can Pregnant Patients Count on Having Any Rights?
- More than a Modus Vivendi: Personhood and Hard Cases
- Navigating the Ethical Maze in Digital Health Research
- Dobbs Opened the Door; Alito Left It Open Wider than His Own Jurisprudence Should Have Allowed
- Making a Case for Appropriate and Humane Treatment of Hamas Belligerents in Israel
- Potential Iatrogenic Effects of Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry
- Parents Have a Right to Refuse Brain Death Testing, Including Apnea Testing
- Vulnerable Patients, Adult Protective Services Investigations, and Reticent Surrogates: What is the Role of Clinical Ethics?
- Putting a Pronouncement about Personhood into Perspective
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries Re: Medicolegal Challenges to Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United Kingdom and USA
- The Brain Death Criterion in Light of Value-Based Disagreement Versus Biomedical Uncertainty
- Parents Don’t Know Best in the United Kingdom
- For Analytics Beyond “Personhood,” Bioethics Should Look Toward Science and Technology Studies (STS)
- The End of Personification: The Mereological Fallacy in Science Communication on Brain Organoids
- No Country for Old Laws: Why the Effort to Revise the UDDA Reveals the Social Weakness of Medicine in the US
- Bioethics Should Not Be Constrained by Linguistic Oddness or Social Offense
- Personhood Is Still Useful, but Not for Everything
- “Please, Don’t Make Me Do This”: The Role of the Ethics Consultant in Responding to and Mitigating Moral Distress
- Defining and Defending Personhood: Lessons from the Disease Debate
- Ethical Issues in Death by Neurologic Criteria Require Critical Scrutiny: Lack of Engagement with Sound Arguments to Save Medical Dogma
- Personhood and the Debate about the Beginning and End of Life
- Applying the Harm Principle to Elder Care
- A Failure to Care or a Failure to Communicate? Exploring Concerns about Decision Maker Suitability
- Re-Framing Moral Distress to Benefit Both Patient and Caregiver
- Personhood and the Public’s Definitions of a Human
- Responding to a Nurse’s Perceived Moral Distress Prompting an Ethics Consultation Request
- The Advantages of the Higher Brain Criterion for Determining Death
- Beyond Personhood: Ethical Paradigms in the Generative Artificial Intelligence Era
- Personhood and the Importance of Philosophical Clarity
- Interests and Choices in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria
- Time for Bioethics to End Talk of Personhood (But Only in the Philosophers’ Sense)
- Protection through Partnering: Applying Social Work Theory to Clinical Ethics in a Case of Suspected Abuse
- A Qualified Defense of Personhood in Bioethics
- Personhood Beyond the West
- Beyond the Personhood: An In-Depth Analysis of Moral Considerations in Human Brain Organoid Research
- Time for Federal Standards on Death Determination: The National Determination of Death Act
- The Concept and Conceptions of Personhood: The Fallacy of Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby’s Argument
- Language and Terminology in Discussions of Moral Status
- The End of Personhood Seems to Be Greatly Exaggerated
- Even Offense Can Be a ‘Normatively Substantive Problem’ in Bioethics: Specificity and Relationality as Alternatives to ‘Personhood’
- The Ends of Personhood
- Reconceptualizing Personhood in Bioethics and Law: A Spectrum-Based Approach
- Prospects for Engineering Personhood
- Consent, Consultation, or Authorization Is Required for DNC Testing in the UK
- Brainstem Death Is Dead. Long Live Brainstem Death!
- Medicolegal Challenges to Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United Kingdom and the United States: Lessons Learned from the Case of Archie Battersbee and a Suggestion for Mid-Level Principles to Enhance an Ongoing Dialogue
- The End of (Lockean-Kantian) Personhood
- Rethinking Personhood through the Lens of Life Forms, Communality, and Moral Agency
- Looking Back and Forward: Relational African Bioethics and Why Personhood is Not Dead
- The Richness of Personhood
- Moral Distress and the Marginalization of Nurses
- By Statute or by Common Law? The Legal Determination of Death
- The Brainstem Criterion of Death and Accurate Syndromic Diagnosis
- A Personalized Patient Preference Predictor for Substituted Judgments in Healthcare: Technically Feasible and Ethically Desirable
- Informed Consent Under Ignorance
- First-in-Human Whole-Eye Transplantation: Ensuring an Ethical Approach to Surgical Innovation
- Which Benefits Can Justify Risks in Research?
- Conscientious Objection to Aggressive Interventions for Patients in a Vegetative State
- Inclusion by Invitation Only? Public Engagement beyond Deliberation in the Governance of Innovative Biotechnology
- Virtue Ethics and the Spheres of Morality Framework
- It Takes Two to Tango: Fostering Engagement Within Citizen Juries
- What Kind of Popular Participation Does Bioethics Need? Clarifying the Ends of Public Engagement through Randomly Selected Mini-Publics
- Disentangling Normativity and Ethics
- Varieties of Citizen Engagement in Deliberation about Biotechnology
- Goldilocks and the Thanatron: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries
- What Is a Physician? Navigating Incommensurable Spheres of Role Morality
- Against the Equality of Moral Spheres in Healthcare
- Public Engagement with Human Germline Editing Requires Specification
- A Decolonial Critique to the Spheres of Morality in the Medical Profession
- Beyond Incommensurability and Appropriateness: Integrating the Telos of Medicine and Addressing Compartmentalization in the Spheres of Morality Framework
- Use Dignity, Not Its Parasites or Offspring
- In Defense of Expert Knowledge in Bioethical Discussions on Human Genome Editing
- There Is Only One Sphere of Morality
- Spheres of Morality: Is There a Point?
- Competing Duties and Professional Roles
- Physicians’ Professional Role in Clinical Care: AI as a Change Agent
- Not All Publics Are the Same—A Note on Power, Diversity, and Lived Expertise in Public Deliberation
- An Opportunity to Reconsider Fiduciary Framing in Medicine
- We Need Role Fidelity and Integrity to Avoid Moral Compartmentalization, Not Sphere or Role Moralities
- Occupying Multiple Practical Identities instead of Moving between the Moral Spheres: An Alternative Perspective on Physicians’ Professional Ethics
- Ethics at the Edges: Normative Considerations When Spheres of Morality Overlap
- Intersecting Moral Spheres, and the Ethical Structures and Functional Roles of Military Medicine: Frameworks in—and for—Reciprocal Rectitude
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries”
- Circumscribing Morality: The Spheres and Their Limits
- Consideration and Disclosure of Group Risks in Genomics and Other Data-Centric Research: Does the Common Rule Need Revision?
- Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees
- Agent-Regret in Healthcare
- Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency
- Translating Commercial Health Data Privacy Ethics into Change
- Aid in Dying in Canada and the United States: Are U.S. States Too Cautious?
- To the Editor
- A Disabled Bioethicist’s Critique of Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID)
- Canadian Medical Assistance in Dying and the Hegemony of Privilege
- The Ethical Data Practices Framework and Its Implications for Data Privacy Relations between the United States and the European Union
- The Limits of a Voluntary Framework in an Unethical Data Ecosystem
- No Means No: Respecting Dignity as the Fourth Principle of Ethical Data Extraction
- Canada Welcomes Tundra’s Immortality Project to Prevent Death (Wall Street Journal, July 13, 2060, p. D1, “Travel and Leisure” Section)
- Comparisons Only Yield Valid Mutual Learnings If Based on Accurate Descriptions of the Comparators
- Different MAiD Laws, Different MAiD Outcomes: Expected Rather Than “Disturbing”
- Of Slopes and Ropes: Learning from the Diversity of European Regulations of Assisted Dying
- The Urgent Need for a U.S. Data Protection Agency
- Empowering Queer Data Justice
- Care to Ease the Slope? Differences in Canadian and Californian Medical Assistance in Dying Laws
- Computational Ethics Tools to Audit Corporate Self-Governance in Data Processing
- A Slippery Argument: Ableism in the Debate on Medical Assistance in Dying
- Responsible Processing and Sharing of Genomic Data: Bringing Health Technologies Industries to the Table
- Top Ten New and Needed Expansions of U.S. Medical Aid in Dying Laws
- When Death Becomes Therapy: Canada’s Troubling Normalization of Health Care Provider Ending of Life
- Strategies for Data Ethics Governance: Elevating Patient and Community Perspectives
- Beyond Individual Rights: How Data Solidarity Gives People Meaningful Control over Data
- Applying the Ethical Data Practices Framework to Digital Therapeutics
- It is Time to Shift from a Rights-Based Approach to a Common Good Approach in the Era of Big Data
- Medical Assistance in Dying: Going beyond the Numbers
- The Slippery Slope Argument and Assisted Death: Which Approach to MAiD Does It Really Support?
- How a US Federal Privacy Law Covering Digital Health Services Can Put Autonomy Back into the Hands of the Patient
- Ethics of Love for End-of-Life Care: Beyond Autonomy and Efficiency
- Blockchain Technology for Ethical Data Practices: Decentralized Biobanking Pilot Study
- What’s Wrong with Medicalization?
- Digital Privacy and Data Protection: From Ethical Principles to Action
- The Quest for Humane Termination of Intractable Suffering May Be an Uphill Struggle, Not a Downhill Slide on a Slippery Slope
- Daryl Pullman on the Slippery Slope of MAID: Simple, Neat, and Wrong
- The Two Front War on Reproductive Rights—When the Right to Abortion is Banned, Can the Right to Refuse Obstetrical Interventions Be Far behind?
- Ancillary Care Obligations of Clinical Trial Investigators in the COVID-19 Pandemic
- The Epistemological Danger of Large Language Models
- ChatGPT’s Relevance for Bioethics: A Novel Challenge to the Intrinsically Relational, Critical, and Reason-Giving Aspect of Healthcare
- The Artificial Third: Utilizing ChatGPT in Mental Health
- What We Owe Those Who Chat Woe: A Relational Lens for Mental Health Apps
- Ethical Vaccine Recommendations in the Context of Tenuous Data: Honesty is the Best Policy
- Meaning by Courtesy: LLM-Generated Texts and the Illusion of Content
- Social Value, Beneficial Information, and Obligations to Participants in a Trial of Novel COVID-19 Vaccines
- Generative AI and the Foregrounding of Epistemic Injustice in Bioethics
- Researcher Obligations to Participants in Novel COVID-19 Vaccine Research
- Informed Consent for Clinician-AI Collaboration and Patient Data Sharing: Substantive, Illusory, or Both
- Publish with AUTOGEN or Perish? Some Pitfalls to Avoid in the Pursuit of Academic Enhancement via Personalized Large Language Models
- The Ouroboros Threat
- Large Language Models and Inclusivity in Bioethics Scholarship
- Why ChatGPT Means Communication Ethics Problems for Bioethics
- ChatGPT and the Law of the Horse
- China’s New Regulations on Generative AI: Implications for Bioethics
- The Impact of AUTOGEN and Similar Fine-Tuned Large Language Models on the Integrity of Scholarly Writing
- Generative AI and Ethical Analysis
- How Can Large Language Models Support the Acquisition of Ethical Competencies in Healthcare?
- Is Academic Enhancement Possible by Means of Generative AI-Based Digital Twins?
- AI Can Show You the World
- Unreliable LLM Bioethics Assistants: Ethical and Pedagogical Risks
- Why Personalized Large Language Models Fail to Do What Ethics is All About
- Moving from Models to Responsible AI as a Moat
- The Hidden Costs of ChatGPT: A Call for Greater Transparency
- Generative-AI-Generated Challenges for Health Data Research
- ChatGPT’s Responses to Dilemmas in Medical Ethics: The Devil is in the Details
- Large Language Models and Biorisk
- The Importance of Understanding Language in Large Language Models
- “Large Language Models” Do Much More than Just Language: Some Bioethical Implications of Multi-Modal AI
- Clinicians Doing Research Should Use Their Clinical Expertise to Help Study Participants
- Reimagining Scholarship: A Response to the Ethical Concerns of AUTOGEN
- Machines Like Me: 4 Corollaries for Responsible Use of AI in the Bioethics Classroom
- Generative AI, Specific Moral Values: A Closer Look at ChatGPT’s New Ethical Implications for Medical AI
- Academic and Private Partnership to Improve Informed Consent Forms Using a Data Driven Approach
- Reasons and Reproduction: Gene Editing and Genetic Selection
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Do Clinicians Have a Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Clinical Trials?”
- When Anti-Discrimination Discriminates
- Digital Simulacra, Bias, and Self-Reinforcing Exclusion Cycles
- Health Digital Twins, Legal Liability, and Medical Practice
- Should We be More Worried about Digital Simulacra in Healthcare Being Our “Caricatures,” Rather than Our “Replicas”?
- What Does True Equality in Assisted Dying Require?
- Value of and Value in Language: Ethics and Semantics in Physician-Assisted Suicide Laws
- MAID in America: Expanding Our Gaze on the Ethics of Assistance
- Acknowledging Complexity and Reimagining IRBs: A Reply to Discussions of the Protection–Inclusion Dilemma
- Current Medical Aid-in-Dying Laws Discriminate against Individuals with Disabilities
- Integrating Social Determinants of Health into Ethical Digital Simulations
- Digital Simulacra and the Call for Epistemic Responsibility: An Ubuntu Perspective
- Aid in Dying Unaided?
- Epistemic Value of Digital Simulacra for Patients
- Permit Assisted Self-Administration: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries on Neurologic Diseases and Medical Aid in Dying: Aid-in-Dying Laws Create an Underclass of Patients Based on Disability
- Accommodating Aid-in-Dying Safeguards for Patients with Neurologic Disease
- Care Depersonalized: The Risk of Infocratic “Personalised” Care and a Posthuman Dystopia
- Beyond Words: Reconsidering the Moral Distinction of Action in Consent for Assisted Dying
- Enabling the Nonhypothesis-Driven Approach: On Data Minimalization, Bias, and the Integration of Data Science in Medical Research and Practice
- Distinguishing “Reasonable Accommodation” From Physical Assistance in Aid-in-Dying
- Digital Simulacra: Circumventing Diversity and Inclusion
- Preventing the Slide down the Slippery Slope from Assisted Suicide to Euthanasia While Protecting the Rights of People with Disabilities Who Are “Not Dead Yet.”
- The Importance of Self-Administration of Aid-in-Dying Medication
- Can People Work Together to Create a Self-Administered Act? No. Should They Work Together to Repeal the End of Life Option Act? Yes
- In Their Own Image: Ethical Implications of the Rise of Digital Twins/Clones/Simulacra in Healthcare
- AI-Based Medical Solutions Can Threaten Physicians’ Ethical Obligations Only If Allowed to Do So
- Individuals and (Synthetic) Data Points: Using Value-Sensitive Design to Foster Ethical Deliberations on Epistemic Transitions
- Ethics, First
- Digital Simulacra Mark an Ontological Shift in Biomedicine with Far-Reaching Consequences for Real Patients
- Proposed Principles for International Bioethics Conferencing: Anti-Discriminatory, Global, and Inclusive
- When Treatment Pressures Become Coercive: A Context-Sensitive Model of Informal Coercion in Mental Healthcare