- Ethical Criteria for Health-Promoting Nudges: A Case-by-Case Analysis
- On the Ethical Criteria for Health-Promoting Nudges: The Importance of Conceptual Clarity
- A Nudge Toward Meaningful Choice
- Are Corporations Nudging the Nudgers?
- Reciprocity and the Quest for Meaningful Disclosure
- When a Push Becomes a Shove: Nudging in Elderly Care
- When Going Beyond Gentle Nudges Is Legitimate
- Rejecting “Understanding”: An Ethical Proposal Whose Time Has Come
- Informed Consent Requires Understanding: Complete Disclosure Is Not Enough
- Social Psychological Theories and Nudges as Tools for Health Promotion
- Nudges and Budges
- Disruption, Diversity, and Global Biobanking
- Informed Consent: A Matter of Aspiration Since 1966 (At Least)
- Nudging Good Samaritans: Opting Out of Organ Donation
- What Is Adequate Understanding?
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries: When Is It Ethical for Physician-Investigators to Seek Consent From Their Own Patients?
- Exploring Understanding of “Understanding”: The Paradigm Case of Biobank Consent Comprehension
- Understanding (in) Consent for Governance
- The Unbearable Requirement of Informed Consent
- Being Polite: Why Biobank Consent Comprehension Is Neither a Requirement nor an Aspiration
- Understanding as an Ethical Aspiration in an Era of Digital Technology-Based Communication: An Analysis of Informed Consent Functions
- Context Matters—Why Nudging in the Clinical Context Is Still Different
- Easy Resistible, Means-Paternalist Nudging in the Clinical Context is an Untenable Proposal
- Measuring Understanding and Respecting Trust in Biobank Consent
- In Defense of Nudging When the Stakes Are High
- Ignorance Isn’t Bliss: Retaining a Meaningful Comprehension Requirement for Consent to Research
- Moving From Understanding of Consent Conditions to Heuristics of Trust
- The Value of Consent for Clinical Research Does Not Always Hinge on Understanding
- Why I Support Medicaid Expansion
- Review of Sunita Puri, That Good Night: Life and Medicine in the Eleventh Hour
- Pediatricians Awakened: Addressing Family Immigration Status as a Critical and Intersectional Social Determinant of Health
- Should Research Participants Be Notified About Results of Currently Unknown but Potential Significance?
- Research Participants Should Have the Option to Be Notified of Results of Unknown but Potential Significance
- Undocumented Migration and Evolving Health Care Ethical Issues
- When Is It Ethical for Physician-Investigators to Seek Consent From Their Own Patients?
- Broadening the Conversation About Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine
- The Limitations of “Boilerplate” Language in Informed Consent: Single IRB Review of Multisite Genetic Research in Military Personnel
- Clinical Ethicists Awakened: Addressing Two Generations of Clinical Ethics Issues Involving Undocumented Patients
- The Importance of Listening to Patients and to Evidence Regarding Consent for Research
- Caring for the Undocumented: A View From the Safety Net
- Everything in Moderation: Dual Role Consent and State Law Mandates
- Dual-Role Research and Consent by Unique Specialists
- An Ethical Case for Dual-Role Consent: Increasing Research Diversity as a Matter of Respect and Justice
- Role Synergy Versus Role Conflict in Dual-Role Consent in Usual Care Trials
- Place, Virtue Ethics and Physician-Researcher Dual-Role Consent in Clinical Research
- Consent for Research Participation in Practice
- A Hybrid Approach to Obtaining Research Consent
- Clinical Research Is a Team Sport
- The Equivalence Thesis: Why Timers Do Not Successfully Resuscitate the Acts/Omissions and Withdrawal/Withholding Debate
- What Is a Clinical Ethicist?
- Justifying Investigator/Clinician Consent When The Physician-Patient Relationship Can Support Better Research Decision-Making
- The DNA Test Results That Uncovered a Family Secret
- Don’t We Need Something More in These Extraordinary Times? Response to the Commentaries
- How Conducting “Usual Care” Research Might Affect Obtaining Consent
- The United States as an Isolationist in Global Biomedical Ethics and Human Rights
- Voluntary Informed Consent Is Not Risk Dependent
- Mitigating Challenges in Dual-Role Consent: Honoring Patient Preferences to Discuss Research Participation With Someone They Know
- Moving Beyond Moral Revulsion: A Deeper Analysis of Social Justice Within Clinical Ethics Training
- Revising Our Standards on Dual-Role Physicians: Proceed, but Proceed With Caution
- A Neuroethical Analysis of Physicians’ Dual Obligations in Clinical Research
- Solving the Single IRB/Boilerplate Bind: Establishing Institutional Guidelines
- The Need for National Guidance Around Informed Consent About GBCA Safety
- Single IRBs Are Responsible to Ensure Consent Language Effectively Conveys the Local Context
- The Bane of “Boilerplate” Language in Research Consent Forms: Ensuring Consent Forms Promote Autonomous Authorization
- Why Insurance Companies Should Pay for Medical Cannabis
- Returning Individual Research Results Regarding Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain Is the Preferable Choice
- The New Colossus: Clinical Ethics, Empathy, and Grace
- Empirical Over Theoretical Ethics: Choosing What Matters to Patients and Families
- Navigating End-of-Life Decisions Using Informed Nondissent
- Dangers of Withholding Treatment in Emergency and Prehospital Settings
- A Global Dialogue on Withholding and Withdrawal of Medical Care: An East Asian Perspective
- Withdrawal Aversion as a Useful Heuristic for Critical Care Decisions
- The Decision to Withdraw in Children With Ventricular Assist Devices
- Withholding and Withdrawing: A Religious–Cultural Path Toward a Practical Resolution
- Sunk Cost Bias and Withdrawal Aversion
- Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Relevance of the Killing Versus Letting Die Distinction
- Withdrawing and Withholding in the Clinical Arena
- “Ceteris Paribus” and Morally Relevant Facts
- Withdrawal Aversion and the Equivalence Test
- Psychological Hesitancy Is Not an Ethical Standard
- To Act or Not to Act, That Is the Question
- Categorical Mistakes and Moral Biases in the Withholding-Versus-Withdrawal Debate
- What to Expect When Expecting CRISPR Baby Number Four
- Withdrawing and Withholding Treatment: What Do Medical Professionals Owe Their Patients?
- No Escalation of Treatment: Moving Beyond the Withholding/Withdrawing Debate
- We Reject the “‘‘Equivalence Thesis”
- Review of Ilana Löwy, Imperfect Pregnancies: A History of Birth Defects & Prenatal Diagnosis
- Review of Ilana Löwy, Imperfect Pregnancies: A History of Birth Defects & Prenatal Diagnosis
- Parental Decision Making and the Limitations of the Equivalence Thesis (and the Harm Principle)
- Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment: Ethically Equivalent?
- Nancy Cruzan and the Withhold Versus Withdraw Dilemma
- Female Genital Cutting (FGC) and the Cultural Boundaries of Medical Practice
- Can Intersectionality Help Lead to More Accurate Diagnosis?
- Addressing the Practical Implications of Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine: Ethical, Embodied and Institutional Dimensions
- Puberty Blockers Are Necessary, but They Don’t Prevent Homelessness: Caring for Transgender Youth by Supporting Unsupportive Parents
- Transgender Children and the Right to Transition: Medical Ethics When Parents Mean Well but Cause Harm
- Transgender Children, Puberty Blockers, and the Law: Solutions to the Problem of Dissenting Parents
- Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine: The Need for a Conceptual Framework
- Intersectionality: A Scientific Realist Critique
- Clinical Encounters: The Social Justice Question in Intersectional Medicine
- A Two-Pronged Approach to Minimizing Harms for Transgender Youth: Medical Interventions and Social Interventions
- Moving Beyond Mismatch
- Intersectionality and Power Imbalances Clinicians of Color Face When Patients Request White Clinicians
- An Argument for the Intersectional Education of Those Working in International Humanitarian Medical Nongovernmental Organizations
- Identification Before Prescription: Necessary Changes for the Support of Transgender Youth
- Multiple Marginalizations: What Bioethics Can Learn From Black Feminism
- Ethical Guidelines for DNA Testing in Migrant Family Reunification
- Intersectionality and Clinical Decision Making: The Role of Race
- The Right to Best Care for Children Does Not Include the Right to Medical Transition
- Is There Cross-Cultural Evidence for an Association Between Intersectionality and Bioethical Decision Making? Not Yet, but Awaiting Advances in Mental Mapping
- PBT and the Rights of Bad Candidates
- Puberty-Blocking Treatment and the Rights of Bad Candidates
- Psychological Maltreatment and Medical Neglect of Transgender Adolescents: The Need for Recognition and Individualized Assessment
- The Social Context of Adolescents’ Right to Transition
- Decision Making and the Long-Term Impact of Puberty Blockade in Transgender Children
- Should Parental Refusal of Puberty-Blocking Treatment be Overridden? The Role of the Harm Principle
- Narrative Ethics and Intersectionality
- True Autonomy/False Dichotomies? Genderqueer Kids and the Myth of the Quick Fix
- Age Difference in the Clinical Encounter: Intersectionality and Phenomenology
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Patenting Foundational Technologies: Lessons From CRISPR and Other Core Biotechnologies”
- Whether, When, and How to Honor Advance VSED Requests for End-Stage Dementia Patients
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Radical Approach to Ebola: Saving Humans and Other Animals”
- Lessons From New York’s Dementia Directive and Applications to Withholding Oral Feedings
- Justifying a Surrogate’s Request to Forego Oral Feeding
- Promoting Professionalism Through Virtue Ethics
- We Can Do Something! Caring for the Ongoing Needs of an Undocumented Patient
- Serious Ethical Violations in Medicine: A Statistical and Ethical Analysis of 280 Cases in the United States From 2008–2016
- Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism
- Genomes in Context
- How Can We Integrate Interests and Reasoned Arguments in Bioethics?
- “DNA Is Information, and Genetics Is Information Technology”: Reconsidering the Genetic Code
- “You Say Unethical, I Say Criminal”: How Definitions Can Influence Approach
- Serious Ethical Violations by Physicians: What’s the Solution?
- Philosophical Bioethics in the Policy Arena: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Just Policy? An Ethical Analysis of Early Intervention Policy Guidance”
- Is Genetic Exceptionalism Past Its Sell-By Date? On Genomic Diaries, Context, and Content
- An Undocumented Immigrant With End-Stage Renal Disease
- Disabusing Physicians of the Assumption of Competing Interests
- Serious Ethical Violations in Medicine: The Irish Situation
- Genomic Contextualism, Genetic Determinism, and Causal Models
- Foregoing Spoon Feeding in End-Stage Dementia
- Unpacking the Concept of a Genomic Result
- Toward Broader Genetic Contextualism: Genetic Testing Enters the Age of Evidence-Based Medicine
- Review of David Alfandre, ed., Against-Medical-Advice Discharges From the Hospital: Optimizing Prevention and Management to Promote High Quality, Patient-Centered Care
- Clarifying the Relationship Between Serious Ethical Violations and Conflicts of Interest
- Bold Societal Responses Are Needed in Tackling Serious Ethical Violations in Medicine
- Thesis, Antithesis, and Fallacious Synthesis: The Troublesome Dialectic of Professional Behavior and Its Regulation
- How Do We Solve Maria’s Problem? A Hospitalist Perspective
- Abusive Doctors: How the Atlanta Newspaper Exposed a System That Tolerates Sexual Misconduct by Physicians
- The Buck Stops Where: The Duty of a Hospital to Provide Medical Care to Undocumented Patients
- Genetic Contextualism and the Value of a Structured Process
- It’s the Idiom, Stupid: A Plea for Formal Rhetorical Analysis in Bioethics
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Health Research Priority Setting: The Duties of Individual Funders”
- Physician Sexual Assault: The Moral Imperative for Gender Equity in Medicine
- Toward More Effective Self-Regulation in Medicine
- Facial Feminization Surgery: Private, Personal Identity, Compensatory Justice, and Resource Allocation
- Facial Feminization Surgery: Privacy, Personal Identity, Compensatory Justice, and Resource Allocation
- The Democratization of Facial Feminization Surgery and the Removal of Artificial Barriers
- Is CRISPR Different? Considering Exclusivity for ResearchTools, Therapeutics, and Everything In Between
- The Biopolitics of Passing and the Possibility of Radically Inclusive Transgender Health Care
- Extending Health Insurance for Body Modifications for Gender Transitions
- Patenting in the Public Interest: The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine Model
- In Favor of Covering Ethically Important Cosmetic Surgeries: Facial Feminization Surgery for Transgender People
- Foundational Technologies and Accountability
- Patenting Foundational Technologies: Lessons From CRISPR and Other Core Biotechnologies
- A Queer, Feminist Bioethics Critique of Facial Feminization Surgery
- Faces Matter
- Sunset on the RAC: When Is It Time to End Special Oversight of an Emerging Biotechnology?
- Gene Patents and the Social Justice Lens
- ‘Medical Necessity’ and Domination
- Laying the Foundation for Foundational Technologies
- The View of CRISPR Patents Through the Lens of Solidarity and the Public Good
- Fair Governance of Biotechnology: Patents, Private Governance, and Procedural Justice
- The Human Right to Science and Foundational Technologies
- Facial Feminization Surgery in Gender Dysphoria Should Be Reimbursed Like Genital Surgery, but the Main Problem Lies Elsewhere
- Accepting Things at Face Value: Insurance Coverage for Transgender Health Care
- Foundational Technologies and Legal Realities
- Acknowledging the Transition Spectrum
- From Interest to Applause to Despair
- CRISPR Patents: Aspiring to Coherent Patent Policy
- Facial Feminization Surgery: The Ethics of Gatekeeping in Transgender Health
- Family Ethics and Public Policy: Beyond the Medical Model
- Response to Commentaries on “Shrinking Poor White Life Spans”
- Asymmetrical Intuitions
- Health Research Priority Setting: A Duty to Maximize Social Value?
- Priority Setting Is More Than Resource Allocation: Reflecting on the Content of Funders’ Duties and Their Implications for Current Practice
- Conceptual, Structural, and Practical Challenges to Ethical Allocation of Research Funds
- Acquired Duties for Ethical Research With American Indian/Alaska Native Populations: An Application of Pierson and Millum’s Framework
- Public Health Disaster-Related Research: A Solidaristic Ethical Prism for Understanding Funders’ Duties
- The Epigenetic Imperative: Responsibility for Early Intervention at the Time of Biological Plasticity
- Aligning Research Priorities to Improve Equity: A Challenge for Health Funders
- Universal Funder Responsibilities That Advance Social Value
- One Health, Bioethics, and Nonhuman Ethics
- Just Ethics? Bioethical Prescriptions for Policymakers Should Remain Communal
- Distinguishing Primary and Secondary Early Intervention Programs: Implications for Families, Clinicians, and Policymakers
- Is There a Business Case for Constitutive Duties of For-Profit Research Funders?
- Beyond Parenting: The Responsibility of Multidisciplinary Health Care Providers in Early Intervention Policy Guidance
- Health Research Priority Setting: The Duties of Individual Funders
- Practical Problems Related to Health Research Funding Decisions
- Pfizer’s Corporate Citizenship
- Health Research Priority Setting: State Obligations and the Human Right to Science
- Just Policy? An Ethical Analysis of Early Intervention Policy Guidance
- Retribution, Reparation, and the Moral Claims of Communities
- The Racist Underbelly of Health Disparities in America
- Responsibility for Poor Health Status of Lower Income People Must Account for Morally Blameworthy Decisions Made by Employers Who Exploit Them
- A Human Rights Approach to Health Disparities
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Ethics of Smart Pills and Self-Acting Devices: Autonomy, Truth-Telling, and Trust at the Dawn of Digital Medicine”
- Engaging the Uncertainties of Ebola Outbreaks: An Anthropo-Ecological Perspective
- Blinds and Research Risks
- Social Reproductive Labor, Gender, and Health Justice
- Vaccines, Apes, and Conspiracy
- It Is Past Time to Think More Inclusively About “Deaths of Despair”
- A Crisis of Identity, a Crisis of Place
- Research to Promote Longevity and Health Span in Companion Dogs: A Pediatric Perspective
- An Experimental Ethics, but an Ethical Experiment? Anthropological Perspectives on Using Unproven Vaccines on Endangered Primates
- Rapamycin: Risking Harm for Canine Longevity
- Companion Animal Studies: Slipping Through a Research Oversight Gap
- A Radical Approach to Ebola: Saving Humans and Other Animals
- Shrinking Poor White Life Spans: Class, Race, and Health Justice
- Floating All Boats: Promoting Solidarity to Advance Social Justice
- Considerations for Unblinding in Biopharmaceutical Industry Sponsored Trials
- The Scientific and Social Implications of Unblinding a Study Subject
- Instilling Fairness in Animal Research
- The One Health Approach to Zoonotic Emerging Infectious Diseases
- A Randomized Trial of Rapamycin to Increase Longevity and Healthspan in Companion Animals: Navigating the Boundary Between Protections for Animal Research and Human Subjects Research
- Ethical Considerations for Unblinding a Participant’s Assignment to Interpret a Resolved Adverse Event
- Shrinking Poor White Life Spans and the Requirements of Justice
- More Risky Than Radical
- 32 Shades of Neuroethics—A Review of the Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics, edited by L. Syd M Johnson and Karen S. Rommelfanger1
- Expanding a Shared Benefit Approach in One Health Research
- Racism and the Health of White Americans
- When Denial Hurts the Children: An Argument for Accountability of Denial in Parental Decision Making
- Denial and Dyads: Patients Whose Surrogates and Physicians Are Unrealistically Optimistic
- Getting Off the Leash
- Policing Compliance: Digital Medicine and Criminal Justice-Involved Persons
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on ‘‘In Defense of ‘Denial’: Difficulty Knowing When Beliefs Are Unrealistic and Whether Unrealistic Beliefs Are Bad”
- Surveillance and Digital Health
- Adherence, Surveillance, and Technological Hubris
- Digital Medicine: An Opportunity to Revisit the Role of Bioethicists
- “I Know I’m Going to Beat This”: When Patients and Doctors Disagree About Prognosis
- “I Know I’m Going to Beat This”: When Patients and Doctors Disagree About Prognosis
- Resisting the Digital Medicine Panopticon: Toward a Bioethics of the Oppressed
- Digital Medicine, Cybersecurity, and Ethics: An Uneasy Relationship
- In Defense of “Denial”: Difficulty Knowing When Beliefs Are Unrealistic and Whether Unrealistic Beliefs Are Bad
- Digital Medicine and Ethics: Rooting for Evidence
- The Ethics of Smart Pills and Self-Acting Devices: Autonomy, Truth-Telling, and Trust at the Dawn of Digital Medicine
- Uterus Transplantation: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on the Ethics of Using Deceased Versus Living Donors
- Dependence on Digital Medicine in Resource-Limited Settings
- Smart Pills for Psychosis: The Tricky Ethical Challenges of Digital Medicine for Serious Mental Illness
- Propositions and Pragmatics
- Hope, Denial, and Third-Party Effects
- Review of Lori A. Roscoe and David Schenck, Communication and Bioethics at the End of Life: Real Cases, Real Dilemmas
- Surveillance Medicine in the DigitalEra: Lessons From Addiction Treatment
- Why (Some) Unrealistic Optimism is Permissible in Patient Decision Making
- We Convey More Than We (Literally) Say
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on ‘‘Provider Conscientious Refusal of Abortion, Obstetrical Emergencies, and Criminal Homicide Law’’
- The Unintended Consequences of Reframing Denial, Unrealistic Optimism, and Self-Deception
- Weaponizing Hope: Sources of Hope, Unrealistic Optimism, and Denial
- In Defense of Common Human Responses
- Off-Target Effects of a Defense of Denial
- Not All Disagreements Are Treatment Refusals: The Need for New Paradigms for Considering Parental Treatment Requests
- Evaluating the Harm Principle and the Best Interest of the Child: A Case Resolved Using Standard Microeconomics Principles
- The “Reasonable Subject Standard” as an Alternative to the “Best Interest Standard”
- Neither the Harm Principle nor the Best Interest Standard Should Be Applied to Pediatric Research
- The Best Interest Standard and the Child’s Right to an Open Future
- Ethical Management of Diagnostic Uncertainty: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Why Bioethics Should Be Concerned With Medically Unexplained Symptoms”
- Why the Best Interest Standard Is Not Self-Defeating, Too Individualistic, Unknowable, Vague or Subjective
- The Best Interest Standard: An Exhaustive Guide for Medical Decision Making in Pediatrics?
- Can Clinicians Be Objective? Inherent Challenges in Using Decision-Making Tools in Cases of Entrenched Disagreements
- In Defense of Best Interests: When Parents and Clinicians Disagree
- Best Interest, Harm, God’s Will, Parental Discretion, or Utility
- The Best Interests Standard as a Logic of Empire: Unpacking the Political Dimensions of Parental Refusal
- Keep It Simple
- Agreed: The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard … but the Best Interest Standard Cannot Replace The Harm Principle Either
- Reasons Don’t Matter
- The Best Interest Standard for Health Care Decision Making: Definition and Defense
- Ethical Complexity and Precaution When Parents and Doctors Disagree About Treatment
- Rumors of the Best Interest Standard’s Demise Have Been Greatly Exaggerated, and the Harm Principle Remains Tenuous: Responding to My Commentators
- The Value of Open Deliberation in Clinical Ethics, and the Role of Parents’ Reasons in the Zone of Parental Discretion
- When Parents Refuse: Resolving Entrenched Disagreements Between Parents and Clinicians in Situations of Uncertainty and Complexity
- The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children
- Prologomena to Any Future Pediatric Bioethics
- Pediatric Decision Making Requires Both Guidance and Intervention Principles
- Ethical Considerations in the Manufacture, Sale, and Distribution of Genome Editing Technologies
- The Harm Principle and the Best Interests Standard: Are Aspirational or Minimal Standards the Key?
- Are Organ Donors Really Dead: The Near-Irrelevance of Autoresuscitation
- Reconsidering Refusal: Are Some Cases Refractory Even to the Best Tools?
- Best Interests or Harm to Reverse Parental Decisions: Each in Its Own Domain
- Being a Doctor and Being a Hospital
- Deceased Donation in Uterus Transplantation Trials: Novelty, Consent, and Surrogate Decision Making
- The Bioethical and Legal Implications of HHS’s New Focus on Conscience and Religious Freedom
- “Whole Again”: Why Are Penile Transplants Less Controversial Than Uterine?
- Duty to Warn in the Era of Next Generation Sequencing
- Conscience as a Civil and Criminal Defense
- Blanket Bans on Therapeutic Abortion and the Responsibilities of Hospitals as Moral Communities
- How Do You Donate Life When People Are Not Dying: Transplants in the Age of Autonomous Vehicles
- Challenges of Obesity Treatment: The Question of Decisional Capacity
- Allocating Uterus Transplants—Who Gets to Be a Gestational Mother?
- Living Donation, Listing, and Prioritization in Uterus Transplantation
- Uterus Transplantation: A Step Too Far
- A Woman in Full
- Forced Calorie Restrictions in the Clinical Setting
- Experience and Ethics at the “Cutting Edge”: Lessons From Maternal–Fetal Surgery for Uterine Transplantation
- Complex Obesity: Multifactorial Etiologies and Multifaceted Responses
- Provider Conscientious Refusal, Medical Malpractice, and the Right to Civil Recourse
- Is There a Duty to Warn Parents of a Cancer-Causing Genetic Mutation?
- UTx With Deceased Donors Also Places Risks and Burdens on Third Parties
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Performance-Enhancing Drugs, Sport, and the Ideal of Natural Athletic Performance”
- Obesity, Pressure Ulcers, and Family Enablers
- The Purported Procurement Priority of Lifesaving Organs Over Non-Lifesaving Organs: Uterus Transplants and the Ethical Importance of Potential Lives
- Conscientious Refusal of Abortion in Emergency Life-Threatening Circumstances and Contested Judgments of Conscience
- Pregnant Women and Equitable Access to Emergency Medical Care
- Conscience Clauses: Too Much Protection for Providers, Too Little for Patients
- Enforcing Conscientious Objection to Abortion in Medical Emergency Circumstances: Criminal and Unethical
- Disclosure of Genetic Risk: When Genetic Relatives Are Not Family Members
- Assessing Duty to Warn in Donated Embryos
- Provider Conscientious Refusal of Abortion, Obstetrical Emergencies, and Criminal Homicide Law
- Toward the Ethical Allocation of Uterine Transplants
- Accommodating Conscience Without Curtailing Women’s Rights, Health, and Lives
- Treating Infertility with Transplantation: Theological views on whether Infertility is a Disease
- “A Little ELF, Please?” The Electronic Long-Form COI Disclosure Statement (ELFCOI)
- On Gender and Reproductive Decision-Making in Uterine Transplantation
- Uterus Transplantation: The Ethics of Using Deceased Versus Living Donors
- Review of David Benatar, The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life’s Biggest Questions
- Getting the Story Straight: Clinical Ethics as a Distinctive Field
- Review of Eric Plemons, The Look of a Woman: Facial Feminization Surgery and the Aims of Trans-Medicine
- Goals Change Roles: How Does the Clinic Redefine Philosophical “Critical Distance”?
- Where’s the Merit in That? Limits to Employing the Natural in Antidoping Ethics
- Genetically Enhanced Minors: Whose Responsibility?
- An Alternative Account of Clinical Ethics: Leveraging the Strength of the Health Care Team
- Optimized or Hijacked? The Moral Boundaries of Natural Athletic Performance
- Effort? Natural Talent? More on the Normative Structure of Sport
- “Natural” Athletic Performance or a Level Playing Field? You Can’t Have Both
- Natural Talent, Fair Equality of Opportunity, and Therapeutic Use Exemptions
- Philosophers’ Invasion of Clinical Ethics: Historical and Personal Reflections
- Responsibility, Inefficiency, and the Spirit of Sport
- Ethics Consultation: Critical Distance/Clinical Competence
- Demythologizing Bioethics: The American Monomyth in Clinical Ethics Consultations
- Outside/Inside/Outside
- A Road Oft Traveled: Stumbling Into Clinical Ethics
- Wuz You Robbed? Concerns With Using Big Data Analytics in Sports
- Performance-Enhancing Drugs and Moral Line Drawing
- Exploring Clinical Ethics’ Past to Imagine Its Possible Future(s)
- Does Professional Objectivity Require Clinical Ethicists to Be Neutral?
- Were the “Pioneer” Clinical Ethics Consultants “Outsiders”? For Them, Was “Critical Distance” That Critical?
- Performance-Enhancing Drugs, Sport, and the Ideal of Natural Athletic Performance
- Where Have All the Theologians Gone and Should We Lament Their Passing?
- Reflections of a ‘Pioneer’: A Somewhat Different Path
- “Natural” Talents and Dedication—Meanings and Values in Sport
- White Privilege and Playing It Safe
- Outsider/Insider