1 September 2023
-
Correction To: Introduction: Metalinguistic Disagreement and Semantic Externalism -
Catia Faria: Animal Ethics in the Wild -
Iconic Syntax: sign language classifier predicates and gesture sequences -
Arthur M. Diamond, Jr., Openness to Creative Destruction Sustaining Innovative Dynamism. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2019 - Number of publications for this day: 4
31 August 2023
-
Wait, Why Gauge? -
An oak is an oak, or not? Understanding and dealing with confusion and disagreement in biological classification -
The Measurement Problem Is a Feature, Not a Bug – Schematising the Observer as a Postulate and the Quantum-Mechanical Concept of an Open System on an Informational, or (neo-)Bohrian, Approach -
Merely Means Paternalist? Prospect Theory and ‘Debiased’ Welfare Analysis -
The elimination of metaphysics through the epistemological analysis: lessons (un)learned from metaphysical underdetermination -
Making a Murderer –- How risk assessment tools may produce rather than predict criminal behavior -
The Problem of the Many -
Permissivism and intellectual virtue -
Midwifery students’ experiences: Violations of dignity during childbirth -
Rethinking Early Modern Philosophy -
Security beyond the state: exploring potential development impacts of community policing reform in post-conflict and fragile environment -
L’Antiquité politique de Jean-Jacques Rousseau: entre exemples et modèles -
Against the backdrop of sovereignty and absolutism. The theology of God’s power and its bearing on the western legal tradition, 1100–1600 -
The Dark Bible: cultures of interpretation in early modern England -
AND THE WORDS BECOME FLESH: EXPLORING A BIOLOGICAL METAPHOR FOR THE BODY OF CHRIST -
Pregeometry over locally o‐minimal structures and dimension -
Logic in Question. Talks from the Annual Sorbonne Logic Workshop (2011–2019) -
Justice in Theory and Practice: Debates about Utopianism and Political Action -
Hegel’s Logic and Metaphysics -
Synthesis and analysis: Jean Nicod as a mediator between Bergson and Russell -
“Dare Explanations” (Wagerklärungen): Hypothetical Thinking in Late Eighteenth- and Early Nineteenth-Century German Philosophy of Science -
Freedom, foreknowledge, and betting -
Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics on virtue competition -
Veridicalism and Scepticism -
Necessarily Veridical Hallucinations: A New Problem for the Uninstantiated Property View -
XIV—Hegel and Fichte: Two Early Critiques of Capitalism -
Frederick Burkhardt, James Secord and the editors of the Darwin Correspondence Project (eds.), The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, volume 22, 1874 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. 855. ISBN 978-1-1070-8872-6. £105.00 (hardback). -
Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen, Freud’s Patients: A Book of Lives London: Reaktion Books, 2021. Pp. 304. ISBN 978-1-7891-4455-0. £20.00 (hardback). -
Andrew Fiss, A History of Communication and Anxiety in the American Mathematics Classroom New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2020. Pp. 216. ISBN 978-1-9788-2021-0. $150.00 (cloth). -
Aileen Fyfe, Noah Moxham, Julie McDougal-Waters and Camilla Mørk Røstvik, A History of Scientific Journals: Publishing at the Royal Society, 1665–2015 London: UCL Press, 2022. Pp. 643. ISBN 978-1-8000-8234-2. £60.00 (hardcover), £0.00 (open-access pdf). Doi:10.14324/111.9781800082328 -
Richard Noakes, Physics and Psychics: The Occult and the Sciences in Modern Britain Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Pp. 419. ISBN 978-1-3168-8243-6. £90.00 (hardcover). -
J. David Archibald, Critical Lives: Charles Darwin London: Reaktion Books, 2021. Pp. 240. ISBN 978-1-7891-4440-6. $19.00 (paperback). -
Robert J. Sternberg and Wade E. Pickren (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Intellectual History of Psychology Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Pp. 533. ISBN 978-1-1084-1869-0. $210.00 (hardback). -
Does the Emotional Modulation of Visual Experience Entail the Cognitive Penetrability of Early Vision? -
Dreyfus is right: knowledge-that limits your skill -
Correction: Defending the link between ethical veganism and antinatalism -
“Stay away from the Park”: A Case for Police-Issued Personal Safety Advice for Women -
Strengthened, and weakened, by belief -
What future for cognitive science(s)? -
The future of cognitive science is pluralistic, but what does that mean? -
What philosophy, if any, is needed for cognitive science? -
Psychology is – and should be – central to cognitive science -
Two open questions in the reformist agenda of the philosophy of cognitive science -
Rethinking cognitive architecture: A heterarchical network of different types of information processors -
From unified to specific theories of cognition -
The mind-body problem between philosophy and the cognitive sciences -
Distributed loci of control: Overcoming stale dichotomies in biology and cognitive science -
Recensione di F. Faggin, Irriducibile. La coscienza, la vita, i computer e la nostra natura -
Cognition – Let’s forget it? -
Recensione di R. Manzotti, La mente allargata - Number of publications for this day: 50
30 August 2023
-
A Better Ape: The Evolution of the Moral Mind and How it Made us Human -
Sumario -
Medical necessity and consent for intimate procedures -
Informed decision-making in labour: action required -
Consent and episiotomies: do not let the perfect be the enemy of the good -
‘How is it possible that at times we can be physicians and at times assistants in suicide? Attitudes and experiences of palliative care physicians in respect of the current legal situation of suicide assistance in Switzerland -
Safeguards for procedural consent in obstetric care -
Episiotomies and the ethics of consent during labour and birth: thinking beyond the existing consent framework -
Trusted research environments are definitely about trust -
Consent and the problem of epistemic injustice in obstetric care -
Herd immunity, vaccination and moral obligation -
Capacity assessment during labour and the role of opt-out consent -
We want to help: ethical challenges of medical migration and brain waste during a pandemic -
Paediatric surgeons current knowledge and practices of obtaining assent from adolescents for elective reconstructive procedures -
Expanding health justice to consider the environment: how can bioethics avoid reinforcing epistemic injustice? -
Birth, trust and consent: reasonable mistrust and trauma-informed remedies -
Loneliness at the age of COVID-19 -
Extending the ethics of episiotomy to vaginal examination: no place for opt-out consent -
TREs are still not about trust -
The ethics of consent during labour and birth: episiotomies -
Setting a human rights and legal framework around ‘the ethics of consent during labour and birth: episiotomies -
The replication crisis is less of a “crisis” in the Lakatosian approach than it is in the Popperian and naïve methodological falsificationism approaches. -
Rubin (2023) – Questionable Metascience Practices -
What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman–Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications -
Ruliology: Linking Computation, Observers and Physical Law. -
Horizons of Passion: Hermeneutics as fusion or as fracture -
A philosophical look at running friendships -
Corrigendum to ‘Let Justice Roll Down’: Confronting Injustice in Theological Education for Māori Flourishing -
Sociality and the minimal self: On Dan Zahavi’s “group‐identification, collectivism, and perspectival autonomy” -
Ideal theory needs a realistic defense -
Multiple masculinities of labour migrants: how Bangladeshi migrant men rationalize gender norms in their home country -
When Anti-Discrimination Discriminates -
Digital Simulacra, Bias, and Self-Reinforcing Exclusion Cycles -
Health Digital Twins, Legal Liability, and Medical Practice -
Should We be More Worried about Digital Simulacra in Healthcare Being Our “Caricatures,” Rather than Our “Replicas”? -
What Does True Equality in Assisted Dying Require? -
Value of and Value in Language: Ethics and Semantics in Physician-Assisted Suicide Laws -
MAID in America: Expanding Our Gaze on the Ethics of Assistance -
Acknowledging Complexity and Reimagining IRBs: A Reply to Discussions of the Protection–Inclusion Dilemma -
Current Medical Aid-in-Dying Laws Discriminate against Individuals with Disabilities -
Integrating Social Determinants of Health into Ethical Digital Simulations -
Digital Simulacra and the Call for Epistemic Responsibility: An Ubuntu Perspective -
Aid in Dying Unaided? -
Epistemic Value of Digital Simulacra for Patients -
Permit Assisted Self-Administration: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries on Neurologic Diseases and Medical Aid in Dying: Aid-in-Dying Laws Create an Underclass of Patients Based on Disability -
Accommodating Aid-in-Dying Safeguards for Patients with Neurologic Disease