- De se puzzles and Frege puzzles
- Presentism, endurance and object-dependence
- On the relation between modality and tense
- What we can learn from how trivalent conditionals avoid triviality
- What should the idealist critique of naturalism be? Hegel, Smithson, and liberal naturalism
- Why we should keep talking about fake news
- Naïve realism and phenomenal similarity
- Bilateralism and invalidities
- Sharing non-observational knowledge
- Computational beliefs
- Instantaneous self-deception
- Ineliminable underdetermination and context-shifting arguments
- Disqualifying ‘disqualifiers’
- Scharp on inconsistent concepts and their engineered replacements, or: can we mend these broken things?
- Fake news is counterfeit news
- Have Mercier and Sperber untied the knot of human reasoning?
- Strictness and connexivity
- Essence and explanation: a logical mismatch
- The infinite, the indefinite and the critical turn: Kant via Kripke models
- Conceptual engineers shouldn’t worry about semantic externalism
- The pessimistic origin of Nietzsche’s thought of eternal recurrence
- Finean feminist metaphysics
- The individualization of conscience: what Daybreak (9, 10, 544) and The Gay Science (117) tell us about the sovereign individual
- The role of removal and elimination in Nietzsche’s model of self-cultivation
- A matter of taste: Nietzsche and the structure of affective response
- Précis of planning, time, and self-governance
- Nietzsche’s intuitions
- Immoral lies and partial beliefs
- ‘The doing is everything’: a middle-voiced reading of agency in Nietzsche
- ‘Testing for intrinsic value, for us as we are’
- Heidegger’s Nietzsche
- The norm of assertion: a ‘constitutive’ rule?
- Michael Bratman’s planning, time, and self-governance
- Moral ignorance and the social nature of responsible agency
- Acts of desire
- Conceptual engineering via experimental philosophy
- Illocution and understanding
- Normative roles, conceptual variance, and ardent realism about normativity
- Ardent realism without referential normativity
- On self-governance over time
- Planning, time, and self-governance: replies to Andreou, Tenenbaum, and Velleman
- Taking causing out of Bennett’s Making Things Up
- General assessments and attractive exceptions: temptation in Planning, Time, and Self-Governance
- The promise and peril of epistocracy
- Giving epistocracy a Fair Hearing
- Disagreeing about who we are
- Metalinguistic proposals
- The world destruction argument
- Grounding nonexistence
- Primitivism and relative fundamentality
- Disability studies, conceptual engineering, and conceptual activism
- Unicorn agnosticism
- Bennett on building
- On the alleged evidence for non-unpleasant pains
- Grounding as minimal necessitation
- Reply to Audi, Bliss, Rosen, Schaffer, and Wang
- Rethinking friendship
- Buildings and grounds: notes on Karen Bennett’s Making Things Up
- Conceptual responsibility
- Existential risks: a philosophical analysis
- Building and modal recombination
- Choosing normative properties: a reply to Eklund’s Choosing Normative Concepts
- Dummett’s objection to the ontological route to intuitionistic logic: a rejoinder
- Kant on the possibilities of mathematics and the scope and limits of logic
- Disagreement about logic
- Husserl on Kant and the critical view of logic
- The entanglement of logic and set theory, constructively
- Metalinguistic negotiation and speaker error
- The ethics of arguing
- Grounding is necessary and contingent
- The regress argument against realism about structure
- Schopenhauerian virtue ethics
- Avner Baz on aspects and concepts: a critique
- Do we hear meanings? – between perception and cognition
- Coordinating perspectives: De se and taste attitudes in communication
- The belief problem for moral error theory
- No, one should not believe all truths
- Nietzsche’s failed engagement with Schopenhauer’s pessimism: an analysis
- Semantic relativism, expressives, and derogatory epithets
- No ground for doomsday
- Method and the speculative sentence in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit
- Demonic despair under the guise of the good? Kierkegaard and Anscombe vs. Velleman
- How to infer what persistent things are up to – a Fregean puzzle for traditional Fregeans
- Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice
- White tears: emotion regulation and white fragility
- Vague fictional objects
- The moving spotlight(s)
- Hierarchical minds and the perception/cognition distinction
- Embedded taste predicates
- On the normative variability of truth and logic
- Pure awareness experience
- Characterizing generics are material inference tickets: a proof-theoretic analysis
- Much ado about aboutness
- Moral regret and moral feeling(s)
- Semantic contestations and the meaning of politically significant terms
- Conceptual engineering for epistemic norms
- Comments on Peter Ludlow’s the dynamic lexicon
- Comments on Peter Ludlow’s Living Words
- Reply to Collins and Sennet
- The dynamic lexicon in a truth-conditional framework; or how to have Your cake and eat it
- Making semantics for essence
- Moral realism and semantic accounts of moral vagueness
- Stalnaker’s assertoric contents
- Knowing how, basic actions, and ways of doing things
- Carnapian explications, experimental philosophy, and fruitful concepts
- On Pictorially mediated mind-object relations
- Reasons why in normative explanation
- On the individuation of words
- Can Evaluativism about unpleasant pains meet the normative condition?
- Cognitive propositions and semantic values
- The ontology of words: a structural approach
- The sense/cognition distinction
- Ideology and normativity: constraints on conceptual engineering
- The normative problem for logical pluralism
- Is understanding reducible?
- Post-perceptual confidence and supervaluative matching profile
- Why incompatibilism about mental causation is incompatible with non-reductive physicalism