Inquiry

• Artificial agents: responsibility & control gaps
  Inquiry04 October 2024By Herman Veluwenkamp Frank Hindriks Department of Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
• Kant on doxastic agency, its scope, and the demands of its exercise
  Inquiry24 September 2024By Alix Cohen a University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USAb University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
• Social kind vs. conferralist approaches to social ontology: ‘race’ as a case study
  Inquiry24 September 2024By Adam Hochman Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
• Distinguishing semantics, pragmatics, and reasoning in the theory of conditionals
  Inquiry23 September 2024By Daniel Lassiter School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
• Absorbed in deceit: modeling intention-driven self-deception with agential layering
  Inquiry21 September 2024By Kevin Korczyk Department of Philosophy, University of California, Riverside, USA
• Illusionism about virtual causation
  Inquiry16 September 2024By Matej Kohár Institute of History and Philosophy of Science, Technology and Literature, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
• Adorno’s dynamic theory of ideology
  Inquiry13 September 2024By Bernardo Ferro Institute for Philosophical Studies (IEF), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
• Conceptual engineering in the Lvov-Warsaw School
  Inquiry12 September 2024By Krzysztof Sękowski Faculty of Philosophy, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
• Fake news & bad science journalism: the case against insincerity
  Inquiry05 September 2024By C.J. Oswald Corcoran Department of Philosophy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
• Political friendship as joint commitment: Aristotle on homonoia
  Inquiry05 September 2024By Cansu Hepçağlayan College of Humanities and Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
• Practical reason as theoretical reason
  Inquiry04 September 2024By William Ratoff Department of Philosophy, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
• Being-there, being-with, and being-a-part: Heidegger’s mereology of Mitsein in Being and Time
  Inquiry27 August 2024By Noam Cohen Department of Philosophy, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
• Irony in earnest: rethinking Hegel’s critique of romantic irony
  Inquiry23 August 2024By Jason Miller Warren Wilson College, Asheville, NC, USA
• Integrational creativity: from combining and blending to transforming and resonating
  Inquiry20 August 2024By Michael Beaney Martha Kunicki a Department of Philosophy, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotlandb Institut für Philosophie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germanyc School of Philosophy, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
• Does valuing ice cream sandwiches make one a true gourmand and connoisseur of them?
  Inquiry17 August 2024By Ke Zhang School of Philosophy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
• Talking about Talking About
  Inquiry13 August 2024By Daniel W. Harris Sam Berstler a Department of Philosophy, Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USAb Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
• ‘Lucifer in person’: on Iris Murdoch’s ‘Heidegger problem’
  Inquiry13 August 2024By Tom Whyman Department of Philosophy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
• Lies are assertions and presuppositions are not
  Inquiry13 August 2024By Andreas Stokke Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
• Explaining systematic polysemy: kinds and individuation
  Inquiry13 August 2024By Katherine Ritchie Sandeep Prasada a Department of Philosophy, University of California, Irvine, CA, USAb Department of Psychology, Hunter College, CUNY & Program in Linguistics, Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, NY, USA
• Hegel, Selbstischkeit, and the experiential self
  Inquiry10 August 2024By Paul R. Matthews Philosophy, Leuphana Universität, Lüneburg, Germany
• A prolegomena to investigating conspiracy theories
  Inquiry10 August 2024By M R. X. Dentith a Center for International Philosophy, Beijing Normal University in Zhuhai, Zhuhai, People’s Repubic of Chinab School of Philosophy, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, People’s Repubic of China
• Contingentism and fragile worlds
  Inquiry08 August 2024By Christopher James Masterman Faculty of Philosophy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
• Idealization, animals, and democracy
  Inquiry06 August 2024By Pablo Magaña Law & Philosophy Research Group, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
• Investigating conspiracy theories – introduction to the special issue
  Inquiry05 August 2024By M R. X. Dentith Julia Duetz Melina Tsapos a Beijing School of Philosophy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, Chinab Center for International Philosophy, Beijing Normal University in Zhuhai, Zhuhai City, Chinac VU Amsterdam, the Netherlandsd Lund University, Sweden
• Presuppositional epistemic contextualism and non-ideal contexts
  Inquiry03 August 2024By William Tuckwell School of Social Work and Arts, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia
• Conceptual engineering and conceptual innovation
  Inquiry01 August 2024By Matti Eklund Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
• How not to argue for the presumption of liberty
  Inquiry29 July 2024By Jason Brennan Christopher Freiman a Strategy, Economics, Ethics, and Public Policy, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USAb General Business, John Chambers College of Business and Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
• Decolonizing epistemic justice: on inter-epistemology
  Inquiry29 July 2024By Elad Lapidot Faculty of Languages, Cultures and Societies, University of Lille, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France
• Epistemic (de-)colonization in the midst of Europe
  Inquiry24 July 2024By Hilkje C. Hänel Potsdam University
• Conspiracy accusations
  Inquiry22 July 2024By Patrick Brooks Julia Duetz a Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USAb Department of Philosophy, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
• ‘Austin vs. Searle on locutionary and illocutionary acts’
  Inquiry20 July 2024By Indrek Reiland Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
• Room for responsibility: Kant on direct doxastic voluntarism
  Inquiry20 July 2024By Christopher Benzenberg University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
• How to make conspiracy theory research intellectually respectable (and what it might be like if it were)
  Inquiry20 July 2024By Charles Pigden Philosophy, University of Otago
• Conceptual engineering, cognitive deficiency, and the foundations of conceptual inquiry
  Inquiry18 July 2024By Gurpreet Rattan Jim Hutchinson a Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canadab Department of History, Philosophy, and Religious Studies, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan
• The size of a lie: from truthlikeness to sincerity
  Inquiry17 July 2024By Jessica Pepp a Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Swedenb Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
• Ultimate-Humeanism
  Inquiry17 July 2024By Samuel John Andrews Independent Researcher, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
• The power of second-order conspiracies
  Inquiry15 July 2024By Alexios Stamatiadis-Bréhier Department of Philosophy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
• Doubts about an argument from doubt
  Inquiry13 July 2024By Pirooz Fatoorchi Independent Scholar, Tehran, Iran
• Conspiracy theorists are not the problem; Conspiracy liars are
  Inquiry13 July 2024By Brian L. Keeley Philosophy Field Group, Pitzer College, Claremont, CA, USA
• Should we worry about conspiracy theorists rejecting experts?
  Inquiry12 July 2024By Melina Tsapos Lund University, Lund, Sweden
• How conspiratorial beliefs spread, and how real conspiracies are covered up
  Inquiry12 July 2024By Catarina Dutilh Novaes
• A new paradox of belief
  Inquiry11 July 2024By Benoit Gaultier Philosophisches Seminar, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
• Moral responsibility and general ability
  Inquiry10 July 2024By Simon Kittle Department of Philosophy, The School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
• Occurrent knowledge is the sole aim of inquiry
  Inquiry10 July 2024By Leonardo Flamini a Department of Humanities, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italyb Department of Philosophy, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
• Where conspiracy theories come from, what they do, and what to do about them
  Inquiry09 July 2024By Keith Raymond Harris University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
• Resisting the ‘civilising mission’. Analysing Hungarian conspiracy theories through standpoint theory
  Inquiry09 July 2024By Attila Kustán Magyari Robert Imre a Tampere University, Tampere, Finlandb Faculty of History and Social Sciences, Faroe Islands
• Spinoza on the parts of God
  Inquiry09 July 2024By Kay Malte Bischof Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
• Racist and antiracist conspiracy theories
  Inquiry06 July 2024By Will Mittendorf Philosophy Department, Cerritos College, Norwalk, CA, USA
• Heterodox conspiracy theories and evidence-based theories of error
  Inquiry06 July 2024By Rico Hauswald Department of Philosophy, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
• Security as a political concept
  Inquiry06 July 2024By Isaac Taylor Department of Philosophy, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
• Epistemic alienation
  Inquiry04 July 2024By Galen Barry Iona University, New Rochelle, NY, USA
• Counting subjects
  Inquiry03 July 2024By Joseph Gottlieb Bob Fischer a Department of Philosophy, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, USAb Department of Philosophy, Texas State University, San Marcos, USA
• Autonomy and knowledge: comments on Adam Carter’s Autonomous Knowledge
  Inquiry03 July 2024By Jesús Vega-Encabo Faculty of Philosophy and Letters, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
• Learning from scams: the target of fake news
  Inquiry03 July 2024By Maurizio Mascitti Department of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
• When conspiracy theorists win
  Inquiry02 July 2024By Steve Clarke a School of Social Work and Arts, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Australiab Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford, UKc Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
• Clinical reasoning and generics
  Inquiry02 July 2024By Rajeev R. Dutta Department of Philosophy and School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
• Talking about: a response to Bowker, Keiser, Michaelson
  Inquiry01 July 2024By Elmar Unnsteinsson a School of Philosophy, University College Dublin, Dublin, Irelandb Faculty of the Humanities, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
• Reasons and ‘because’*
  Inquiry26 June 2024By Wolfgang Freitag Institute of Philosophy, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
• False friends in political dogwhistles
  Inquiry26 June 2024By Stefan Rinner Alexander Hieke a University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germanyb University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
• Fichte’s world of wordless lies
  Inquiry19 June 2024By Roy Sorensen Quentin Farr Department of Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
• On the culpable ignorance of group agents: the group justification thesis
  Inquiry18 June 2024By Nathan W. Biebel a Department of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Polandb African Center for Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
• Toward a paradigm shift: corrective trust as a pathway to mitigate biases in healthcare and beyond
  Inquiry17 June 2024By Ju Zhang Center for Ethics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USAJu Zhang is a postdoctoral fellow in bioethics at the Emory University Center for Ethics. Her current research focuses on developing and defending a trust-oriented model of the patient-physician relationship. Her goal is to promote reasonable patient-physician trust by modifying relevant concepts such as patient autonomy, informed consent, and justified intervention in light of her model. She intends to extend her research on patient-physician trust to nonexpert-expert trust in general and to trust between a relatively disadvantaged individual/group and a relatively advantaged individual/group. She is also interested in studying trust and cooperation among communities, societies, and nations, believing that reasonable trust is key in tackling global issues such as climate change and pandemics.
• Conceptual engineering and the dynamics of linguistic intervention
  Inquiry16 June 2024By Adam F. Gibbons Department of Philosophy/Hong Kong Catastrophic Risk Centre, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong SAR
• Moral status of believing in races
  Inquiry14 June 2024By Aness Kim Webster Department of Philosophy, Durham University, Durham, UK
• From pictures to employments: later Wittgenstein on ‘the infinite’
  Inquiry14 June 2024By Philip Bold Philosophy, UMN, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA
• On the intrinsic value of diversity
  Inquiry12 June 2024By Seth D. Baum Andrea Owe a Global Catastrophic Risk Institute, Washington DC, USAb Civilization Research Institute, Oslo, Norway
• True lies and attempted lies
  Inquiry12 June 2024By Emanuel Viebahn
• Kant on scientific pedantry and epistemic populism
  Inquiry10 June 2024By Axel Gelfert Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
• Equal desires and self-control
  Inquiry08 June 2024By Daniel Coren Philosophy, Seattle University, Seattle, USA
• Social goodness: the ontology of social norms
  Inquiry07 June 2024By Charlotte Witt University of New Hampshire
• Is health the absence of disease?
  Inquiry07 June 2024By Somogy Varga Andrew J. Latham a Department of Philosophy and History of Ideas, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmarkb The Centre for Philosophy of Epidemiology, Medicine and Public Health, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
• Romantic love and the first-person plural perspective
  Inquiry01 June 2024By Felipe León a Department of Thematic Studies: Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Linköping, Swedenb Centre for Medical Humanities and Bioethics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
• Lambert on moral certainty and the justification of induction
  Inquiry24 May 2024By Aaron WellsPaderborn University, Paderborn, Germany
• How far can genealogies affect the space of reasons? Vindication, justification and excuses
  Inquiry22 May 2024By Francesco TestiniInterdisciplinary Centre for Ethics, Jagiellonian University in Krakow
• Comments on Alex Byrne, Transparency and self-knowledge
  Inquiry20 May 2024By Andre GalloisDepartment of Philosophy, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA
• Hume on causation: against the quasi-realist interpretation
  Inquiry17 May 2024By Alexander MillerSaba GhorooriPhilosophy Programme, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
• Responses to Professors Richardson, Rouse and Lepold
  Inquiry16 May 2024By Charlotte WittPhilosophy Department, University of New Hampshire, Durham, USA
• Slurring individuals
  Inquiry16 May 2024By Víctor Carranza-Pinedoa Department of Philosophy, University of Münster, Münster, Germanyb Joint Institute for Individualisation in a Changing Environment (JICE), University of Münster and Bielefeld University, Münster, Germany
• Democratic disenfranchisement: a relational account
  Inquiry15 May 2024By Alexandru VolacuUniversity of Bucharest, Faculty of Business and Administration, Bucharest, Romania
• The self saves the day! Value pluralism, autonomous belief and the dissolution of the value problem through the encroachment of the self on knowledge
  Inquiry15 May 2024By Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding PedersenPeter J. Grahama Underwood International College, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Koreab Department of Philosophy, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
• Kant’s account of emotive art
  Inquiry15 May 2024By Larissa BergerDepartment of Philosophy, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany
• How can individuals criticise social norms? A commentary on Charlotte Witt’s Social Goodness: The Ontology of Social Norms
  Inquiry09 May 2024By Kristina LepoldDepartment of Philosophy, Humboldt University Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany
• In between impossible worlds
  Inquiry09 May 2024By Maciej SendłakFaculty of Philosophy, University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
• A quasi-deflationary solution to the problems of mixed inferences and mixed compounds
  Inquiry08 May 2024By Zhiyuan ZhangDepartment of Philosophy, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
• Perception and illusion: replies to Sethi, Speaks and Cutter
  Inquiry08 May 2024By Adam PautzBrown University, Providence, RI, USA
• Social role normativity: from individualism to institutionalism
  Inquiry08 May 2024By Kevin RichardsonPhilosophy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
• Introduction to the annual Examen Philosophicum lecture
  Inquiry07 May 2024By Reidar MaliksDepartment of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
• Social norms and the dynamics of practices
  Inquiry06 May 2024By Joseph RouseDepartment of Philosophy and College of Science and Technology Studies, Wesleyan University, Middletown, USA
• Future selves, paternalism and our rational powers
  Inquiry02 May 2024By Kyle van OosterumFaculty of Philosophy, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
• A unificationist approach to wrongful pure risking
  Inquiry29 April 2024By Kritika MaheshwariDepartment of Values, Technology, and Innovation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
• The rational roles of experiences of utterance meanings
  Inquiry23 April 2024By Berit BrogaardDepartment of Philosophy, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
• Mathematical impossibilities
  Inquiry16 April 2024By Ulrich MeyerPhilosophy Department, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY, USA
• Question-relative knowledge for minimally rational agents
  Inquiry10 April 2024By Francisca SilvaDepartment of Philosophy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
• As you embed, so Ködel must lie … 
  Inquiry09 April 2024By C. Naomi Osorio-Kupferbluma University of Vienna, Vienna, Austriab Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
• Fragmenting modal logic
  Inquiry09 April 2024By Samuele IaquintoCiro De FlorioAldo Frigerioa Department of Humanities, University of Eastern Piedmont, Vercelli, Italyb Department of Philosophy, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy
• Must we worry about epistemic shirkers?
  Inquiry08 April 2024By Daniele BrunoInstitut für Philosophie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
• The limits of recognition
  Inquiry05 April 2024By Marijn KnieriemRadboud University, Institute for Management Research, Department of Political Science & Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
• Exploration of neuroplasticity: changes in aesthetic cognition and enhancement of aesthetic experiences
  Inquiry31 March 2024By Ranran WeiXin LyuZhiqi LiangYang Youa Academy of Arts & Design, Qingdao University, Qingdao, People’s Republic of Chinab College of Art and Design, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, People’s Republic of Chinac Graduate School, Hongik University, Seoul, South Korea
• Illusion, delusion, and neural sense data: comments on Adam Pautz’s Perception
  Inquiry28 March 2024By Brian CutterDepartment of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
• Comments on David Hunter’s On believing
  Inquiry26 March 2024By Miriam Schleifer McCormickUniversity of Richmond, Virginia, USA
• The early development of Kant’s practical notion of belief
  Inquiry24 March 2024By Lewis WangDepartment of Philosophy, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
• Concepts and their engineering
  Inquiry24 March 2024By Heimir GeirssonDepartment of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
• Impossibilities without impossibilia
  Inquiry23 March 2024By Bjørn JespersenMarie DužíMassimiliano Carraraa Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlandsb Department of Computer Science, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republicc Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology-FISPPA, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
• Précis of on believing: being right in a world of possibilities
  Inquiry22 March 2024By David HunterPhilosophy Department, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Canada
• Attitudes, objects, and norms: replies to Drucker, Schleifer McCormick, and Richard
  Inquiry18 March 2024By David HunterPhilosophy Department, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada
• Defining sensory representation
  Inquiry16 March 2024By Umrao SethiDepartment of Philosophy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
• Counterpossibles, consequence and context
  Inquiry15 March 2024By Daniel NolanDepartment of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
• What is the proper function of language?
  Inquiry14 March 2024By Eliot MichaelsonKing's College London
• Injustice by design
  Inquiry13 March 2024By Elena RuízEzgi Sertlera Research Institute for Structural Change, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USAb Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Utah Valley University, Orem, USA
• Can theorising epistemic injustice help us decolonise?*
  Inquiry12 March 2024By Veli MitovaAfrican Centre for Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
• Pautz on the laws of appearance, internalism, and color realism
  Inquiry08 March 2024By Jeff SpeaksDepartment of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
• Is present-bias a distinctive psychological kind?
  Inquiry07 March 2024By Natalja DengBatoul HodrojAndrew J. LathamJordan Lee-ToryKristie Millera Underwood College, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Koreab Department of Philosophy, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australiac Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University, Denmark
• Attitudes as positions
  Inquiry05 March 2024By Daniel DruckerUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
• Understanding racism
  Inquiry05 March 2024By Kwame Anthony AppiahDepartment of Philosophy, New York University, New York, NY, USA
• On epistemic freedom and epistemic injustice
  Inquiry05 March 2024By Karl Landströma Responsible and Sustainable Business Lab, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UKb African Centre for Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
• ‘The many faces of laziness’
  Inquiry27 February 2024By Kasper Lippert-Rasmussena Department of Politics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmarkb Department of Philosophy, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
• What was that like? Intuitions and the epistemology of consciousness
  Inquiry27 February 2024By Brandon AshbyPhilosophy Department and Center for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Canada
• Buridan on ‘Ex impossibili quodlibet’, ‘Ex contradictione quodlibet’, and ‘Ex falso quodlibet’
  Inquiry24 February 2024By Wolfgang LenzenDepartment of Philosophy, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
• Debating powers: where the real puzzle lies
  Inquiry22 February 2024By Samuel Kimpton-NyeKing’s College London, London, UK
• Facts and ideologies: race and moral equality
  Inquiry22 February 2024By Anna SmajdorUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
• Judgments of taste as strategic moves in a coordination game
  Inquiry22 February 2024By Filip BuekensDept. of Philosophy, Tilburg University & Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, Belgium
• Hope: a solution to the puzzle of difficult action
  Inquiry21 February 2024By Catherine RiouxFaculté de Philosophie, Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
• Does know-how need to be autonomous?
  Inquiry13 February 2024By Gloria AndradaSchool of Social Sciences and Humanities, NOVA Institute of Philosophy, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
• Regulating speech: harm, norms, and discrimination
  Inquiry13 February 2024By Daniel WodakUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
• A way forward for responsibility in the age of AI
  Inquiry13 February 2024By Dane Leigh GogoshinDepartment of Practical Philosophy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
• On Hedden’s proof that machine learning fairness metrics are flawed
  Inquiry11 February 2024By Anders SøgaardKlemens KappelThor GrünbaumCenter for Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
• Al-Ḫūnaǧī on essentialist and externalist propositions and inferences from the impossible
  Inquiry10 February 2024By Behnam ZolghadrDepartment of Philosophy, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
• Logical norms as defeasible obligations: disentangling sound and feasible inferences
  Inquiry09 February 2024By Matteo De BenedettoAlessandra Marraa Institut für Philosophie II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germanyb Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
• What is good thinking? Comments on Mona Simion’s Shifty Speech and Independent Thought
  Inquiry07 February 2024By Robin McKennaDepartment of Philosophy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
• Reasoning from the impossible: early medieval views on conditionals and counterpossibles
  Inquiry06 February 2024By Irene BininiDepartment of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
• Cooperation – Kantian-style
  Inquiry04 February 2024By Jan Willem WielandDepartment of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
• Care before friendship: care as a model of civic solidarity
  Inquiry02 February 2024By Donghye KimYonsei University, Yonsei, Republic of Korea
• Moral progress and grand narrative genealogy
  Inquiry02 February 2024By Jinglin ZhouSchool of Philosophy, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
• Imaginative beliefs
  Inquiry02 February 2024By Joshua MyersLOGOS, Department of Philosophy, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
• Maimon as a Baconian: natural histories, induction and the ladder of certainty
  Inquiry02 February 2024By Idit ChikurelMunich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
• Does predictive sentencing make sense?
  Inquiry02 February 2024By Clinton CastroAlan RubelLindsey Schwartza The Information School, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United Statesb Philosophy Department, Denison University, Granville, United States
• Machine learning in healthcare and the methodological priority of epistemology over ethics
  Inquiry01 February 2024By Thomas GroteCluster of Excellence: ‘Machine Learning: New Perspectives for Science’, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
• Being a believer: social identity in post-truth political discourse
  Inquiry01 February 2024By Moritz A. SchulzSimon Schellera Institute of Philosophy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germanyb Institute of Political Science, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
• Possibilities, representations, and norms of belief: remarks on David Hunter’s On Believing
  Inquiry30 January 2024By Mark RichardPhilosophy Department, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
• Legal gluts?
  Inquiry26 January 2024By Jeremiah Joven JoaquinDepartment of Philosophy, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
• Multiplying co-intensional properties: a reply to Streumer
  Inquiry23 January 2024By J. J. SnodgrassDepartment of Philosophy and Arché Philosophical Research Centre for Logic, Language, Metaphysics, and Epistemology, University of St. Andrews, Scotland, UK
• Property dualists shouldn’t be nominalists about properties
  Inquiry22 January 2024By Daniel GibermanDavid Mark Kovacsa Department of Philosophy, Linguistics, and Theory of Science (FLoV), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Swedenb Department of Philosophy and Humanities, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texasc Tel Aviv University (equal co-authorship)
• Why do numbers exist? A psychologist constructivist account
  Inquiry18 January 2024By Markus Pantsara RWTH Aachen, Human Technology Center, Aachen, Germanyb Faculty of Arts, Discipline of Philosophy, History and Art, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
• Social constructs and how not to ground them
  Inquiry17 January 2024By Umut BaysanSt Anne’s College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
• Real sparks of artificial intelligence and the importance of inner interpretability
  Inquiry12 January 2024By Alex GrzankowskiInstitute of Philosophy, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK
• Reply to Critics of The Birth of Ethics
  Inquiry08 January 2024By Philip PettitPhilosophy, Australian National University, Australia, Canberra
• There is no right to a competent electorate
  Inquiry03 January 2024By Brian KogelmannJeffrey Carrolla John Chambers College of Business and Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USAb Department of Philosophy, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA
• Proposing an Islamic virtue ethics beyond the situationist debates
  Inquiry02 January 2024By Muhammad VeljiPhilosophy Department, Wesleyan University, Middletown, USA
• What is Nietzschean about Nietzsche’s perspectivism? Preliminary reflections
  Inquiry27 December 2023By R. Lanier AndersonDepartment of Philosophy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
• Precis the birth of ethics
  Inquiry23 December 2023By Philip PettitPhilosophy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
• Precis of The Birth of Ethics
  Inquiry23 December 2023By Philip PettitPhilosophy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
• Crime and punishment; drama and meaning: lessons from On the Genealogy of Morals II
  Inquiry19 December 2023By Mark MigottiDepartment of Philosophy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
• Authenticity as transparency
  Inquiry12 December 2023By Allan Hazletta Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United Statesb University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
• The point of view of shared agency
  Inquiry11 December 2023By Glenda SatneJohannes Roesslera University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australiab University of Warwick, Coventry, England
• Conceptual engineering and conceptual change. An argument for the learnability of ameliorated concepts
  Inquiry08 December 2023By Markus BohlmannDepartment of Philosophy, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
• Modelling the mind: Nietzsche’s epistemic ends in his account of drive interaction
  Inquiry08 December 2023By Toby TricksDepartment of Philosophy, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
• Genealogy and political philosophy: introduction to the special issue
  Inquiry08 December 2023By Paul RaekstadJanosch Prinza Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Programme group: Challenges to Democratic Representation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlandsb Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Department of Philosophy, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
• A disjointed account of the illusion of auditory continuity: in favor of hearing everyday sounds but against hearing semantic properties
  Inquiry08 December 2023By Elvira Di BonaDepartment of Philosophy and Education Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
• Advancing the debate on the consequences of misinformation: clarifying why it’s not (just) about false beliefs
  Inquiry01 December 2023By Maarten van DoornCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
• Can prejudiced beliefs be rational?
  Inquiry29 November 2023By Thomas KellyDepartment of Philosophy, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
• Nietzsche’s response to David Strauss: a case study in the Nietzschean practice of enmity
  Inquiry23 November 2023By Mark HigginsBirkbeck College, University of London, London, UK
• ‘Poor mankind!—’: reexamining Nietzsche’s critique of compassion
  Inquiry21 November 2023By Jessica N. BerryDepartment of Philosophy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
• The Kripkean explanation of aposteriori necessity: in the case of identity statements about chemical substances
  Inquiry17 November 2023By Dongwoo KimThe School of Digital Humanities and Computational Social Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea
• What is priority monism? Reply to Kovacs
  Inquiry15 November 2023By Damiano CostaInstitute of Philosophy, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
• Ordinal type theory
  Inquiry15 November 2023By Jan PlateUniversità della Svizzera, Lugano, Switzerland
• Responses to critics
  Inquiry14 November 2023By Endre BegbyDepartment of Philosophy, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
• A new concept of replication
  Inquiry06 November 2023By Vera MatareseUniversity of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
• Precis of Amie L. Thomasson, norms and necessity
  Inquiry26 October 2023By Amie L. ThomassonDepartment of Philosophy, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire, USA
• Norms and necessity: replies to critics
  Inquiry24 October 2023By Amie L. ThomassonDepartment of Philosophy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
• The social life of prejudice
  Inquiry20 October 2023By Renée JorgensenDepartment of Philosophy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
• The revenge of Moral Twin Earth
  Inquiry19 October 2023By Alexios Stamatiadis-BréhierAzrieli International Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Philosophy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
• Heard but not received
  Inquiry19 October 2023By Grace PatersonDepartment of Law, Philosophy and International Studies, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway
• Prejudice, generics, and resistance to evidence
  Inquiry19 October 2023By M. Giulia NapolitanoErasmus School of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
• Grounding physicalism and ‘Moorean’ connections
  Inquiry17 October 2023By Alex MoranDepartment of Philosophy, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
• Nothing explains essence
  Inquiry17 October 2023By Taylor-Grey MillerBrigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
• Duties of social identity? Intersectional objections to Sen’s identity politics
  Inquiry17 October 2023By Alex MadvaKatherine GasdaglisShannon Dobernecka Department of Philosophy, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, USAb Unaffiliated
• Why Twitter does not gamify communication
  Inquiry13 October 2023By Jacob BrowningZed Adamsa New York University, New York, NY, United Statesb The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, United States
• Encapsulation, inference and utterance interpretation
  Inquiry13 October 2023By Nicholas AllottDepartment of Literature, Area Studies and European Languages, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
• Precis of prejudice: a study in non-ideal epistemology
  Inquiry13 October 2023By Endre BegbyDepartment of Philosophy, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
• A monstrous account of non-deictic readings of complex demonstratives
  Inquiry11 October 2023By Joan Gimeno-SimóDepartment of Philosophy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Do you want to see other content?