- A Surgeon’s Perspective From the Sharp End of Surgical Innovation
- Reopening the ‘Window to the Soul’?: The Ethics of Eye Transplantation Now and in the Future
- Opioid Overdose and Capacity
- From Opioid Overdose to LVAD Refusals: Navigating the Spectrum of Decisional Autonomy
- Disability Bioethics, Social Inclusion, and Whole-Eye Transplantation
- Confidence in Care Instead of Capacity: A Feminist Approach to Opioid Overdose
- The Ethical Challenges of Whole-Eye Transplantation: Is Recipient Informed Consent Enough?
- Why Patients Leave: The Role of Stigma and Discrimination in Decisions to Refuse Post-Overdose Treatment
- An Eye for an Eye?: Problematic Risk–Benefit Trade-Offs in Whole Eye Transplantation
- Autonomy-Based Obligations to Patients in the Emergency Department Following Opioid Overdose
- Capacity, Rationality, and the Promotion of Autonomy: A Trauma-Informed Approach to Refusals of Care After Opioid Poisoning
- Whether Whole Eye Transplant is a Benefit or Harm Depends on More Than the Observer
- Law Enforcement Interventionism as Determinant of Decision-Making Among Resuscitated Opioid Users
- Autonomy, Thin and Thick
- Revive and Survive: A Critical Lens on the Refusal of Care After Opioid Overdose
- Illuminating the Consequentialist Logic of Harm Reduction After Overdose Through a Hypothetical Randomized Trial
- Revive and Respect: Using Structural Competency and Humility to Reframe Discussions of Decision-Making Capacity
- Current Ethical Considerations of Human Whole Eye Transplantation is Short-Sighted
- Resisting Inadequate Care is Not Irrational, and Coercive Treatment is Not an Appropriate Response to the Drug Toxicity Crises
- Ophthalmic Research’s Unique Challenges: Not All First-in-Human Surgeries Are the Same
- Everyone With an Addiction Has Diminished Decision-Making Capacity
- Equitable Participant Selection Concerns for First-In-Human Whole-Eye Transplantation
- Hospitals Are Not Prisons: Decision-Making Capacity, Autonomy, and the Legal Right to Refuse Medical Care, Including Observation
- Ethical Pathways: Transitioning Whole-Eye Transplantation Into Clinical Practice
- Autonomy and Its Constrictive Effects on Our Ethical Lenses and Imaginations
- Putting a Face on WET Recipients
- Establishing and Defining an Approach to Climate Conscious Clinical Medical Ethics
- Cost-Related Non-Adherence to Prescribed Medicines: What Are Physicians’ Moral Duties?
- Language in Bioethics: Beyond the Representational View
- A Justice-Based Defense of a Litmus Test
- Qatar’s Bioethics Meeting
- The Ethics of International Bioethics Conferencing: Continuing the Conversation
- To Swab or Not to Swab: Waiver of Consent to Collect Perianal Specimens from Incapacitated Patients With Severe Burn Injury
- Bioethics’ Duty to Conference in Qatar: Reply to Magnus
- Think Like a Journalist and Act as a Risk and Crisis Communicator in the Context of Public Health Emergencies
- Collaborations Beyond Conferencing: Exploring Broader Applications of the Anti-Discriminatory, Global, and Inclusive Framework
- Two Models of Bioethics
- The Right Way to Approach Conference Site Selection
- Ethics of Conferencing
- Ethical Tradeoffs in Public Health Emergency Crisis Communication
- The Overlooked Risk of Intimate Violation in Research: No Perianal Sampling Without Consent
- Optimizing the PHERCC Matrix for Risk Communication: Integrating Action-Guiding Models for Enhanced Accessibility and Applicability
- The Ethics of Ethics Conferences: Enhancing Further Transparency
- Ethical Justifications for Waiving Informed Consent for a Perianal Swab in Critical Burn Care Research
- Using the PHERCC Matrix to Define Essential Workers During Public Health Emergencies
- Re-thinking the Ethics of International Bioethics Conferencing
- Thanks IAB, for Caring about Our Planet and Health!
- The International Association of Bioethics Failed Its Rosa Parks Moment
- Zooming in on Justice: The Case for Virtual Bioethics Conferencing
- Green Conferencing, Justice and the “Global South”
- Community Perspectives Are Essential to Assess Risk in Emergent Care Research
- Interrogating Sites of Knowledge Production: The Role of Journals, Institutions, and Professional Societies in Advancing Epistemic Justice in Bioethics
- I’m Not Welcome There: Why I Am Not Attending IAB 2024
- Challenges of Bioethics Frameworks for Non-Democratic Contexts
- International Bioethics Conferencing: “Can the Subaltern Speak?”
- Health and Data Equity in Public Health Emergency Risk and Crisis Communication (PHERCC)
- Synergies in Risk Communication: Integrating Ethical Frameworks and Behavioral Economics in Public Health Emergencies
- Separating the Signal from the Noise in Public Health Messaging: The UK’s COVID-19 Experience
- Standing for Democracy – Bioethics Conferences and Totalitarian Regimens
- Making Ethical Considerations Transparent in the Formulation of Public Health Guidance
- Respect for Persons Is Not Always About Consent: The Importance of Context
- Invisible: People with Disability and (In)equity in Precision Medicine Research
- Addressing Environmental Injustices Requires a Public Health Ethics and/or Human Rights Perspective
- Promising Practices for Inclusive Precision Medicine Research and the Contribution to Public and Population Health
- Moving to Equity in the All of Us Research Program
- Beyond Advocacy: Human Health, the Environment, and Tradeoff Ethics
- Environmental Injustices within Us: The Case of the Human Microbiome and the Need for More Creative Bioethics
- Advocating for a Context Specific Approach to Tackle Inequities
- “All from us” or “All with us”: Addressing Precision Medicine Inequities Requires Inclusion of Intersectionally Minoritized Populations as Partners and Project Leaders
- The Kids Are Not Alright: The Mental Health Toll of Environmental Injustice
- For Bioethics to Center Justice, We Must Reconsider Funding, Training, and the Taxonomy of Bioethics
- From “Inclusion in What” to “Equity in What”: (Re)Thinking the Question of In/Equity in Precision Medicine and Health
- Environmental Justice for Whom?
- Precision Public Health Equity: Another Utopian Mirage?
- Environmental Justice in and of Healthcare
- Environmental Justice: A Missing Core Tenet of Global Health
- Bioethics Interested in Environmental Justice Should First and Foremost Criticize Capitalism
- The Ethical Implications of Environmental Racism: Considerations for Advancing Health Equity
- What Do Rights Have to Do with It?
- Environmental Injustice: Is Bioethics Part of the Solution?
- No Elder Left Behind: The Role of Environmental Justice in Geriatrics and Palliative Care
- Is the Right to a Healthy Environment Enough? Reckoning with a History of Failures in Chemical Valley
- Overcoming Barriers to Health Equity in Precision Medicine Research
- Conflicts of Integrity: Research Ethics Practice and Environmental Justice
- Downstream Exclusion in Rural Rare Disease Precision Medicine Research
- Challenges for Environmental Justice Under Bioethical Principlism
- Implementing Environmental Considerations into HRSA’s Medically Underserved Area Designation
- Missing the “We” in Precision Medicine
- Unhealthy Environments Are a Problem of Structural Injustice
- The Urgent Need for Health Data Justice in Precision Medicine
- Environmental Justice: More Hard Work yet to Be Done
- “Precision Medicine” Is Genomic Medicine
- Do Medically Underserved Individuals Benefit from Participating in All of Us?
- Global Environmental Justice and Bioethics: Overcoming Beneficence and Individual Responsibility
- Medical Sanctions Against Russia: Arresting Aggression or Abrogating Healthcare Rights?
- We Are Not Okay: Moral Injury and a World on Fire
- AUTOGEN and the Ethics of Co-Creation with Personalized LLMs—Reply to the Commentaries
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethical Responsibilities for Companies That Process Personal Data”
- A Different Slippery Slope
- The Tip of the Iceberg—Obstetrical Management and Pregnancy Rights
- Chemical Restraints for Obstetric Violence: Anesthesiology Professionals, Moral Courage, and the Prevention of Forced and Coerced Surgeries
- Return of Results in Digital Phenotyping: Ethical Considerations for Real-World Use Cases
- Clarifying the Philosophical and Legal Foundations of Dobbs
- Bodily Autonomy & the Patient’s Right to Refuse Medical Care
- Dobbs and Rights during Ongoing Pregnancy: Connecting the Dots
- The Contested Future of Patient Autonomy and Fetal Personhood
- Psychiatry, Ethics, and Digital Phenotyping: Moral Challenges and Considerations for Returning Mental Health Research Results to College Students
- Respecting the Value-Laden Nature of Participant Preferences: AI, Digital Phenotyping, and Psychiatry
- Reproductive Justice and Abolition: Important Lessons Black Feminists Have Been Teaching Us for Years
- Patient Agency without Provider Agony: The Need to Address Clinician Moral Distress in Advancing the Rights of Pregnant Persons
- Prescribing Teratogenic Medications Post-Dobbs
- Incorporating Research Burden and Utility Considerations as Limiting Factors in a Framework for Returning IRR
- What Bioethics Owes Reproductive Justice
- If You Are in the Chart, You Help Chart the Course
- From the Front Lines: The Need for Stakeholder Coalitions in Preserving Reproductive Autonomy
- Duty of Care toward Fetuses and the Limits of Maternal Rights to Refusal
- The Right to Refuse Obstetrical Interventions: In Principle, in Practice
- Balancing the Double-Edged Implications of AI in Psychiatric Digital Phenotyping
- The Right to Refusal of Unwanted End-of-Life Interventions for Pregnant Persons: Additional Challenges to Reproductive Rights Post-Roe
- Personalized Roadmaps for Returning Results From Digital Phenotyping
- Reproductive Intrusions: Evidence and Ethics
- Fetal Personhood and the Boundless Responsibilities of Pregnant Persons
- Contending with Real and Perceived Intrusiveness in Digital Phenotyping Research
- When the Right to Abortion is Banned, Can Pregnant Patients Count on Having Any Rights?
- More than a Modus Vivendi: Personhood and Hard Cases
- Navigating the Ethical Maze in Digital Health Research
- Dobbs Opened the Door; Alito Left It Open Wider than His Own Jurisprudence Should Have Allowed
- Making a Case for Appropriate and Humane Treatment of Hamas Belligerents in Israel
- Potential Iatrogenic Effects of Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry
- Parents Have a Right to Refuse Brain Death Testing, Including Apnea Testing
- Vulnerable Patients, Adult Protective Services Investigations, and Reticent Surrogates: What is the Role of Clinical Ethics?
- Putting a Pronouncement about Personhood into Perspective
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries Re: Medicolegal Challenges to Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United Kingdom and USA
- The Brain Death Criterion in Light of Value-Based Disagreement Versus Biomedical Uncertainty
- Parents Don’t Know Best in the United Kingdom
- For Analytics Beyond “Personhood,” Bioethics Should Look Toward Science and Technology Studies (STS)
- The End of Personification: The Mereological Fallacy in Science Communication on Brain Organoids
- No Country for Old Laws: Why the Effort to Revise the UDDA Reveals the Social Weakness of Medicine in the US
- Bioethics Should Not Be Constrained by Linguistic Oddness or Social Offense
- Personhood Is Still Useful, but Not for Everything
- “Please, Don’t Make Me Do This”: The Role of the Ethics Consultant in Responding to and Mitigating Moral Distress
- Defining and Defending Personhood: Lessons from the Disease Debate
- Ethical Issues in Death by Neurologic Criteria Require Critical Scrutiny: Lack of Engagement with Sound Arguments to Save Medical Dogma
- Personhood and the Debate about the Beginning and End of Life
- Applying the Harm Principle to Elder Care
- A Failure to Care or a Failure to Communicate? Exploring Concerns about Decision Maker Suitability
- Re-Framing Moral Distress to Benefit Both Patient and Caregiver
- Personhood and the Public’s Definitions of a Human
- Responding to a Nurse’s Perceived Moral Distress Prompting an Ethics Consultation Request
- The Advantages of the Higher Brain Criterion for Determining Death
- Beyond Personhood: Ethical Paradigms in the Generative Artificial Intelligence Era
- Personhood and the Importance of Philosophical Clarity
- Interests and Choices in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria
- Time for Bioethics to End Talk of Personhood (But Only in the Philosophers’ Sense)
- Protection through Partnering: Applying Social Work Theory to Clinical Ethics in a Case of Suspected Abuse
- A Qualified Defense of Personhood in Bioethics
- Personhood Beyond the West
- Beyond the Personhood: An In-Depth Analysis of Moral Considerations in Human Brain Organoid Research
- Time for Federal Standards on Death Determination: The National Determination of Death Act
- The Concept and Conceptions of Personhood: The Fallacy of Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby’s Argument
- Language and Terminology in Discussions of Moral Status
- The End of Personhood Seems to Be Greatly Exaggerated
- Even Offense Can Be a ‘Normatively Substantive Problem’ in Bioethics: Specificity and Relationality as Alternatives to ‘Personhood’
- The Ends of Personhood
- Reconceptualizing Personhood in Bioethics and Law: A Spectrum-Based Approach
- Prospects for Engineering Personhood
- Consent, Consultation, or Authorization Is Required for DNC Testing in the UK
- Brainstem Death Is Dead. Long Live Brainstem Death!
- Medicolegal Challenges to Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United Kingdom and the United States: Lessons Learned from the Case of Archie Battersbee and a Suggestion for Mid-Level Principles to Enhance an Ongoing Dialogue
- The End of (Lockean-Kantian) Personhood
- Rethinking Personhood through the Lens of Life Forms, Communality, and Moral Agency
- Looking Back and Forward: Relational African Bioethics and Why Personhood is Not Dead
- The Richness of Personhood
- Moral Distress and the Marginalization of Nurses
- By Statute or by Common Law? The Legal Determination of Death
- The Brainstem Criterion of Death and Accurate Syndromic Diagnosis
- A Personalized Patient Preference Predictor for Substituted Judgments in Healthcare: Technically Feasible and Ethically Desirable
- Informed Consent Under Ignorance
- First-in-Human Whole-Eye Transplantation: Ensuring an Ethical Approach to Surgical Innovation
- Which Benefits Can Justify Risks in Research?
- Conscientious Objection to Aggressive Interventions for Patients in a Vegetative State
- Inclusion by Invitation Only? Public Engagement beyond Deliberation in the Governance of Innovative Biotechnology
- Virtue Ethics and the Spheres of Morality Framework
- It Takes Two to Tango: Fostering Engagement Within Citizen Juries
- What Kind of Popular Participation Does Bioethics Need? Clarifying the Ends of Public Engagement through Randomly Selected Mini-Publics
- Disentangling Normativity and Ethics
- Varieties of Citizen Engagement in Deliberation about Biotechnology
- Goldilocks and the Thanatron: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries
- What Is a Physician? Navigating Incommensurable Spheres of Role Morality
- Against the Equality of Moral Spheres in Healthcare
- Public Engagement with Human Germline Editing Requires Specification
- A Decolonial Critique to the Spheres of Morality in the Medical Profession
- Beyond Incommensurability and Appropriateness: Integrating the Telos of Medicine and Addressing Compartmentalization in the Spheres of Morality Framework
- Use Dignity, Not Its Parasites or Offspring
- In Defense of Expert Knowledge in Bioethical Discussions on Human Genome Editing
- There Is Only One Sphere of Morality
- Spheres of Morality: Is There a Point?
- Competing Duties and Professional Roles
- Physicians’ Professional Role in Clinical Care: AI as a Change Agent
- Not All Publics Are the Same—A Note on Power, Diversity, and Lived Expertise in Public Deliberation
- An Opportunity to Reconsider Fiduciary Framing in Medicine
- We Need Role Fidelity and Integrity to Avoid Moral Compartmentalization, Not Sphere or Role Moralities
- Occupying Multiple Practical Identities instead of Moving between the Moral Spheres: An Alternative Perspective on Physicians’ Professional Ethics
- Ethics at the Edges: Normative Considerations When Spheres of Morality Overlap
- Intersecting Moral Spheres, and the Ethical Structures and Functional Roles of Military Medicine: Frameworks in—and for—Reciprocal Rectitude
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries”
- Circumscribing Morality: The Spheres and Their Limits
- Consideration and Disclosure of Group Risks in Genomics and Other Data-Centric Research: Does the Common Rule Need Revision?
- Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees
- Agent-Regret in Healthcare
- Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency
- Translating Commercial Health Data Privacy Ethics into Change
- Aid in Dying in Canada and the United States: Are U.S. States Too Cautious?
- To the Editor
- A Disabled Bioethicist’s Critique of Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID)
- Canadian Medical Assistance in Dying and the Hegemony of Privilege
- The Ethical Data Practices Framework and Its Implications for Data Privacy Relations between the United States and the European Union
- The Limits of a Voluntary Framework in an Unethical Data Ecosystem
- No Means No: Respecting Dignity as the Fourth Principle of Ethical Data Extraction
- Canada Welcomes Tundra’s Immortality Project to Prevent Death (Wall Street Journal, July 13, 2060, p. D1, “Travel and Leisure” Section)
- Comparisons Only Yield Valid Mutual Learnings If Based on Accurate Descriptions of the Comparators
- Different MAiD Laws, Different MAiD Outcomes: Expected Rather Than “Disturbing”
- Of Slopes and Ropes: Learning from the Diversity of European Regulations of Assisted Dying
- The Urgent Need for a U.S. Data Protection Agency
- Empowering Queer Data Justice
- Care to Ease the Slope? Differences in Canadian and Californian Medical Assistance in Dying Laws
- Computational Ethics Tools to Audit Corporate Self-Governance in Data Processing
- A Slippery Argument: Ableism in the Debate on Medical Assistance in Dying
- Responsible Processing and Sharing of Genomic Data: Bringing Health Technologies Industries to the Table
- Top Ten New and Needed Expansions of U.S. Medical Aid in Dying Laws
- When Death Becomes Therapy: Canada’s Troubling Normalization of Health Care Provider Ending of Life
- Strategies for Data Ethics Governance: Elevating Patient and Community Perspectives
- Beyond Individual Rights: How Data Solidarity Gives People Meaningful Control over Data
- Applying the Ethical Data Practices Framework to Digital Therapeutics
- It is Time to Shift from a Rights-Based Approach to a Common Good Approach in the Era of Big Data
- Medical Assistance in Dying: Going beyond the Numbers
- The Slippery Slope Argument and Assisted Death: Which Approach to MAiD Does It Really Support?
- How a US Federal Privacy Law Covering Digital Health Services Can Put Autonomy Back into the Hands of the Patient
- Ethics of Love for End-of-Life Care: Beyond Autonomy and Efficiency
- Blockchain Technology for Ethical Data Practices: Decentralized Biobanking Pilot Study
- What’s Wrong with Medicalization?
- Digital Privacy and Data Protection: From Ethical Principles to Action
- The Quest for Humane Termination of Intractable Suffering May Be an Uphill Struggle, Not a Downhill Slide on a Slippery Slope
- Daryl Pullman on the Slippery Slope of MAID: Simple, Neat, and Wrong
- The Two Front War on Reproductive Rights—When the Right to Abortion is Banned, Can the Right to Refuse Obstetrical Interventions Be Far behind?
- Ancillary Care Obligations of Clinical Trial Investigators in the COVID-19 Pandemic
- The Epistemological Danger of Large Language Models
- ChatGPT’s Relevance for Bioethics: A Novel Challenge to the Intrinsically Relational, Critical, and Reason-Giving Aspect of Healthcare
- The Artificial Third: Utilizing ChatGPT in Mental Health
- What We Owe Those Who Chat Woe: A Relational Lens for Mental Health Apps
- Ethical Vaccine Recommendations in the Context of Tenuous Data: Honesty is the Best Policy
- Meaning by Courtesy: LLM-Generated Texts and the Illusion of Content
- Social Value, Beneficial Information, and Obligations to Participants in a Trial of Novel COVID-19 Vaccines
- Generative AI and the Foregrounding of Epistemic Injustice in Bioethics
- Researcher Obligations to Participants in Novel COVID-19 Vaccine Research
- Informed Consent for Clinician-AI Collaboration and Patient Data Sharing: Substantive, Illusory, or Both
- Publish with AUTOGEN or Perish? Some Pitfalls to Avoid in the Pursuit of Academic Enhancement via Personalized Large Language Models
- The Ouroboros Threat
- Large Language Models and Inclusivity in Bioethics Scholarship
- Why ChatGPT Means Communication Ethics Problems for Bioethics
- ChatGPT and the Law of the Horse
- China’s New Regulations on Generative AI: Implications for Bioethics
- The Impact of AUTOGEN and Similar Fine-Tuned Large Language Models on the Integrity of Scholarly Writing
- Generative AI and Ethical Analysis
- How Can Large Language Models Support the Acquisition of Ethical Competencies in Healthcare?
- Is Academic Enhancement Possible by Means of Generative AI-Based Digital Twins?
- AI Can Show You the World
- Unreliable LLM Bioethics Assistants: Ethical and Pedagogical Risks
- Why Personalized Large Language Models Fail to Do What Ethics is All About
- Moving from Models to Responsible AI as a Moat
- The Hidden Costs of ChatGPT: A Call for Greater Transparency
- Generative-AI-Generated Challenges for Health Data Research
- ChatGPT’s Responses to Dilemmas in Medical Ethics: The Devil is in the Details
- Large Language Models and Biorisk
- The Importance of Understanding Language in Large Language Models
- “Large Language Models” Do Much More than Just Language: Some Bioethical Implications of Multi-Modal AI
- Clinicians Doing Research Should Use Their Clinical Expertise to Help Study Participants
- Reimagining Scholarship: A Response to the Ethical Concerns of AUTOGEN
- Machines Like Me: 4 Corollaries for Responsible Use of AI in the Bioethics Classroom
- Generative AI, Specific Moral Values: A Closer Look at ChatGPT’s New Ethical Implications for Medical AI
- Academic and Private Partnership to Improve Informed Consent Forms Using a Data Driven Approach
- Reasons and Reproduction: Gene Editing and Genetic Selection
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Do Clinicians Have a Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Clinical Trials?”
- When Anti-Discrimination Discriminates
- Digital Simulacra, Bias, and Self-Reinforcing Exclusion Cycles
- Health Digital Twins, Legal Liability, and Medical Practice
- Should We be More Worried about Digital Simulacra in Healthcare Being Our “Caricatures,” Rather than Our “Replicas”?
- What Does True Equality in Assisted Dying Require?
- Value of and Value in Language: Ethics and Semantics in Physician-Assisted Suicide Laws
- MAID in America: Expanding Our Gaze on the Ethics of Assistance
- Acknowledging Complexity and Reimagining IRBs: A Reply to Discussions of the Protection–Inclusion Dilemma
- Current Medical Aid-in-Dying Laws Discriminate against Individuals with Disabilities
- Integrating Social Determinants of Health into Ethical Digital Simulations
- Digital Simulacra and the Call for Epistemic Responsibility: An Ubuntu Perspective
- Aid in Dying Unaided?
- Epistemic Value of Digital Simulacra for Patients
- Permit Assisted Self-Administration: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries on Neurologic Diseases and Medical Aid in Dying: Aid-in-Dying Laws Create an Underclass of Patients Based on Disability
- Accommodating Aid-in-Dying Safeguards for Patients with Neurologic Disease
- Care Depersonalized: The Risk of Infocratic “Personalised” Care and a Posthuman Dystopia
- Beyond Words: Reconsidering the Moral Distinction of Action in Consent for Assisted Dying
- Enabling the Nonhypothesis-Driven Approach: On Data Minimalization, Bias, and the Integration of Data Science in Medical Research and Practice
- Distinguishing “Reasonable Accommodation” From Physical Assistance in Aid-in-Dying
- Digital Simulacra: Circumventing Diversity and Inclusion
- Preventing the Slide down the Slippery Slope from Assisted Suicide to Euthanasia While Protecting the Rights of People with Disabilities Who Are “Not Dead Yet.”
- The Importance of Self-Administration of Aid-in-Dying Medication
- Can People Work Together to Create a Self-Administered Act? No. Should They Work Together to Repeal the End of Life Option Act? Yes
- In Their Own Image: Ethical Implications of the Rise of Digital Twins/Clones/Simulacra in Healthcare
- AI-Based Medical Solutions Can Threaten Physicians’ Ethical Obligations Only If Allowed to Do So
- Individuals and (Synthetic) Data Points: Using Value-Sensitive Design to Foster Ethical Deliberations on Epistemic Transitions
- Ethics, First
- Digital Simulacra Mark an Ontological Shift in Biomedicine with Far-Reaching Consequences for Real Patients
- Proposed Principles for International Bioethics Conferencing: Anti-Discriminatory, Global, and Inclusive
- When Treatment Pressures Become Coercive: A Context-Sensitive Model of Informal Coercion in Mental Healthcare
- Ethics Education for Healthcare Professionals in the Era of chatGPT and Other Large Language Models: Do We Still Need It?
- Ethics Education for Healthcare Professionals in the Era of ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models: Do We Still Need It?
- AUTOGEN: A Personalized Large Language Model for Academic Enhancement—Ethics and Proof of Principle
- Pragmatic Research and Quality Assessment/Improvement Initiatives: Kindred Spirits
- Some Treatments Over Objection, Not Others, Are Ethically Justifiable When Managing Anorexia Nervosa
- Challenges in the Ethics and Implementation of Learning Health Care Systems
- Ethical Pragmatic Clinical Trials Require the Virtue of Cultivated Uneasiness
- “A Community-Engaged Approach to Address Collateral Findings in Embedded Research”
- Ethically Alluring but Legally Destructive
- Tube Feed or Not Tube Feed: Ethics beyond the Consult Question
- Reasons for Not Participating in PCTs: The Comparative Case of Emergency Research under an Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC)
- Blurred Boundaries: Toward an Expanded Ethics of Research and Clinical Care
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Think Pragmatically: Investigators’ Obligations to Patient-Subjects When Research is Embedded into Care”
- A Paradigm of Investigator Duty to Multiple Stakeholder Participants
- Special Considerations When Research is Embedded within Community Health Centers
- Medicine’s Commitment to Science and the Duties That Bind Clinicians
- Canceling Tuskegee
- “I Don’t Want to Gain Weight!” The Ethics of Tube Feeding Over the Objection of a Patient with Anorexia Nervosa
- Should the Incapacitated Patient’s Prior Refusal of Dialysis Be Honored? The Value of a Systematic Approach to Gathering Data in an Ethics Consultation
- Patient Ineligibility as a Barrier to Participation in Clinical Trials
- Clinicians’ Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Further Considerations
- A Neuroethical Analysis of Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Balancing Diverse Interests associated with Collateral Findings
- Treatment over Objection (in Anorexia Nervosa): Capacity Is Not the Whole Story
- More-Than-Partial Entrustment in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
- Why Clinicians Do Not Have a Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Clinical Trials
- Distinguishing Clinical and Research Risks in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: The Need for Further Stakeholder Engagement
- End-to-End Integration of Pragmatic Trials Into Health Care Settings
- Is There a Doctor in the House?
- Pragmatic Research and Clinical Duties: Solutions Through Precision AI-Enabled Clinically Embedded Research
- Refusal of Dialysis: Context Matters
- Participation in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: A Matter of Physicians’ Professional Ethics?
- Dialysis Refusal: Discerning the Credibility of a Prior Verbal Directive
- Seizing the Opportunity to Improve Ethical Oversight of Clinical Research
- Progressing from “Whether to” to “How to” Conduct Pragmatic Trials
- Not Wanting Dialysis Does Not Necessarily Mean Non-Acceptance—Words Matter
- What Should ChatGPT Mean for Bioethics?
- Beyond Suppressing Testosterone: A Categorical System to Achieve a “Level Playing Field” in Sport
- A Public Health Ethics Framework for Populations with Limited English Proficiency
- Oppressive Medical Objects and Spaces: Response to Commentaries
- Affect, Values and Problems Assessing Decision-Making Capacity
- Moral Stress and Moral Distress: Confronting Challenges in Healthcare Systems under Pressure
- Critiquing the Critique of Advocacy
- Getting It Right: How Public Engagement Might (and Might Not) Help Us Determine What Is Equitable in Genomics and Precision Medicine
- Rethinking the “Public” and Rethinking “Engagement”
- Hypervisibility, Surveillance, and Bounded Justice through Data-Driven Health Equity Efforts
- What Constitutes Ethical Engagement with Africa and the Global South?
- Tackling Structural Injustices: On the Entanglement of Visibility and Justice in Emerging Technologies
- The Dialectics of Racial Invisibility and Hyper-Visibility under the Mestizaje Discourse in Latin America
- Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Genomics Research: Implications for Building a More Racially Diverse Bioethics Workforce
- Curiosity and Uncertainty Resolution: Inflating the Perceived Utility of Genetic Information
- Translational Justice in Human Gene Editing: Bringing End User Engagement and Policy Together
- Who Is Responsible for Promoting Equity in Rare Disease Research?
- Ethical Considerations in Clinical Trials for Rare Genetic Diseases: The Case of Huntington’s Disease
- Deliberative Mini-Publics and Equity: Procedural Benefits and Promising Outcomes for Gene Editing
- The Australian Citizens’ Jury and Global Citizens’ Assembly on Genome Editing
- Innovating for a Just and Equitable Future in Genomic and Precision Medicine Research
- Unbounding ELSI: The Ongoing Work of Centering Equity and Justice
- Whose Genome? Which Genetics?
- Imperfect Methods for Imperfect Democracies: Increasing Public Participation in Gene Editing Debates
- STS and Bioethics: Forging New Synergies for Exploring the Potentials and Pitfalls of Public Engagement with New Biotechnologies
- Reconfiguring Health: The Importance of Recognizing Embodied Subjectivity and Social Dynamics in Health
- Narrative Equity in Genomic Screening at the Population Level
- Social Inequality and Human Genome Editing: A Nuanced Analysis of the Ubuntuan Ethical Prism
- Public Engagement in Shaping Bioethics Policy: Reasons for Skepticism
- Rare Disease, Advocacy, and Caregiver Burnout
- Addressing the Burdens That Newborn Screening Imposes on Underserved Communities
- From Community-Based Carrier Programs to Opportunistic Carrier Screening: How the Objective of Carrier Screening Was Lost in Translation
- Reliance on Advocacy is the Symptom Not the Disease
- When Less is More: Lessons for Expanded Carrier Screening from Newborn Sequencing Research
- What Difference Can Public Engagement in Genome Editing Make, and for Whom?
- Disclosing Reproductive Genetic Carrier Status: What about the Donor?
- Racism and the Textures of Visibility
- The Intrinsic Value of Public Deliberation in the Governance of Human Genome Editing
- The Other Side of the Self-Advocacy Coin: How For-Profit Companies Can Divert the Path to Justice in Rare Disease
- Ethical Responsibilities for Companies That Process Personal Data
- ECMO as a Palliative Bridge to Death
- Withdrawal of ECMO Support over the Objections of a Capacitated Patient can be Appropriate
- Balancing Protection and Inclusion by Including More Non-Scientist and Nonaffiliated Members on IRBs
- Battle of the Bridge: Ethical Considerations Related to Withdrawal of ECMO Support for Pediatric Patients over Family Objections
- Adolescents, Sensitive Topics, and Appropriate Access to Biomedical Prevention Research
- Why Deny ECMO-DT to the Incapacitated?
- The Divergence of Technical and Human Teleology
- Can the Extraordinary Become Ordinary? Re-Examining the Ethics of ECMO-DT
- Bridge or Destination: Ethical Complexity, Emotional Unrest
- “Sorry, but the Ethicist Said Your Life Isn’t Actually Worth Living”: Misunderstanding Ethics and the Role of the Ethics Consultant
- Integrating Community Perspectives on Inclusion and Protection into IRB Structures
- Reflection Requires Representation
- The Research Protection-Inclusion Dilemma in Pregnancy: Who is Being Protected? Who is Being Included?
- Unilateral Withdrawal, Technological Creep, and the Role of Proportionality in ECMO Policy
- ECMO as a Destination Therapy is Not a Bridge to Nowhere
- ECMO: What Would a Deliberative Public Judge?
- Ethical Withdrawal of ECMO Support Over the Objections of Competent Patients
- Ethical Issues in the Transition to ECMO as a Destination Therapy
- When Critically Ill Patients with Decision Making Capacity and No Further Therapeutic Options Request Indefinite Life Support
- The Moral Relevance of ECMO Bridge Maintenance
- A Bridge to Nowhere
- The Human and Humanity that Differentiate Withholding from Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Therapy: An ECMO Bridge to Nowhere
- Personalizing Care and Communication at the Limits of Technology
- Fairly Distributing the Distributive Justice Argument Permits Stopping ECMO
- Significant Protection-Inclusion Tensions in Research on Medical Emergencies: A Practical Challenge for IRBs
- Unilateral ECMO Withdrawal and the Argument From Distributive Justice
- Community Engagement and the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma
- What is Fair Representation in Research?
- Leveraging the Power of the Centralized IRB Review
- When the Bridge Crumbles: Balancing ECMO-DT With Transplant Program Needs
- The ECMO Bridge and 5 Paths
- The Protection-Inclusion Dilemma: A Global Distributive Justice Perspective
- Wither Vulnerability? The Over/Under Protection Dilemma and Research Equity
- IRBs and Industry Sponsors: Clash of Priorities
- Don’t Ask Too Much: Non-maleficence as the Guiding Principle in IRB Decision-Making
- Included but Still Invisible?: Considering the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma in Qualitative Research Findings
- Researching Those in the Shadows: Undocumented Immigrants, Vulnerability, and the Significance of Research
- Bounded Justice, Inclusion, and the Hyper/Invisibility of Race in Precision Medicine
- Revive and Refuse: Capacity, Autonomy, and Refusal of Care After Opioid Overdose
- The Promise and Reality of Public Engagement in the Governance of Human Genome Editing Research
- Promoting Equality in the Governance of Heritable Human Genome Editing through Ubuntu: Reflecting on a South African Public Engagement Study
- Rare Disease, Advocacy and Justice: Intersecting Disparities in Research and Clinical Care
- Is It Just for a Screening Program to Give People All the Information They Want?
- Slowing the Slide Down the Slippery Slope of Medical Assistance in Dying: Mutual Learnings for Canada and the US
- Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry
- Lost in Gestation: On Fetonates, Perinates, and Gestatelings
- On the Permissibility of Elective Ectogestation
- Ethical Aspects of Machine Listening in Healthcare
- Differences in Degree-not-Kind-of Responsibility within Conversational Artificial Intelligence
- Beyond a Medicalized View of Reproduction: Recentering Pregnant People in the Ethics of Ectogenesis
- Capabilities and Stakeholders – Two Ways of Enriching the Ethical Debate on Artificial Womb Technology
- Tools, Agents or Something Different? – The Importance of Techno-Philosophical Premises in Analyzing Health Technology
- Therapists or Replicants? Ethical, Legal, and Social Considerations for Using ChatGPT in Therapy
- A Different Take on the Law and Ethics of AWT
- Beyond the Domains: What Would be the Fundamental Ethical Questions in the Development of the Artificial Womb
- Deception Mode: How Conversational AI Can Respect Patient Autonomy
- Artificial Wombs or Artificial Feminism: What Is Wrong With Being Pregnant?
- Conversational Artificial Intelligence—Patient Alliance Turing Test and the Search for Authenticity
- Toward Relational Diversity for AI in Psychotherapy
- The Postphenomenological Impact of Conversational Artificial Intelligence on Autonomy and Psychological Integrity
- Justice, Vulnerable Populations, and the Use of Conversational AI in Psychotherapy
- Responsible Use of CAI: An Evolving Field
- Conversational Artificial Intelligence and the Potential for Epistemic Injustice
- Artificial Womb on Maternal Request and Without the Father’s Consent: Ethical Perspectives Through a Principlist Approach
- Artificial Womb Technology and the Restructuring of Gestational Boundaries
- Therapeutic Conversational Artificial Intelligence and the Acquisition of Self-understanding
- Therapeutic Artificial Intelligence: Does Agential Status Matter?
- Staying Curious With Conversational AI in Psychotherapy
- Is the Mother’s Decision to Opt for Artificial Womb Technology Always “Supererogatory”?
- Why We Should Understand Conversational AI as a Tool
- Bias and Epistemic Injustice in Conversational AI
- Relational Reciprocity from Conversational Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy
- Artificial Womb Technology, Catholic Health Care, and Social Justice
- Thinking Inside the Bag: Patient Selection, Framing the Ethical Discourse, and the Importance of Terminology in Artificial Womb Technology
- The Dilemmas of Artificial Wombs: Conventional Ethics and Science Fiction
- The Actionless Agent: An Account of Human-CAI Relationships
- Feminist Concerns About Artificial Womb Technology
- Viewing CAI as a Tool Within the Mental Health Care System
- Abortion, Artificial Wombs, and the “No Difference” Argument
- Expanding the Frame: An Afrofuturist Response to Artificial Womb Technology
- Is the Algorithm Good in a Bad World, or Has It Learned to be Bad? The Ethical Challenges of “Locked” Versus “Continuously Learning” and “Autonomous” Versus “Assistive” AI Tools in Healthcare
- The Ethical and Legal Status of ‘Fetonates’ Or ‘Gestatelings’
- Toward a Broader Conception of Equity in Artificial Womb Technology
- Tools and/or Agents? Reflections on Sedlakova and Trachsel’s Discussion of Conversational Artificial Intelligence
- No Substitute: The False Promise of Artificial Womb Technology as an Alternative to Abortion
- Artificial Placenta – Imminent Ethical Considerations for Research Trials and Clinical Translation
- Conversational Artificial Intelligence and Distortions of the Psychotherapeutic Frame: Issues of Boundaries, Responsibility, and Industry Interests
- The PHERCC Matrix. An Ethical Framework for Planning, Governing, and Evaluating Risk and Crisis Communication in the Context of Public Health Emergencies
- What is Death and Why Do We Insist on the Dead Donor Rule? A Response to Our Critics
- Capacities to Refuse Treatment: A Reply
- The Bioethics of Environmental Injustice: Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Implications of Unhealthy Environments
- Rationing, Responsibility, and Vaccination during COVID-19: A Conceptual Map