- Humanity and the future: replies to Tina Rulli and Jay Wallace
- How general can theories of ‘why’ and ‘because’ be?
- What is bitcoin?
- Does polysemy support radical contextualism? On the relation between minimalism, contextualism and polysemy
- Humanity as an object of attachment
- Mereological endurantism defined
- Dynamic disagreement
- Carnap meets Foucault: conceptual engineering and genealogical investigations
- A (limited) defence of Priorianism
- Conceptual engineering, speaker-meaning and philosophy
- Moral adjectives, judge-dependency and holistic multidimensionality
- Assertion, expression, experience
- Trivialization of conceptual engineering
- Metalinguistic negotiations in moral disagreement
- Conceptual engineering is extremely unlikely to work. So what?
- Fully experimental conceptual engineering
- A Nietzschean theory of emotional experience: affect as feeling towards value
- Metasemantics without semantic intentions
- Kant’s conception of life and the limits of a discursive intellect
- Verbal disputes and topic continuity
- Taking control: conceptual engineering without (much) metasemantics
- Properties and a grounding principle
- Suspending judgment the correct way
- The Ravens Paradox and negative existential judgments about evidence
- How to be a compatibilist in metaphysics: the epistemic strategy
- Jon Elster’s ‘Enthusiasm and Anger in History’
- Practical knowledge and shared agency: pluralizing the Anscombean view
- Indexicality, de re belief, and narrow content: A reply to Sawyer
- Knowing others as persons
- Enthusiasm and anger in history
- Permissiveness in morality and epistemology
- Relativism, metasemantics, and the future
- Spontaneous expression and intentional action
- A Bayesian solution to Hallsson’s puzzle
- Do the folk represent time as essentially dynamical?
- Rejoinder to Ainslie, Bourke, Gjelsvik, and Moene
- On enthusiasm in history and elsewhere (enthusiastic comments on Elster)
- Conceptual engineering and the implementation problem
- Copredication, polysemy and context-sensitivity
- The nature of content: a critique of Yli-Vakkuri and Hawthorne*
- Beyond benefits: gratitude as a response to moral regard
- What is conceptual engineering and what should it be?
- What are the debates on same-sex marriage and on the recognition of transwomen as women about? On anti-descriptivism and revisionary analysis
- Taking Rorty seriously: pragmatism, metaphilosophy, and truth
- Externalist perspectives on meaning change and conceptual stability
- Naturalism without a subject: Huw Price’s pragmatism
- Meaning and framing: the semantic implications of psychological framing effects
- Fake news: the case for a purely consumer-oriented explication
- Temporal externalism, conceptual continuity, meaning, and use
- Truth and objectivity in conceptual engineering
- Semantic burden-shifting and temporal externalism
- Construction and continuity: conceptual engineering without conceptual change
- Conceptual change in perspective
- A norm of aesthetic assertion and its semantic (in)significance
- Features of referential pronouns and indexical presuppositions
- Experimental philosophy within its proper bounds
- Passions: Kant’s psychology of self-deception
- Please pass the peas: psychology, philosophy and welcome boundaries
- Is it identity all the way down? From supersubstantivalism to composition as identity and back again
- Response to Chris Crandall and John Symons
- What is the lexical meaning of polemical terms?
- Blind rule-following and the regress of motivations
- An empirical argument against moral non-cognitivism
- A Kantian quality of will account of excuses
- Other I’s, communication, and the second person
- Encounters of the third kind: performative utterances and forms of life
- Open texture clarified
- Conceptual cartography
- Plural practical knowledge
- Conceptual change and conceptual engineering: the case of colour concepts
- Humanity and personality – what, for Kant, is the source of moral normativity?
- Intentionalism and bald-faced lies
- Must we be perfect?: A case against supererogation
- The limits of acceptance
- Conceptual control: on the feasibility of conceptual engineering
- Linguistic types are capacity-individuated action-types
- Against mythical backward-looking creationism
- How method travels: genealogy in Foucault and Castro-Gómez
- Fake news, conceptual engineering, and linguistic resistance: reply to Pepp, Michaelson and Sterken, and Brown
- Wittgenstein on the pictorial roots of referentialism
- Belief and settledness
- A genealogy of emancipatory values
- Intuitions about cases as evidence (for how we should think)
- The challenge of heritability: genetic determinants of beliefs and their implications
- Free choice effects and exclusive disjunction
- On value dependence and meliorative projects
- Need anything follow from a contradiction?
- The value of genealogies for political philosophy
- What is Nietzsche’s genealogical critique of morality?
- Ground and modality
- Inexact knowledge 2.0
- Uncertain preferences in rational decision
- ‘When you (say you) know, you can’t be wrong’: J.L. Austin on ‘I know’ claims
- I think – Mrs. Smith thinks
- Temporal ontology and joint action
- The threat of the intuition-shaped hole
- Every man has his price: Kant’s argument for universal radical evil
- Preface to Special Issue Logical Pluralism and Normativity
- A dogma of speech act theory
- On the basis of friendship – a reply to Phelan
- Learning from another
- Ethics and epistemic hopelessness
- Fake news, relevant alternatives, and the degradation of our epistemic environment
- Some hazards of motivational internalism: the practical case for externalism
- Author meets critics: Matti Eklund’s choosing normative concepts
- On the distinction between uptake and perlocutionary object: the case of issuing and obeying orders
- The Super Justification Argument for Phenomenal Transparency
- How to conceptually engineer conceptual engineering?
- Moral realism and semantic accounts of moral vagueness