- Taking on Systems That Produce Moral Stress
- Treatment Pressure: A Step Forward, but Not the Final Word on “Informal Coercion”
- Moral Stress: A Systems Problem Requiring a Systems Solution
- Moral Stress, Distress, and Injury: Clarifications Using the ADC Model of Moral Judgment
- Informal Coercion Is Both Unavoidable and (Sometimes) Ethically Justifiable
- Navigating Moral Stress and Moral Distress in Moral Case Deliberation: A Joint Endeavor
- “Treatment Pressures” and “Informal Coercion”: “Threats” in Mental Healthcare
- Moral Stress and Moral Distress: Confronting Challenges in Post-Dobbs Contexts
- Psychiatry’s Unruly Practices and Their Implications for the Ethics of Psychiatry
- A Difference in Degree, Not Kind: Moral Stress, Distress, and Injury
- You Say Potato, I Say Potahto: Should We Call the Whole Thing Off?
- Moral Stress and Moral Distress in a Novel Space of Virtual Healthcare
- The Role of Law Enforcement in Coercive Psychiatric Interventions
- You Might Think You’re Being Coerced When You Aren’t—And Vice Versa
- The Conflation of All Suffering
- Context-Sensitivity and the Inclusion of Subjective Beliefs Have Broad Implications
- Confronting Moral Stress and Fostering Change with Humanism and Human Dignity
- Systems, Stress, and Embodied Inequality in Community Health
- Context Matters
- You Don’t Have to Be Bad to Work Here: Sustaining Ideals Inside Healthcare Institutions
- Steady Hands, Heavy Hearts and the Path Forward to Moral Resilience in Organ Transplantation
- Context Sensitive Informal Coercion and Coercive Offers
- Moral Reflection and the Feeling of Powerlessness
- From Pressures to Enforcement: Understanding Undue Influence in Community Mental Health Care
- Recognizing the Systemic Root Causes of Moral Distress
- Counteracting Informal Coercion from Within Coercive Contexts: Can a Wrong Approach Be Practiced Rightly?
- Distinguishing Moral Stress from Moral Distress: Moving Beyond the Individual to Expose the Systemic Ethical Challenges
- Examining Moral Stress and Moral Distress Through the Lens of Non-Human Animal Clinicians: Understanding Challenges in Animal Healthcare Systems
- Reframing Coercion in Mental Health Care: A Focus on Treatment Trust
- Moral Distress and Moral Stress Among Nurses Facing Challenges in a Health Care System Under Pressure
- Coercion, Power Relations, and the Expectations Patients Bring to Mental Health Treatment
- Expanding the Scope of Justified Beliefs Relevant to Coercion
- Digital Doppelgängers and Lifespan Extension: What Matters?
- Enabling Demonstrated Consent for Biobanking with Blockchain and Generative AI
- Allocation of Treatment Slots in Elective Mental Health Care—Are Waiting Lists the Ethically Most Appropriate Option?
- Errors, Omissions, and Pediatric Gender Medicine
- The Ethical Standard for End-of-Life Decisions for Unrepresented Patients
- We Need a Framework – But Should the Focus Be Broader?
- The Bilingual Patient’s Dilemma: Same Question, Different Answer
- Beyond Suppressing Testosterone: Overlooked Considerations Impacting Female Athletic Performance
- Language, Stigma, and Neuropsychiatry in Limited English Proficiency Populations
- Medical Interpretation Services: Challenges for LEP Communities
- Federalism and Infrastructural Responsibility
- Integrating Intersectionality: Legal Status, Health Disparities, and LEP Populations
- Evaluating Fairness in Sports: Beyond Testosterone Suppression
- Role of Terminology for Linguistic Preferences in Clinical and Public Health Communication
- Patients with Limited English Proficiency: Legal Mandates for Language Assistance Services
- Inclusivity as Fairness
- The Elite Sport Classification System Needs Improvement, Not Replacement
- Beyond Policing Bodies: A Broader Conception of Fairness in Women’s Sports
- Why It Could Be Ethical to Return to Biological Categories in Sport: Values-Based Rules
- Is It Ever OK to Reclassify Someone Out of Their Birth-Observed Sex Without Personal Consent? How Do We Manage Competing Methods of Classifying Sex?
- Operationalizing Fairness
- Bridging Ethics and Evidence: Language as a Critical Determinant of Health Equity
- How Does the Categorical System Account for Socioeconomic Background and Embodied Advantage? A Policy Development Dialogue
- When Worlds Collide: The Problem of Health Inequities and Anti-Immigrant Politics
- In Praise of Logical Inconsistency: World Athletics and the Evidence Bar of the “Reasonable Person in Good Faith”
- Categorically Complicated
- What Is Considered “Fair” Depends on the Purposes of Elite Sports
- Ideal Fairness in Sport is Impossible
- Patient Consent and The Right to Notice and Explanation of AI Systems Used in Health Care
- Some Extensions of the Loop: A Response to the Comments on Machine Learning-Driven Decision Aids
- Race Illiteracy as a Barrier to Antiracist Reform in Healthcare and Bioethics
- Addressing Discrimination and Epistemic Injustices in Bioethics and Medicine
- Disclosing Interim Results to Parents Offered Enrollment in a Fetal Intervention Trial
- Challenging the Centrality of Anti-Racism in Bioethics
- Learning From Those Who Were Not REDI
- Thinking Through How Race, Disability, and Gender Work Together
- Adaptive Machine Learning in Medicine: Not Human Subjects Research, Not Research at All
- REDI in Bioethics Cannot Be Achieved Without the Promotion of Anti-Ableism
- Using Activism to Combat Systemic Racism in Bioethics and Healthcare
- REDI in Practice: A Need to Expand Our Knowledge Pool
- Prudently Evaluating Medical Adaptive Machine Learning Systems
- Bolder Bioethics: Demanding a Gold Standard in REDI Recommendations
- Centering More than Trauma Experiences: Reflections from Launching a Graduate Course on Bioethics & Racial Justice in Canada
- Doing What We Do Well: How Bioethicists Can Assist in Promoting Racial Justice
- REDI, Set, Caution
- Achieving Live Birth is Not an Endpoint but a Steppingstone
- Machine Learning-Generated Clinical Data as Collateral Research: A Global Neuroethical Analysis
- From Classification to Governance: Ethical Challenges of Adaptive Learning in Medicine
- The Role of Perinatal Palliative Care to Support Parental Decision-Making about Clinical Research for Seriously Ill Children in the Neonatal Period
- The Need for an Evolving Informed Consent Process in a Fetal Therapy Trial
- Adaptive Medical Machine Learning Models Should Not Be Classified as Perpetual Research, but Do Require New Regulatory Solutions
- Beyond the Goodness of REDI and Racism’s Evil: On the Colonial Power of Bioethics
- Bioethics, Equity, and Inclusion: How Do We Not Add to the Minority Tax?
- The Epistemological Nuances of Interpreting Adaptive Machine Learning Systems Through the Lens of Surgical Innovation
- Whether Designated as Research or Not, Who Resolves Ethical Considerations Emerging with Healthcare AI?
- Beyond Consent: The MAMLS in the Room
- A Bioethics Assessment of Continuous Learning in Medicine and AI
- Using Health Justice to Achieve Racial Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Bioethics
- Adaptive Machine Learning Systems in Medicine: The Post-Authorization Phase
- The Fine Balance Between Complete Data Integrity in Medical Adaptive Machine Learning Systems and the Protection of Research Participants
- Anti-Racism in Clinical Ethics Fellowships: Rising to the Occasion
- Adaptive Machine Learning Systems in Medicine – More Learner, Less Machine
- Designing Regulatory Frameworks for Machine Learning Systems in Medicine—Time for Balance and Practicality
- Adaptive Machine Learning as Research: Does the Cure Fit the Disease?
- Discerning the Nature of MAMLS: Research, Quality Improvement, or Both?
- The Incommensurability of Caring: ML, Clinical Decision-Making, and Human Reasoning in Healthcare
- In Assessing the Character and Quality of Contemporary Bioethical Discourse, “Counting Heads” May Not Be Very Helpful
- ASBH and the VIBeS Survey
- Transparency, Evaluation and Going From “Ethics-Washing” to Enforceable Regulation: On Machine Learning-Driven Clinician Decision Aids
- Knowing You Know Better
- Coverage Error and Generalizability: Concerns about the “Views in Bioethics Survey”
- The Future of Bioethics: Striving for a More Diverse and Inclusive Bioethics
- Disrespect for Deontology
- Co-reasoning by Humans in the Loop as a Goal for Designers of Machine Learning-Driven Algorithms in Medicine
- Limitations of Patient-Physician Co-Reasoning in AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems
- Patient Diversity and Collaborative Co-Reasoning for Ethical Use of Machine Learning-Driven Decision Support Systems
- Early AI Lifecycle Co-Reasoning: Ethics Through Integrated and Diverse Team Science
- What and For Whom Is Bioethics?
- A Holistic, Multi-Level, and Integrative Ethical Approach to Developing Machine Learning-Driven Decision Aids
- The Black Box Dilemma: Challenges in Human-AI Collaboration in ML-CDSS
- Comparing the Results of Two Surveys on the Views of Bioethicists
- Safety in Numbers and Other Questions from Pierson et al.’s Bioethics Survey
- Scapegoat-in-the-Loop? Human Control over Medical AI and the (Mis)Attribution of Responsibility
- Diversifying Bioethics: Taking Action, Making Progress, Sustaining Success
- A Knower Without a Voice: Co-Reasoning with Machine Learning
- The Predictive Value of Moral Diversity in Bioethics
- Co-Reasoning and Epistemic Inequality in AI Supported Medical Decision-Making
- What Are Patients Doing in the Loop? Patients as Fellow-Workers in the Everyday Use of Medical AI
- Co-Reasoning in Context: Collaboration in Critical Care
- What Does “Bioethics” Mean? Education, Training, and Shaping the Future of Our Field
- What Do We Do with Physicians When Autonomous AI-Enabled Workflow is Better for Patient Outcomes?
- Suppose We Told Them Fully What an Ethics Consult Is
- Inclusion Not Conformity: A Response to a Call for Diversity Based on a Recent Survey of American Bioethicists
- From Human-in-the-Loop to Human-in-Power
- From “Human in the Loop” to a Participatory System of Governance for AI in Healthcare
- Ableist Bias Persists Among Bioethicists: Interpreting the Views in Bioethics Survey’s “Disability” Findings
- Bioethics Should Not Seek to Reflect Public Opinion
- Bioethics: Then, Now and Tomorrow
- Bridging the Gap Between Bioethicists and the Public: A Living Ethics Perspective
- Reasons in the Loop: The Role of Large Language Models in Medical Co-Reasoning
- Does It Matter That Surveyed Bioethicists Are Not Similar to Patients in Clinical Ethics Consultations
- Clinical Ethics Fellowship Programs in the U.S. and Canada: A Descriptive Study of Program Characteristics and Practices
- Do Reasons Matter? Navigating Parents’ Reasons in Healthcare Decisions for Children
- Breaching Confidentiality in Genetic and Non-Genetic Cases: Two Problematic Distinctions
- Capacity, Disability, and Hedonic Adaptation
- What Reasons Are Really at Play in Reproduction?
- The Hypothetical Embryo and the Prosecutor’s Fallacy
- Banning Puberty-Pausing Medications Endangers Transgender Adolescents
- Beyond Supported Decision-Making: The Need for Supported Engagement for Neurodivergent Adults
- Challenges in Assessing Affect and Values in Decision-Making Capacity
- Medical Treatment, Genetic Selection, and Gene Editing: Beyond the Distinction Between Person-Affecting and Impersonal Reasons
- Regarding Reasons and Reproduction
- Enhancing Decision-Making Capacity Assessments Beyond Outlier Cases: A Multi-Faceted Health Care Systems Approach
- Process and Rigor in Decision-Making Capacity Evaluations: A Disability Ethics Perspective
- Let’s Not Be Hasty: A Framework for Honoring Imprudent Health Care Decisions
- Appreciating Your Interests
- To Assess or Not to Assess? Physician-Patient Disagreement as the Primary Trigger for Capacity Testing in Clinical Practice
- Barriers to Overriding Refusal for Patients Who Lack Capacity
- Gene Editing vs. Genetic Selection
- A Disability Critique of the Comparative View
- Grounded in Reality: Integrating Community Values and Priorities of End Users in Human Gene Editing
- Gene Editing, Genetic Selection, and Reasons That Matter
- Place-Based Thoughtfulness and Decision-Making in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection
- The Right to Make Fatal Decisions
- Emphasizing Future Personhood: Implications for Access to Abortion and in Vitro Fertilization
- Prudence, Preferences, and Power: The (Ir)Relevance of Decision-Making Capacity in Medical Decision Making
- Repro-Timing Harm and Benefit in Assisted Reproduction: Person-Affecting Reasons Before the Advent of Genome Editing
- When Patients Are Not Themselves
- Complexities in Capacity Assessment for Persons with Severe and Enduring Anorexia
- Better than What?: Embryo Selection, Gene Editing, and Evaluative Counterfactuals
- From Personal Interests to Practical Wisdom
- From CRISPR to Conscience: Ethical Dilemmas in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection
- What’s the Alternative? Comparative Benefits in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection
- Medical Decision-Making Capacity Under Oppressive Conditions
- Person-Affecting Reasons for Prenatal Gene-Editing?
- Reasons, Persons, Eugenics and an Argument in Favour of Gene Editing
- More, Fewer, Reconceptualized, or Relational Criteria? Recent Trends in Bioethics Scholarship on Decision-Making Capacity
- Embryo Gene Editing is Not Morally Better than Selection Even If Person-Affecting
- Against Genetic Determinism of Welfare and Behavior
- In Defense of a More Antinatalist Bioethics
- The True Self and Decision-Making Capacity
- How to Think About Difficult Capacity Assessments: Are We Making Progress?
- When Gene Editing Should Be Mandatory
- Tracking Personal Interests: Thinking More Holistically About Values and Subjectivity in Capacity Assessments
- Racial Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Bioethics: Recommendations from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors Presidential Task Force
- War, Bioethics, and Public Health
- Reestablishing Circulation in Donors: To What Degree Does It Matter?
- Genital Modifications in Prepubescent Minors: When May Clinicians Ethically Proceed?
- Defining Death: Toward a Biological and Ethical Synthesis
- The Social Value Misconception in Clinical Research
- The Uniform Determination of Death Act is Not Changing. Will Physicians Continue to Misdiagnose Brain Death?
- Near Fatal Opioid Overdose: A Paradigm Case Where Principlism Fails
- Should SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination be Required for Heart Transplant Listing
- Responsibility – Crime, and Punishment: Why We Should Not Allocate Intensive Care Based on Vaccination Status
- Priority is Not a Proportional, Fitting, or Fair Return for Vaccination
- The Problematic “Existence” of Digital Twins: Human Intention and Moral Decision
- When “Next of Kin” Isn’t “Who Knows Best”: the Ethics of Choosing a Surrogate Decision Maker
- Ethical Complexities in Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Surrogate Decision Making
- Against a New Wave of Vaccine Apartheid: Reconceptualizing Justice in Vaccine-Sensitive Rationing
- On the Differing Role of Counterexamples in Philosophical Theory and Health Policy
- Predicting Patient Preferences with Artificial Intelligence: The Problem of the Data Source
- The Ethics of Using Vaccination Status as a Rationing Criterion: Luck Egalitarianism and Discrimination
- Dealer’s Choice?: Choosing Among Surrogate Decision Makers with Different Decisions and Knowledge of the Patient
- Can P4 Support Family Involvement and Best Interests in Surrogate Decision-Making?
- Social Coercion, Patient Preferences, and AI-Substituted Judgments
- Is Resource Allocation that is Sensitive to Vaccination Status Coercive? Who Cares?
- Justice Pluralism during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Weighing Patient Preferences: Lessons for a Patient Preferences Predictor
- How to Evaluate an Individual’s Decision Whether to Vaccinate during a Pandemic: Better by a Knowledge Commons than by Luck Egalitarianism
- Who Should Decide When the Patient Can’t: When Ethics and Law Collide
- Respect for Autonomy Requires a Mental Model
- Harm-Prevention Arguments are Easier to Confuse Than to Rebut
- The Personalized Patient Preference Predictor: A Harmful and Misleading Solution Losing Sight of the Problem It Claims to Solve
- Navigating Tensions Between Law and Ethics in Surrogate Decision Making
- Emergency Department Boarding of a Teen Requiring Complex Care: How Should an Ethics Consultant Respond?
- Machine Learning Algorithms in the Personalized Modeling of Incapacitated Patients’ Decision Making—Is It a Viable Concept?
- Artificial Intelligence, Digital Self, and the “Best Interests” Problem
- Adolescent Boarding in the ED: Issues of Autonomy, Nonmaleficence, and Distributive Justice
- Eliminating or Calibrating the Role of Chance? Acute Resource Scarcity as a Challenge for Luck Egalitarianism
- The Patient Preference Predictor: A Timely Boost for Personalized Medicine
- Potentially Perilous Preference Parrots: Why Digital Twins Do Not Respect Patient Autonomy
- Personal but Necessarily Predictive? Developing a Bioethics Research Agenda for AI-Enabled Decision-Making Tools
- Good Ethics Begin With Good Facts—Vaccination Sensitive Strategies for Scarce Resource Allocation Are Impractical as Well as Unethical
- Vexing Vaccine Ethics: Denying ICU Care to Vaccine Refusers
- As an AI Model, I Cannot Replace Human Dialogue Processes. However, I Can Assist You in Identifying Potential Alternatives
- Vaccine-Sensitive Allocation – Another Divide to Divide Us?
- Personalized Patient Preference Predictors Are Neither Technically Feasible nor Ethically Desirable
- Parrots at the Bedside: Making Surrogate Decisions with Stochastic Strangers
- Vaccination-Sensitive Healthcare Rationing: Overlooked Conditions, Translational Ethics, and Climate-Related Challenges
- Navigating the Ethical Dilemmas of Youth Boarding in the Emergency Department: Strategies for Respecting Developing Autonomy While Also Reducing Risk
- Fairly Incorporating Vaccination Status into Scarce Resource Allocation Frameworks
- Is Suffering a Useless Concept?
- NRP: Neither Perfusion nor Regional
- Change the Law to Optimize Organ Donation
- The Challenge of Framing the Discourse of Normothermic Regional Perfusion
- Medicine, Bioethics, and the Search for Truth: Does “Declaring” Death Make It So?
- Distinguishing Ethical from Diagnostic Concerns About NRP-cDCD
- To Procure Organs for Transplantation, Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Brain Death Dislocate Circulation and Brain from an Integrated Concept of Embodied Persons
- The Unified Brain-Based Determination of Death: Conceptual Challenges
- Gerrymandering Circulation: Why NRP is Inconsistent with the Dead Donor Rule
- A Legal Pathway Aligning Law and the Practice of NRP
- A Clarified Interpretation of Permanence Justifies Death Determination in NRP Protocols
- Revivification in ECPR and TA-NRP: A Consideration of Intent and Impact
- New Reasons to Revise the UDDA: Controversies Related to Death by Circulatory-Respiratory Criteria
- Public Opinion of DDR and Public Trust
- Moving Forward With Normothermic Regional Perfusion Amidst Ethical Controversy
- An Ethics Committee’s Evaluation of Normothermic Regional Perfusion (NRP) in 2018–Unsatisfactory Answers Then—and Now
- Normothermic Regional Perfusion, Public Reason, and the Idea of Integrated Organismic Function
- “Essentially as One of Fact to Be Determined by Physicians”: Applying Lessons Learned From Brain Death to Normothermic Regional Perfusion
- Requesting an Autopsy of the Dead Donor Rule: Improving, Not Abandoning, the Guiding Rule in Organ Donation
- “Time Is Brain:” DCDD-NRP Invalidates the Unified Brain-Based Determination of Death
- Restoring the Organism as a Whole: Does NRP Resurrect the Dead?
- The Unified Brain Based Determination of Death and DCCD/NRP: Curb Your Enthusiasm
- Resuscitating the Dead: NRP and Language
- NRP Possibly Violates “Do No Harm” and Is Not Worth Risking the Perception That It Does
- Ethical and Equity Guidance for Transplant Programs Considering Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion (TA-NRP) for Procurement of Hearts
- The Unified Brain-Based Determination of Death Conceptually Justifies Death Determination in DCDD and NRP Protocols
- Health Consequences of an Ideological Perspective on Population Growth in Iran
- Beyond Trade-Offs: Autonomy, Effectiveness, Fairness, and Normativity in Risk and Crisis Communication
- What Are Humans Doing in the Loop? Co-Reasoning and Practical Judgment When Using Machine Learning-Driven Decision Aids
- Bioethicists Today: Results of the Views in Bioethics Survey
- The Hopkins-Oxford Psychedelics Ethics (HOPE) Working Group Consensus Statement
- Should the Use of Adaptive Machine Learning Systems in Medicine be Classified as Research?
- A Surgeon’s Perspective From the Sharp End of Surgical Innovation
- Reopening the ‘Window to the Soul’?: The Ethics of Eye Transplantation Now and in the Future
- Opioid Overdose and Capacity
- From Opioid Overdose to LVAD Refusals: Navigating the Spectrum of Decisional Autonomy
- Disability Bioethics, Social Inclusion, and Whole-Eye Transplantation
- Confidence in Care Instead of Capacity: A Feminist Approach to Opioid Overdose
- The Ethical Challenges of Whole-Eye Transplantation: Is Recipient Informed Consent Enough?
- Why Patients Leave: The Role of Stigma and Discrimination in Decisions to Refuse Post-Overdose Treatment
- An Eye for an Eye?: Problematic Risk–Benefit Trade-Offs in Whole Eye Transplantation
- Autonomy-Based Obligations to Patients in the Emergency Department Following Opioid Overdose
- Capacity, Rationality, and the Promotion of Autonomy: A Trauma-Informed Approach to Refusals of Care After Opioid Poisoning
- Whether Whole Eye Transplant is a Benefit or Harm Depends on More Than the Observer
- Law Enforcement Interventionism as Determinant of Decision-Making Among Resuscitated Opioid Users
- Autonomy, Thin and Thick
- Revive and Survive: A Critical Lens on the Refusal of Care After Opioid Overdose
- Illuminating the Consequentialist Logic of Harm Reduction After Overdose Through a Hypothetical Randomized Trial
- Revive and Respect: Using Structural Competency and Humility to Reframe Discussions of Decision-Making Capacity
- Current Ethical Considerations of Human Whole Eye Transplantation is Short-Sighted
- Resisting Inadequate Care is Not Irrational, and Coercive Treatment is Not an Appropriate Response to the Drug Toxicity Crises
- Ophthalmic Research’s Unique Challenges: Not All First-in-Human Surgeries Are the Same
- Everyone With an Addiction Has Diminished Decision-Making Capacity
- Equitable Participant Selection Concerns for First-In-Human Whole-Eye Transplantation
- Hospitals Are Not Prisons: Decision-Making Capacity, Autonomy, and the Legal Right to Refuse Medical Care, Including Observation
- Ethical Pathways: Transitioning Whole-Eye Transplantation Into Clinical Practice
- Autonomy and Its Constrictive Effects on Our Ethical Lenses and Imaginations
- Putting a Face on WET Recipients
- Establishing and Defining an Approach to Climate Conscious Clinical Medical Ethics
- Cost-Related Non-Adherence to Prescribed Medicines: What Are Physicians’ Moral Duties?
- Language in Bioethics: Beyond the Representational View
- A Justice-Based Defense of a Litmus Test
- Qatar’s Bioethics Meeting
- The Ethics of International Bioethics Conferencing: Continuing the Conversation
- To Swab or Not to Swab: Waiver of Consent to Collect Perianal Specimens from Incapacitated Patients With Severe Burn Injury
- Bioethics’ Duty to Conference in Qatar: Reply to Magnus
- Think Like a Journalist and Act as a Risk and Crisis Communicator in the Context of Public Health Emergencies
- Collaborations Beyond Conferencing: Exploring Broader Applications of the Anti-Discriminatory, Global, and Inclusive Framework
- Two Models of Bioethics
- The Right Way to Approach Conference Site Selection
- Ethics of Conferencing
- Ethical Tradeoffs in Public Health Emergency Crisis Communication
- The Overlooked Risk of Intimate Violation in Research: No Perianal Sampling Without Consent
- Optimizing the PHERCC Matrix for Risk Communication: Integrating Action-Guiding Models for Enhanced Accessibility and Applicability
- The Ethics of Ethics Conferences: Enhancing Further Transparency
- Ethical Justifications for Waiving Informed Consent for a Perianal Swab in Critical Burn Care Research
- Using the PHERCC Matrix to Define Essential Workers During Public Health Emergencies
- Re-thinking the Ethics of International Bioethics Conferencing
- Thanks IAB, for Caring about Our Planet and Health!
- The International Association of Bioethics Failed Its Rosa Parks Moment
- Zooming in on Justice: The Case for Virtual Bioethics Conferencing
- Green Conferencing, Justice and the “Global South”
- Community Perspectives Are Essential to Assess Risk in Emergent Care Research
- Interrogating Sites of Knowledge Production: The Role of Journals, Institutions, and Professional Societies in Advancing Epistemic Justice in Bioethics
- I’m Not Welcome There: Why I Am Not Attending IAB 2024
- Challenges of Bioethics Frameworks for Non-Democratic Contexts
- International Bioethics Conferencing: “Can the Subaltern Speak?”
- Health and Data Equity in Public Health Emergency Risk and Crisis Communication (PHERCC)
- Synergies in Risk Communication: Integrating Ethical Frameworks and Behavioral Economics in Public Health Emergencies
- Separating the Signal from the Noise in Public Health Messaging: The UK’s COVID-19 Experience
- Standing for Democracy – Bioethics Conferences and Totalitarian Regimens
- Making Ethical Considerations Transparent in the Formulation of Public Health Guidance
- Respect for Persons Is Not Always About Consent: The Importance of Context
- Invisible: People with Disability and (In)equity in Precision Medicine Research
- Addressing Environmental Injustices Requires a Public Health Ethics and/or Human Rights Perspective
- Promising Practices for Inclusive Precision Medicine Research and the Contribution to Public and Population Health
- Moving to Equity in the All of Us Research Program
- Beyond Advocacy: Human Health, the Environment, and Tradeoff Ethics
- Environmental Injustices within Us: The Case of the Human Microbiome and the Need for More Creative Bioethics
- Advocating for a Context Specific Approach to Tackle Inequities
- “All from us” or “All with us”: Addressing Precision Medicine Inequities Requires Inclusion of Intersectionally Minoritized Populations as Partners and Project Leaders
- The Kids Are Not Alright: The Mental Health Toll of Environmental Injustice
- For Bioethics to Center Justice, We Must Reconsider Funding, Training, and the Taxonomy of Bioethics
- From “Inclusion in What” to “Equity in What”: (Re)Thinking the Question of In/Equity in Precision Medicine and Health
- Environmental Justice for Whom?
- Precision Public Health Equity: Another Utopian Mirage?
- Environmental Justice in and of Healthcare
- Environmental Justice: A Missing Core Tenet of Global Health
- Bioethics Interested in Environmental Justice Should First and Foremost Criticize Capitalism
- The Ethical Implications of Environmental Racism: Considerations for Advancing Health Equity
- What Do Rights Have to Do with It?
- Environmental Injustice: Is Bioethics Part of the Solution?
- No Elder Left Behind: The Role of Environmental Justice in Geriatrics and Palliative Care
- Is the Right to a Healthy Environment Enough? Reckoning with a History of Failures in Chemical Valley
- Overcoming Barriers to Health Equity in Precision Medicine Research
- Conflicts of Integrity: Research Ethics Practice and Environmental Justice
- Downstream Exclusion in Rural Rare Disease Precision Medicine Research
- Challenges for Environmental Justice Under Bioethical Principlism
- Implementing Environmental Considerations into HRSA’s Medically Underserved Area Designation
- Missing the “We” in Precision Medicine
- Unhealthy Environments Are a Problem of Structural Injustice
- The Urgent Need for Health Data Justice in Precision Medicine
- Environmental Justice: More Hard Work yet to Be Done
- “Precision Medicine” Is Genomic Medicine
- Do Medically Underserved Individuals Benefit from Participating in All of Us?
- Global Environmental Justice and Bioethics: Overcoming Beneficence and Individual Responsibility
- Medical Sanctions Against Russia: Arresting Aggression or Abrogating Healthcare Rights?
- We Are Not Okay: Moral Injury and a World on Fire
- AUTOGEN and the Ethics of Co-Creation with Personalized LLMs—Reply to the Commentaries
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethical Responsibilities for Companies That Process Personal Data”
- A Different Slippery Slope
- The Tip of the Iceberg—Obstetrical Management and Pregnancy Rights
- Chemical Restraints for Obstetric Violence: Anesthesiology Professionals, Moral Courage, and the Prevention of Forced and Coerced Surgeries
- Return of Results in Digital Phenotyping: Ethical Considerations for Real-World Use Cases
- Clarifying the Philosophical and Legal Foundations of Dobbs
- Bodily Autonomy & the Patient’s Right to Refuse Medical Care
- Dobbs and Rights during Ongoing Pregnancy: Connecting the Dots
- The Contested Future of Patient Autonomy and Fetal Personhood
- Psychiatry, Ethics, and Digital Phenotyping: Moral Challenges and Considerations for Returning Mental Health Research Results to College Students
- Respecting the Value-Laden Nature of Participant Preferences: AI, Digital Phenotyping, and Psychiatry
- Reproductive Justice and Abolition: Important Lessons Black Feminists Have Been Teaching Us for Years
- Patient Agency without Provider Agony: The Need to Address Clinician Moral Distress in Advancing the Rights of Pregnant Persons
- Prescribing Teratogenic Medications Post-Dobbs
- Incorporating Research Burden and Utility Considerations as Limiting Factors in a Framework for Returning IRR
- What Bioethics Owes Reproductive Justice
- If You Are in the Chart, You Help Chart the Course
- From the Front Lines: The Need for Stakeholder Coalitions in Preserving Reproductive Autonomy
- Duty of Care toward Fetuses and the Limits of Maternal Rights to Refusal
- The Right to Refuse Obstetrical Interventions: In Principle, in Practice
- Balancing the Double-Edged Implications of AI in Psychiatric Digital Phenotyping
- The Right to Refusal of Unwanted End-of-Life Interventions for Pregnant Persons: Additional Challenges to Reproductive Rights Post-Roe
- Personalized Roadmaps for Returning Results From Digital Phenotyping
- Reproductive Intrusions: Evidence and Ethics
- Fetal Personhood and the Boundless Responsibilities of Pregnant Persons
- Contending with Real and Perceived Intrusiveness in Digital Phenotyping Research
- When the Right to Abortion is Banned, Can Pregnant Patients Count on Having Any Rights?
- More than a Modus Vivendi: Personhood and Hard Cases
- Navigating the Ethical Maze in Digital Health Research
- Dobbs Opened the Door; Alito Left It Open Wider than His Own Jurisprudence Should Have Allowed
- Making a Case for Appropriate and Humane Treatment of Hamas Belligerents in Israel
- Potential Iatrogenic Effects of Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry
- Parents Have a Right to Refuse Brain Death Testing, Including Apnea Testing
- Vulnerable Patients, Adult Protective Services Investigations, and Reticent Surrogates: What is the Role of Clinical Ethics?
- Putting a Pronouncement about Personhood into Perspective
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries Re: Medicolegal Challenges to Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United Kingdom and USA
- The Brain Death Criterion in Light of Value-Based Disagreement Versus Biomedical Uncertainty
- Parents Don’t Know Best in the United Kingdom
- For Analytics Beyond “Personhood,” Bioethics Should Look Toward Science and Technology Studies (STS)
- The End of Personification: The Mereological Fallacy in Science Communication on Brain Organoids
- No Country for Old Laws: Why the Effort to Revise the UDDA Reveals the Social Weakness of Medicine in the US
- Bioethics Should Not Be Constrained by Linguistic Oddness or Social Offense
- Personhood Is Still Useful, but Not for Everything
- “Please, Don’t Make Me Do This”: The Role of the Ethics Consultant in Responding to and Mitigating Moral Distress
- Defining and Defending Personhood: Lessons from the Disease Debate
- Ethical Issues in Death by Neurologic Criteria Require Critical Scrutiny: Lack of Engagement with Sound Arguments to Save Medical Dogma
- Personhood and the Debate about the Beginning and End of Life
- Applying the Harm Principle to Elder Care
- A Failure to Care or a Failure to Communicate? Exploring Concerns about Decision Maker Suitability
- Re-Framing Moral Distress to Benefit Both Patient and Caregiver
- Personhood and the Public’s Definitions of a Human
- Responding to a Nurse’s Perceived Moral Distress Prompting an Ethics Consultation Request
- The Advantages of the Higher Brain Criterion for Determining Death
- Beyond Personhood: Ethical Paradigms in the Generative Artificial Intelligence Era
- Personhood and the Importance of Philosophical Clarity
- Interests and Choices in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria
- Time for Bioethics to End Talk of Personhood (But Only in the Philosophers’ Sense)
- Protection through Partnering: Applying Social Work Theory to Clinical Ethics in a Case of Suspected Abuse
- A Qualified Defense of Personhood in Bioethics
- Personhood Beyond the West
- Beyond the Personhood: An In-Depth Analysis of Moral Considerations in Human Brain Organoid Research
- Time for Federal Standards on Death Determination: The National Determination of Death Act
- The Concept and Conceptions of Personhood: The Fallacy of Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby’s Argument
- Language and Terminology in Discussions of Moral Status
- The End of Personhood Seems to Be Greatly Exaggerated
- Even Offense Can Be a ‘Normatively Substantive Problem’ in Bioethics: Specificity and Relationality as Alternatives to ‘Personhood’
- The Ends of Personhood
- Reconceptualizing Personhood in Bioethics and Law: A Spectrum-Based Approach
- Prospects for Engineering Personhood
- Consent, Consultation, or Authorization Is Required for DNC Testing in the UK
- Brainstem Death Is Dead. Long Live Brainstem Death!
- Medicolegal Challenges to Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United Kingdom and the United States: Lessons Learned from the Case of Archie Battersbee and a Suggestion for Mid-Level Principles to Enhance an Ongoing Dialogue
- The End of (Lockean-Kantian) Personhood
- Rethinking Personhood through the Lens of Life Forms, Communality, and Moral Agency
- Looking Back and Forward: Relational African Bioethics and Why Personhood is Not Dead
- The Richness of Personhood
- Moral Distress and the Marginalization of Nurses
- By Statute or by Common Law? The Legal Determination of Death
- The Brainstem Criterion of Death and Accurate Syndromic Diagnosis
- A Personalized Patient Preference Predictor for Substituted Judgments in Healthcare: Technically Feasible and Ethically Desirable
- Informed Consent Under Ignorance
- First-in-Human Whole-Eye Transplantation: Ensuring an Ethical Approach to Surgical Innovation
- Which Benefits Can Justify Risks in Research?