- First‐order logics over fixed domain
- Defining disability and the role of the disability and the medical communities
- Defining Disciplines and Subdisciplines
- New problems for Tennant’s definition of harmony
- Flat Physicalism
- Guiding Principles and Special Laws†
- A structuralist interpretation of the relational interpretation
- Paraphrasability and the Causal Status of Types
- African Ethics, Respect for Persons, and Moral Dissent
- A Nominalist Alternative to Reference by Abstraction
- The Right Argument from Moral Disagreement
- Semicompatibilism Imperiled
- Pain Begins
- Thin Mereological Sums, Abstraction, and Interpretational Modalities
- Has Philosophy Failed?
- Medieval Scepticism
- Demarcation without Dogmas
- The links of causal chains
- From Magnitudes to Geometry and Back: De Zolt’s Postulate
- How to Supplement Mentalist Evidentialism: What Are the Fundamental Epistemological Principles?
- A Metaphysical Puzzle for Neo‐Fregean Abstractionists
- Thin entities
- Social Evolution in Jürgen Habermas: Towards a Weak Anthropological Naturalism between Kant and Darwin
- “Let Me Double‐Check That”: A Challenge for Conciliationism
- A philosophically neutral semantics for perception sentences
- Protection of Patient Autonomy via Consumer Protection Litigation: The Israeli Eltroxin Class Action as a Case Study
- Understanding Attribution: Problems, Options, and a Proposal
- Towards a sensible bifurcationism (concerning what grounds thought about particulars)
- Holism
- Reflections on Naming and Necessity
- Back to the Golden Age: Saul Kripke’s Naming and Necessity and Twenty‐First Century Philosophy
- Introduction to the Volume “Naming and Necessity: A 40th‐Year Anniversary”
- Forty Years Later: Naming Without Necessity, Necessity Without Naming1
- Proof‐theoretic semantics of natural deduction based on inversion
- Thinking Disagreement
- “A Better Picture ….”
- The Uniqueness of Necessary Truth and the Status of S4 and S5
- Scientific Models and Political Theory: The Ideal Theory Debate Revisited
- Thin Objects Are Not Transparent
- On What Ground Do Thin Objects Exist? In Search of the Cognitive Foundation of Number Concepts
- How Obscurantism Differs from Bullshit: A Proposal
- Reference Fixing and the Contingent A Priori
- The Legacy of Naming and Necessity1
- Linnebo’s Abstractionism and the Bad Company Problem
- Has Williamson’s Claim that Knowledge Is the most General Factive Mental State Been Disproved?
- “What on Earth Is Smenkhkare?” WH‐Questions, Truth‐Makers, and Causal‐Informational Account of Reference
- Some Remarks on the Role of Essence in Kripke’s “Naming and Necessity”
- Frege’s Answer to Kripke
- Cleaning up, and Moving Past, Simple Swamping
- The Myth of Epistemic Implicata
- Philosophical Obscurity
- The Policy of Evidence
- The Logic of Illusion: Kant on the Reasons of Error
- On Wyatt’s Absolutist Account of Faultless Disagreement in Matters of Personal Taste
- From Self‐Determination to Offspring‐Determination? Reproductive Autonomy, Procrustean Parenting, and Genetic Enhancement
- Contribution, Replaceability and the Meaning of Our Lives
- The Complexity of the Concept of Literary Autonomy
- Empirically Incoherent Quantum Gravity
- Duns Scotus on Identities — I Mean, Mereological Fusions
- Colocationist Answers to the Grounding Problem
- Frege’s Conception of Logic: Truth, the True, and Assertion
- Ethical Reasoning: Guidance or Just Rationalization?
- Mapping Traces: Editorial Introduction
- Swedish Theses in Philosophy 2020
- Logical Grounding: The Case of “if‐then‐else”
- Chalmers and Semantics
- On the Problem of Deviant Realizations
- Contrastive Hinge Epistemology
- Ghazālī’s Transformative Answer to Scepticism
- Scepticisms in the Formation of Islamic Rational Theology: Abū al‐Qāsim al‐Balkhī and Ibn al‐Malāḥimī Providing a Window on the Transmission of Arguments from Late Antiquity
- Structural Injustice and Labour Migration – From Individual Responsibility to Collective Action
- Close Error, Visual Perception, and Neural Phase: A Critique of the Modal Approach to Knowledge
- Which Attitudes for the Fitting Attitude Analysis of Value?
- How exact can philosophy be?
- Soul‐Switching and the Immateriality of Human Nature: On an Argument Reported by Razi
- Ubuntu and the Ontology of Radical Escape
- Rational Suspension
- We Should Not Be a Counterpart Theorist of Events If We Want to Be a Counterfactual Theorist of Causation
- The Contingent A Priori, Linguistic Stipulation, and Singular Thought
- Constancy and Constitution
- No Infelicity for the Infallibilist
- What Is the Value of Vagueness?
- Plagiarize or Perish?
- Divide and Conquer: Dividing Lines and Universality
- Reason, Revelation, and Sceptical Argumentation in 12th‐ to 14th‐Century Byzantium
- Dialectic and Metaphysical Skepticism in Jacob Anatoli
- Show, Don’t Tell
- Masks, Interferers, Finks, and Mimickers: A Novel Approach
- The “Cicero”/“Cicero” Puzzling Case
- A New Argument for Goldman and Olsson’s Solution to the Extra‐Value‐of‐Knowledge Problem
- Deontic Concepts and Their Clash in Mīmāṃsā: Towards an Interpretation
- Agency, Causation, and Empiricism
- Why Those Biscuits Are Relevant and on the Sideboard
- Should Acknowledgments in Published Academic Articles Include Gratitude for Reviewers Who Reviewed for Journals that Rejected Those Articles?
- On Some Sceptical Elements in Barhebraeus
- Philosophy and Alternative Realities
- Cheryl Misak, Frank Ramsey: A Sheer Excess of Powers. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2020. 544 pp. Hardback, £ 25.00
- An Introduction: Concepts, Contexts and Communication
- Reference by Deference: The Real Semiotic Profile of Indexicals and Their Context
- The Lying Test, Ambiguity, and Determination of Content: Lying and Determination of Content
- Justice, Symmetry, and Voting Rights Ceilings
- Around Logical Perfection
- Categoricity, External and Internal: An Excerpt from a Conversation with Saharon Shelah
- The Dividing Line Methodology: Model Theory Motivating Set Theory
- Akbarian Scepticism in Islam: Qūnawī’s Sceptical Arguments from Relativity and Disagreement
- Akbarian Scepticism in Islam: Qūnawī’s Sceptical Arguments from Relativity and Disagreement
- Leibniz on Intellectual Pleasure, Perception of Perfection, and Power
- What Is Theoretical Knowledge?
- Typologies of Scepticism in the Philosophical Tradition of Kalām
- Disguised Plagiarism
- Women in Philosophy: Voices from Scandinavia – An Introduction
- A Rationalist Defence of Determinism
- Fundamental Yet Grounded
- Evaluating Art Morally
- Disagreement and Conflict: How Moral and Taste Judgements Do Not Differ
- The Philosophy of Black Lives Matter
- Indicative Conditionals in Objective Contexts
- What, If Anything, Is Wrong with Offsetting Nature?
- Deliberative Agency, Self‐Control, and the Divided Mind
- False Beliefs and Misleading Evidence
- Work’s Role in Learning How
- Meaning and Definition: Scepticism and Semantics in Twelfth‐Century Arabic Philosophy
- Are Identities Unexplainable? Towards a Non‐causal Contrastive Explanation of Identities
- What Makes Discrimination Morally Wrong? A Harm‐Based View Reconsidered
- Tropes, Universals and Visual Phenomenology
- On the Definition of Slavery
- Quine’s Scientific Realism Revisited
- Joschka Haltaufderheide, Johanna Hovemann and Jochen Vollmann (eds.) Ageing Between Participation and Simulation. De Gruyter, Berlin, 2020, 244 pp. isbn 978‐3‐11‐067740‐9
- A Family of Kripke Contingency Logics
- Do Moral Philosophers Have to Be Moral?
- Bullshit, Pseudoscience and Pseudophilosophy
- Truth or Accuracy?
- Godel and the Integrated Self, or: On the Philosopher’s Second Sailing
- Gödel and the Integrated Self, or: On the Philosopher’s Second Sailing
- Belief, Credence and Statistical Evidence
- Conceptions of Temporality: Reconsidering Time in an Age of Impending Emergency
- Why Parfit Can Rebut Johnstonʼs Reductio
- The Unavailability of Authorial Intent
- Understanding by Testimony: A Reply to Malfatti
- The Culture‐Bound Brain: Epigenetic Proaction Revisited
- Is Dickie’s Account of Aboutness‐Fixing Explanatory?
- Is Dickie’s Account of Aboutness‐Fixing Explanatory?
- Utterances, Sub‐utterances and Token‐Reflexivity
- What Can We Demand of a Referee Report?
- Swedish Theses in Philosophy 2019
- John Perry Frege’s Detour. An Essay on Meaning, Reference, and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 148. ISBN 978–0–19–881282–1
- Practical Knowledge, Equal Standing, and Proper Reliance on Others
- Tracing Internal Categoricity
- Reconsidering the Meta‐ethical Implications of Motivational Internalism and Externalism
- Why Not Road Ethics?
- Reference by Deference: The Real Semiotic Profile of Indexicals and their Context
- Spectrum Arguments, Parity and Persistency
- Indexical Signs and Artistic, Political and Historical Complexity
- Can We Know Substances? Suárez on a Sceptical Puzzle
- A Unified Account: Pictorial, Photographic and Sculptural Seeing as Spectral Seeing
- A Pragmatic Logic for Expressivism
- Images in Mathematics
- Logic & Structure: An Art Project
- An Overview of Saharon Shelah’s Contributions to Mathematical Logic, in Particular to Model Theory
- Philosophical Expertise
- Perception, Content, Generality
- Moral Explanations of Moral Beliefs: Inappropriate to Demand Them?
- Patterns, Patterns, Patterns: Art and Meaning at the Crossroads between Two Opposing Forces
- An Inconsistent Triad: Priority Pluralism, Perdurantism and (the Possibility of) Gunky Time
- Does Research Ethics Apply to Us?
- Externalized Migration Governance and the Limits of Sovereignty: The Case of Partnership Agreements between EU and Libya
- Expansionism and Mereological Universalism
- Mathematical, Artistic and Literary Traces in Reason/Heart (Razón/Co‐razón) Transitions
- Implicit Bias and Discrimination
- Alex Broadbent Philosophy of Medicine. Oxford University Press, New York, 2019. xx + 274 pp. isbn 978‐0‐19‐061214‐6 (pbk).
- Measures of Similarity
- Realism and Lexical Flexibility
- Refined Invariantism
- Can Testimony Transmit Understanding?
- Cheating Students
- Peano’s Counterexample to Harmony
- The Ethical Consequences of Criminalizing Solidarity in the EU
- Nec Cogitare Sed Facere: The Paradox of Fiction at the Tribunal of Ancient Poetics
- The Normative Force of Logical and Probabilistic Reasoning in Improving Beliefs
- Centred Propositions, What is Asserted, and Communication
- On the Sick Father, the Repentant Sinner, and Other Problems in Medieval Deontic Logic
- Further developments after Professor Dougherty’s recent article in Theoria
- Lennart Åqvist in Memoriam
- Academic and Non‐academic Freedom of Speech
- Conceptualism and Concept Acquisition
- The Constitution of Abstract Objects
- Variability, Rigidity and the Nesting Problem
- Faultless and Genuine Disagreement over Vague Predicates
- Personal Identity and Trivial Survival
- Imagination and Knowledge in the Metaphorology of Paul Ricœur
- In Defence of Armchair Expertise
- Contexts and Constraints on Use
- Academic Whistle‐Blowing
- Post “Post‐Truth”: Are We There Yet?
- Similarity Reimagined (with Implications for a Theory of Concepts)
- Communicating and Disagreeing with Distinct Concepts: A Defense of Semantic Internalism
- An Argument for the Law of Desire
- Indeterminacy and Failure of Grounding
- Stop the Assault on Brazilian Philosophy and Sociology!
- The Corruption of Philosophical Communication by Translation Plagiarism
- Normalcy, Understanding and the Problem of Statistical Evidence
- Swedish Theses in Philosophy 2018
- Unifying Three Notions of Concepts
- On Successful Communication, Intentions and False Beliefs
- Flow Fragmentalism
- Reliabilism, the Generality Problem, and the Basing Relation
- An Empiricist View on Laws, Quantities and Physical Necessity
- The Plausible Impact of Phenomenology on Gödel’s Thoughts
- The Plausible Impact of Phenomenology on Gödel’s Thoughts
- Retracted: De Se Attitudes and Computation
- De Se Attitudes and Computation
- You Can Trust the Ladder, But You Shouldn’t
- Hanno Sauer Moral Judgments as Educated Intuitions. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2017. 312 pp. isbn 9780262035606. $50.00 (hbk)
- The Metaphysics of Words
- Kevin Macnish The Ethics of Surveillance – An Introduction. Routledge, New York, 2017. 216 pp. isbn 978‐1‐138‐64378‐9
- A Counterexample to Three Imprecise Decision Theories
- Philosophy after the Aprioristic Parenthesis?
- On the Arithmetical Truth of Self‐Referential Sentences
- A More Plausible Collapsing Principle
- Fairness and the Puzzle of Disability
- What Is Philosophy, Really?
- Introduction: Ruth Millikan – Rolf Schock Prize Laureate
- Strategic Content: Representations of Epistemic Modality in Biosemantics (and Success Semantics)
- Millikan, Meaning, and Minimalism
- Swedish Theses in Philosophy 2017
- Emergentism and the Contingent Solubility of Salt
- Sider’s Ontologese Introduction Instructions
- Parfit’s Fission Dilemma: Why Relation R Doesn’t Matter
- Erik Nis Ostenfeld Human Wisdom. Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy (Academia Philosophical Studies Vol. 53). Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin, 2016. 382 pp. isbn 978‐3‐89665‐694‐0. €39.00.
- Anonymous Philosophical Communication
- Herman Cappelen, Tamar S. Gendler and John Hawthorne (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016. xvi + 752 pp. isbn 9780199668779. $150.00 (hardback)
- Disagreement and Conceptual Understanding
- Biosemantics and Words that Don’t Represent
- Apriority, Necessity and the Subordinate Role of Empirical Warrant in Mathematical Knowledge
- Trying Cognitivism: A Defence of the Strong Belief Thesis
- Perspectival Disagreement
- The Moral Gradation of Media of Deception
- Republicanism, Deliberative Democracy, and Equality of Access and Deliberation
- Peter Baumann Epistemic Contextualism: A Defense. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016. ix + 265 pp. isbn 978-0-19-875431-2, £45.00
- The Totality of States of Affairs and the Minimal Truthmaker
- Anderson’s Restriction of Deontic Modalities to Contingent Propositions
- Mistakes in Philosophy
- Subjective Externalism
- On a Generality Condition in Proof-Theoretic Semantics
- Disagreeing with Confidence
- Friendship, Value and Interpretation
- Incommensurability as Vagueness: a Burden-Shifting Argument
- Albert W. Dzur, Ian Loader, and Richard Sparks (eds) Democratic Theory and Mass Incarceration. Oxford University Press, 2016, 360 pp. ISBN 9780190243098, £18.99
- Swedish Theses in Philosophy 2016
- Lars-Göran Johansson Philosophy of Science for Scientists. Springer Undergraduate Texts in Philosophy, 2016. xv + 257 pp. ISBN 978-3-319-26551-3 (eBook), $54.99
- Serena Parekh Refugees and the Ethics of Forced Displacement. Routledge, New York, 2017. 192 pp. ISBN 9780415712613, £85.00
- The Uses and Misuses of Philosophical Scepticism
- Index of Swedish Theses in Philosophy 2007–2016
- Names of Truth Bearers, and “That”-Clauses: A Dilemma for Millians
- Dretske on Non-Epistemic Seeing
- Demotivating Intentional Mentalism
- Ramsey’s Pragmatic Approach to Truth and Belief
- Deontological Conservatism and Perceptual Justification
- Can Reasons Be Propositions? Against Dancy’s Attack on Propositionalism
- Who Should be Author?
- McGee’s Counterexample to the Ramsey Test
- The Paradox of Useful Research
- Schmidtz on Moral Recognition Rules: A Critique
- Reasoning Biases, Non-Monotonic Logics and Belief Revision
- The Consequential Conception of Doxastic Responsibility
- Why Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience
- From Falsemakers to Negative Properties
- Common Sense and Evidence: Some Neglected Arguments in Favour of E=K
- Against Deductive Closure